Monthly Archives: October 2012

october 04th 2012 @ 4:38am homeward residential adnd american home morrtge to remove from my credit report my ceidt report t

Date: Fri. September 28th 2012

Homeward Residential 
/ American Home Mortgage

P.O.  Box 631730

Irving Tx. 75063

Account number: 647002252xxxx

Attn: Customer Service

 

To Whom It May Concern:

On September 27th 
2012, I received a copy of my credit report from
www.freecreditreport.com

with all three  credit
reporting agency reports. Included in that report was the following incorrect
or incomplete information you reported:

Mortgage listed from:  
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL  ACCOUNT #
647002252xxxx.

                                      For:  Mary Jean Ziska   Opened: 
11/01/2006 

 

                                     AMERICAN
HOME MORTGAGE # 647002252xxxx.

                                     For:  Mary Jean Ziska  Opened: 
11/07/2006

 

 

This information is not correct.

I do not… and  have
never had a mortgage with  Homeward
Residential opened 11/1/2006 Account # 647002252 nor American Home Mortgage
opened: 11/07/2006  Account#647002252. I
have enclosed copies of the following documentation supporting my claim that
the information you reported is incorrect. 

1.            Complete
copy of the Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court reporting Results printed
September 27th 2012 with all mortgages filed at the court house in my name for
my property starting in 1999.  In this
documentation as listed on 11/21/2006 my mortgage was with Option One  and could not possibly be with Homeward
Residential or American Home Mortgage.

2.            Paperwork
documenting American Home Mortgage’s filing for bankruptcy august 6, 2007.  American Home Mortgage has the same account
number as Homeward Residential   and both
are incorrect accounts listed on my credit report.

3.            Listed
on  the credit report from
freecreditreport.com  both Homeward
Residential or American Home Mortgage are listed as having the same documented
account number so I am assuming they are referring to the  same fraudulent account.  Both need to be removed from my credit
reports and from all your company 
information no matter the claims of haveing had a mortgage in 2006. 

4.            The
mortgage  Option One paperwork to support
that I had Option One as my mortgage company in 2006 from the collier county
court house.

5.            There is
no listing of either American Home Mortgage or 
Homeward Mortgage  for owning my
original note. 

This incorrect 
information is damaging my credit. Please contact Experian, TransUnion,
and Equifax immediately and direct them to remove this information from my
credit file. Please confirm upon receipt of this letter  that you have directed these credit reporting
agencies to remove this information, and provide me a copy of the form you used
to advise them. 

Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

 

Name: Mary Jean Ziska

Address: 5632 Whisperwood Blvd. #1601

Naples, Florida  34110

Email address : whatabtmary@gmail.com

octobber 4th 2012 @ 4:36am robo signer let othr people sign their name

Tired Robo-Signers Let Other People Sign Their Names

Feel sorry for the poor robo-signer who had to sign 1,000
foreclosure files a day? Then here’s some good news: allegations are now
surfacing that at least one robo-signer got help from co-workers.

Follow us

 

Our newsletter

 

Sign up for the Money Talks Newsletter and we‘ll send you a
PDF with 205 ways to save!

Money Talks News

Improving lives for 22 years, 102 days

 

    News

    Videos

    Deals

    Interest Rates

    Credit Cards

    Insurance

    Store

 

Search:

 

    Cars

    College

    Credit & Debt

    Family

    Insurance

    Investing

    Jobs & Work

    Real Estate

    Retirement

    Spending

    Taxes

    Tech

    Travel

 

advertisement

Tired Robo-Signers Let Other People Sign Their Names

 

Feel sorry for the poor robo-signer who had to sign 1,000
foreclosure files a day? Then here’s some good news: allegations are now
surfacing that at least one robo-signer got help from co-workers.

 

Share | 0 comments ↓ | Scroll to story ↓

Read next:

 

    5 Sneaky Tricks
Your Grocer Doesn’t Want You to Know

    Finding Designer
Accessories at Deep Discounts

    Online Mortgage
and Rate Searches: The Big Lie?

 

Stacy Johnson

advertisement

By Stacy Johnson | Oct 20, 2010

Share on email Share on print

 

Money Talks News has been doing an investigative series
about a local foreclosure law firm that’s one of the nation’s largest. If you
haven’t seen it yet, part 1 is The Foreclosure Freeze and Why It Matters. Part
2 is The Mother of All Foreclosure Mistakes.

