Monthly Archives: September 2012

Monday September 17th 2012 @ 3:47am email reply to larry august 23rd aat 9 33pm

reply email to larry on august 23rd at 9 33 pm

Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:33 PM

From:”mary jean ziska”
<whatabtmary@gmail.com>

View contact details

To:larrypivacek@aol.com

Cc:whatabtmary@yahoo.com, whatabtmary@gmail.com, maryjeanziska@mysearchforjustice.com

Hi larry,     August
23rd 2012 @ 9:18pm

Replying to your email…. I was chatting with magic jack for
three hours to try to see what  was  going on with my phone….   But I don’t think anything is really fixed…
nothing in my life  is yet…  I have emailed the probate court to get rid
of Patrick as nothing is fixed  they told
me they have forwarded the emails to the judges and  to 
lawyers.  I think you may have
been contacted as well….

You mention that you do not have anything to do with the
foreclosure.. you mention every time…you mail me  so I really understand that. But this
guardian is not doing what he is supposed to do… nothing is fixed    if you did not receive the e-mail  that I sent to the  probate court, to the judges to the  guardianship association,   to anyone who would listen or could help.
Let me know…I’ll send it  to you again!  there is a list of what was supposed to be
done   by my guardian pursuant to the
Florida statutes 744 , and by what he had told me was his “action plan”   you know…. he was supposed to file  what he was supposed to  do his plan of action… to the courts… and be
held accountable…someone needs to be held accountable! …. And you have to  be in charge of something? … what? I’m a bit
confused?…. If the guardian isn’t doing what he is supposed to be doing ….
isn’t that  where you come in as legal
representation on my behalf?  Well here
is your chance..  everything is still
messed up… and even more messed up… what are my options? Thanks mary jean
Ziska 

From: Lawrence Pivacek [mailto:larrypivacek@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:52 PM

To: mary jean ziska

Subject: Re: email to larry from mary jean ziska august 16th
2012 at 4 37 pm

Dear Mary Jean

I apologize for you not bring able to reach me.I have tried
to both call you and E-Mail you in response. 
I did receive  a voicemail from
you yesterday but the message was unclear, full of static and broke up after 10
seconds.As I have said in the past, I do not represent you in the foreclosure action.

 

 

 

Please respond to this E-Mail so that I know you received
it.

I hope to hear from you soon.

Larry

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:00 PM, “mary jean ziska”
<whatabtmary@gmail.com> wrote:

Larry             
August 16, 2012  at 4:44ppm

 I keep  trying to call you but get a  really loud buzzing sound … can you hear me
when I call?… can you email me?… What the hell is going on? .. I called
Elizabeth kriers office today to  tell
her about this horrid deal  that Patrick
made with  the HOA Is this true?……..
$5000.00  down and $500.00 a
month???????? I cannot afford that! .. 
the  $500.00 a month payments  are 
more than  I get for medical
disability….(which he did not  help to
raise!). How am I supposed to  make up
the difference, and pay electric, or car insurance..  or gas…. Or even
tampons????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

If  I had $5000.00
then wouldn’t it be better to get a  real
lawyer to defend the foreclosure?… and 
to clear the title on my condo?…

Today I was bullied on the phone to the point of throwing
up!…..I have idiots on the phone who want to sell my car for less than  it is worth.. someone wants my mom ‘s silver
or her Picasso… those are my inheritance.. and this is the wrong deal!  Nothing has been fixed….. . the identity
theft and  credit problems  and 
everything is still  a mess…. Can
I get a real guardian?… who actually has my best interest  at heart? 
When I called Elizabeth Kriers office 
some woman  told me that  your wife is in charge of  the 
foreclosure case  now…is that
true? or just another lie I keep being told to upset me….

Aren’t  those  opposing sides?…. If you are my
guardianship  lawyer representing me when
my guardian is making horrendous decisions about my life concerning  the foreclosure…. .and she is making
decisions about the foreclosure… isn’t that a conflict of interest?  Please email me back and clear this up thanks
mary jean Ziska  ( why in the Florida
Bar  member search  is your 
email listed as the aol address? ) 

The email below is what I just sent to the probate  court. Since the probate court is in  charge of 
regulating  and punishing the
guardianship and the guardians… I guess this is my only means  of justice…… at least this will all be in the
court record that  I am  very unhappy with  what is going 
on … if I didn’t know any better I 
would think I  was still stuck
with the criminals  who have been  ruining my life…..for  the past 10 years…..

 

To Whom it may concern:    
August 16th 2012 @ 3:22pm

Patrick Weber is the guardian of Mary Jean Ziska. It is a
limited guardianship restricted for only his assistance in financial and legal
matters.    I have been trying to report
his misconduct and to have him replaced since May or June of this year. I have
emailed Patrick weber himself, contacted his office,  the sheriff and police department, the
Florida Guardianship Association, my guardianship attorney Larry Pivacek  and 
even contacted the Florida Bar Association  to reveal his misconduct!

His direct actions have harmed me, my home ownership
and  violated my rights  instead of helping.  His 
neglect in assisting me with the issues he was entrusted/obligated  by the 
courts to remedy  have also  affected my life.  When he was first assigned my guardian last
year  he was  so assigned to assist in legal matters
concerning the  HOA foreclosure suit that
was  directed to me instead of to my  guardian. 
He did not know how to defend a foreclosure suit and one of his main
objectives was to obtain competent council on my behalf, He never got a lawyer
or any legal counsel to assist in the foreclosure suit.  Another objective  he had was to raise the payment of my medical
disability benefits to assist in the repayment of any settlement for the HOA.
He did not do anything toward an increase.  
A third objective he told me he would assist with is in  clearing mu an identity theft  that started in 2002 to not only
increase  my  credit score but to stop any additional
fraudulent  activity from occurring.  He did 
not do anything  to remedy the
identity theft, or  to  assist in removing fraudulent  accounts from my  credit report.  He also said he had a friend  and connections  with Regions bank to allow for an equity line
e of credit  to also pay back any  amount 
to the HOA.  I actually told him
of another  option I found in the Florida
Statutes 744.309 where a “trust company, state bank, national bank or a federal
savings and loan may be a guardian “   I
had asked him to check into this option 
and to have my Wels Faro bank as a co- guardian to assist with  the equity line of credit,  to set up a direct payment  to the HOA.  
He did not even ask the court for this option or follow up  on the 
phone numbers and department personnel 
I gave him  that I had received
from the manager of my bank.  When we
first met he  also told me that he would
assist in clearing my condo title as it should be clear  and there should be no mortgage on my condo
due to  the criminals and  continued fraud  by numerous “robo signing” companies that
need to be cleared off my title! He didn’t even get a forensic audit
completed!   I was told he has 250 cases
and was too busy to take my phone calls or my emails,  and never notified me of  court cases 
where  I might  actually be present in court.  Recently, when I was in court  with 
Patrick weber,  he tried to waive
the state of limitations  to allow  for the 
condo association to  continue the
foreclosure proceedings  after the
statute of limitations  had run out… this
was defiantly NOT in my best inters or a way 
to defend  a foreclosure
suit!   In fact when I told him he
couldn’t do that…  he threatened to have
e backer acted for standing up for my rights!  
When I did nothing wrong,! 
But  tell him his actions were
going to  harm me and my home ownership!  I even sent him a 48 page document  listing 
the Florida Statutes of limitations regulations!  Of course I received no response…. Most
recently I have been bullied including today to the pint of throwing up by
people telling me that  a settlement was
made without my knowledge or my agreement for 
the HOA.  This settlement  I am being told is not what I can afford… in
fact as my guardian, Patrick weber should know that I receive less than $
500.00  a month payment for medical
disability  let alone  have $5000.00 to put down as a lump sum to
pay.  This agreement is completely
different than the  equity line of credit
he was supposed to get with a $100.00 payment!  
How am I supposed to pay my electric… or car insurance.. or tampons for
that matter!   This is a grievous  situation…. If I lose my home due to a deal
he made that I had no knowledge of.. or cannot afford….  This is terrible….. I was even bullied
and  threated that  I was to sell 
my car…. When  it would be against
the law as it would have had to be ordered by a judge or approved by a judge,
for  anyone especially on behalf of a
guardian,  to sell my possessions  for such an outlandish settlement!   I believe that he is committing a fraud
against the court,  and against me as his
ward,  by not  following through with any the areas he was
supposed to be entrusted  in helping… and
instead is harming me and my homeownership! 
The fraud against the court is his assistance of continuing to be my
guardian and be paid by the court  even
though the was doing nothing  on my
behalf to remedy  and to  rectify any of the  situations 
that destroyed my life and caused a nervous breakdown  which 
caused me to need that guardian in the first place!.. 

Please Help….. This 
needs to stop …. I don’t 
know  if you can get  me a better guardian, or  real legal representation ….. but this is not
working!  No one is listening to me…. No
one is helping! Sincerely, Mary Jean Ziska  
5632 Whisperwood Blvd. 1601 Naples Florida, 34110   whatabtmry@yahoo.com, whatabtmary@gmail.com,
www.mysearchforjustice.com style=”mso-spacerun:yes”> 
maryjeanziska@mysearchforjustice.com

Ps:   He never returns
phone calls or rarely emails me as to the status of  the foreclosure or anything else he was
to  assist in fixing…   but instead emails my mother. This alone is
a direct violation of my ability to 
protect my freedoms and to make informed decisions….  

 

 

 

 

 

reply email to larry on august 23rd at 9 33 pm

Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:33 PM

From:”mary jean ziska” <whatabtmary@gmail.com>

View contact details

To:larrypivacek@aol.com

Cc:whatabtmary@yahoo.com, whatabtmary@gmail.com, maryjeanziska@mysearchforjustice.com

Hi larry,     August 23rd 2012 @ 9:18pm

Replying to your email…. I was chatting with magic jack for three hours to try to see what  was  going on with my phone….   But I don’t think anything is really fixed… nothing in my life  is yet…  I have emailed the probate court to get rid of Patrick as nothing is fixed  they told me they have forwarded the emails to the judges and  to  lawyers.  I think you may have been contacted as well….

You mention that you do not have anything to do with the foreclosure.. you mention every time…you mail me  so I really understand that. But this guardian is not doing what he is supposed to do… nothing is fixed    if you did not receive the e-mail  that I sent to the  probate court, to the judges to the  guardianship association,   to anyone who would listen or could help. Let me know…I’ll send it  to you again!  there is a list of what was supposed to be done   by my guardian pursuant to the Florida statutes 744 , and by what he had told me was his “action plan”   you know…. he was supposed to file  what he was supposed to  do his plan of action… to the courts… and be held accountable…someone needs to be held accountable! …. And you have to  be in charge of something? … what? I’m a bit confused?…. If the guardian isn’t doing what he is supposed to be doing …. isn’t that  where you come in as legal representation on my behalf?  Well here is your chance..  everything is still messed up… and even more messed up… what are my options? Thanks mary jean Ziska 

From: Lawrence Pivacek [mailto:larrypivacek@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:52 PM

To: mary jean ziska

Subject: Re: email to larry from mary jean ziska august 16th 2012 at 4 37 pm

Dear Mary Jean

I apologize for you not bring able to reach me.I have tried to both call you and E-Mail you in response.  I did receive  a voicemail from you yesterday but the message was unclear, full of static and broke up after 10 seconds.As I have said in the past, I do not represent you in the foreclosure action.

 

 

 

Please respond to this E-Mail so that I know you received it.

I hope to hear from you soon.

Larry

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:00 PM, “mary jean ziska” <whatabtmary@gmail.com> wrote:

Larry              August 16, 2012  at 4:44ppm

 I keep  trying to call you but get a  really loud buzzing sound … can you hear me when I call?… can you email me?… What the hell is going on? .. I called Elizabeth kriers office today to  tell her about this horrid deal  that Patrick made with  the HOA Is this true?…….. $5000.00  down and $500.00 a month???????? I cannot afford that! ..  the  $500.00 a month payments  are  more than  I get for medical disability….(which he did not  help to raise!). How am I supposed to  make up the difference, and pay electric, or car insurance..  or gas…. Or even tampons????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

If  I had $5000.00 then wouldn’t it be better to get a  real lawyer to defend the foreclosure?… and  to clear the title on my condo?…

Today I was bullied on the phone to the point of throwing up!…..I have idiots on the phone who want to sell my car for less than  it is worth.. someone wants my mom ‘s silver or her Picasso… those are my inheritance.. and this is the wrong deal!  Nothing has been fixed….. . the identity theft and  credit problems  and  everything is still  a mess…. Can I get a real guardian?… who actually has my best interest  at heart?  When I called Elizabeth Kriers office  some woman  told me that  your wife is in charge of  the  foreclosure case  now…is that true? or just another lie I keep being told to upset me….

Aren’t  those  opposing sides?…. If you are my guardianship  lawyer representing me when my guardian is making horrendous decisions about my life concerning  the foreclosure…. .and she is making decisions about the foreclosure… isn’t that a conflict of interest?  Please email me back and clear this up thanks mary jean Ziska  ( why in the Florida Bar  member search  is your  email listed as the aol address? ) 

The email below is what I just sent to the probate  court. Since the probate court is in  charge of  regulating  and punishing the guardianship and the guardians… I guess this is my only means  of justice…… at least this will all be in the court record that  I am  very unhappy with  what is going  on … if I didn’t know any better I  would think I  was still stuck with the criminals  who have been  ruining my life…..for  the past 10 years…..

 

To Whom it may concern:     August 16th 2012 @ 3:22pm

Patrick Weber is the guardian of Mary Jean Ziska. It is a limited guardianship restricted for only his assistance in financial and legal matters.    I have been trying to report his misconduct and to have him replaced since May or June of this year. I have emailed Patrick weber himself, contacted his office,  the sheriff and police department, the Florida Guardianship Association, my guardianship attorney Larry Pivacek  and  even contacted the Florida Bar Association  to reveal his misconduct!

His direct actions have harmed me, my home ownership and  violated my rights  instead of helping.  His  neglect in assisting me with the issues he was entrusted/obligated  by the  courts to remedy  have also  affected my life.  When he was first assigned my guardian last year  he was  so assigned to assist in legal matters concerning the  HOA foreclosure suit that was  directed to me
instead of to my  guardian.  He did not know how to defend a foreclosure suit and one of his main objectives was to obtain competent council on my behalf, He never got a lawyer or any legal counsel to assist in the foreclosure suit.  Another objective  he had was to raise the payment of my medical disability benefits to assist in the repayment of any settlement for the HOA. He did not do anything toward an increase.   A third objective he told me he would assist with is in  clearing mu an identity theft  that started in 2002 to not only increase  my  credit score but to stop any additional fraudulent  activity from occurring.  He did  not do anything  to remedy the identity theft, or  to  assist in removing fraudulent  accounts from my  credit report.  He also said he had a friend  and connections  with Regions bank to allow for an equity line e of credit  to also pay back any  amount  to the HOA.  I actually told him of another  option I found in the Florida Statutes 744.309 where a “trust company, state bank, national bank or a federal savings and loan may be a guardian “   I had asked him to check into this option  and to have my Wels Faro bank as a co- guardian to assist with  the equity line of credit,  to set up a direct payment  to the HOA.   He did not even ask the court for this option or follow up  on the  phone numbers and department personnel  I gave him  that I had received from the manager of my bank.  When we first met he  also told me that he would assist in clearing my condo title as it should be clear  and there should be no mortgage on my condo due to  the criminals and  continued fraud  by numerous “robo signing” companies that need to be cleared off my title! He didn’t even get a forensic audit completed!   I was told he has 250 cases and was too busy to take my phone calls or my emails,  and never notified me of  court cases  where  I might  actually be present in court.  Recently, when I was in court  with  Patrick weber,  he tried to waive the state of limitations  to allow  for the  condo association to  continue the foreclosure proceedings  after the statute of limitations  had run out… this was defiantly NOT in my best inters or a way  to defend  a foreclosure suit!   In fact when I told him he couldn’t do that…  he threatened to have e backer acted for standing up for my rights!   When I did nothing wrong,!  But  tell him his actions were going to  harm me and my home ownership!  I even sent him a 48 page document  listing  the Florida Statutes of limitations regulations!  Of course I received no response…. Most recently I have been bullied including today to the pint of throwing up by people telling me that  a settlement was made without my knowledge or my agreement for  the HOA.  This settlement  I am being told is not what I can afford… in fact as my guardian, Patrick weber should know that I receive less than $ 500.00  a month payment for medical disability  let alone  have $5000.00 to put down as a lump sum to pay.  This agreement is completely different than the  equity line of credit he was supposed to get with a $100.00 payment!   How am I supposed to pay my electric… or car insurance.. or tampons for that matter!   This is a grievous  situation…. If I lose my home due to a deal he made that I had no knowledge of.. or cannot afford….  This is terrible….. I was even bullied and  threated that  I was to sell  my car…. When  it would be against the law as it would have had to be ordered by a judge or approved by a judge, for  anyone especially on behalf of a guardian,  to sell my possessions  for such an outlandish settlement!   I believe that he is committing a fraud against the court,  and against me as his ward,  by not  following through with any the areas he was supposed to be entrusted  in helping… and instead is harming me and my homeownership!  The fraud against the court is his assistance of continuing to be my guardian and be paid by the court  even though the was doing nothing  on my behalf to remedy  and to  rectify any of the  situations  that destroyed my life and caused a nervous breakdown  which  caused me to need that guardian in the first place!.. 

Please Help….. This  needs to stop …. I don’t  know  if you can get  me a better guardian, or  real legal representation ….. but this is not working!  No one is listening to me…. No one is helping! Sincerely, Mary Jean Ziska   5632 Whisperwood Blvd. 1601 Naples Florida, 34110   whatabtmry@yahoo.com, whatabtmary@gmail.com,  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday September 17th 2012 @ 3:45am email to everyone do you knw what it must me like to say no and no one listen…

From:  Mary Jean Ziska

5632 Whisperwood Blvd. #1601

Naples Florida 34110

239-234-4065

whatabtmary@yahoo.com/  

  To  Patrick, and Larry:                                         
September 11 2012 @ 7:47pm

Do you know what it feels like to be raped? To say no… to
cry…. to plead …  and to have a
man  take it upon himself to do what ever
he wants to a girl…. dismissing any rights? any consideration of  what the girl may want? …. WHEN NO MEANS
NO…. that means NO

 

What you are doing to me is basically raping me… you are
going  against my wishes..  my concerns 
and my will to do what ever you want……. not considering  my needs or wants.. not asking… not
communicating…. NOT STOPPING when I tell you NO….  No… you have no right to take my money…
to make a horrid deal…  with the  HOA 
… you are as  much a criminal as
a rapist   I have rights…. I pay my
bills my medical disability is mine only because of the anxiety you are even
helping to  create….. what you are
trying  to do is illegal and i said
NO  a million times over NO!