There’s been a lot of press lately about bank robo-signers
signing hundreds of foreclosure-related documents daily without bothering to
review what was in the files. Many on Wall Street are calling this a mere
technicality: for example, here’s JP Morgan CEO Jamie Diamond, quoted in this
recent article in Fortune: “We’ve known there are issues for a while,” he said
of the foreclosure process. But, he stressed, “We’re not evicting people who
deserve to stay in their house.”

Others point out that whether the right people are being
thrown out is beside the point: Robo-signing is far from a technicality,
because these signers are essentially swearing to a judge that they have
personal knowledge that the foreclosure file is accurate. They’re attesting
that the lender has the legal right to take the home, and the people losing the
home are the right people: something kind of hard to do if you haven’t read the
file.

But while taking people’s homes without reading their file
has to be a tough job, nobody seems to care how difficult it must be to sign
your name 1,000 times a day. Sound exhausting? It must be, because now
allegations are surfacing that at least one robo-signer was so over worked, she
had to get help to sign her own name.

The Florida Attorney General is currently conducting an
investigation into one of the largest foreclosure law firms in the country, the
law offices of David Stern. As part of that investigation, they’re taking
depositions from some of Stern’s former paralegals, giving a fascinating
glimpse into the workings of a firm that processed an incredible 70,000
foreclosure cases in 2009.

It’s through the deposition of a former Stern employee named
Kelly Scott, taken on October 4, 2010, that we learn how other employees of
Stern’s firm allegedly came to the aid of their beleaguered robo-signing
colleague – by signing her name for her.

According to Ms. Scott, the person who was doing most of the
robo-signing was Stern employee Cheryl Salmons. Here’s a cut-and-paste from
Scott’s deposition about Cheryl getting help from co-workers.

    Q: Are you aware
of anyone other than Cheryl Salmons signing Cheryl Salmons’ name to documents?

    A: Yes

    Q: Could you tell
me about that, please?

    A: Cheryl would
give certain paralegals rights to sign her name, because most of the time she
was very tired, exhausted from signing her name numerous times per day. You had
to understand it was more than five hundred files that she’s signing morning
and afternoon.

 

    Q: Five hundred in
the morning and then another five hundred in the afternoon?

    A: Yes.

    Ads by Google

    Foreclosure Law
Center

    Florida
Foreclosure Attorneys. Find Help When You Need It Most.

   
www.TheForeclosureLawCenter.com

    Q: So
approximately a thousand a day?

    A: A thousand a
day. So, yes, she would, you know, if they were very close with Cheryl Salmons

    Q: They who? Could
you give me their names?

    A: Shannon Smith,
Elizabeth Davilla, Beth Cerni.

    Q: These people
were allowed to sign her name?

    A: Yes.

So, what do you think? Is it OK for law firm employees to
robo-sign foreclosure files? If so, I guess there’s no reason that someone else
shouldn’t sign their name when they got tired…right?

Subscribe by email

Like this article? Sign up for our email updates and we’ll
send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and
advice, free! We’ll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson’s ’205 Ways to Save
Money’ as soon as you’ve subscribed. It’s full of great tips that’ll help you
save a ton of extra cash. It doesn’t cost a dime, so why wait? Click here to
sign up now.

Ads by Google

Foreclosure Help in “FL”

Florida Homeowners may Qualify for Reduced Payment &
Stop Foreclosure.

Florida.LenderHelpLine.com

advertisement

You might like:

    6 Little-Known
Ways Car Dealers Rip You Off

    The Best Fast Food
Restaurants

    10 Common
Misconceptions About Money

Money Tips Network logo

Feedback

    Get updates by
email

    Follow us on
Twitter

    Find us on
Facebook

    Subscribe by RSS

© 2012 Money Talks News. All Rights Reserved.

    About

    Advertise

    Contact

    Contribute

    Embed

    Scripts

    TV

    Radio

    Privacy

advertisement

october 4th 2012 @4:31 housing wire article on stern

HousingWire

Published on HousingWire (http://www.housingwire.com)

Home > Florida Bar files complaint against David J. Stern
over MERS case

Florida Bar files complaint against David J. Stern over MERS
case

Author(s): Christine Ricciardi [1]

 

The Florida Bar filed a complaint against foreclosure
attorney David J. Stern Friday afternoon for allegedly violating the bar’s
rules by failing to produce documents as ordered by the court in February.

One of the stated rules Stern allegedly broke: “A
lawyer shall not knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal
except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation
exists,” the filing states.

The complaint is asking for an investigation [2] to find out
why Stern did not file the documents, and is asking for disciplinary action.
The document does not suggest what that action should be if Stern is found
culpable.