Enclosed is a package consisting of 15 documents (listed
below).  Each package contains
information and documentation composed of letters and emails sent to my guardianship
lawyer:   Larry Pivacek, and my
guardian:   Patrick Weber, over the
course of this past year’s events.  These
documents   provide evidence of the
issues and problems encountered during this past year’ experiences in dealing
with the judicial and guardianship departments in Collier County.  

The purpose of 
guardianship assistance 
especially within my “limited guardianship”  is to 
assist  in  only legal 
and  financial  matters. 
Definition of a guardian:   a
person who has been appointed by the court to act on behalf of a ward’s person,
property, or both. (FS 744.102(9)).  The
guardian may exercise only  those rights
that have been removed from the ward and delegated to the guardian F.S
744.361(1)).  The limited guardianship is
designed to encourage the most self-reliance and independence possible and
to  be the least restrictive alternative
to a complete or plenary guardianship.  
A guardian who is appointed to manage the incapacitated person’s
financial affairs must protect and preserve the incapacitate person’s assets
and manage the assets as a “prudent person” would in managing the financial
affairs of another person.  The attorney
for the alleged incapacitated person must represent the alleged incapacitated
person’s expressed wishes, unless they are contrary to the Florida Rules
governing attorney’s conduct ( F.S. 744.102(1)).    

 

 The oath taken by
guardians( as per FS 744.347) “prior to exercising authority every guardian
must take an oath that he or she will faithfully perform his or her duties as a
guardian” 

 

I am writing this letter to 
enlist the assistance, of  the
lawyers,  judges, congressmen, and   government 
official in rectifying  
consequences of  many
transgressions that  are harming my
homeownership,  my life my civil liberties
and rights.   I am recording the events
and supplementing the events with  the
emails and  the letters sent to both
Patrick Weber and to Larry Pivacek 
during  this past year while
I  have been under their control  as per 
the  limited guardianship of  Patrick Weber and my guardianship lawyer
Larry Pivacek.

I will list the points and problems in numerical order.  These points catalogue topics that I have
encountered with the guardianship assistance program and address my personal
experiences as follows: 

 

1.           
Limited  or at times  no contact personally between guardian and
guardianship lawyer attempted   through
emails, telephone conversations and personal meetings.  Responses were few,   if at all.

 

*I rarely received answers from Patrick Weber when I emailed
or called his office.  I never received
notice from him as to the court dates and what he was going to say or do in
those court cases concerning  the HOA, or
any of my welfare concerns.  I thought I
could turn to him for assistance  and was
supposed to  let him know of any
injustices so that he would be able to 
remedy  the  situation. 
Examples such as:   When I told
him that the front gate of my condo claimed that the sticker on my car was
disabled due to the non- payment of the HOA fees( which is still a case that is
still in the courts)HE DID NOTHING!  When
I found the telephone number and contact information ,  for Wels Fargo corporate that would be able to
make the bank a co- guardian and 
assist  in  banking accounts and  would with court approval be able to help in
attaining  the  equity line of credit  from my condo, HE DID NOTHING!  When I alerted him to the fraud on my credit
report,    including additional mortgages
amounting to over $800,000.00, HE DID NOTHING!  
When I found documents that David stern 
had lost my original note which with proper  litigation would have in itself,  cleared the title on my condo HE DID NOTHING!
When I alerted him and filed police reports detailing items including $1000.00
that had been stolen HE DID NOTHING!

 

2.           
Guardianship monitoring by the Florida courts  was nonexistent.  Annual reports/ visits are neither scheduled
nor completed .  No reports/ results  given to 
ward.

 

*Patrick Weber has only been to my home once  and that was years ago.  The reports detailing  my expenses and the bills( I myself pay
online) I gave to him the first meeting of last year.  In my expenses I outlined  the bills I had paid in the past, and the
estimated billed expenses including electric, car insurance,  cable /internet service etc. .  He should 
have  had a complete understanding
of my cost of living.  His
negotiations  concerning the HOA dues hat
need to be paid   are very
unreasonable!    If he took the time to
even look at the  monthly budget and expenses  used, he would   have understood that  the medical disability  alone doesn’t cover all normal expenses.   I brought that fact to this attention   at our first meeting when  I wrote a letter requesting my independence
and was talked out of it by both Patrick and Larry on the grounds that his
assistance as my lawyer and my guardian was paramount in my defense for the
foreclosure  suit and paramount in
attaining  the equity line of credit,
and  any additional benefits at  this 
point in time of my life.  I do
not believe that he submitted any reports and if he did he never gave me any
copies nor provided me even with 
the  information  or written documentation.

 

3.            In
addition to the  initial plan , the  annual guardianship reports must be filed
within ninety (90)days after the last day of the anniversary month of the
guardian’s appointment.  This report must
include the annual guardianship plan and the annual financial return.  All guardianship reports must be filed in a
timely manner with the probate division of the circuit court.  The ward except in certain  circumstances, must be served with a copy as
well.  Failure to file annual  reports may result in sanctions against the
guardian ( FS 744.367) Written objections to any portion of the annual report
may be filed  by an interested person
including the ward within thirty (30) days after the annual report has been
filed.  If such an objection has been
filed, the  court must set the matter for
hearing and conduct the hearing within 
(30) days of the date that the objection was filed ( FS
744.367(4),(7)  

 

*No action plan for this past year was  given to me! 
If one had ever even  been
written.   No report, or plan of action
after development was written up and given to judge or to ward.   Even worse, not following through with any
of the items discussed at first meeting 
which should have been included in the 
plan of action for this year of limited guardianship were ever
addressed.    To have a copy of the
annual review of the guardianship report and plan as per the rights of the
incapacitated  ward that  are retained by the  ward (FS 744.3215(1)) No sanctions were ever
imposed upon my guardian or guardianship lawyer 
due to the r failures in my case!

 

4.            Limited
help by guardianship lawyer to  assist in
my expressed wishes  and to contact my
guardian  for  current situations.

 

Minor assistance : 
trying to get response from guardian by contacting guardian lawyer,  address problem with condo association,
stopping of  guard gate pass, fraud from
the companies of  Comcast, Empire Today,
and  Sears.  Having to file police reports when money and
items were stolen from my home   I
attempted to contact Larry Pivacek on numerous occasions via phone messages and
emails to tell him what my guardian was not doing, situations that were not
being even addressed, and requesting his assistance making the guardian at the
very least answer my concerns. Most occasions I received the same email back,
telling me that  he does  not handle anything to do with the  foreclosure case only the guardianship
case.  Many times the requests were  to have the guardian actually do his job,
such as assist in   increasing the  medical disability payments, or even contacting
the guard gate so my pass would again work, 
or to call my bank concerning the equity line of credit!  Or to assist in clearing  my title when 
all the fraud was found, or even 
for me to even get a different 
guardian…. One who actually did his job in protecting  my rights and cared about my concerns for
my  life! I’m sure as a guardianship
lawyer he was supposed to  do more than
meet with  me  at the initial  meeting 
at Patrick’s  office!   The minor assistance received by my guardian
and my guardianship lawyer has left me 
feeling very neglected  and
not  legally represented in the best
possible manner.      When I could  not  
get assistance from my guardian ship lawyer,  especially to have my guardian removed, I
emailed  the police, sheriff,  probate office, Then I  went further, emailing troubleshooter channel
( 4)  and other the local television
stations, channel  (2) and channel(7)   to alert them of the misconduct.  I contacted the Florida Bar Association, the
local Collier County Bar Association, to see what I needed to do to file a
formal complaint. I sent emails to  rick
Scott, the governor and to the congressmen 
Connie Mack and  Cliff Sterns  to notify them of the  problems with the judicial system concerning
the guardianship  cases in Collier County
especially  mine!  I have 
sent sealed signed receipt packages containing the 15 documents  to: 
Judge Cynthia A Pivacek, Judge Vincent Murphy, Judge Elizabeth Krier,
Congressman  Cliff Sterns, Congressman
Connie Mack,  The Florida Bar
Association, Governor Rick Scott, Collier County Bar  Association, 
Attorney  Gloria Fletcher,
Attorney Larry Pivacek, and Attorney Patrick Weber.  My hope is that  everyone will receive this information  and  
the negligence  will stop and
actions can be taken to rectify the grave injustice that has occurred  which may result in me losing  my 
home!

 

5.            Fraud
upon the court:   as per the  waiving the statute of limitations/
attempting to use his friend to get a loan from regions bank but then not
getting any real loan….   to pay the  equity line of credit….telling me to keep him
for my guardian  for this entire  year, 
I believe  these were  questionable ethical concerns and possible
conflicts of interest  but the  attempt 
to  make money by being paid
through the court system as a guardian, when none of the  duties of a guardian were being performed by
my guardian!  This was a clear
misrepresentation of  his duties.   His 
concern for my welfare  as my
guardian  is not visible.  He is 
using the courts  to his advantage
for his payment of services rendered when nothing is being accomplished.   He should have  been able 
to clear most of these situations within a  years’ time given his “connections” and
“resources” . It appears to me,  as if he
is purposely trying to allow me to lose my home, either through his negligence
as a lawyer or as guardian or as both! 
His lack of  honesty in correctly
presenting the facts of the cases, obtaining correct legal representation if he
did not know how to defend the case, and actually helping the HOA to  try to win their case when in fact he is
supposed to be representing me….  I
believe  that Patrick Weber committed
grievous injustices toward me, and the court system through.

 

 FRAUD UPON THE  COURT: 
“In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have
fraudulently presented facts  to the  court so that the court is impaired in the
impartial performance of its legal task the act known as fraud upon the court
is a crime  deemed so severe and
fundamentally  opposed to the operation
of justice that it is not subject to any statue of limitations.  Officers of the court include lawyers,
judges, referees, and those appointed guardian ad litem, parenting time
expeditors, mediators, rule 144 neutrals evaluators administrators special
appointees and any others whose influence are part of the judicial
mechanism.       

 

6.            Rights
of the ward:  The guardian’s role is to
balance the protection and care provided to the ward with genuine respect for
the encouragement of the independence still exercisable by the ward.

 

Patrick Weber did not balance the protection and care
provided with respect for the encouragement of the  ward: 
One instance where Patrick Weber 
definitely  did not represent my
best interest occurred at the court house. 
He told the HOA he would waive the statute of limitations (which had
almost run out) so that he would be allowed to still foreclose on my home.  In the one year period   the delay had been that t Patrick Weber even
though my guardian and a lawyer had no knowledge in how to defend a foreclosure
suit.  As my guardian he was required to
obtain competent legal counsel and in one years’ time had not been   able to obtain a lawyer with knowledge of
foreclosure defense.  Also within this
year, the other continued delay had been the ruling on the need to have  a guardian. 
This ruling had not been determined. 
I met with two nurses   and one
doctor as per the requirements of the Florida statutes 744.  The doctor said he was not satisfied.  He wanted me to have 12 hours of tests
costing approx.   $1500.00.   I’m not certain but I do believe that a
delay also occurred because Patrick petitioned the court for money to pay for
the unnecessary tests.     I thought this
was   a horrible waste of money when  the guardianship was  strictly 
for a limited guardianship and 
only encompassed   legal and  financial matters!    The delays were legitimate concerns  and if the statute of limitations had run out
or not , Patrick Weber’s concern should have been   my part of the case not on changing  the 
law to fit the  HOA’s motivation
for  their lawsuit!  In addition after the case, he winked at me
and laughed  when I was upset at his
remarks to backer act me, and  when I
mentioned that the doctor (who  I could
not find  listed in the directory of the
AMA) did not even know how to  apply a
pressure cuff when taking my blood pressure and after putting it on  backwards, and not being able to get  reading, he immediately  reapplied the cuff  to my same arm allowing for a very inaccurate
reading!  The point I was making was that
Patrick Weber laughed at my remarks about the ir0ny of the incompetent doctor
giving me a competency test!  

 

  Due to his direct
action of telling the judge he would l waive the statute of limitations,  a date of sale for July 18th 2012 was set by
the court.  He then proceeded to threaten
that I would be backer acted because I stood up and told him he wasn’t allowed
to waive the statute of limitations. I later emailed him legal definitions consisting
of 25 pages including the definition of statute of limitations.  Prior to his actions, we had discussed his
asking for a continuance primarily because of his lack of obtaining counsel   on my behalf to defend the foreclosure
suit!    He did not  represent my best interest  afterward the final line of the agreed  order mentioned that  he accepted service  and will file a responsive pleading within 30
days from the date of  this order!   The “Agreed Order” case no. 07-3121-CC:   1- canceled the foreclosure sale that he
allowed to happen (Thank God!)  2-  It vacated the final summary judgment to
defendant Mary Jean Ziska.   3- motion to
vacate default  a s to defendant Mary
jean Ziska was granted   all of those
points seems to  in my favor and rightly
so since the entire foreclosure suit was not only  served to a person who was declared
incompetent at the time of service, but 
the guardian was not notified, no legal representation was
provided,    and everything was done
improperly!

 

 The 4th point  for the 
case no 07-3221-cc mentions that the defendants guardian agrees to
accept service and will file  a
responsive pleading within (30) days. The date 
was June 21st 2012.  Patrick Weber
should have not accepted service on the foreclosure  on my home for two very important reasons
:  1- he still does not know how to
defend a foreclosure suit    2- he has
still not obtained legal representation on my behalf!   Hi primary purpose was to protect me from
corrupt lawyers  (hence the   guardianship included his assistance in
legal matters)…. But he himself did not protect me in the legal arena but
instead his actions directly adversely affected my legal outcomes and are still
affecting my life through his legal misdealing’s  done on purpose for my legal cases!  

 

7.           
Nonexistence of the annual review report and plan for this past
year.  Not following through with any of
the items discussed at first meeting that was to be included in plan of action
for this year of limited guardianship.  
To have a copy of the annual review of the guardianship report and plan
as per the rights of the incapacitated 
ward that  are retained by
the  ward (FS 744.3215(1))

 

a.           
Items/topics that were  discussed
that needed to be fixed:

 

1.            Increase
medical  disability money to help
increase income.  Not only did I need the
additional  money for living expenses but
Patrick weber said I needed the 
verifiable  steady income to
obtain the equity line of credit that would be established to pay the HOA fees.

 

2.            Obtain
the loan or equity line of credit from my condo for the HOA fees.

 

3.            Get a
forensic audit for the title  of my
condo  and any additional  documentation necessary to  establish 
my title as free of debt due to the 
past fraud from multiple mortgage 
companies, the loss of my original note, etc.  and 
clear it of  any fraud .  

 

4.            Defend
this foreclosure suit by finding a great lawyer who knew  how to defend a foreclosure suit.

 

5.            He was
to help me clear up the fraudulent items 
of identity theft on my credit report thus increasing my credit
score.  This was  also done 
to eventually help with the  HOA
payment.

 

6.            He was
supposed to help protect me from fraud and criminals who have preyed on my life
and on me  however I had at least three
instances of  con-artist related
incidences  by repair men who
allegedly   were from Sears, sales reps
who were allegedly  from Empire Today,
and actual theft from Comcast! I have since 
reported the  scams  and theft to the BBB and to Pam Bond’s office
at the attorney general’s office!    I
also had to  have a roommate removed
when  $1000.00 was stolen  and have had to have  a supplemental identity theft report
submitted and accepted to the police department when pictures,  information from my external hard drive, blog
posts from
www.mysearchforjustice, style=”mso-spacerun:yes”>  were
stolen!  Patrick weber did nothing to
protect me or my property and I alone had to file  police reports and  no resolution has been found in the Comcast
case, or the police reported missing items!

 

7.            He is in
charge  of assisting me in legal matters,
however  noting has been done  to instill any justice for the harassing,
bulling and my eventual nervous breakdown at the hands  of Karen Kael and her  group. 
The $5000.00 medical bill is still on my credit report  and harming my credit due to Karen  Kahel and 
her bullying  friends from Ohio
State.  Patrick Weber did nothing to
assist in even  initiating a law suit for
the intentional infliction of emotional distress that  led to the need for a guardian  and protection from harm and abuse  and 
assistance  in legal and financial
matters!

 

8.            As for
additional law suits, Patrick weber also did not  even initiate a  law suit to gain restitution for
the$3000.00   monies taken by Ian
Stein  during the  renegotiations of the Aegis refinancing .

 

9.            David
Stern’s paperwork  indicated that my
mortgage note had been lost, and the paperwork involved was extremely
corrupt   and I needed legal  assistance 
in making sure the  title was free
and clear for my condo. The additional assistance  of 
a  true professional lawyer was
needed for   this mess to be cleared
through  the  courts.  
Patrick Weber was to have the resources 
to accomplish this but he never did anything in this years’ time to
remedy the  situation! 

 

10.         
Patrick  said he would also  negotiate with the condo association as per
the balances owed and since it was fraudulent to actually serve paperwork to
the ward instead of the guardian,  he
assured me that the  attorney’s fees and
the   interest should legally be waived.  Now that the actual first foreclosure suit
was dismissed I believe that  those
expenses are not my responsibility however , 
I keep having  people call me  on the phone to threaten me with  amounts and settlements that are absolutely
unreasonable!  I have had one person say
that ah Patrick weber made a settlement for $62,000.00 and wanted $5000.00 down
and  $500.00 payments a month!   The $500.00 a month is more than I receive
at all for my disability payments each 
month!   No true guardian who is
aware of  my monthly budge t and expenses
should have ever come up with such an outrageous payment!                                

 

8.            “To be
restored to capacity at earliest possible time” as per the  rights of the incapacitated ward that are
retained by the ward ( FS 744.3215(1))

 

When I first met with Patrick Weber and Larry Pivacek in
2011, I asked for guidance and direction concerning the status of the
guardianship case.  My first request from
them was advice and their recommended plan of action for my guardianship
status.  I believed at that point in time
I was possibly ready to have my independence restored to full  capacity. 
Upon their advice,  and my limited
funds to retain council I maintained the same limited guardianship status.  I 
needed    legal representation
which would  produce a result for  my best interest  in the foreclosure  case 
and in numerous additional issues and 
problems still unresolved.  These
situations ,  would have been  overwhelming to handle all by myself so  I 
depended on   both Larry and
Patrick  to do what they said they were
going to do and legally represent me.  
Enclosed is the letter I presented to the two nurses and the doctor and
the two lawyers the day of the evaluation. 
I also brought pictures of my living accommodations, my  ability to take care of myself  and my surroundings, my budget and  current status of the bills  which encompassed my  living expenses!    This limited guardianship   was to aid in areas we discussed and I
trusted them to be participants in helping to rectify and remedy   the worst experiences of my life!  Having any type of guardianship still means I
am deprived of certain rights and trusting that these individuals delegated by
the court system be diligent in their effort to assist me.  I have experienced no  support system that makes me feel that
my  wishes and best interest are
being  considered  and am completely disappointed in the  entire year of guardianship where
nothing  was  remedied, where  negligence 
was persistent and    prevalent
and where my trust in justice and an honest legal system is being tested and
questioned.        

 

9.            To be treated humanely with dignity
and respect  and to be protected against
abuse,  neglect, and  exploitation.    As per the 
rights of the incapacitated ward that are retained by the ward (
FS.744.3215(1))

 

a.            Threats
of being backer- acted by lawyer 
when  ward standing up for
rights  and when lawyer said he would
disregard/waive the statute of limitations for 
foreclosure.

 

b.            Winking
and  laughing  regarding 
the  doctor  who 
was to give final evaluation  that
would determine  guardianship status.

 

c.             No
reply  or contact  regarding emails, letters and phone calls.

 

10.          To remain
as independent as possible including having 
preference as to place and standard do living honored  as per the rights of the incapacitated
ward  that are retained by the ward( FS
744.3215(1)).

 

I have maintained my independence by residing  in my own condo (5632 Whisperwood Blvd. 1601
Naples Florida 34110) since  1999.  I worked on three different businesses while
living here:  a faux painting business:
(M&M Decorative Painting);  a
babysitting business: ( A Tender Loving Care Service) ; an etiquette school:
(  A TLC Prep) My choice for living
accommodations is to reside in the condo 
that I  selected with my father
and mother in 1999 and where  I moved
into my condo  April 1999!  I am very upset  that my home ownership is being  threatened by allowing guardians and lawyers
to make decisions  about a “deal
  with the   HOA. 
The amount of monies they are telling the HOA I will pay each month as a
settlement is more than my current income, does not allow for any  normal bills to be paid such as electric,
gas, car insurance, toilet paper and tampons ! 
It does not allow for additional HOA fees to be paid which will create
the same situation   of unpaid HOA fees
all over again!  They are single handedly
and very insidiously setting me up for failure and for the loss of my home!    This is my condo, only my condo!  I am the person who selected the white
tile,  and has had this residence as my
home address since 1999!  I have had many
plans for my residence and for how I wanted to live in my residence…. and for
the past ten years my life has been on hold while I have had to clean up one
mess after another and still nothing is completely rectified!  My wishes are 
to have  everything fixed and to
once again be able to decorate my condo, plan my life and live out my wishes
and dreamed for my future  minus all the
problems!    My guardian and lawyer for
my guardianship should know this but I don’t believe they have actually asked
me,   and I know for certain  we have never sat  down to plan out how  not only 
how  past can be remedied but how
the future will be mapped out and accomplished!

 

11.          To
receive prudent  financial management
of  his 
or her  property and to be
informed how his or her property is being managed as per the  rights of the incapacitated ward that are
retained by the ward ( FS 744.321(1))

 

To be certain, I do not believe that given  the current situation and my  financial 
income budget, that neither Patrick weber nor Larry Pivacek   would have created the same  deal for them given the same  monetary circumstances!  I understand the basic principal of
debt:  more money has to go out than
comes into a household…. Therefore  at
the basis of their plan for repayment of the HOA more money  ( $500.00) just for the repayment of the HOA
fees would be going out than  the(
$465.00) that  is brought  into my household per month!   There is no one that  would agree to such a deal and both these
people are supposed to be standing up for my rights in the  financial 
department… it is unthinkable 
that such a travesty should occur!  
Are they taking advantage of their power to handle financial matters? In
fact, the lump sum that Patrick Weber decided upon is outrageous!  If I had $5000.00 for a lump sum  to give the HOA I would have rather spend it
on a lawyer who was able to defend the foreclosure,  to reduce the 
amount owed and to actually practice law in my favor!   A decision such as that would have been in
my best interest.  I am not living an
opulent lifestyle, over this past year  I
have had to cut my own hair to save money, 
take whole milk and water it down 
to  make it  last longer, I have had to  water down shampoo, and conditioner… have had
to  forgo shopping  for 
any extras  for myself and have
only spent money I have saved for  my
families holiday gifts!  I went for an
entire year without any air-conditioning which was really difficult when the
weather was  very hot and humid.  I did all of this to limit my budget and  live within my means!    I do not have a cell phone, but only use a
magic jack attached to my computer and I only have one cable expense… the
internet for my outside  communication
!  I am completely disgusted  that the people entrusted to help me  would not 
acknowledge any  of this and make
a deal that  is completely unacceptable
financially!  I know they would not  sacrifice as much as I have and then
make  a 
settlement and payment  schedule
such as the one I am being told 
they  worked out for me….    The power given to guardians  to make decisions that they alone would never
accept but that they accept on behalf of their wards,   to me is unacceptable and borders on grievous  especially when conditions are set for
failure due to the  outlined  stipulations! 
Such decisions should d be over ruled by a court system that recognizes
that no one person or group of persons should have ultimate power and control
for financial or legal decisions that would harm the ward even if they are a
guardian!

12.          To have
access to the courts, as per the rights of the incapacitated ward that are
retained by the ward  (FS
744.321(1)). 

 

Patrick Weber  and
Larry Pivacek  have not allowed me to
speak  when  the few times I was in court! I was told to
be quiet to sit down and not  to do or
say anything!   Have emailed the probate
court to request that a new and more qualified guardian be appointed for
my  guardian.  The email however took 22 hours from the time
I emailed it/sent it…. To the time the carbon copy I emailed to myself arrived
in my mail box.  I can only assume that
there was a glitch in my outlook account for that moment  and not some 
hacker preventing me from  access
to the courts!  I am sending this package
to  a number of people in the court
system and will be putting this letter and the contents of the package on the
internet in my website: 
www.mysearchforjustice.com  under
the blog entries once it is mailed!     I
will assume that each and every recipient will receive the original package and
all its contents otherwise  not only
will  I not have  access to the 
courts, but there would be mail tampering involved and involvement of
felony charges based on mail 
fraud/tampering would be:  (FS
817)    I have  a right 
to have access to the court system just as any other person who does not
have a guardian has a right  to be heard
by a judge concerning my life!           

13.          To be
represented by counsel:

 

As one of my rights as a ward, I have the right to be
defended in any lawsuit by counsel.   I
should say I have a right to have counsel that is competent in defending any
law suit!  I have Larry Pivacek  who is supposed to be my guardianship lawyer,
he is supposed to  represent me
concerning  my guardian.  He has consistently emailed me  every time I email him that he is only my
guardianship lawyer and gives no counsel on any other  topic. 
I have to date not received any counsel from Larry concerning  any guardianship  questions.    
I definitely need to have a lawyer represent me in every  instance who has knowledge of the areas that
are affecting my life, my homeownership, my independence and  every other area   necessary 
for legal representation!    These
areas include:    

 

a.            Defend
foreclosure suit with qualified lawyer who is competent in defending
foreclosure suite neither brought on by HOA. 
Neither Larry nor Patrick  have
any knowledge on how to defend  a
foreclosure suit!   So  on that basis alone, I need additional
representation for  the various areas
that  are 
currently under unqualified and 
unsatisfactory representation.

 

There is also a rule on how long a plaintiff can keep open a
foreclosure lawsuit that has no activity. 
The rule says that after 1 year of inactivity, the lawsuit can be
dismissed by the court. The  failure to
prosecute  within one Year,    *The” failure to prosecute within one year”
rule.  If the court  dismisses the lawsuit after one year and
before the bank asks for  a deficiency
judgment the  lender can still file a new
lawsuit and sue just on the  promissory
note unpaid balance .    This valuable
entry from a document I gave to Patrick and Larry in an email.  It was of course ignored, and instead   the Patrick who threatened me, laughed and
winked at me when I was in distress, used the knowledge against me and in favor
of the HOA which set a sale date of July 18th   
for my condo when he had no knowledge of how to defend a foreclosure
and  defiantly  proved his incompetence in regards to this
matter by his actions.  These
actions  adversely and directly  affected my home ownership! !            

 

b.            Reduce
settlement   by qualified lawyer or legal
representative.  Since Patrick Weber or
Larry Pivacek  is not privy to basic
principles of debt, a knowledgeable representative  who can create a settlement that adheres to
my budge may be required!  A qualified  lawyer who is well versed in settlement
negotiations   is defiantly
required!  I need additional representation
for the various areas that are currently under unqualified and unsatisfactory
representation.    

14.          To
receive notice of all proceedings related to determination of capacity and
guardianship unless the court finds the incapacitated person lacks the ability
to comprehend the notice.  As per the
rights of the incapacitated ward that are retained by the ward (FS 744.
321(1)).

 

Patrick or Larry have not notified me of any of the court
dates or court  appearances.  I received some of  my information from phone messages or
forwarded emails sent by my mother Marion Gregory.  She is not my legal guardian,  nor my guardianship lawyer, nor my
negotiator, nor  is legally able to speak
for me or my wishes or on  my behalf! It
is not her job but the job of my guardian to notify me of any court dates and
the reasons for the court dates!   I have
not been receiving direct emails from Patrick Weber even though I have been
sending him direct emails via his email address at  his office. I receive no response back!   I have only received court documents sent in
the mail.  Last week I  was told that Larry, my guardianship attorney
called my mother to get my address. 
I  would think after being my
guardianship lawyer for the past year he would be privy  to information such as my address! I
thought  my guardian and guardianship
lawyer  would have been required to have
files full of  information on my
behalf.    This method of communication
has been unacceptable!   I have resorted
to  sending   emails to other departments in
government  for additional  assistance, for information,  and  to
attempt to  get help !   I have even sent emails to the probate
court,  who then told me they were
sending information to the appropriate judges and the lawyers on my behalf.

 

Both  Patrick Weber
and Larry Pivacek   don’t appear  to want 
to assist in rectifying any of the situations we discussed upon our
first meeting!    So I will need
additional legal representation to address their replacement as well!   

 

 

 

15.          To
determine  how  payments were to be made  to the HOA:

 

a.            Use
my  bank as co- guardian:                                                                                                                                
When I first did any research on guardians,/guardianship  I 
looked up (FS 744).   Within the
(FS 744) was a chapter that stated: 
“Also a Trust company, State Bank, National Bank, or Federal Savings and
Loan may be a guardian (FS 744.309(4))  A
non –profit corporation organized for religious or charitable purposes may be
appointed as a guardian ( FS 744.309(5)) “   
Under this ruling  I requested
Patrick Weber have as a co guardian a bank. 
I requested my bank and asked my branch manager for information on  guardianships and trusts.  She gave me a telephone number which I passed
along to Patrick Weber to see what criteria, guidelines and qualifications were
necessary to establish a bank as a guardian. 
To my knowledge, he never even checked on the bank as a guardian. His
negligence cost me an equity line of credit through my bank or any bank that
would have qualified.            

 

b.           
Patrick’s connection and 
Regions  bank loan:    Patrick Weber  decided to contact his friend who worked for
Regions Bank to assist in making preparations for the repayment of the
HOA.   He did not tell me who he spoke
with concerning the monies. He did not tell me whether it was to be an equity
line of credit, or a loan for the monies. 
He did not tell me what the interest rate would be, or confirm how much
payments  would be each month.  He did not tell me what the  total amount would be that  he would try to obtain.  He did not tell me when this loan/ or equity
line of credit  would be ready to use for
the repayment of HOA!  I was told via hearsay
(which means via a phone call from my mother and an email from my mother!)  that there was a loan that would have only a
payment of $100.00 per month! I was told that I needed to save  for a balloon payment but that wouldn’t be
for a while…. Then I heard two completely new versions of the repayment and
settlement  for the HOA and the entire
process has been a nightmare!  

 

c.             Equity
line of credit from my own bank.:  I
asked  Patrick Weber  to check on using my bank for the equity line
of credit .  It is the bank where the
direct deposit for my medical  disability
payment is made.  The bank account from
which  I pay my bills.  The bank account  where if an equity line of credit  existed I would only have to access one
website to make sure that no identity theft or 
problems arose, or where a direct payment  for the 
HOA could be easily monitored and 
carefully maintained!  As far as I
know, Patrick Weber never even checked on the 
options of procuring an equity line of credit from my bank for my
condominium  to repay the HOA fees!

 

In conclusion, I am writing to enlist the assistance of the
proper authorities and to call attention to the negligence in completing any of
the initial objectives for this past year 2011-2012 while I have been under
the  direction of my guardian Patrick Weber
and my lawyer for the guardianship Larry Piviach.       The events of this past year should have
produced results allowing for assistance in both financial and legal  state of affairs.   For closure and  remedy to long standing situations.   For accountability, culpability, sanctions
and consequences  where it  is 
warranted.    For adequate
resolution and finality to a multiple 
of  unforgivable circumstances.

 

Thank you for your kind attention to this letter.

 

Sincerely,

 

Mary Jean Ziska            
                                                                                                                                           5632
Whisperwood Blvd.  #1601                                                                                       
                                                                   Naples
Florida  34110                                                                                                                           
whatabtmary@yahoo.com

 The enclosures:

 

1.            Information and definition for
Patrick Weber from Mary Jean Ziska Fri may 25th 2012 @ 10:56am

 

2.           
Letter/speech I gave to Patrick Weber and to the members of the
evaluation committee

 

3.            August
16th @ 2011@ 3:32am (random notes Florida Statutes/guardianship and
foreclosure)

 

4.            Agreed
Order:  case no. 07-3121-CC

 

5.            Hi
Patrick,  Once again I am trying to reach
you and keep getting your voice mail. I left a message today June 28th
@12:37pm….

 

6.            Message from Mary Jean Ziska August 7th 2012
evening concerning removing my guardian Wednesday August 8th 2012  11:09am   
Dear Larry august 7th 2012 @ 8:11pm

 

7.            To whom
it may concern:  August  8th 2011 11:20am

 

8.            From
Mary Jean Ziska (mail to : whatabtmary@gmail.com) Sent Wednesday, August 08
2012 2:30pm  To  Minutes and Records

 

9.           
Fwd.:  message from Mary Jean
Ziska august 7th 2012 evening concerning removing my guardian Wednesday 8, 2012
2:47pm

 

10.          BLOG.MYSEARCHFORJUSTICE.COM:  July 2nd 
email sent to sheriff office as complaint against guardian’s actions

 

11.          Called
the collier clerk of courts today: 
august 8th 2012 at 11:30am to request email address for transcript in
writing for court date August 6th 2012 involving the motion for extension of
time granted ( 20 days were granted)

 

12.          On Monday
8/6/12, Mary Jean Ziska whatabtmary@yahoo.com      Hi Patrick, I emailed you last year
concerning having a co guardian as a bank….                  

 

13.          To whom
it may concern:  August 16th 2012 @
3:22pm   Patrick Weber is the guardian of
Mary Jean Ziska.  It is a limited
guardianship restricted for only his assistance in financial and legal
matters.  I have been trying to  report his misconduct

 

14.         
cid@colliersheriff.net   It is now
5:15pm on august 23rd 2012, my name is Mary jean Ziska and since your  office is closed  I am emailing you concerning the group of
identity thieving con-artist

 

15.          Hi Larry,
August 23rd 2012 @ 9:18pm   replying  to your 
email… I was chatting with magic jack

 

  I want to 
say this again…. So you can clearly hear me this time….

 

Do you know what it feels like to be raped? To say no… to
cry…. to plead …  and to have a
man  take it upon himself to do what ever
he wants to a girl…. dismissing any rights? any consideration of  what the girl may want? …. WHEN NO MEANS
NO…. that means NO

 

What you are doing to me is basically raping me… you are
going  against my wishes..  my concerns 
and my will to do what ever you want……. not considering  my needs or wants.. not asking… not communicating….
NOT STOPPING when I tell you NO…. 
No… you have no right to take my money… to make a horrid
deal…  with the  HOA 
… you are as  much a criminal as
a rapist   I have rights…. I pay my
bills my medical disability is mine only because of the anxiety you are even
helping to  create….. what you are
trying  to do is illegal and i said
NO  a million times over NO!

 

A Tender Loving Care Service

 

Marion Gregory  
Director 239-598-1515

 

naplesmarion@aol.com

 

Mary Jean Ziska  
Assistant Director 239-234-4065

 

whatabtmary@yahoo.com

Monday September 17th 2012 @3:40pm definations for guardianship adn backer act

GUARDIANSHIP

 

A guardianship is a legal proceeding in the Circuit Courts
of Florida in which a guardian exercises the legal rights of an incapacitated
person or a minor child. A guardian is an individual or institution, such as a
bank trust department, appointed by the court to care for an incapacitated
person or a minor child. All guardianship matters in the State of Florida
require an attorney (Rule 5.030).

 

Guardianships for an adult person are filed when it is
believed that a person is not mentally capable of taking care of
himself/herself. Mental Health appoints a committee to evaluate the person and
make their report to the court. Guardians can be appointed as guardian of the
person only, property only, or person and property. If a person recovers in
whole or part from the condition that caused him or her to be incapacitated,
the court will have the ward examined and can restore some or all of the
person’s rights.

 

Guardianships for minors are filed when the minor child has
inherited money or has property in excess of $15,000.00. A guardian of the
property is all that is needed if the minor child’s parents are living. If the
minor child’s parents are deceased or unable to be appointed guardians, he/she
may need a guardian of the person and property.

 

BAKER ACT

 

Persons who are mentally ill and refuse to seek treatment
and are a danger to themselves or others may be court ordered for evaluation
and treatment or emergency pickup, if necessary, under the provision of the
Baker Act when the licensed service provider determines the criteria. The
agency files the petition and assists with the preparation and filing of
emergency petitions.

 

Baker Act records are confidential.

Monday september 17th 2012@ 3:38pm proper technique for blood pressure

Proper Technique for Blood Pressure Measurement

From Craig Weber, M.D., former About.com Guide

Updated February 05, 2007

About.com Health’s Disease and Condition content is reviewed
by the Medical Review Board

Proper Technique Can Save Your Life

Correct blood pressure measurements are essential to
diagnosing and treating high blood pressure. Accordingly, a specific set of
techniques and procedures have been developed which describe the proper method
for obtaining the most accurate blood pressure readings possible. Because
research has shown that medical professionals often do not completely follow
these guidelines, it is important for the patient to be able to identify when
proper protocol is not being followed.