At the beginning of the year, the Law Offices of David J.
Stern represented SunTrust Bank in a lawsuit against Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, according to the complaint. The Florida district court
issued Stern’s firm an “order to show cause” on Feb. 16, which asked
him to prove why sanctions should not be entered against him after he neglected
to file certain documents “in a timely manner.” Stern allegedly
ignored this order, the complaint said.

“Respondent failed to produce the documents and has
otherwise failed to respond,” the complaint said.

On March 14, the issue was referred to the Florida Bar to
figure out why Stern did not abide by the order. Stern attained a mountain of
litigation against him and his firm during that period, as investigations into
the robo-signing scandal were well underway.

Stern lost [3] Freddie Mac’s business in November 2010 over
foreclosure documentation issues, and lost [4] Fannie Mae’s shortly thereafter.
On February 25, the Florida Attorney General launched an investigation [5] into
several real estate law firms across the state, including Stern’s. In March,
the Plantation, Fla.-based company ceased foreclosure work [6] and stopped
trading [7] on the Nasdaq.

Stern’s attorney Jeff Tew told The Palm Beach Post his
client was fired from SunTrust in mid-December 2010, before the Feb. 16 order
was issued. Tew also said it was possible Stern missed the notice among 10,000
pieces of incoming mail everyday.

Write to Christine Ricciardi [8].

Source URL (retrieved on Sep 30 2012 – 10:07pm):
Links:

[1] [2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8] mailto:cricciardi@housingwire.com

october 4th 2012 @ 4:29am article of foreclosure

 

This is the final part – at least for now – in a series on
our nation’s current foreclosure debacle. In the first installment, I explained
what’s behind the recent headlines regarding foreclosures that are being frozen
nationwide – the fact that the mass robo-signing of legal documents deprived
homeowners of their rights, and now gives them leverage with lenders. In the
second part, I introduced you to Hugo San Martin – a homeowner who was
foreclosed on even though he’d made his payments on time. In this story, we’ll
explore other potential problems that could strengthen and lengthen what’s
starting to be called “foreclosure-gate”.

 

I’ve been doing a lot of reading lately on foreclosure
issues, and a lot of it takes the tack that while it was an unfortunate
procedural error that foreclosure files were signed, witnessed and notarized by
people unfamiliar with their contents, these problems should be easily sorted
out. And that in a matter of weeks the foreclosure factories can once again
start churning out the paperwork. (In fact, Bank of American has already thawed
their foreclosure freeze.)

 

Here’s a quote from a recent editorial in the Wall Street
Journal:

 

    The affidavit was
supposed to be signed by the nameless, faceless employee in the back office who
reviewed the file, not the other nameless, faceless employee who sits in the front.

 

    The result is the
same, but politicians understand the pain that results when the anonymous paper
pusher who kicks you out of your home is not the anonymous paper pusher who is
supposed to kick you out of your home. Welcome to Washington’s financial crisis
of the week.

 

In other words, this isn’t a legal problem, it’s just
liberal political squealing. The editorial goes on to say, “We’re not aware of
a single case so far of a substantive error.”

 

Well, maybe the author of this editorial meet Kenneth Trent,
the foreclosure defense lawyer in the following news story. Check it out, then
meet me on the other side for more.

 

As you saw from the video, robo-signing might be just the
tip of a rather large iceberg. Because while some might argue that people
submitting documents to a court that they haven’t read is immaterial (albeit
not exactly legal), arguing that it’s OK to take someone’s house without
properly notifying them first is something else entirely. In addition,
systemically signing someone else’s name on legal documents is another major
potential fly in the ointment – and since this story broke, that’s been born
out: see Tired Robo-signers Let Coworkers Sign Their Names.

Ads by Google

FHA Streamline Refinance

See rates, fees, & costs (if any) New Customers Saved
$181/month!

freedommortgage.com/no-lender-fees

 

And when you ask Kenneth Trent, the lawyer from the video
above, even these problems pale when compared to another looming issue: whether
banks can actually prove that they’re the owners of these loans in the first
place.

 

Last July Trent filed a suit contending that David Stern’s
law firm violated the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act
by foreclosing on thousands of homeowners on behalf of lenders who couldn’t
prove they hold the original mortgages – which means they didn’t have legal
standing to bring the suit.

 

When I talked to Stern’s lawyer, Jeffrey Tew, about this a
few weeks ago, he said Trent’s suit had no merit. In fact, he called it
“silly.” As you saw in my last story, Tew has also told the media that the
other issues raised by Trent were also invalid and that the Stern firm has done
nothing wrong.

What does it all mean?

 

This story is still unfolding, so it’s impossible to know at
this point where it will ultimately lead. But from the time I’ve put into this
story, here are some of my initial conclusions:

 

    This could become
a bigger issue than the banks and Stern’s representative would have you
believe, particularly in states with judicial foreclosure.