Wrap the blood pressure cuff around your patient’s upper
arm. Make sure it is fully deflated and placed slightly above the groove of his
elbow by centering the arrows on the cuff in that area. Now place the
sphygmomanometer next to the patient’s arm and near the cuff.

Put your stethoscope’s ear pieces into your ears and place
the diaphragm in the groove of your patient’s elbow. Make sure the valve of
your pressure bulb is closed then quickly inflate the blood pressure cuff to a
value that is 30mm/Hg above your patient’s last blood pressure value.

Slowly release the pressure bulb at a rate of 2 to 3mm/Hg
per second. Then listen for the first clear sound from your stethoscope. When
you hear it, note the value at which it occurred on your sphygmomanometer. This
is the systolic blood pressure value. The sound will slowly increase in
intensity. Wait for the sound to start decreasing in intensity and listen for
the last muffled sound. Note the value at which the last muffled sound
occurred. This is the diastolic blood pressure value.

Remove the cuff from your patient, assist him into a
comfortable position and write down your his blood pressure values.

Taking blood
pressure twice question

Hi, I know that you can’t take your BP twice on the same arm
very quickly. My question is, can I take it on my right arm, then a minute
later take it on my left arm? The veins wouldn’t be “overpumped”
getting a false reading in that case right? I ask b/c I find that doing this,
the first time gets rid of my cuff anxiety so my 2nd reading (in whichever arm
I do second) is always much lower. But I’m not getting a false low reading b/c
I just took it in the other arm am I? Does that make sense?

Thanks!/Linda

Read more: How to Use a Stethoscope & Blood-Pressure
Cuff | eHow.com  

MondaySeptember 17th 2012 @3:35am email reply to larry about court date sept 20th y

hi
larry…. a very long response.. please contact me on monday when you
get a chance to discuss this email reply thanks mary jean ziska

Monday, September 17, 2012 3:27 AM
From:

This sender is DomainKeys verified


View contact details

To:
“larry pivacek guardianship lawyer” <larrypivacek@gmail.com>
Cc:
“mary jean ziska”
<whatabtmary@yahoo.com>, “mary jean ziska me!”
<whatabtmary@gmail.com>, maryjeanziska@mysearchforjustice.com

Dear Larry,                                                              
Sunday  September 16th 2012

In response to your email concerning the court hearing on
September 20th 2012.  There
are a few motivating factors which have contributed to my decision  not to attend.   ….

 1. Not on judge’s schedule:   First,
I looked up the month schedule for Lauren L. Brodie the collier circuit judge
that I was told was to oversee   the
case… the funny thing…. On the docket for September 20th she has cases all
day…. One at 1:50pm that is “no title” and one at   2:30pm listed as 10 minutes motions…. But
nothing for 2:00pm..Hummm…  AS for
Magistrate David Friedman  he has on this
Sept. month schedule:  1:30pm (6)   5 minute motions and  then at 2:00pm (3) no title) ….. with everyone
and their brother wanting me to leave my home … I was just wondering….. why
the  lie?….  the last time 
I left my home  for any length of
time  or had to go very far away  I had someone in my home  who lowered my ac to 70 degrees.. Who stole information
off my external hard drive, who stole personal pictures  and since I have had the last ten year’s
worth of people deciding they could steal 
from me without any 
repercussions… (IE my guardian 
didn’t lift a finger  to try
to  prosecute any thieves.. or bullies..
or even  try to make sure stolen items
were returned….. so the thieves believe they can get away with harming my life…
with threatening  me and obviously with lying  and stealing from me… then  the 2nd reason….

2.  I have been threatened (over the phone)  at least 3-4 times that if I stand up for my
rights and say anything while
I am in the courthouse,…..  if I get
upset by my guardian harming my life, and disregarding  my  needs, 
requests,   demands …..   or disregarding  even   legal protocol…. as he has done this entire
year! …..If  I  say anything 
about his  horrid
representation  as a lawyer….I am
threatened that I will be backer acted????…  for disrupting the court???…. What the
Hell?????  I am supposed to be punished again…. Instead of the person
who the courts entrusted to be a guardian… to protect me from harm…. And who
was legally obligated to obtain legal representation to defend what he has no legal knowledge for defense….
and  most importantly…..didn’t do
anything  on my behalf… ….  (who still does not know how to defend a
foreclosure.. or in my opinion the worst person to actually be a guardian….
and who has purposely gone out of his way to make every wrong choice..(forme ,
mylife or my wishes… or needs)  and  seems to want me to lose my  temper  on purpose… lose control of my emotions … and
to lose my condo… perfect example is when he laughed…  while I got upset when he  told the court that as a lawyer he was
going  to disregard the  legal and binding statute of limitations… and
wave it for the  HOA ….WHAT THE HELL WAS
HE DOING?

YET …. I AM THE PERSON WHO IS BEING  THREATENED ON THE PHONE!…. ABOUT BEING  BACKER- ACTED????….. DO THEY EVEN KNOW  WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS ARE?….  I  HAVE
THE DEFINATION FROM THE  COURT HOUSE WEBSITE…. 

BAKER ACT:  “Persons
who are mentally ill and refuse to seek treatment and are a danger to
themselves or others may be court ordered for evaluation and treatment or
emergency pickup, if necessary, under the provision of the Baker Act when the licensed
service provider determines the criteria. The agency files the petition and
assists with the preparation and filing of emergency petitions.”

In no way shape or form is 
standing up for your  rights  a reason for such a horrid threat…..  

 

 

3.  The third 
reason, I am not attending 
the  September 20th
hearing ….is I am completely disgusted at the Lack  of Competent Legal representation!

Patrick Weber,  who
still does not know how to defend a foreclosure. Or even know any  guardianship laws…. And in my opinion the
worst person to actually be a guardian…. has purposely gone out of his way to
make every wrong choice.. and it appears he actually  gets pleasure and  enjoyment 
and actually  me to lose my
temper….   on purpose… lose control of my emotions … and
to lose my condo!  A perfect example is
when he laughed…  while I got upset when
he  told the court that as a lawyer he
was going  to disregard the  legal and binding statute of limitations… and
wave it  “Just for the HOA” so they
could  foreclose upon my home… He
laughed…. About the doctor.. dr mcgoo… or what ever his name was supposed to
be… ( I couldn’t find his name in the AMA…American Medical Association
Directory) the doctor who couldn’t 
figure out how to put on a blood pressure cuff… and tried to take  my blood pressure twice… once then again
immediately  right after  the first time and on both times on the same
arm… when  the proper procedure was:

 “Proper Technique for
Blood Pressure Measurement   From Craig
Weber, M.D., former About.com Guide  Updated
February 05, 2007  About.com Health’s
Disease and Condition content is reviewed by the Medical Review Board  Proper Technique Can Save Your Life    Correct blood pressure measurements are
essential to diagnosing and treating high blood pressure. Accordingly, a
specific set of techniques and procedures have been developed which describe
the proper method for obtaining the most accurate blood pressure readings
possible. Because research has shown that medical professionals often do not
completely follow these guidelines, it is important for the patient to be able
to identify when proper protocol is not being followed.  Wrap the blood pressure cuff around your
patient’s upper arm. Make sure it is fully deflated and placed slightly above
the groove of his elbow by centering the arrows on the cuff in that area. Now
place the sphygmomanometer next to the patient’s arm and near the cuff.  Put your stethoscope’s ear pieces into your
ears and place the diaphragm in the groove of your patient’s elbow. Make sure
the valve of your pressure bulb is closed then quickly inflate the blood
pressure cuff to a value that is 30mm/Hg above your patient’s last blood
pressure value.   Slowly release the
pressure bulb at a rate of 2 to 3mm/Hg per second. Then listen for the first
clear sound from your stethoscope. When you hear it, note the value at which it
occurred on your sphygmomanometer. This is the systolic blood pressure value.
The sound will slowly increase in intensity. Wait for the sound to start
decreasing in intensity and listen for the last muffled sound. Note the value
at which the last muffled sound occurred. This is the diastolic blood pressure
value.  Remove the cuff from your
patient, assist him into a comfortable position and write down your his blood pressure
values.                                                                    
Taking blood pressure twice question:      Hi, I know that you can’t take your BP
twice on the same arm very quickly. My question is, can I take it on my right
arm, then a minute later take it on my left arm? The veins wouldn’t be
“overpumped” getting a false reading in that case right? I ask b/c I
find that doing this, the first time gets rid of my cuff anxiety so my 2nd
reading (in whichever arm I do second) is always much lower. But I’m not
getting a false low reading b/c I just took it in the other arm am I? Does that
make sense?Thanks!/Linda  Read more: How
to Use a Stethoscope & Blood-Pressure Cuff | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_5577398_use-stethoscope-amp-bloodpressure-cuff.html#ixzz26hEHRklR 

 

 

His laughter  at  my pain, 
or laughter at my reaction to his 
threats….is totally unacceptable 
from a person  who is supposed to
be a guardian….….

 His lack of knowledge
of the Florida Statutes and  for protecting
my rights.. his disrespect and 
misrepresentation.. is disgraceful …..then to be threatened that if  or when  I  take
a stand for protecting my rights…. Or the 
actual  laws in  United States of America.. or the Florida
Statutes….that i will be backer-acted???   Patrick
doesn’t  seem to know  what the 
hell he is doing!  .. He has done
everything IN HIS POWER TO MAKE EVERY WRONG CHOICE… for my  life ! That is if he even bothered to do
anything on my behalf at all!…. ….   IT
IS AND HAS BEEN ONE FULL YEAR OF MISCONDUCT AND 
NEGLIGENCE … AND  still I GET
THREATENED TO  BE PUNISHED FOR HIS
ACTIONS?…. I am in total shock… and disbelief at the utter  disregard of the law… and taking  advantage 
of power and  the  …. If I was in a coma… God forbid  a person like Patrick would ever be in charge
of  their lives… I have  had to 
protect my life , my freedoms and my own home  ownership from  the person who was supposed to help me…. my
own guardian!

NO….. I WILL NOT BE AT THE COURT ON THE 20TH…. I
WILL NOT  GIVE ANYONE  THE 
OPPORTUNITY TO  HARASS ME.. TO
BELITTLE ME …..OR TO MAKE ME UPSET .. ESPECIALLY TO THE POINT  WHERE I AM SHAKING  AND READY TO THROW-UP… I WAS BULLIED BY
KARNE KAHEL AND OTHERS IN THAT MANNER UNTIL I HAD THE BREAKDOWN  THAT CAUSED THE NEED FOR A GUARDIAN….  I WILL TRY TO SAY CLEAR OF SUCH ABUSE
ESPECIALLY FROM  SOMEONE  WHO IS HIRED TO PROTECT ME… MY
GUARDIAN….  TO THREATEN  TO BACKER ACT ME??????? …AND NOT EVEN
ON  THE PROPER SUFFICIENT   GROUNDS…( SUCH AS:   I AM NOT PLANNING TO HARM MYSELF OR ANYONE
ELSE…   AND THIS THREAT IS MADE
BECAUSE  I MAY SPEAK IN THE COURT ROOM….  

I WANTED  AND NEEDED COMPETENT
LEGAL REPRESENTATION.. WHICH HE SAID WAS THE   MAIN  REASON I SHOULD  KEEP  HIM AS MY GUARDIAN  THIS  ENTIRE  YEAR…

 HE HAS NOT PROVIDED
THAT AT ALL!   WHAT IS HIS MOTIVATION?…
DOES  HE GET SOME KIND OF SICK
PLEASURE  SEEING GIRLS CRY? …OR HAVING
MY ANXIETY GET SOOO BAD THAT  I CRY
OR  THROW UP.?..  DOES HE LIKE DOING A HORRID JOB SO EVERYONE
ELSE HAS TO  CLEAN UP HIS MESS?   …LIKE 
THIS DEAL ….HE MADE…. WITHOUT EVEN CONSULTING ME…. AND SEEMS  INTENT ON 
EVERY CHOICE HARMING ME? … EVERYTHING  HAS BEEN  EXECUTED IN THE WRONG MANNER… AND WTIHTEH
WORST POSSIBLE OUTCOME…. ALL ON MY BEHALF????

 DOES HE GET A COMMISSION FROM THIS HOA
DEAL?….IS HE TRYING TO IMPRESS KIMMY  OR KATIE OR KARN THE PARALEGAL?… WHAT THE
HELL IS HE DOING?    THIS SHOULD HAVE ALL BEEN
FIXED IN  3-6 MONTHS WHEN HE STARTED AS
MY GUARDIAN… WITH THE INTENSION OF NOT HARMING MY LIFE …. AND   SO THAT HIS DECISION  WOULDN’T HARM MY LIFE… INSTEAD ALL OF HIS
DECISIONS HAVE HARMED MY LIFE, MY INDEPENDENCE, AND MY HOME OWNERSHIP!…. AS I
MENTIONED BEFORE,  HE  SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO BE A
GUARDIAN…..EVER!..

 

 

Speaking of  the  bullies on the phone…In fact, someone over
the phone seems to be under the impression that I will have a guardian my
entire life….  I have a limited
guardianship…. For assistance with financial and  legal 
representation……I do not  need 12
hours of  neurological testing…  for this 
limited guardianship…. And it is your 
assistance  as my attorney for the
guardianship case… to reiterate that fact!  

 

and that i am not allowed to have legal representation
unless have a guardian…( a lie. And completely untrue… .). and also told me
that unless I have  Patrick as my
guardian I will not be able to have my 
medical disability  payments….
(another lie! And completely untrue…)… 
more lies not based on any laws or facts and more threats…. all over
the “idiots “ over the phone  but I am
not taking any chances …especially  in
person…. I am not a punching bag for people to abuse…. not anymore…..

To the point about 
gaining my independence:  I
printed out my car insurance and have had the same account and paid billed
receipts  for  7 years. 
I have  a  man from my car insurance sending me  a copy of the 
complete record  to prove I have
paid and  continue to pay my bills without
Patrick’s interference… I also have records of my fpl account and paid bill receipts
to   prove the right for paying my bills
cannot be taken away from me ….   Do you
want me to go into the Florida statutes concerning the protection  of my rights from people trying to take away
money or rights from me… I can also 
provide you with the budget…. Pretty much similar to the budget I gave
you and  Patrick when I first met with
you … to reiterate…

I feed myself  / I
cloth myself. / I bath  myself/ I pay my bills/
I keep my home clean and organized/  I
can cook for myself and completed  and
passed the  testing for math and
simple  decisions .  My breakdown was due to bulling and  anxiety 
which  has affected my life
tremendously but not enough for Patrick to go into the SS office and try to
steal money for paying my bills to pay the HOA for a deal that is
horrendous….     A $500.00 payment
could  be 
payments  for  two 
brand new cars! …    audacity to
say that I should move  if I can’t afford
the deal he is trying to make for my life… on a condo my mother and  father helped me to select in the  hopes I would have  a great future…    I was sooo upset to read that email..
completely unacceptable….   

Did he even do anything to help clear my title?… I hear d
that  he thought option one was the  last mortgage on my title… He was even wrong
about that….I went to the  website for
the  clerk of courts and there was a
release of the option one mortgage….  To
residential funding.. ( DAVID J STERN) 
Who was sued by the  state of
Florida… who I have documentation that he lost the original note….  I just needed legal representation to clear
the title… on a  technicality …. And I
also  checked on  an equity line of credit with my own bank….
Spoke with a girl  who went through the
numbers with me…. We are talking 
$122  to $150 or $170.. for a
payment… a huge difference from  
$500.00…..  he never even  did anything 
in that direction to help 
me…..  I could go on and on  with 
example  upon example  of negligence and misconduct…. In fact I have
emailed everyone lawyers, judges, governor, police, senators… television
stations…. For visibility of the misconduct and negligence… and  for assistance to stop him from harming my
life any further…..     

Now Larry, it is up to you….

I was reading that “ a referral to a magistrate requires tha
conscent of all parties . You are entirtled to have thismatter heard by a
judge.  If you do not want to have  this matter heard by the magistrate you must
file a written objection to the reference prior to comencent of the hering

*It must be written

*it must be in a timely manner

If either party files a timely objection this matter shall
be returned to the undersigned judge with a notice stating the  amount of time  needed for hearing  If  required
by a magistrate the attorneys shall prepare a proposed report falure to submit
said proposed report on a timely basis may 
result in sanctions being by the 
circuit court judge.”

 

According to this rule…. Under rules of civil procedure
5.095 rule 1.490(a) You need to file this paperwork to give me time to get a
real attorney  to clear the title… to get
the loan with lower payments and then the HOA will be happy to have all their
money in one  payment!…. you had
mentioned  you wanted to know  what 
my plans are… they have not changed… the same   items that need to be fixed haven’t
changed…. Patrick never helped with anything…  
but my mom said she already gave money to Patrick for the lump sum….
Instead  when he is fired that money
should be given back to her and  to hire
a REAL lawyer  who won’t lie and can
accomplish  the tasks at hand….. I still
think it will be at least 90 days    for me to find legal representation… and to
clear up my credit  report.. to
clear  the  title… to increase  the medical disability payments …  and to obtain the loan  that will help me…. Not benefit
Patrick…. 

Do you think that can be accomplished in that amount of time
or do we need more time?

The grounds for firing him(Patrick) …. Can even start by his
noncompliance with the rue to  fill
out  the paperwork for the plan of
action….. remember I told you about 
that…. Then take your  pick he did
nothing…. On my behalf… not one objective was achieve….    

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.  Fraud upon the court:    

He lied to me point blank and told me to keep him as my
limited guardian ….. that i needed him for this legal representation that he
did not provide…..By lying  to  me by his misconduct and his
negligence…..  he has lied to the
courts….. Is he  retaining wards to just
make the fee given by the state?   Does
he get a commission ?   for his work with It would be pretty illegal
if he had some deal with the  HOA like he
had  some 
inside deal with his friend at regions bank?….  Does he even realize  how unethical he is being…… and if he is
making   “blood money”  / additional money off this  horrid deal…. does he even realize how much
it will harm my life and home ownership?  
What is his real  motivation?   I trusted him and you to protect  my rights to help me.. and as i mentioned on
the phone I  am completely disgusted by  this entire year that was wasted.. and ruined
and it appears that it was done all on purpose…. and instead of Patrick begin
some hero who  saves the day he is the
villain, who ruins everything! 

 

  It is very clear
that what ever  his motivation …. he is
not a guardian who is in the  business of
helping  people…. since he is still
not  answering any   of my emails or phone calls… I have
not  received any communication even from
anyone in the  office  nothing from him directly…. No  calls or emails…. I he actually still
communicates with my  mother…. It is
completely  unprofessional and
unacceptable!  …. ..

 

As to the most recent threats and bulling on the phone….
especially the  most recent  phone conversations….I received a call from
the  Social Security office…where people
want to take my money  and funnel it into
their accounts directly…. What????? ….. to make me keep a guardian who does
nothing but harm my life….. and even threaten me  that if i say anything .. they will baker act
me?….

Laws were created to protect me…. Protect me, the ward from
predators…. Like these people  and these
criminal actions….   laws to protect me
from  all of this….and i should have been
able to count on my guardian to protect me .. but now that he is the person who
is doing the most harm… how  do I
protect myself  from the  abuser himself?….especially when the abuser
is the person who has some control over my life… and the decisions for my
life….  

 

This is my real life…. I don’t get one minute of it back….
10years of my life being  harmed/sacrificed
  is unforgivable! I will not stand
for even one more minute…. of losing my freedom and my rights for stoping
decisions that will harm my life…. For what ?….. so that I can be threatened?   … if i didn’t have  him as my guardian…  and those same threats from  someone trying  to take money from me … it would be
considered stealing…. And I could have him arrested!  .. as i said before  unforgivable …

 

Ii have I even got so upset when  the person on the phone  decided that they could  do or say 
anything they like to me… as far as threats .I have a right to be
heard  but will have to count  on you to represent my wishes and  to represent me  in the court house!  I will also need to court on you to make
sure  that  Patrick Weber doesn’t make any more
horrendous mistakes…

for example: during one of the past court  hearings… where Patrick weber told the  court 
his decision to waive the statute of limitations so the  ( young girl)/lawyer    representing the HOA  would be 
still able l to still file for foreclosure . At that meeting he was
supposed to ask for a continuance since 
he had still not competed any
o
f the tasks  he was enlisted to
assist me  with.  There was only  a very short time period left before the
statute of limitations was to run out… approx. 
two- three  week window  before the one full  year for the statute of limitations would
have run out…. He did not accept the sale date for the foreclosure…. On my
behalf….  Who was he trying to help?…the
young girl lawyer?… or me?….His misconduct still make my blood boil! …..He was
supposed to ask for a continuance because  nothing 
was ever done  to assist me in
preparing   for anything…. for
preparing  and  obtaining 
the loan… NOTHING HAS STILL BEEN DONE…. I am trying to  clear the title myself.. to clear my credit
reports myself.. and to check on loans and payment schedules….myself…. but I
need real legal representation which Patrick weber is clearly not providing….
Nor has he ever provided it  to me this
entire year…nothing  with  my best interest at heart….. WHAT A HORRID
WAY TO REPRESNET HIS WARD DON’T YOUTHINK?

In conclusion, NO!   I
will not be attending the court date  September 20th at 2:00pm

Thank you for your kind attention to this email.  Honestly, thank you Larry…. You are the only
person who has actually asked if there  is anything you can do for me… or to help …. I
needed to get some ink cartridges.. and a really kind person   who
works near by and my  mom  helped with that….I just need to go the  grocery store once a month…  and everything else  I do from home… pay bills, and  try to fix what I can from here….. I just don’t
really need the extra anxiety from 
people not honoring my needs or requests… and making more of a mess I may
not  be able to ever fix… I definitely don’t
need the bullies on the  phone…   can you
stop  the lies and the bullies? Ha… or
find me really great legal representation for 
all that needs to still be fixed….  If you can help with those things that would be
great!   Just do your  best on my behalf… and keep my best interests
as the main priority…..   thanks…   

Sincerely,

Mary Jean Ziska 

A Tender Loving Care Service     Marion Gregory   Director 239-598-1515   naplesmarion@aol.com

Mary Jean Ziska  /
239-234-4065/whatabtmary@yahoo.com

 

— On Wed, 9/12/12, Larry Pivacek
<larrypivacek@gmail.com> wrote:

    From: Larry
Pivacek <larrypivacek@gmail.com>

    Subject: Re: Larry
please contact me a.s.a.p… as per the dockets I have a new judge? Lauren l. Brodie,
and what is the “authority to act?” to get rid of the guardian or for Patrick to take my medical
disability money?

    To: “mary
jean ziska” <whatabtmary@yahoo.com>

    Date: Wednesday,
September 12, 2012, 8:09 PM

    Confidential
Attorney – Client Communication / Not To Be Published

    Dear Mary Jean

    The presiding
judge in your case is Judge Lauren Brodie.

    She will be the
ultimate decision-maker on any hearing heard by herself or the Magistrate on
any requests made by us or the guardian.

    Judge Brodie has
assigned the hearing for September 20, 2012 to Magistrate David Friedman and so
the Magistrate is who will hear our Motion To Continue and the guardian’s
Petition To Act.

    The Petition To
Act is the request by Pat Weber as Guardian to enter into an Agreement on your
behalf with the HOA for you to pay $500.00 per month and $5,000.00 as a down
payment on your HOA dues.

    As per your
request I will file an Objection to Petition To Act.

    That way, even if
the Motion To Continue is denied we can still argue against the Petition To
Act.

    Mary Jean, if the
Petition To Act is denied and there is no agreement with the HOA how to you
plan to pay you quarterly fee of $1,500.00?

    Is that amount
going to be satisfied by the loan you are applying for?

    Also, what do you
plan to do about the foreclosure action if we get the guardianship dismissed,
or Mr. Weber dismissed?

    I just want to
make sure you have thought of these issues as our hearing on the Petition To
Remove Guardian and Terminate Guardianship may be heard as early as October.

    Have you
reconsidered appearing at the hearing on September 20?

    I think you could
really help if you were there to testify regarding our requests.

    Finally, I know
that you said you are not leaving the house too often.

    If there anything
I can ask the guardian to get for you like necessities or food?

    Please let me
know.

    Larry

    Confidential
Attorney – Client Communication / Not To Be Published

 

 

    On Wed, Sep 12,
2012 at 12:56 PM, mary jean ziska <whatabtmary@yahoo.com> wrote:

 

        05/14/2012                 PETITION FOR STATUS REVIEW

        05/16/2012                 SET ON HEARING DOCKET 6/7/2012
BEGINNING AT 2:00 PM FRIEDMAN, DAVID C

        (SEE NOTICE OF HEARING FOR ACTUAL
HEARING TIME)

        05/16/2012                 NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR
STATUS REVIEW 2:00 P.M.

        05/17/2012                 SET ON HEARING DOCKET 5/17/2012
BEGINNING AT 2:00 PM FRIEDMAN, DAVID

        C (SEE NOTICE
OF HEARING FOR ACTUAL HEARING TIME)

        05/17/2012                 HEARING SET BY JUDGE’S OFFICE
PETITION FOR COURT’S REVIEW 2:00 PM

        05/17/2012                 PROCEEDING: HEARING

        05/17/2012                 PRESIDING JUDGE: FRIEDMAN, DAVID
C

        05/17/2012                 PRESENT: PATRICK WEBER (GUARDIAN
PLENARY)

        05/17/2012                 ATTORNEY PRESENT PIVACEK,
LAWRENCE SAMUEL (WARD)

        05/17/2012                 CASE MANAGEMENT HELD

        05/29/2012                 CANCELLED HEARING ON 6/7/2012
2:00:00 PM DUE TO PER MAGISTRATES OFFICE

        06/30/2012                 PER ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, CASE
REASSIGNED TO JUDGE CYNTHIA A PIVACEK

        08/17/2012                 CORRESPONDENCE FROM WARD MARY
ZISKA

        08/22/2012                 ORDER OF RECUSAL

        08/22/2012                 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT TO LAUREN
L BRODIE

        08/23/2012                 NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR
AUTHORITY TO ACT 2:00 P.M.

        08/23/2012                 PETITION FOR AUTHORITY TO ACT

        08/28/2012                 SET ON HEARING DOCKET 9/20/2012
BEGINNING AT 2:00 PM FRIEDMAN, DAVID

        C (SEE NOTICE
OF HEARING FOR ACTUAL HEARING TIME)

               

        Wednesday
night is regular maintenance time on our servers; as a result brief outages

 

 

        A Tender
Loving Care Service

 

        Marion
Gregory   Director 239-598-1515

 

       
naplesmarion@aol.com

 

        Mary Jean
Ziska   Assistant Director 239-234-4065

 

        whatabtmary@yahoo.com

 

A Tender Loving Care Service

Marion Gregory   Director 239-598-1515

naplesmarion@aol.com

Mary Jean Ziska   Assistant Director 239-234-4065

whatabtmary@yahoo.com



Reply
Reply All
Forward
Forward

Tuesday September 11th 2012 @ 11:22pm thank god and email back from larry

Dear Larry,                                                                                             September 11th 2012`
Thank you God!  I am finally being heard… Yes i believe that this plan of action would be for the best. To definitely have a continuance based on the status of the guardian’s negligence but   I have a few questions.  If i gain back my independence what happens to the mess Patrick has made of the HOA case? and the foreclosure case that he accepted   when he was supposed to ask for a continuance?or did he accept anything or is the entire mess of 5000.00 down and then 500.00 a month  just some sort of  deal between him and the HOA?  I have never seen any paperwork.. or heard that there was a court case that determined these amounts!

Am i left to clean up this HOA mess  how he leaves it or does it start all  over…or  will it all be dismissed? i thought since   the court case will need to be postponed… with a continuance right?  Even though  the  original foreclosure was dismissed…. or will I  i have to get another guardian instead of Patrick Weber  … but still a continuance…. someone who actually knows the laws for guardianship… and isn’t trying  to take my money from medial disability…I need your professional advice as my lawyer for my guardianship…

 I’m terrified that the next guardian will be worse… i really want my independence back but don’t want to be left with even more of a mess…. help!  and  i don’t want Patrick taking money i need for living expenses  to pay a bill that should  be a lot less!  

How long of a continuance an there be? 60 days? or 90 days… to obtain legal council? Please reply asap so this can be finalized!  Today i freaked out again… when someone  had gone into social security to have my money for medial disability transferred to their account?  To be independ. “they” would  have no right to take money or anything  from  me right? they could never hurt me again right? or take away any of my rights?…. please let me  know how  soon we can get an extension and  remove patrick weber?  thank  you for responding so quickly
sincerely
mary jean ziska

n Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:21 PM, <larrypivacek@aol.com> wrote:

Privileged Attorney / Client Communication — Not To Be Published

Dear Mary Jean

Please be advised that I received both of your telephone calls today.  As you have requestedI will prepare the following paperwork for the Court to consider regarding your requests that:
1.  The hearing set for September 20, 2012 be continued;
2.  That Pat Weber be removed as your guardian;
3.  That the Guardianship itself be terminated and that the court order that your capacity and rights be restored so that you can have your freedom.
Please confirm that this is the course of action that you would like me to pursue.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Larry Pivacek

Privileged Attorney / Client Communication – Not To Be Published

—–Original Message—–
From: mary jean ziska <whatabtmary@gmail.com>
To: larrypivacek <larrypivacek@aol.com>
Cc: whatabtmary <whatabtmary@yahoo.com>; whatabtmary <whatabtmary@gmail.com>; maryjeanziska <maryjeanziska@mysearchforjustice.com>
Sent: Thu, Aug 23, 2012 9:34 pm
Subject: reply email to larry on august 23rd at 9 33 pm

Hi larry,     August 23rd 2012 @ 9:18pm
 
Replying to your email…. I was chatting with magic jack for three hours to try to see what  was  going on with my phone….   But I don’t think anything is really fixed… nothing in my life  is yet…  I have emailed the probate court to get rid of Patrick as nothing is fixed  they told me they have forwarded the emails to the judges and  to  lawyers.  I think you may have been contacted as well…. 
You mention that you do not have anything to do with the foreclosure.. you mention every time…you mail me  so I really understand that. But this guardian is not doing what he is supposed to do… nothing is fixed    if you did not receive the e-mail  that I sent to the  probate court, to the judges to the  guardianship association,   to anyone who would listen or could help. Let me know…I’ll send it  to you again!  there is a list of what was supposed to be done   by my guardian pursuant to the Florida statutes 744 , and by what he had told me was his “action plan”   you know…. he was supposed to file  what he was supposed to  do his plan of action… to the courts… and be held accountable…someone needs to be held accountable! …. And you have to  be in charge of something? … what? I’m a bit confused?…. If the guardian isn’t doing what he is supposed to be doing …. isn’t that  where you come in as legal representation on my behalf?  Well here is your chance..  everything is still messed up… and even more messed up… what are my options? Thanks mary jean Ziska  
 
From: Lawrence Pivacek [mailto:larrypivacek@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:52 PM
To: mary jean ziska
Subject: Re: email to larry from mary jean ziska august 16th 2012 at 4 37 pm
 
Dear Mary Jean
 
I apologize for you not bring able to reach me.
 
I have tried to both call you and E-Mail you in response.
 
I did receiver a voicemail from you yesterday but the message was unclear, full of static and broke up after 10 seconds.
 
As I have said in the past, I do not represent you in the foreclosure action.
 
Please respond to this E-Mail so that I know you received it.
 
I hope to hear from you soon.
 
Larry
 
Sent from my iPhone
 
On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:00 PM, “mary jean ziska” <whatabtmary@gmail.com> wrote:
Larry              August 16, 2012  at 4:44ppm
 I keep  trying to call you but get a  really loud buzzing sound … can you hear me when I call?… can you email me?… What the hell is going on? .. I called Elizabeth kriers office today to  tell her about this horrid deal  that Patrick made with  the HOA Is this true?…….. $5000.00  down
and $500.00 a month???????? I cannot afford that! ..  the  $500.00 a month payments  are  more than  I get for medical disability….(which he did not  help to raise!). How am I supposed to  make up the difference, and pay electric, or car insurance..  or gas…. Or even tampons????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
If  I had $5000.00 then wouldn’t it be better to get a  real lawyer to defend the foreclosure?… and  to clear the title on my condo?… 
 
Today I was bullied on the phone to the point of throwing up!…..I have idiots on the phone who want to sell my car for less than  it is worth.. someone wants my mom ‘s silver or her Picasso… those are my inheritance.. and this is the wrong deal!  Nothing has been fixed….. . the identity theft and  credit problems  and  everything is still  a mess…. Can I get a real guardian?… who actually has my best interest  at heart?  When I called Elizabeth Kriers office  some woman  told me that  your wife is in charge of  the  foreclosure case  now…is that true? or just another lie I keep being told to upset me….
 
Aren’t  those  opposing sides?…. If you are my guardianship  lawyer representing me when my guardian is making horrendous decisions about my life concerning  the foreclosure…. .and she is making decisions about the foreclosure… isn’t that a conflict of interest?  Please email me back and clear this up thanks mary jean Ziska  ( why in the Florida Bar  member search  is your  email listed as the aol address? )  
 
The email below is what I just sent to the probate  court. Since the probate court is in  charge of  regulating  and punishing the guardianship and the guardians… I guess this is my only means  of justice…… at least this will all be in the court record that  I am  very unhappy with  what is going  on … if I didn’t know any better I  would think I  was still stuck with the criminals  who have been  ruining my life…..for  the past 10 years….. 
 
To Whom it may concern:     August 16th 2012 @ 3:22pm
Patrick Weber is the guardian of Mary Jean Ziska. It is a limited guardianship restricted for only his assistance in financial and legal matters.    I have been trying to report his misconduct and to have him replaced since May or June of this year. I have emailed Patrick weber himself, contacted his office,  the sheriff and police department, the Florida Guardianship Association, my guardianship attorney Larry Pivacek  and  even contacted the Florida Bar Association  to reveal his misconduct! 
 
His direct actions have harmed me, my home ownership and  violated my rights  instead of helping.  His  neglect in assisting me with the issues he was entrusted/obligated  by the  courts to remedy  have also  affected my life.  When he was first assigned my guardian last year  he was  so assigned to assist in legal matters concerning the  HOA foreclosure suit that was  directed to me instead of to my  guardian.  He did not know how to defend a foreclosure suit and one of his main objectives was to obtain competent council on my behalf, He never got a lawyer or any legal counsel to assist in the foreclosure suit.  Another objective  he had was to raise the payment of my medical disability benefits to assist in the repayment of any settlement for the HOA. He did not do anything toward an increase.   A third objective he told me he would assist with is in  clearing mu an identity theft  that started in 2002 to not only increase  my  credit score but to stop any additional fraudulent  activity from occurring.  He did  not do anything  to remedy the identity theft, or  to  assist in removing fraudulent  accounts from my  credit report.  He also said he had a friend  and connections  with Regions bank to allow for an equity line e of credit  to also pay back any  amount  to the HOA.  I actually told him of another  option I found in the Florida Statutes 744.309 where a “trust company, state bank, national bank or a federal savings and loan may be a guardian “   I had asked him to check into this option  and to have my Wels Faro bank as a co- guardian to assist with  the equity line of credit,  to set up a direct payment  to the HOA.   He did not even ask the court for this option or follow up  on the  phone numbers and department personnel  I gave him  that I had received from the manager of my bank.  When we first met he  also told me that he would assist in clearing my condo title as it should be clear  and there should be no mortgage on my condo due to  the criminals and  continued fraud  by numerous “robo signing” companies that need to be cleared off my title! He didn’t even get a forensic audit completed!   I was told he has 250 cases and was too busy to take my phone calls or my emails,  and never notified me of  court cases  where  I might  actually be present in court.  Recently, when I was in court  with  Patrick weber,  he tried to waive the state of limitations  to allow  for the  condo association to  continue the foreclosure proceedings  after the statute of limitations  had run out… this was defiantly NOT in my best inters or a way  to defend  a foreclosure suit!   In fact when I told him he couldn’t do that…  he threatened to have e backer acted for standing up for my rights!   When I did nothing wrong,!  But  tell him his actions were going to  harm me and my home ownership!  I even sent him a 48 page document  listing  the Florida Statutes of limitations regulations!  Of course I received no response…. Most recently I have been bullied including today to the pint of throwing up by people telling me that  a settlement was made without my knowledge or my agreement for  the HOA.  This settlement  I am being told is not what I can afford… in fact as my guardian, Patrick weber should know that I receive less than $ 500.00  a month payment for medical disability  let alone  have $5000.00 to put down as a lump sum to pay.  This agreement is completely different than the  equity line of credit he was supposed to get with a $100.00 payment!   How am I supposed to pay my electric… or car insurance.. or tampons for that matter!   This is a grievous  situation…. If I lose my home due to a deal he made that I had no knowledge of.. or cannot afford….  This is terrible….. I was even bullied and  threated that  I was to sell  my car…. When  it would be against the law as it would have had to be ordered by a judge or approved by a judge, for  anyone especially on behalf of a guardian,  to sell my possessions  for such an outlandish settlement!   I believe that he is committing a fraud against the court,  and against me as his ward,  by not  following through with any the areas he was supposed to be entrusted  in helping… and instead is harming me and my homeownership!  The fraud against the court is his assistance of continuing to be my guardian and be paid by the court  even though the was doing nothing  on my behalf to remedy  and to  rectify any of the  situations  that destroyed my life and caused
a nervous breakdown  which  caused me to need that guardian in the first place!..  
Please Help….. This  needs to stop …. I don’t  know  if you can get  me a better guardian, or  real legal representation ….. but this is not working!  No one is listening to me…. No one is helping! Sincerely, Mary Jean Ziska   5632 Whisperwood Blvd. 1601 Naples Florida, 34110   whatabtmry@yahoo.com, whatabtmary@gmail.com, www.mysearchforjustice.com ; maryjeanziska@mysearchforjustice.com
 
Ps
 He never returns phone calls or rarely emails me as to the status of  the foreclosure or anything else he was to  assist in fixing…   but instead emails my mother. This alone is a direct violation of my ability to  protect my freedoms and to make informed decisions….   
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                          

TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 11 2012 @8:15PM ARTICLE MAN LIVING IN AN ATTIC

http://news.yahoo.com/video/mother-5-finds-ex-boyfriend-155400748.html

A Rock Hill, N.C., woman knew
something was in her attic when she heard a thump and then saw some
nails start popping out from her bedroom ceiling one night.