    Even as I write this, you can bet that the
ranks of foreclosure defense lawyers are swelling – and those lawyers are going
to find plenty of willing clients. Translation? Our overburdened courts may
soon experience a lot more contested foreclosures.

    If I were a
homeowner facing foreclosure, particularly if it was filed by one of the banks
that’s admitted wrongdoing or by David Stern’s firm, I’d probably at least talk
to a lawyer – especially if my goal was to negotiate a deal that might let me
to keep my house. Although I wouldn’t expect miracles. It’s unlikely, for
example, that your legal leverage would enable you to cut your mortgage in
half.

    If I were a
homeowner facing foreclosure, what I wouldn’t expect is to permanently enjoin a
lender from foreclosing. Ultimately, this will be sorted out and people who
haven’t paid their mortgages will lose their homes.

    If I were an
investor thinking about buying a foreclosure at auction, I’d wait to see how
things work out. While it’s highly unlikely that you’d lose a home purchased at
a legitimate auction, there’s no rush. Let the smoke clear. And don’t even
think of buying any foreclosure, whether at auction or through a real estate
agent, that doesn’t have title insurance.

 

I’ll keep following this story – you do the same by checking
back!

Subscribe by email

 

Like this article? Sign up for our email updates and we’ll
send you a regular digest of our newest stories, full of money saving tips and
advice, free! We’ll also email you a PDF of Stacy Johnson’s ’205 Ways to Save
Money’ as soon as you’ve subscribed. It’s full of great tips that’ll help you
save a ton of extra cash. It doesn’t cost a dime, so why wait? Click here to
sign up now.

Ads by Google

Foreclosure Law Center

Florida Foreclosure Attorneys. Find Help When You Need It
Most.

www.TheForeclosureLawCenter.com

 

 

October 04th 2012 @ foreclsure king david stern shutting his law firm

Foreclosure King David Stern Shuttering His Law Firm

—By Andy Kroll

| Mon Mar. 7, 2011 10:35 AM PST

A caricature of David J. Stern, the once-mighty foreclosure
attorney, that he printed on T-shirts used to woo potential investors.

By the end of the month, the Law Offices of David J. Stern,
the once-mighty foreclosure mill in southeastern Florida, will be no more.
According to a terse, two-sentence filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the firm—the subject of a Mother Jones investigation published last
August—”will be ceasing the practice of law with respect to all pending
foreclosure matters in the State of Florida” by March 31.

The reversal of fortune for David Stern and his law firm has
been swift and breathtaking. A little over a year ago, the Stern’s operation
reigned king in the foreclosure business. Its clients included Wall Street
powerhouses such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citgroup; the firm was
also cozy with government housing corporations Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
which hand-picked Stern’s firm operation to process foreclosure cases for them.
In 2009, the firm handled 70,000 foreclosure cases, and employed more than
1,000 people—paralegals, attorneys, paper-pushers, secretaries, and more. From
2006 to 2008, revenue generated by the non-legal, foreclosure-related parts of
Stern’s operations spiked from $40 million to $200 million. But the big payoff
didn’t come until January 2010, when Stern spun off those lucrative non-legal
operations into a separate, publicly-traded company, netting him $58.5 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Through the staggering success of his businesses, Stern
amassed great personal wealth. Over the years he purchased many
multi-million-dollar waterfront properties in southeastern Florida, including a
beachfront condo in the Ritz Carlton Fort Lauderdale. He bought Italian-made,
jet-powered yachts and plenty of sports cars: at the time I published my story,
he owned four Ferraris, four Porsches, a pair of Mercedes-Benzes, and a
Bugatti. While secretive in his personal and professional life, Stern’s wealth
was conspicuous enough that Fort Lauderdale’s Water Taxi boat captains made
sure to point out his $15 million, 16,000-square-foot mansion on the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway.

But last fall, the business empire that allowed Stern to
live like a king began to crumble. Days after Mother Jones published my
investigation into Stern and the world of foreclosure mills, the Florida
attorney general announced a probe into Stern’s firm and two others to
determine whether “improper documentation may have been created and filed
with Florida courts to speed up foreclosure processes, potentially without the
knowledge or consent of the homeowners involved.” It’s all been downhill since
then for Stern: Fannie and Freddie dropped him from their “designated
counsel” program, and many big banks and mortgage servicing companies
stopped hiring his firm. Citing MoJo’s reporting, members of Congress demanded
investigations into why Fannie and Freddie ever did business with Stern’s firm
and others like it. Soon, no one, it seemed, wanted to do business with the Law
Offices of David J. Stern.