Tracy, a mother of five, thought it might be an animal. She sent her older sons and nephew to check it out, she told WCNC-TV in Charlotte.

She told the Charlotte Observer she thought “there was some poltergeist stuff going on.”

And what they found was surprising. It wasn’t an animal. It was the woman’s ex-boyfriend.

He came down from the attic without any explanation and left with a smile before police could arrive, the Observer reports.

The man had been living in the
attic for about two weeks, WCNC reports, noting that the ex-boyfriend
was recently released from jail.

“He had packed all the old coats
and jackets into the heating unit and was sleeping in the heating unit,”
said Tracy, who did not reveal her last name.

There were also large plastic
cups containing human waste, which explain how he relieved himself in
his rooftop hideaway, WCNC reported.

Tracy’s nephew told the Observer the man was able to peek through an air vent in the ceiling of the woman’s bedroom.

“It’s got me flabbergasted,” she told the newspaper. “How can you look at someone through an air vent?”

Another mystery is how the man got in and out of the attic because the only access is through the lower level of the house.

She and the man had dated for
about a year more than a decade ago, she told the Observer. She had
called it off after he became involved in petty crime, she said.  He
helped her install some doors in her house about a year ago and that was
the last she saw of him—until she saw him come down from her attic.

Tracy has changed her locks, the newspaper reports. But her children are still afraid to sleep in their bedrooms.

She hopes the man is located and charged with a crime.

“I want him to be charged with
it,” she told the Observer. “It could be somebody else he does the same
thing to, but she might not be so lucky.”

Tuesday september 11 2012 @ 7:53pm email to patrick and larry DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO BE RAPED? NO MEANS NO

From:  Mary Jean Ziska

5632 Whisperwood Blvd. #1601

Naples Florida 34110

239-234-4065

whatabtmary@yahoo.com/ www.mysearchforjustice.com


  To  Patrick, and Larry:                                          September 11 2012 @ 7:47pm 


 

Do you know what it feels like to be raped? To say no… to cry…. to plead …  and to have a man  take it upon himself to do what ever he wants to a girl…. dismissing any rights? any consideration of  what the girl may want? …. WHEN NO MEANS NO…. that means NO

What you are doing to me is basically raping me… you are going  against my wishes..  my concerns  and my will to do what ever you want……. not considering  my needs or wants.. not asking… not communicating…. NOT STOPPING when I tell you NO….  No… you have no right to take my money… to make a horrid deal…  with the  HOA  … you are as  much a criminal as a rapist   I have rights…. I pay my bills my medical disability is mine only because of the anxiety you are even helping to  create….. what you are trying  to do is illegal and i said NO  a million times over NO!

 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Enclosed is a package consisting of 15 documents (listed below).  Each package contains information and documentation composed of letters and emails sent to my guardianship lawyer:   Larry Pivacek, and my guardian:   Patrick Weber, over the course of this past year’s events.  These documents   provide evidence of the issues and problems encountered during this past year’ experiences in dealing with the judicial and guardianship departments in Collier County.   

The purpose of  guardianship assistance  especially within my “limited guardianship”  is to  assist  in  only legal  and  financial  matters.  Definition of a guardian:   a person who has been appointed by the court to act on behalf of a ward’s person, property, or both. (FS 744.102(9)).  The guardian may exercise only  those rights that have been removed from the ward and delegated to the guardian F.S 744.361(1)).  The limited guardianship is designed to encourage the most self-reliance and independence possible and to  be the least restrictive alternative to a complete or plenary guardianship.   A guardian who is appointed to manage the incapacitated person’s financial affairs must protect and preserve the incapacitate person’s assets and manage the assets as a “prudent person” would in managing the financial affairs of another person.  The attorney for the alleged incapacitated person must represent the alleged incapacitated person’s expressed wishes, unless they are contrary to the Florida Rules governing attorney’s conduct ( F.S. 744.102(1)).     

 The oath taken by guardians( as per FS 744.347) “prior to exercising authority every guardian must take an oath that he or she will faithfully perform his or her duties as a guardian”  

I am writing this letter to  enlist the assistance, of  the lawyers,  judges, congressmen, and   government  official in rectifying   consequences of  many transgressions that  are harming my homeownership,  my life my civil liberties and rights.   I am recording the events and supplementing the events with  the emails and  the letters sent to both Patrick Weber and to Larry Pivacek  during  this past year while I  have been under their control  as per  the  limited guardianship of  Patrick Weber and my guardianship lawyer Larry Pivacek. 

 

 

 

 

I will list the points and problems in numerical order.  These points catalogue topics that I have encountered with the guardianship assistance program and address my personal experiences as follows:  

1.            Limited  or at times  no contact personally between guardian and guardianship lawyer attempted   through emails, telephone conversations and personal meetings.  Responses were few,   if at all. 

*I rarely received answers from Patrick Weber when I emailed or called his office.  I never received notice from him as to the court dates and what he was going to say or do in those court cases concerning  the HO
A, or any of my welfare concerns.  I thought I could turn to him for assistance  and was supposed to  let him know of any injustices so that he would be able to  remedy  the  situation.  Examples such as:   When I told him that the front gate of my condo claimed that the sticker on my car was disabled due to the non- payment of the HOA fees( which is still a case that is still in the courts)HE DID NOTHING!  When I found the telephone number and contact information ,  for Wels Fargo corporate that would be able to make the bank a co- guardian and  assist  in  banking accounts and  would with court approval be able to help in attaining  the  equity line of credit  from my condo, HE DID NOTHING!  When I alerted him to the fraud on my credit report,    including additional mortgages amounting to over $800,000.00, HE DID NOTHING!   When I found documents that David stern  had lost my original note which with proper  litigation would have in itself,  cleared the title on my condo HE DID NOTHING! When I alerted him and filed police reports detailing items including $1000.00 that had been stolen HE DID NOTHING! 

2.            Guardianship monitoring by the Florida courts  was nonexistent.  Annual reports/ visits are neither scheduled nor completed .  No reports/ results  given to  ward. 

*Patrick Weber has only been to my home once  and that was years ago.  The reports detailing  my expenses and the bills( I myself pay online) I gave to him the first meeting of last year.  In my expenses I outlined  the bills I had paid in the past, and the estimated billed expenses including electric, car insurance,  cable /internet service etc. .  He should  have  had a complete understanding of my cost of living.  His negotiations  concerning the HOA dues hat need to be paid   are very unreasonable!    If he took the time to even look at the  monthly budget and expenses  used, he would   have understood that  the medical disability  alone doesn’t cover all normal expenses.   I brought that fact to this attention   at our first meeting when  I wrote a letter requesting my independence and was talked out of it by both Patrick and Larry on the grounds that his assistance as my lawyer and my guardian was paramount in my defense for the foreclosure  suit and paramount in attaining  the equity line of credit, and  any additional benefits at  this  point in time of my life.  I do not believe that he submitted any reports and if he did he never gave me any copies nor provided me even with  the  information  or written documentation. 

 

3.            In addition to the  initial plan , the  annual guardianship reports must be filed within ninety (90)days after the last day of the anniversary month of the guardian’s appointment.  This report must include the annual guardianship plan and the annual financial return.  All guardianship reports must be filed in a timely manner with the probate division of the circuit court.  The ward except in certain  circumstances, must be served with a copy as well.  Failure to file annual  reports may result in sanctions against the guardian ( FS 744.367) Written objections to any portion of the annual report may be filed  by an interested person including the ward within thirty (30) days after the annual report has been filed.  If such an objection has been filed, the  court must set the matter for hearing and conduct the hearing within  (30) days of the date that the objection was filed ( FS 744.367(4),(7)   

*No action plan for this past year was  given to me!  If one had ever even  been written.   No report, or plan of action after development was written up and given to judge or to ward.   Even worse, not following through with any of the items discussed at first meeting  which should have been included in the  plan of action for this year of limited guardianship were ever addressed.    To have a copy of the annual review of the guardianship report and plan as per the rights of the incapacitated  ward that  are retained by the  ward (FS 744.3215(1)) No sanctions were ever imposed upon my guardian or guardianship lawyer  due to the r failures in my case! 

 

4.            Limited help by guardianship lawyer to  assist in my expressed wishes  and to contact my guardian  for  current situations.

Minor assistance :  trying to get response from guardian by contacting guardian lawyer,  address problem with condo association, stopping of  guard gate pass, fraud from the companies of  Comcast, Empire Today, and  Sears.  Having to file police reports when money and items were stolen from my home   I attempted to contact Larry Pivacek on numerous occasions via phone messages and emails to tell him what my guardian was not doing, situations that were not being even addressed, and requesting his assistance making the guardian at the very least answer my concerns. Most occasions I received the same email back, telling me that  he does  not handle anything to do with the  foreclosure case only the guardianship case.  Many times the requests were  to have the guardian actually do his job, such as assist in   increasing the  medical disability payments, or even contacting the guard gate so my pass would again work,  or to call my bank concerning the equity line of credit!  Or to assist in clearing  my title when  all the fraud was found, or even  for me to even get a different  guardian…. One who actually did his job in protecting  my rights and cared about my concerns for my  life! I’m sure as a guardianship lawyer he was supposed to  do more than meet with  me  at the initial  meeting  at Patrick’s  office!   The minor assistance received b
y my guardian and my guardianship lawyer has left me  feeling very neglected  and not  legally represented in the best possible manner.      When I could  not   get assistance from my guardian ship lawyer,  especially to have my guardian removed, I emailed  the police, sheriff,  probate office, Then I  went further, emailing troubleshooter channel ( 4)  and other the local television stations, channel  (2) and channel(7)   to alert them of the misconduct.  I contacted the Florida Bar Association, the local Collier County Bar Association, to see what I needed to do to file a formal complaint. I sent emails to  rick Scott, the governor and to the congressmen  Connie Mack and  Cliff Sterns  to notify them of the  problems with the judicial system concerning the guardianship  cases in Collier County especially  mine!  I have  sent sealed signed receipt packages containing the 15 documents  to:  Judge Cynthia A Pivacek, Judge Vincent Murphy, Judge Elizabeth Krier, Congressman  Cliff Sterns, Congressman Connie Mack,  The Florida Bar Association, Governor Rick Scott, Collier County Bar  Association,  Attorney  Gloria Fletcher, Attorney Larry Pivacek, and Attorney Patrick Weber.  My hope is that  everyone will receive this information  and   the negligence  will stop and actions can be taken to rectify the grave injustice that has occurred  which may result in me losing  my  home! 

  

5.            Fraud upon the court:   as per the  waiving the statute of limitations/ attempting to use his friend to get a loan from regions bank but then not getting any real loan….   to pay the  equity line of credit….telling me to keep him for my guardian  for this entire  year,  I believe  these were  questionable ethical concerns and possible conflicts of interest  but the  attempt  to  make money by being paid through the court system as a guardian, when none of the  duties of a guardian were being performed by my guardian!  This was a clear misrepresentation of  his duties.   His  concern for my welfare  as my guardian  is not visible.  He is  using the courts  to his advantage for his payment of services rendered when nothing is being accomplished.   He should have  been able  to clear most of these situations within a  years’ time given his “connections” and “resources” . It appears to me,  as if he is purposely trying to allow me to lose my home, either through his negligence as a lawyer or as guardian or as both!  His lack of  honesty in correctly presenting the facts of the cases, obtaining correct legal representation if he did not know how to defend the case, and actually helping the HOA to  try to win their case when in fact he is supposed to be representing me….  I believe  that Patrick Weber committed grievous injustices toward me, and the court system through.

 FRAUD UPON THE  COURT:  “In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts  to the  court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task the act known as fraud upon the court is a crime  deemed so severe and fundamentally  opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statue of limitations.  Officers of the court include lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 144 neutrals evaluators administrators special appointees and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.        

 

6.            Rights of the ward:  The guardian’s role is to balance the protection and care provided to the ward with genuine respect for the encouragement of the independence still exercisable by the ward. 

Patrick Weber did not balance the protection and care provided with respect for the encouragement of the  ward:  One instance where Patrick Weber  definitely  did not represent my best interest occurred at the court house.  He told the HOA he would waive the statute of limitations (which had almost run out) so that he would be allowed to still foreclose on my home.  In the one year period   the delay had been that t Patrick Weber even though my guardian and a lawyer had no knowledge in how to defend a foreclosure suit.  As my guardian he was required to obtain competent legal counsel and in one years’ time had not been   able to obtain a lawyer with knowledge of foreclosure defense.  Also within this year, the other continued delay had been the ruling on the need to have  a guardian.  This ruling had not been determined.  I met with two nurses   and one doctor as per the requirements of the Florida statutes 744.  The doctor said he was not satisfied.  He wanted me to have 12 hours of tests costing approx.   $1500.00.   I’m not certain but I do believe that a delay also occurred because Patrick petitioned the court for money to pay for the unnecessary tests.     I thought this was   a horrible waste of money when  the guardianship was  strictly  for a limited guardianship and  only encompassed   legal and  financial matters!    The delays were legitimate concerns  and if the statute of limitations had run out or not , Patrick Weber’s concern should have been   my part of the case not on changing  the  law to fit the  HOA’s motivation for  their lawsuit!  In addition after the case, he winked at me and laughed  when I was upset at his remarks to backer act me, and  when I mentioned that the doctor (who  I could not find  listed in the directory of the AMA) did not even know how to  apply a pressure cuff when taking my blood pressure and after putting it on  backwa
rds, and not being able to get  reading, he immediately  reapplied the cuff  to my same arm allowing for a very inaccurate reading!  The point I was making was that Patrick Weber laughed at my remarks about the ir0ny of the incompetent doctor giving me a competency test!   

  Due to his direct action of telling the judge he would l waive the statute of limitations,  a date of sale for July 18th 2012 was set by the court.  He then proceeded to threaten that I would be backer acted because I stood up and told him he wasn’t allowed to waive the statute of limitations. I later emailed him legal definitions consisting of 25 pages including the definition of statute of limitations.  Prior to his actions, we had discussed his asking for a continuance primarily because of his lack of obtaining counsel   on my behalf to defend the foreclosure suit!    He did not  represent my best interest  afterward the final line of the agreed  order mentioned that  he accepted service  and will file a responsive pleading within 30 days from the date of  this order!   The “Agreed Order” case no. 07-3121-CC:   1- canceled the foreclosure sale that he allowed to happen (Thank God!)  2-  It vacated the final summary judgment to defendant Mary Jean Ziska.   3- motion to vacate default  a s to defendant Mary jean Ziska was granted   all of those points seems to  in my favor and rightly so since the entire foreclosure suit was not only  served to a person who was declared incompetent at the time of service, but  the guardian was not notified, no legal representation was provided,    and everything was done improperly! 

 The 4th point  for the  case no 07-3221-cc mentions that the defendants guardian agrees to accept service and will file  a responsive pleading within (30) days. The date  was June 21st 2012.  Patrick Weber should have not accepted service on the foreclosure  on my home for two very important reasons :  1- he still does not know how to defend a foreclosure suit    2- he has still not obtained legal representation on my behalf!   Hi primary purpose was to protect me from corrupt lawyers  (hence the   guardianship included his assistance in legal matters)…. But he himself did not protect me in the legal arena but instead his actions directly adversely affected my legal outcomes and are still affecting my life through his legal misdealing’s  done on purpose for my legal cases!  

 

7.            Nonexistence of the annual review report and plan for this past year.  Not following through with any of the items discussed at first meeting that was to be included in plan of action for this year of limited guardianship.   To have a copy of the annual review of the guardianship report and plan as per the rights of the incapacitated  ward that  are retained by the  ward (FS 744.3215(1))

a.            Items/topics that were  discussed that needed to be fixed:

1.            Increase medical  disability money to help increase income.  Not only did I need the additional  money for living expenses but Patrick weber said I needed the  verifiable  steady income to obtain the equity line of credit that would be established to pay the HOA fees.

2.            Obtain the loan or equity line of credit from my condo for the HOA fees.

3.            Get a forensic audit for the title  of my condo  and any additional  documentation necessary to  establish  my title as free of debt due to the  past fraud from multiple mortgage  companies, the loss of my original note, etc.  and  clear it of  any fraud .   

4.            Defend this foreclosure suit by finding a great lawyer who knew  how to defend a foreclosure suit.

5.            He was to help me clear up the fraudulent items  of identity theft on my credit report thus increasing my credit score.  This was  also done  to eventually help with the  HOA payment.

6.            He was supposed to help protect me from fraud and criminals who have preyed on my life and on me  however I had at least three instances of  con-artist related incidences  by repair men who allegedly   were from Sears, sales reps who were allegedly  from Empire Today, and actual theft from Comcast! I have since  reported the  scams  and theft to the BBB and to Pam Bond’s office at the attorney general’s office!    I also had to  have a roommate removed when  $1000.00 was stolen  and have had to have  a supplemental identity theft report submitted and accepted to the police department when pictures,  information from my external hard drive, blog posts from www.mysearchforjustice,  were stolen!  Patrick weber did nothing to protect me or my property and I alone had to file  police reports and  no resolution has been found in the Comcast case, or the police reported missing items!