The publicly traded company he helped start, DJSP
Enterprises, floundered as well. After opening in January 2010 at $9.25 a
share, DJSP’s stock has plummeted to rock bottom: At midday on Monday, it was
worth 16 cents a share. In November, facing a mountain of criticism, Stern
himself resigned as president and CEO of the company. In December, the company
received a warning from NASDAQ that it would be delisted unless it boosted its
per-share price to $1 by mid-June.

And as his business empire crumbled, so, too, has his
personal fortune. Stern is reportedly offloading a pair of prime properties in
the Fort Lauderdale area, believed to be worth tens of millions of dollars.
According to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, he’s also trying to sell his
130-foot Mangusta yacht, named Misunderstood.

Stern’s law firm currently employs around 50 or so
employees, after shedding the majority of the staff over the past five months
due to the drop in referrals. It’s unclear how DJSP Enterprises, the publicly
traded company, will fare as Stern’s firm prepares to shut down; as the company
admitted in early SEC filings, Stern’s law firm was the primary source of
business for DJSP. Without it, it’s hard to see how DJSP stays afloat.

Stern is still under investigation by the Florida AG, which
is looking at the past practices of his law firm. Which is to say, while the
Law Offices of David J. Stern will soon be gone, today’s news isn’t the last
we’ll hear of David J. Stern.

Below is a letter obtained by Mother Jones that Stern sent
to Judge Lee Hayworth in Florida’s Sarasota County, outlining his law firm’s
plans to close its doors and remove itself from all pending foreclosure cases:  stern-letter-hayworth-closing

October 04th 2012 @ foreclsure king david stern shutting his law firm

Foreclosure King David Stern Shuttering His Law Firm

—By Andy Kroll

| Mon Mar. 7, 2011 10:35 AM PST

A caricature of David J. Stern, the once-mighty foreclosure
attorney, that he printed on T-shirts used to woo potential investors.

By the end of the month, the Law Offices of David J. Stern,
the once-mighty foreclosure mill in southeastern Florida, will be no more.
According to a terse, two-sentence filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the firm—the subject of a Mother Jones investigation published last
August—”will be ceasing the practice of law with respect to all pending
foreclosure matters in the State of Florida” by March 31.

The reversal of fortune for David Stern and his law firm has
been swift and breathtaking. A little over a year ago, the Stern’s operation
reigned king in the foreclosure business. Its clients included Wall Street
powerhouses such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citgroup; the firm was
also cozy with government housing corporations Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
which hand-picked Stern’s firm operation to process foreclosure cases for them.
In 2009, the firm handled 70,000 foreclosure cases, and employed more than
1,000 people—paralegals, attorneys, paper-pushers, secretaries, and more. From
2006 to 2008, revenue generated by the non-legal, foreclosure-related parts of
Stern’s operations spiked from $40 million to $200 million. But the big payoff
didn’t come until January 2010, when Stern spun off those lucrative non-legal
operations into a separate, publicly-traded company, netting him $58.5 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Through the staggering success of his businesses, Stern
amassed great personal wealth. Over the years he purchased many
multi-million-dollar waterfront properties in southeastern Florida, including a
beachfront condo in the Ritz Carlton Fort Lauderdale. He bought Italian-made,
jet-powered yachts and plenty of sports cars: at the time I published my story,
he owned four Ferraris, four Porsches, a pair of Mercedes-Benzes, and a
Bugatti. While secretive in his personal and professional life, Stern’s wealth
was conspicuous enough that Fort Lauderdale’s Water Taxi boat captains made
sure to point out his $15 million, 16,000-square-foot mansion on the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway.

But last fall, the business empire that allowed Stern to
live like a king began to crumble. Days after Mother Jones published my
investigation into Stern and the world of foreclosure mills, the Florida
attorney general announced a probe into Stern’s firm and two others to
determine whether “improper documentation may have been created and filed
with Florida courts to speed up foreclosure processes, potentially without the
knowledge or consent of the homeowners involved.” It’s all been downhill since
then for Stern: Fannie and Freddie dropped him from their “designated
counsel” program, and many big banks and mortgage servicing companies
stopped hiring his firm. Citing MoJo’s reporting, members of Congress demanded
investigations into why Fannie and Freddie ever did business with Stern’s firm
and others like it. Soon, no one, it seemed, wanted to do business with the Law
Offices of David J. Stern.

The publicly traded company he helped start, DJSP
Enterprises, floundered as well. After opening in January 2010 at $9.25 a
share, DJSP’s stock has plummeted to rock bottom: At midday on Monday, it was
worth 16 cents a share. In November, facing a mountain of criticism, Stern
himself resigned as president and CEO of the company. In December, the company
received a warning from NASDAQ that it would be delisted unless it boosted its
per-share price to $1 by mid-June.

And as his business empire crumbled, so, too, has his
personal fortune. Stern is reportedly offloading a pair of prime properties in
the Fort Lauderdale area, believed to be worth tens of millions of dollars.
According to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, he’s also trying to sell his
130-foot Mangusta yacht, named Misunderstood.

Stern’s law firm currently employs around 50 or so
employees, after shedding the majority of the staff over the past five months
due to the drop in referrals. It’s unclear how DJSP Enterprises, the publicly
traded company, will fare as Stern’s firm prepares to shut down; as the company
admitted in early SEC filings, Stern’s law firm was the primary source of
business for DJSP. Without it, it’s hard to see how DJSP stays afloat.

Stern is still under investigation by the Florida AG, which
is looking at the past practices of his law firm. Which is to say, while the
Law Offices of David J. Stern will soon be gone, today’s news isn’t the last
we’ll hear of David J. Stern.

Below is a letter obtained by Mother Jones that Stern sent
to Judge Lee Hayworth in Florida’s Sarasota County, outlining his law firm’s
plans to close its doors and remove itself from all pending foreclosure cases:  stern-letter-hayworth-closing

october 04th 2012 @ 4:23am foreclsore king investigated for questionable practices

Florida’s Foreclosure King
Investigated For Questionable Practices

Abcnews.go.com/business/florida-foreclosure5JE9S

By RAY SANCHEZ

Oct. 12, 2010

A former paralegal with Florida’s largest foreclosure law
practice has told state investigators that the firm routinely signed court
paperwork without reading it, misdated records, forged signatures and passed
around notary stamps in the rush to foreclose on homes.

“This is just the beginning really,” the
paralegal, Tammie Lou Kapusta, told ABCNews.com. “It’s the tip of an
extreme iceberg.”

The allegations are the latest leveled against the firm of
multimillionaire attorney David J. Stern, who has amassed a fortune foreclosing
on the homes of struggling families on behalf of lenders.

The 50-year-old Stern even considered naming his $20-million
yacht “Su Casa Es Mi Casa – “Your House is My House,” an
acquaintance told the New York Times. After his wife and others reportedly
cautioned against it, Stern settled on Misunderstood. He denied to the newspaper
that he considered “Su Casa Es Mi Casa.”

“From David Stern’s perspective, he’s a lawyer given
defaulted mortgages to foreclose in a court proceeding,” said his lawyer,
Jeffrey Tew. “So it’s really wrong to vilify him. Let’s put it this way,
there is a well-organized defense bar who is making a lot of money keeping
people in their homes.”

VIDEO:The Mortgage Bullies

ABCNEWS.com

View Full Size

‘Save the Dream’ Offers Hope to Homeowners Watch Video

Families in Foreclosure Watch Video

The Housing Mess Watch Video

 

But it’s the booming mortgage-servicing industry that is
under legal scrutiny. Some 40 state attorneys general are expected to announce
this week a joint investigation into the industry in hopes of pressuring
financial institutions to rewrite a sea of troubled loans.

Across the nation, mortgage-servicers, which include units
of major banks such as Bank of America Corp., have been accused of submitting
fraudulent documents in thousands of foreclosure proceedings.

 

In Florida, Stern is foreclosure king, operating the large
law firm plus a foreclosure processing company and other support businesses
that he recently sold off.

His Plantation, Fla., firm, which filed 70,382 foreclosure
cases last year, is the largest of three under investigation by state Attorney
General Bill McCollum for allegedly filing improper documents with courts to
hasten the overloaded foreclosure process.

Foreclosure Industry Poster Boy

To detractors, the 50-year-old Stern has become emblematic
of the foreclosure crisis, the architect of what they call a giant assembly
line that has undermined struggling homeowners at a time of record
foreclosures. Nationwide, there were 2.8 million foreclosures in 2009. Florida
leads the nation in foreclosures with more than 400,000 filings this year
alone.

“He is notorious in Florida and, in the rest of the
country, we pay some attention to Florida because the worst behavior often
emanates from there,” said Linda Fisher, a professor and mortgage-fraud
expert at Seton Hall University’s law school. She said she had no direct
knowledge of the Stern’s practices. “I’ve heard some pretty bad stories
about Stern for at least the last couple of years or so.”