7.            He is in charge  of assisting me in legal matters, however  noting has been done  to instill any justice for the harassing, bulling and my eventual nervous breakdown at the hands  of Karen Kael and her  group.  The $5000.00 medical bill is still on my credit report  and harming my credit due to Karen  Kahel and  her bullying  friends from Ohio State.  Patrick Weber did nothing to assist in even  initiating a law suit for the intentional infliction of emotional distress that  led to the need for a guardian  and protection from harm and abuse  and  assistance  in legal and financial matters! 

8.            As for additional law suits, Patrick weber also did not  even initiate a  law suit to gain restitution for the$3000.00   monies taken by Ian Stein  during the  renegotiations of the Aegis refinancing .

9.            David Stern’s paperwork  indicated that my mortgage note had been lost, and the paperwork involved was extremely corrupt   and I needed legal  assistance  in making sure the  title was free and clear for my condo. The additional assistance  of  a  true professional lawyer was needed for   this mess to be cleared through  the  courts.   Patrick Weber was to have the resources  to accomplish this but he never did anything in this years’ time to remedy the  situation!  

10.          Patrick  said he would also  negotiate with the condo association as per the balances owed and since it was fraudulent to actually serve paperwork to the ward instead of the guardian,  he assured me that the  attorney’s fees and the   interest should legally be waived.  Now that the actual first foreclosure suit was dismissed I believe that  those expenses are not my responsibility however ,  I keep having  people call me  on the phone to threaten me with  amounts and settlements that are absolutely unreasonable!  I have had one person say that ah Patrick weber made a settlement for $62,000.00 and wanted $5000.00 down and  $500.00 payments a month!   The $500.00 a month is more than I receive at all for my disability payments each  month!   No true guardian who is aware of  my monthly budge t and expenses should have ever come up with such an outrageous payment!                                

     

 

8.            “To be restored to capacity at earliest possible time” as per the  rights of the incapacitated ward that are retained by the ward ( FS 744.3215(1))

When I first met with Patrick Weber and Larry Pivacek in 2011, I asked for guidance and direction concerning the status of the guardianship case.  My first request from them was advice and their recommended plan of action for my guardianship status.  I believed at that point in time I was possibly ready to have my independence restored to full  capacity.  Upon their advice,  and my limited funds to retain council I maintained the same limited guardianship status.  I  needed    legal representation which would  produce a result for  my best interest  in the foreclosure  case  and in numerous additional issues and  problems still unresolved.  These situations ,  would have been  overwhelming to handle all by myself so  I  depended on   both Larry and Patrick  to do what they said they were going to do and legally represent me.   Enclosed is the letter I presented to the two nurses and the doctor and the two lawyers the day of the evaluation.  I also brought pictures of my living accommodations, my  ability to take care of myself  and my surroundings, my budget and  current status of the bills  which encompassed my  living expenses!    This limited guardianship   was to aid in areas we discussed and I trusted them to be participants in helping to rectify and remedy   the worst experiences of my life!  Having any type of guardianship still means I am deprived of certain rights and trusting that these individuals delegated by the court system be diligent in their effort to assist me.  I have experienced no  support system that makes me feel that my  wishes and best interest are being  considered  and am completely disappointed in the  entire year of guardianship where nothing  was  remedied, where  negligence  was persistent and    prevalent and where my trust in justice and an honest legal system is being tested and questioned.         

 

9.            To be treated humanely with dignity and respect  and to be protected against abuse,  neglect, and  exploitation.    As per the  rights of the incapacitated ward that are retained by the ward ( FS.744.3215(1))

a.            Threats of being backer- acted by lawyer  when  ward standing up for rights  and when lawyer said he would disregard/waive the statute of limitations for  foreclosure. 

b.            Winking and  laughing  regarding  the  doctor  who  was to give final evaluation  that would determine  guardianship status. 

c.             No reply  or contact  regarding emails, letters and phone calls.

d.              

 

10.          To remain as independent as possible including having  preference as to place and standard do living honored  as per the rights of the incapacitated ward  that are retained by the ward( FS 744.3215(1)).

I have maintained my independence by residing  in my own condo (5632 Whisperwood Blvd. 1601 Naples Florida 34110) since  1999.  I worked on three different businesses while living here:  a faux painting business: (M&M Decorative Painting);  a babysitting business: ( A Tender Loving Care Service) ; an etiquette school: (  A TLC Prep) My choice for living accommodations is to reside in the condo  that I  selected wi
th my father and mother in 1999 and where  I moved into my condo  April 1999!  I am very upset  that my home ownership is being  threatened by allowing guardians and lawyers to make decisions  about a “deal “  with the   HOA.  The amount of monies they are telling the HOA I will pay each month as a settlement is more than my current income, does not allow for any  normal bills to be paid such as electric, gas, car insurance, toilet paper and tampons !  It does not allow for additional HOA fees to be paid which will create the same situation   of unpaid HOA fees all over again!  They are single handedly and very insidiously setting me up for failure and for the loss of my home!    This is my condo, only my condo!  I am the person who selected the white tile,  and has had this residence as my home address since 1999!  I have had many plans for my residence and for how I wanted to live in my residence…. and for the past ten years my life has been on hold while I have had to clean up one mess after another and still nothing is completely rectified!  My wishes are  to have  everything fixed and to once again be able to decorate my condo, plan my life and live out my wishes and dreamed for my future  minus all the problems!    My guardian and lawyer for my guardianship should know this but I don’t believe they have actually asked me,   and I know for certain  we have never sat  down to plan out how  not only  how  past can be remedied but how the future will be mapped out and accomplished!

 

11.          To receive prudent  financial management of  his  or her  property and to be informed how his or her property is being managed as per the  rights of the incapacitated ward that are retained by the ward ( FS 744.321(1))

To be certain, I do not believe that given  the current situation and my  financial  income budget, that neither Patrick weber nor Larry Pivacek   would have created the same  deal for them given the same  monetary circumstances!  I understand the basic principal of debt:  more money has to go out than comes into a household…. Therefore  at the basis of their plan for repayment of the HOA more money  ( $500.00) just for the repayment of the HOA fees would be going out than  the( $465.00) that  is brought  into my household per month!   There is no one that  would agree to such a deal and both these people are supposed to be standing up for my rights in the  financial  department… it is unthinkable  that such a travesty should occur!   Are they taking advantage of their power to handle financial matters? In fact, the lump sum that Patrick Weber decided upon is outrageous!  If I had $5000.00 for a lump sum  to give the HOA I would have rather spend it on a lawyer who was able to defend the foreclosure,  to reduce the  amount owed and to actually practice law in my favor!   A decision such as that would have been in my best interest.  I am not living an opulent lifestyle, over this past year  I have had to cut my own hair to save money,  take whole milk and water it down  to  make it  last longer, I have had to  water down shampoo, and conditioner… have had to  forgo shopping  for  any extras  for myself and have only spent money I have saved for  my families holiday gifts!  I went for an entire year without any air-conditioning which was really difficult when the weather was  very hot and humid.  I did all of this to limit my budget and  live within my means!    I do not have a cell phone, but only use a magic jack attached to my computer and I only have one cable expense… the internet for my outside  communication !  I am completely disgusted  that the people entrusted to help me  would not  acknowledge any  of this and make a deal that  is completely unacceptable financially!  I know they would not  sacrifice as much as I have and then make  a  settlement and payment  schedule such as the one I am being told  they  worked out for me….    The power given to guardians  to make decisions that they alone would never accept but that they accept on behalf of their wards,   to me is unacceptable and borders on grievous  especially when conditions are set for failure due to the  outlined  stipulations!  Such decisions should d be over ruled by a court system that recognizes that no one person or group of persons should have ultimate power and control for financial or legal decisions that would harm the ward even if they are a guardian! 

  

12.          To have access to the courts, as per the rights of the incapacitated ward that are retained by the ward  (FS 744.321(1)).  

Patrick Weber  and Larry Pivacek  have not allowed me to speak  when  the few times I was in court! I was told to be quiet to sit down and not  to do or say anything!   Have emailed the probate court to request that a new and more qualified guardian be appointed for my  guardian.  The email however took 22 hours from the time I emailed it/sent it…. To the time the carbon copy I emailed to myself arrived in my mail box.  I can only assume that there was a glitch in my outlook account for that moment  and not some  hacker preventing me from  access to the courts!  I am sending this package to  a number of people in the court system and will be putting this letter and the contents of the package on the internet in my website:  www.mysearchforjustice.com  under the blog entries once it is mailed!     I will assume that each and every recipient will receive the original package and all its contents otherwise  not only will  I not have  access to the  courts, but there would be mail tampering involved and involvement of felony charges based on mail  fraud/tampering would be:  (FS 817)    I have&
nbsp;
a right  to have access to the court system just as any other person who does not have a guardian has a right  to be heard by a judge concerning my life!            

 

13.          To be represented by counsel: 

As one of my rights as a ward, I have the right to be defended in any lawsuit by counsel.   I should say I have a right to have counsel that is competent in defending any law suit!  I have Larry Pivacek  who is supposed to be my guardianship lawyer, he is supposed to  represent me concerning  my guardian.  He has consistently emailed me  every time I email him that he is only my guardianship lawyer and gives no counsel on any other  topic.  I have to date not received any counsel from Larry concerning  any guardianship  questions.     I definitely need to have a lawyer represent me in every  instance who has knowledge of the areas that are affecting my life, my homeownership, my independence and  every other area   necessary  for legal representation!    These areas include:     

a.            Defend foreclosure suit with qualified lawyer who is competent in defending foreclosure suite neither brought on by HOA.  Neither Larry nor Patrick  have any knowledge on how to defend  a foreclosure suit!   So  on that basis alone, I need additional representation for  the various areas that  are  currently under unqualified and  unsatisfactory representation.

There is also a rule on how long a plaintiff can keep open a foreclosure lawsuit that has no activity.  The rule says that after 1 year of inactivity, the lawsuit can be dismissed by the court. The  failure to prosecute  within one Year,    *The” failure to prosecute within one year” rule.  If the court  dismisses the lawsuit after one year and before the bank asks for  a deficiency judgment the  lender can still file a new lawsuit and sue just on the  promissory note unpaid balance .    This valuable entry from a document I gave to Patrick and Larry in an email.  It was of course ignored, and instead   the Patrick who threatened me, laughed and winked at me when I was in distress, used the knowledge against me and in favor of the HOA which set a sale date of July 18th    for my condo when he had no knowledge of how to defend a foreclosure and  defiantly  proved his incompetence in regards to this matter by his actions.  These actions  adversely and directly  affected my home ownership! !             

   

b.            Reduce settlement   by qualified lawyer or legal representative.  Since Patrick Weber or Larry Pivacek  is not privy to basic principles of debt, a knowledgeable representative  who can create a settlement that adheres to my budge may be required!  A qualified  lawyer who is well versed in settlement negotiations   is defiantly required!  I need additional representation for the various areas that are currently under unqualified and unsatisfactory representation.     

 

 

14.          To receive notice of all proceedings related to determination of capacity and guardianship unless the court finds the incapacitated person lacks the ability to comprehend the notice.  As per the rights of the incapacitated ward that are retained by the ward (FS 744. 321(1)). 

Patrick or Larry have not notified me of any of the court dates or court  appearances.  I received some of  my information from phone messages or forwarded emails sent by my mother Marion Gregory.  She is not my legal guardian,  nor my guardianship lawyer, nor my negotiator, nor  is legally able to speak for me or my wishes or on  my behalf! It is not her job but the job of my guardian to notify me of any court dates and the reasons for the court dates!   I have not been receiving direct emails from Patrick Weber even though I have been sending him direct emails via his email address at  his office. I receive no response back!   I have only received court documents sent in the mail.  Last week I  was told that Larry, my guardianship attorney called my mother to get my address.  I  would think after being my guardianship lawyer for the past year he would be privy  to information such as my address! I thought  my guardian and guardianship lawyer  would have been required to have files full of  information on my behalf.    This method of communication has been unacceptable!   I have resorted to  sending   emails to other departments in government  for additional  assistance, for information,  and  to attempt to  get help !   I have even sent emails to the probate court,  who then told me they were sending information to the appropriate judges and the lawyers on my behalf. 

Both  Patrick Weber and Larry Pivacek   don’t appear  to want  to assist in rectifying any of the situations we discussed upon our first meeting!    So I will need additional legal representation to address their replacement as well!    

 

15.          To determine  how  payments were to be made  to the HOA: 

a.            Use my  bank as co- guardian:                                                                                         &nb
sp;                            
          When I first did any research on guardians,/guardianship  I  looked up (FS 744).   Within the (FS 744) was a chapter that stated:  “Also a Trust company, State Bank, National Bank, or Federal Savings and Loan may be a guardian (FS 744.309(4))  A non –profit corporation organized for religious or charitable purposes may be appointed as a guardian ( FS 744.309(5)) “    Under this ruling  I requested Patrick Weber have as a co guardian a bank.  I requested my bank and asked my branch manager for information on  guardianships and trusts.  She gave me a telephone number which I passed along to Patrick Weber to see what criteria, guidelines and qualifications were necessary to establish a bank as a guardian.  To my knowledge, he never even checked on the bank as a guardian. His negligence cost me an equity line of credit through my bank or any bank that would have qualified.             

b.            Patrick’s connection and  Regions  bank loan:    Patrick Weber  decided to contact his friend who worked for Regions Bank to assist in making preparations for the repayment of the HOA.   He did not tell me who he spoke with concerning the monies. He did not tell me whether it was to be an equity line of credit, or a loan for the monies.  He did not tell me what the interest rate would be, or confirm how much payments  would be each month.  He did not tell me what the  total amount would be that  he would try to obtain.  He did not tell me when this loan/ or equity line of credit  would be ready to use for the repayment of HOA!  I was told via hearsay (which means via a phone call from my mother and an email from my mother!)  that there was a loan that would have only a payment of $100.00 per month! I was told that I needed to save  for a balloon payment but that wouldn’t be for a while…. Then I heard two completely new versions of the repayment and settlement  for the HOA and the entire process has been a nightmare!   

c.             Equity line of credit from my own bank.:  I asked  Patrick Weber  to check on using my bank for the equity line of credit .  It is the bank where the direct deposit for my medical  disability payment is made.  The bank account from which  I pay my bills.  The bank account  where if an equity line of credit  existed I would only have to access one website to make sure that no identity theft or  problems arose, or where a direct payment  for the  HOA could be easily monitored and  carefully maintained!  As far as I know, Patrick Weber never even checked on the  options of procuring an equity line of credit from my bank for my condominium  to repay the HOA fees! 

In conclusion, I am writing to enlist the assistance of the proper authorities and to call attention to the negligence in completing any of the initial objectives for this past year 2011-2012 while I have been under the  direction of my guardian Patrick Weber and my lawyer for the guardianship Larry Piviach.       The events of this past year should have produced results allowing for assistance in both financial and legal  state of affairs.   For closure and  remedy to long standing situations.   For accountability, culpability, sanctions and consequences  where it  is  warranted.    For adequate resolution and finality to a multiple  of  unforgivable circumstances. 

Thank you for your kind attention to this letter.

Sincerely,

Mary Jean Ziska                                                                                                                                                        5632 Whisperwood Blvd.  #1601                                                                                                                                                           Naples Florida  34110                                                                                                                            whatabtmary@yahoo.com

       

The enclosures:

1.            Information and definition for Patrick Weber from Mary Jean Ziska Fri may 25th 2012 @ 10:56am

2.            Letter/speech I gave to Patric
k Weber and to the members of the evaluation committee

3.            August 16th @ 2011@ 3:32am (random notes Florida Statutes/guardianship and foreclosure)

4.            Agreed Order:  case no. 07-3121-CC

5.            Hi Patrick,  Once again I am trying to reach you and keep getting your voice mail. I left a message today June 28th @12:37pm….

6.            Message from Mary Jean Ziska August 7th 2012 evening concerning removing my guardian Wednesday August 8th 2012  11:09am    Dear Larry august 7th 2012 @ 8:11pm

7.            To whom it may concern:  August  8th 2011 11:20am

8.            From Mary Jean Ziska (mail to : whatabtmary@gmail.com) Sent Wednesday, August 08 2012 2:30pm  To  Minutes and Records

9.            Fwd.:  message from Mary Jean Ziska august 7th 2012 evening concerning removing my guardian Wednesday 8, 2012 2:47pm

10.          BLOG.MYSEARCHFORJUSTICE.COM:  July 2nd  email sent to sheriff office as complaint against guardian’s actions 

11.          Called the collier clerk of courts today:  august 8th 2012 at 11:30am to request email address for transcript in writing for court date August 6th 2012 involving the motion for extension of time granted ( 20 days were granted)

12.          On Monday 8/6/12, Mary Jean Ziska whatabtmary@yahoo.com      Hi Patrick, I emailed you last year concerning having a co guardian as a bank….                   

13.          To whom it may concern:  August 16th 2012 @ 3:22pm   Patrick Weber is the guardian of Mary Jean Ziska.  It is a limited guardianship restricted for only his assistance in financial and legal matters.  I have been trying to  report his misconduct

14.          cid@colliersheriff.net   It is now 5:15pm on august 23rd 2012, my name is Mary jean Ziska and since your  office is closed  I am emailing you concerning the group of identity thieving con-artist 

15.          Hi Larry, August 23rd 2012 @ 9:18pm   replying  to your  email… I was chatting with magic jack

 

Do you know what it feels like to be raped? To say no… to cry…. to plead …  and to have a man  take it upon himself to do what ever he wants to a girl…. dismissing any rights? any consideration of  what the girl may want? …. WHEN NO MEANS NO…. that means NO

What you are doing to me is basically raping me… you are going  against my wishes..  my concerns  and my will to do what ever you want……. not considering  my needs or wants.. not asking… not communicating…. NOT STOPPING when I tell you NO….  No… you have no right to take my money… to make a horrid deal…  with the  HOA  … you are as  much a criminal as a rapist   I have rights…. I pay my bills my medical disability is mine only because of the anxiety you are even helping to  create….. what you are trying  to do is illegal and i said NO  a million times over NO!