To defenders, Stern is a hard worker who has legally reaped
enormous profits representing banks and financial services in actions against
tens of thousands of delinquent borrowers.

“It’s really unfair to make the foreclosure lawyer …
somehow a villain,” Tew said. “With the increase in volume, there’s
no question that David firm’s revenues have grown dramatically but there’s
nothing wrong with that. He’s not gouging.”

Tew said Stern’s firm makes about $1,400 per foreclosure,
totaling about $98 million last year.

 

Florida’s Foreclosure King Investigated For Questionable
Practices

Page 2 of 2

Oct. 12, 2010

 

Still, the rising foreclosure tide also meant shortcuts and
sloppy legal work, according to Kapusta’s sworn statement to the state attorney
general.

The paralegal, who worked for Stern a little more than a
year, described an office where signatures on notarized documents were
regularly forged, legal papers were outsourced to Guam and the Philippines, and
shouting matches erupted when cases stalled.

The accusations, in a sworn statement taken late last month
by the Florida attorney general, coincide with mounting nationwide criticism of
the practices used to take homes from families.

Kapusta, who claims she was fired by the firm in July 2009
after refusing to falsify documents, said Stern’s business jumped from about
200 employees to 1,100 in one year as foreclosures skyrocketed and staff
struggled to keep up.

Notary stamps were always available, and employees such as
Kapusta, who were not notaries, routinely used them on official documents, she
said. Those who could best fake the signature of the person who verified
foreclosure affidavits were allegedly sought out to forge her name.

“If you focus on the way these businesses operate,
it’s, at best, sloppy and, at worst, fraudulent,” Fisher said of the firms
that have become known as foreclosure mills. “The whole system was broken
down.”

Tew dismissed Kapusta’s allegations as simply untrue, the
rants of a disgruntled former employee. “You can see she has a real
vindictiveness against the firm,” he said.

Stern’s lawyer denied any wrongdoing in the foreclosure process.

‘Save the Dream’ Offers Hope to Homeowners Watch Video

Families in Foreclosure Watch Video

The Housing Mess Watch Video

“There is no question that there is a necessity to make
these foreclosures correct and appropriate,” Tew said. “We do not
admit that there was any intentional cutting of corners. There may have been
some human error on a very small percentage but there was no intentional
cutting of corners.”

 

In the past month, GMAC, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America
have halted or slowed foreclosure procedures, after bank employees and
affiliates admitted to signing thousands of documents without knowing the
details of the cases.

 

“The problems with these firms – and they’re very
sloppy practices – is that they unacceptably cut legal corners and put the
burden on borrowers to basically pay whatever these folks have them pay,”
said Jeffrey Golant, an attorney in Pompano Beach. “They’re loading down
with junk fees and illegitimate charges, basically putting people who are
already struggling, maybe possibly in most cases legitimately behind on their
mortgages, but loading up with such abusive fees that people will never get out
of foreclosure.”

 

Yachts, Real Estate, Private Island

 

Still, the crisis has been good for Stern and the rest of
the mortgage-servicing industry. Stern and his wife Jeanine have brought nearly
$60 million in real estate in recent years, mostly in Florida, according to
property records.

 

His 16,000-square-foot mansion, valued at more than $15
million, occupies a corner lot in a private island community on the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway in Fort Lauderdale, according to the New York Times and
Mother Jones magazine.

 

The mansion is featured on a water-taxi tour of the area’s
grandest estates, including the homes of Jay Leno and billionaire Blockbuster
founder Wayne Huizenga, and the former residence of Desi Arnaz and Lucille
Ball. In addition to the 130-foot yacht, Stern reportedly has an automobile
collection that includes a 2008 Bugatti and multiple Ferraris, Porsches and
Mercedes.

 

But Tew declined to discuss his client’s assets.

 

“All that does is feed into this scenario that somehow
they’re taking advantage of poor people who are losing their houses and getting
rich off of it,” he said. “You could say the same thing about a neurosurgeon
that makes millions of dollars a year from people who sustained terrible head
injuries.”

 

More from ABC News

 

    The Housing Mess

    Thousands Line Up
to Prevent Foreclosure

    Fannie Mae Issues
New Foreclosure Penalties

    Americans Fighting
Back Against Foreclosure

    ‘Save the Dream’
Offers Hope to Homeowners

    Families in
Foreclosure

 

   

 

 

homeward letter with wrong spacing becasu eashh hoel was in mhy home and stoel the laptop this mornign

Date: Fri. September 28th 2012

Homeward Residential 
/ American Home Mortgage

P.O.  Box 631730

Irving Tx. 75063

Account number: 647002252xxxx

 

Attn: Customer Service

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

On September 27th 
2012, I received a copy of my credit report from
www.freecreditreport.com

with all three  credit
reporting agency reports. Included in that report was the following incorrect
or incomplete information you reported:

Mortgage listed from:  
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL  ACCOUNT #
647002252xxxx.

                                      For:  Mary Jean Ziska   Opened: 
11/01/2006 

 

                                     AMERICAN
HOME MORTGAGE # 647002252xxxx.

                                     For:  Mary Jean Ziska  Opened: 
11/07/2006

 

 

This information is not correct.

I do not… and  have
never had a mortgage with  Homeward
Residential opened 11/1/2006 Account # 647002252 nor American Home Mortgage
opened: 11/07/2006  Account#647002252. I
have enclosed copies of the following documentation supporting my claim that
the information you reported is incorrect. 

1.            Complete
copy of the Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court reporting Results printed
September 27th 2012 with all mortgages filed at the court house in my name for
my property starting in 1999.  In this
documentation as listed on 11/21/2006 my mortgage was with Option One  and could not possibly be with Homeward
Residential or American Home Mortgage.

2.            Paperwork
documenting American Home Mortgage’s filing for bankruptcy august 6, 2007.  American Home Mortgage has the same account
number as Homeward Residential   and both
are incorrect accounts listed on my credit report.

3.            Listed
on  the credit report from
freecreditreport.com  both Homeward
Residential or American Home Mortgage are listed as having the same documented
account number so I am assuming they are referring to the  same fraudulent account.  Both need to be removed from my credit
reports and from all your company 
information no matter who claims have had a mortgage in 2006. 

4.            The
mortgage  Option One paperwork to support
that I had Option One as my mortgage company in 2006 from the collier county
court house.

 

This incorrect or incomplete information is damaging my
credit. Please contact Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax immediately and direct
them to remove this information from my credit file. Please confirm upon
receipt of this letter  that you have
directed these credit reporting agencies to remove this information, and
provide me a copy of the form you used to advise them. 

 

Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

_________________________

Your Signature]

 

Name: Mary Jean Ziska

Address: 5632 Whisperwood Blvd. #1601

Naples, Florida  34110

Email address : whatabtmary@gmail.com

homewart residential

Date: Fri. September 28th 2012

Homeward Residential 
/ American Home Mortgage

P.O.  Box 631730

Irving Tx. 75063

Account number: 647002252xxxx

 

Attn: Customer Service

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

On September 27th 
2012, I received a copy of my credit report from
www.freecreditreport.com

with all three  credit
reporting agency reports. Included in that report was the following incorrect
or incomplete information you reported:

Mortgage listed from:  
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL  ACCOUNT #
647002252xxxx.

                                      For:  Mary Jean Ziska   Opened: 
11/01/2006 

 

                                     AMERICAN
HOME MORTGAGE # 647002252xxxx.

                                     For:  Mary Jean Ziska  Opened: 
11/07/2006

 

 

This information is not correct.

I do not… and  have
never had a mortgage with  Homeward
Residential opened 11/1/2006 Account # 647002252 nor American Home Mortgage
opened: 11/07/2006  Account#647002252. I
have enclosed copies of the following documentation supporting my claim that
the information you reported is incorrect. 

1.            Complete
copy of the Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court reporting Results printed
September 27th 2012 with all mortgages filed at the court house in my name for
my property starting in 1999.  In this
documentation as listed on 11/21/2006 my mortgage was with Option One  and could not possibly be with Homeward
Residential or American Home Mortgage.

2.            Paperwork
documenting American Home Mortgage’s filing for bankruptcy august 6, 2007.  American Home Mortgage has the same account
number as Homeward Residential   and both
are incorrect accounts listed on my credit report.

3.            Listed
on  the credit report from
freecreditreport.com  both Homeward
Residential or American Home Mortgage are listed as having the same documented
account number so I am assuming they are referring to the  same fraudulent account.  Both need to be removed from my credit
reports and from all your company 
information no matter who claims have had a mortgage in 2006. 

4.            The
mortgage  Option One paperwork to support
that I had Option One as my mortgage company in 2006 from the collier county
court house.

 

This incorrect or incomplete information is damaging my
credit. Please contact Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax immediately and direct
them to remove this information from my credit file. Please confirm upon
receipt of this letter  that you have
directed these credit reporting agencies to remove this information, and
provide me a copy of the form you used to advise them. 

 

Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

_________________________

Your Signature]

 

Name: Mary Jean Ziska

Address: 5632 Whisperwood Blvd. #1601

Naples, Florida  34110

Email address : whatabtmary@gmail.com