 

A Tender Loving Care Service

Marion Gregory   Director 239-598-1515

naplesmarion@aol.com

Mary Jean Ziska   Assistant Director 239-234-4065

whatabtmary@yahoo.com

Tuesday September 11 2012 @ 7:08pm letter to patrick weber after a disturbing phone call from soial security

Dear Patrick Weber,                                                                           September 11, 2012@ 7:00pm

What is going on?  I received a phone call today   allegedly from the social security office telling me that my mother went into the office and asked to have my social security money sent into her account?  This is   the money I live off of? Pay electric with….  When I called her she said that you want to take my SSI money? What the hell ….  You are not in charge of paying my bills I have been paying my bills since even before we met…. You are the person who messed up and accepted service on the foreclosure … you are the person who didn’t get appropriate legal council or even mediate a settlement…. You have messed up in actions and these actions are affecting my life…. I want my independence ….    I want real legal council and I want you to be fired if you think that what you have doesn’t is acceptable you should never be a guardian EVER!   You have no right ruining a life…. My life!   

I have told you over and over…. You are not allowed to make a deal  with the HOA that  would exceed my income!  How the hell did you think that was acceptable?  You are not allowed to take over any of my income!  To even pay one bill!…. The Florida  Statutes  actually states that with even a limited guardianship  you give  back independence at the earliest moment!

 744.643:  Discharge of guardian of minor or incompetent ward.  When a minor ward for whom a guardian  has been appointed under  the provisions of this part or other laws of this state, attains  his or her majority and if such minor is declared competent by the  United  States department of Veterans affairs and the court  the guardian shall upon making a satisfactory accounting be discharged upon a petition filed for that purpose .

Also since  you don’t seem to actually remember the Florida statues especially 744 which deals with guardianship … I though I would remind you of that actually Florida statues that govern the laws of the United  States of America !   is this large enough an you read it? Do you understand it?

Fla. Statues 744.1012 Legislative intent :  The  legislature finds that adjudicating a person totally incapacitated and in need of a guardian deprives such person of all her or his civil and legal rights and that such deprivation may be unnecessary.  The Legislature further finds that it is desireable to make available the least restrictive form of guardianship to assist persons  who are only partially incapable of caring for ther needs.  Recognizing that every individual has unique needs an differning abilities, the legislature declares tht it is the purpose of this act to promote the public welfare by establishing a system that permits incapacitated person to participate as fully as possible in all decisions affecting them ; that assists such persons in meeting the essential requiremnts for their physical  health and safty, in protecting their rights, in managing their financial resources, and in developing or regaining ther abililties to the maxium extent possible; and that accomplishes  these objectives though providing in each case  the form of assistance that lest interfers with the legal apaity of a person to act in her or his own behalf.  This at shall be liberally construed to accomplish this purpose.     

Does this help to jog you memory of the laws of the united states? Of the Florida statutes? You have no right to take away a freedom / right  to handle and  pay bills when I have already been paying my own bills and on time I might add since before you came into the picture!  As far as you assisting in financial matters…. You were supposed to use your  legal  knowledge and background to assist in obtaining  legal council in dealing with the HOA…. You promised to assist in clearing the title and then to assist in obtaining an equity line of credit from my home that would  assist  in helping with  my credit rating not yours!  You didn’t even file  paperwork  presented to the court  or a copy given to me  that outlined what you were supposed to do!   You have messed up  with your decisions in my life  in every situation … which seems absolutely impossible but you have… EVERY DECISION You made has been wrong!  

You are not to  take any of my finances… you are not to make horrid deals  with the  HOA…  You are not to take  away my rights you were supposed to assist not imprison!… not harm!… DO NO HARM!  You had to take an oath  to be a guardian right? Did you forget that as well? I am beyond disgusted I am not some muslim girl in a foreign county where I have no rights… I am an American!  You are not allowed to do this to me…. To take anything away from me….  Do you know  the constitution?  It’s 9/11 today… I would have though today above all days you would realized the value of life/ liberty and the pursuit of happiness… of what America the land  of the free would represent…. And how valuable freedom actually is…. What the hell is wrong with you?

Sincerely

Mary Jean Ziska    I demand an immediate response!    

 

 

Tuesday September 11th 2012 @ 9:08am fair and accurate transaction act

This  afternoon I received a call from Lexington law i had put in an inquiry to find out information on their services for clearing  my credit report of all the fraud…. and they mentioned the fair and accurate credit transaction act/ the fair  credit reporting   act  / the FTC office of the secretary fair credit reporting act  links /  teh  fair credit reporting act / www.flc. gov/us statutes/031224 FCRA.pdf  their services wer pretty high… $99.oo each month with a success rate of  about 28 itemes taken of the credit report  in a year….. thats’s a lot… of money for those rates.. imay need a lawyer to litigate teh  false mortages since no one has been able to  do antything on my behalf through the guardianship  and the lawyers who were  supposed to help…..  

*speaking of lawyers  i have called Patrick Weber today, Larry  Pivacek,of course no one answered so i left messages,  also the  department of justice   emailed at 10:09am ( askdoj@usdoj.gov .  Fox 4 for troubleshooter items  let them know the current situation…. about the  misconduct and  negligence …..
something is really weird when i am typing  there e is a pause for the letters to show up the last time that  this happened was a hacker… also illegal…. go daddy i think was bought out by someone else and I’m not so sure how secure this website and blog is which is very  disturbing since this is my life … my research to assist in catching the criminals and if it is not owned by American or  honest people… i want to make sure that  my information and my security is protected! this is copyrighted  and   my intellectual property  … need to check on the laws that  cover my ownership and  my ability to prosecute  anyone who damages or  alters anything  I write! anyway i will try to  place a copy of all the  credit laws that maybe can be used to …  to  get the fraudulent items off my credit report and to help raise my credit score!
On the  positive side it was nice to see a few ads on banks! 
I called my bank yesterday…. i had started inquires  in early 2012 ( Feb. 2012 ) and gave the information  to my guardian concerning  the option of having  a co guardian and the  option of having an equity line  of credit  …. and the woman i spoke with was wonderful…. able to  give me a best case scenario of having $122.00 payment verses the payment s of $500.00….  huge difference! I dont nwo what the hell  the guardianadn  was or is doing to me! unforgivable!   

PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
FAIR AND ACCURATE CREDIT TRANSACTIONS
ACT OF 2003
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00001 Fmt 6579 Sfmt 6579 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1952 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
Public Law 108–159
108th Congress
An Act
To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act, to prevent identity theft, improve resolution
of consumer disputes, improve the accuracy of consumer records, make improvements
in the use of, and consumer access to, credit information, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003’’.
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act
is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definitions.
Sec. 3. Effective dates.
TITLE I—IDENTITY THEFT PREVENTION AND CREDIT HISTORY
RESTORATION
Subtitle A—Identity Theft Prevention
Sec. 111. Amendment to definitions.
Sec. 112. Fraud alerts and active duty alerts.
Sec. 113. Truncation of credit card and debit card account numbers.
Sec. 114. Establishment of procedures for the identification of possible instances of
identity theft.
Sec. 115. Authority to truncate social security numbers.
Subtitle B—Protection and Restoration of Identity Theft Victim Credit History
Sec. 151. Summary of rights of identity theft victims.
Sec. 152. Blocking of information resulting from identity theft.
Sec. 153. Coordination of identity theft complaint investigations.
Sec. 154. Prevention of repollution of consumer reports.
Sec. 155. Notice by debt collectors with respect to fraudulent information.
Sec. 156. Statute of limitations.
Sec. 157. Study on the use of technology to combat identity theft.
TITLE II—IMPROVEMENTS IN USE OF AND CONSUMER ACCESS TO CREDIT
INFORMATION
Sec. 211. Free consumer reports.
Sec. 212. Disclosure of credit scores.
Sec. 213. Enhanced disclosure of the means available to opt out of prescreened
lists.
Sec. 214. Affiliate sharing.
Sec. 215. Study of effects of credit scores and credit-based insurance scores on
availability and affordability of financial products.
Sec. 216. Disposal of consumer report information and records.
Sec. 217. Requirement to disclose communications to a consumer reporting agency.
TITLE III—ENHANCING THE ACCURACY OF CONSUMER REPORT
INFORMATION
Sec. 311. Risk-based pricing notice.
15 USC 1601
note.
Fair and
Accurate Credit
Transactions Act
of 2003.
Dec. 4, 2003
[H.R. 2622]
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00002 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6582 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1953
Sec. 312. Procedures to enhance the accuracy and integrity of information furnished
to consumer reporting agencies.
Sec. 313. FTC and consumer reporting agency action concerning complaints.
Sec. 314. Improved disclosure of the results of reinvestigation.
Sec. 315. Reconciling addresses.
Sec. 316. Notice of dispute through reseller.
Sec. 317. Reasonable reinvestigation required.
Sec. 318. FTC study of issues relating to the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Sec. 319. FTC study of the accuracy of consumer reports.
TITLE IV—LIMITING THE USE AND SHARING OF MEDICAL INFORMATION
IN THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM
Sec. 411. Protection of medical information in the financial system.
Sec. 412. Confidentiality of medical contact information in consumer reports.
TITLE V—FINANCIAL LITERACY AND EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT
Sec. 511. Short title.
Sec. 512. Definitions.
Sec. 513. Establishment of Financial Literacy and Education Commission.
Sec. 514. Duties of the Commission.
Sec. 515. Powers of the Commission.
Sec. 516. Commission personnel matters.
Sec. 517. Studies by the Comptroller General.
Sec. 518. The national public service multimedia campaign to enhance the state of
financial literacy.
Sec. 519. Authorization of appropriations.
TITLE VI—PROTECTING EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 611. Certain employee investigation communications excluded from definition
of consumer report.
TITLE VII—RELATION TO STATE LAWS
Sec. 711. Relation to State laws.
TITLE VIII—MISCELLANEOUS
Sec. 811. Clerical amendments.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Act—
(1) the term ‘‘Board’’ means the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System;
(2) the term ‘‘Commission’’, other than as used in title
V, means the Federal Trade Commission;
(3) the terms ‘‘consumer’’, ‘‘consumer report’’, ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’, ‘‘creditor’’, ‘‘Federal banking agencies’’, and
‘‘financial institution’’ have the same meanings as in section
603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by this
Act; and
(4) the term ‘‘affiliates’’ means persons that are related
by common ownership or affiliated by corporate control.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATES.
Excep
t as otherwise specifically provided in this Act and the
amendments made by this Act—
(1) before the end of the 2-month period beginning on
the date of enactment of this Act, the Board and the Commission
shall jointly prescribe regulations in final form establishing
effective dates for each provision of this Act; and
(2) the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1) shall
establish effective dates that are as early as possible, while
allowing a reasonable time for the implementation of the provisions
of this Act, but in no case shall any such effective date
be later than 10 months after the date of issuance of such
regulations in final form.
Regulations.
15 USC 1681
note.
15 USC 1681
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00003 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1954 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
TITLE I—IDENTITY THEFT PREVENTION
AND CREDIT HISTORY RESTORATION
Subtitle A—Identity Theft Prevention
SEC. 111. AMENDMENT TO DEFINITIONS.
Section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a)
is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(q) DEFINITIONS RELATING TO FRAUD ALERTS.—
‘‘(1) ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY CONSUMER.—The term ‘active
duty military consumer’ means a consumer in military service
who—
‘‘(A) is on active duty (as defined in section 101(d)(1)
of title 10, United States Code) or is a reservist performing
duty under a call or order to active duty under a provision
of law referred to in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United
States Code; and
‘‘( is assigned to service away from the usual duty
station of the consumer.
‘‘(2) FRAUD ALERT; ACTIVE DUTY ALERT.—The terms ‘fraud
alert’ and ‘active duty alert’ mean a statement in the file
of a consumer that—
‘‘(A) notifies all prospective users of a consumer report
relating to the consumer that the consumer may be a
victim of fraud, including identity theft, or is an active
duty military consumer, as applicable; and
‘‘( is presented in a manner that facilitates a clear
and conspicuous view of the statement described in
subparagraph (A) by any person requesting such consumer
report.
‘‘(3) IDENTITY THEFT.—The term ‘identity theft’ means a
fraud committed using the identifying information of another
person, subject to such further definition as the Commission
may prescribe, by regulation.
‘‘(4) IDENTITY THEFT REPORT.—The term ‘identity theft
report’ has the meaning given that term by rule of the Commission,
and means, at a minimum, a report—
‘‘(A) that alleges an identity theft;
‘‘( that is a copy of an official, valid report filed
by a consumer with an appropriate Federal, State, or local
law enforcement agency, including the United States Postal
Inspection Service, or such other government agency
deemed appropriate by the Commission; and
‘‘(C) the filing of which subjects the person filing the
report to criminal penalties relating to the filing of false
information if, in fact, the information in the report is
false.
‘‘(5) NEW CREDIT PLAN.—The term ‘new credit plan’ means
a new account under an open end credit plan (as defined
in section 103(i) of the Truth in Lending Act) or a new credit
transaction not under an open end credit plan.
‘‘(r) CREDIT AND DEBIT RELATED TERMS—
‘‘(1) CARD ISSUER.—The term ‘card issuer’ means—
‘‘(A) a credit card issuer, in the case of a credit card;
and
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00004 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1955
‘‘( a debit card issuer, in the case of a debit card.
‘‘(2) CREDIT CARD.—The term ‘credit card’ has the same
meaning as in section 103 of the Truth in Lending Act.
‘‘(3) DEBIT CARD.—The term ‘debit card’ means any card
issued by a financial institution to a consumer for use in
initiating an electronic fund transfer from the account of the
consumer at such financial institution, for the purpose of
transferring money between accounts or obtaining money, property,
labor, or services.
‘‘(4) ACCOUNT AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER.—The terms
‘account’ and ‘electronic fund transfer’ have the same meanings
as in section 903 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.
‘‘(5) CREDIT AND CREDITOR.—The terms ‘credit’ and ‘creditor’
have the same meanings as in section 702 of the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act.
‘‘(s) FEDERAL BANKING AGENCY.—The term ‘Federal banking
agency’ has the same meaning as in section 3 of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act.
‘‘(t) FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘financial institution’
means a State or National bank, a State or Federal savings and
loan association, a mutual savings bank, a State or Federal credit
union, or any other person that, directly or indirectly, holds a
transaction account (as defined in section 19(b) of the Federal
Reserve Act) belonging to a consumer.
‘‘(u) RESELLER.—The term ‘reseller’ means a consumer reporting
agency that—
‘‘(1) assembles and merges information contained in the
database of another consumer reporting agency or multiple
consumer reporting agencies concerning any consumer for purposes
of furnishing such information to any third party, to
the extent of such activities; and
‘‘(2) does not maintain a database of the assembled or
merged information from which new consumer reports are produced.
‘‘(v) COMMISSION.—The term ‘Commission’ means the Federal
Trade Commission.
‘‘(w) NATIONWIDE SPECIALTY CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY.—
The term ‘nationwide specialty consumer reporting agency’ means
a consumer reporting agency that compiles and maintains files
on consumers on a nationwide basis relating to—
‘‘(1) medical records or payments;
‘‘(2) residential or tenant history;
‘‘(3) check writing history;
‘‘(4) employment history; or
‘‘(5) insurance claims.’’.
SEC. 112. FRAUD ALERTS AND ACTIVE DUTY ALERTS.
(a) FRAUD ALERTS.—The Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 605 the following:
‘‘§ 605A. Identity theft prevention; fraud alerts and active
duty alerts
‘‘(a) ONE-CALL FRAUD ALERTS.—
‘‘(1) INITIAL ALERTS.—Upon the direct request of a consumer,
or an individual acting on behalf of or as a personal
representative of a consumer, who asserts in good faith a suspicion
that the consumer has been or is about to become a
15 USC 1681c–1.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 14:13 Dec 23, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00005 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 APPS10 PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1956 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
victim of fraud or related crime, including identity theft, a
consumer reporting agency described in section 603(p) that
maintains a file on the consumer and has received appropriate
proof of the identity of the requester shall—
‘‘(A) include a fraud alert in the file of that consumer,
and also provide that alert along with any credit score
generated in using that file, for a period of not less than
90 days, beginning on the date of such request, unless
the consumer or such representative requests that such
fraud alert be removed before the end of such period,
and the agency has received appropriate proof of the
identity of the requester for such purpose; and
‘‘( refer the information regarding the fraud alert
under this paragraph to each of the other consumer
reporting agencies described in section 603(p), in accordance
with procedures developed under section 621(f).
‘‘(2) ACCESS TO FREE REPORTS.—In any case in which a
consumer reporting agency includes a fraud alert in the file
of a consumer pursuant to this subsection, the consumer
reporting agency shall—
‘‘(A) disclose to the consumer that the consumer may
request a free copy of the file of the consumer pursuant
to section 612(d); and
‘‘( provide to the consumer all disclosures required
to be made under section 609, without charge to the consumer,
not later than 3 business days after any request
described in subparagraph (A).
‘‘(b) EXTENDED ALERTS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon the direct request of a consumer,
or an individual acting on behalf of or as a personal representative
of a consumer, who submits an identity theft report to
a consumer reporting agency described in section 603(p) that
maintains a file on the consumer, if the agency has received
appropriate proof of the identity of the requester, the agency
shall—
‘‘(A) include a fraud alert in the file of that consumer,
and also provide that alert along with any credit score
generated in using that file, during the 7-year period beginning
on the date of such request, unless the consumer
or such representative requests that such fraud alert be
removed before the end of such period and the agency
has received appropriate proof of the identity of the
requester for such purpose;
‘‘( during the 5-year period beginning on the date
of such request, exclude the consumer from any list of
consumers prepared by the consumer reporting agency and
provided to any third party to offer credit or insurance
to the consumer as part of a transaction that was not
initiated by the consumer, unless the consumer or such
representative requests that such exclusion be rescinded
before the end of such period; and
‘‘(C) refer the information regarding the extended fraud
alert under this paragraph to each of the other consumer
reporting agencies described in section 603(p), in accordance
with procedures developed under section 621(f).
‘‘(2) ACCESS TO FREE REPORTS.—In any case in which a
consumer reporting agency includes a fraud alert in the file
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00006 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1957
of a consumer pursuant to this subsection, the consumer
reporting agency shall—
‘‘(A) disclose to the consumer that the consumer may
request 2 free copies of the file of the consumer pursuant
to section 612(d) during the 12-month period beginning
on the date on which the fraud alert was included in
the file; and
‘‘( provide to the consumer all disclosures required
to be made under section 609, without charge to the consumer,
not later than 3 business days after any request
described in subparagraph (A).
‘‘(c) ACTIVE DUTY ALERTS.—Upon the direct request of an active
duty military consumer, or an individual acting on behalf of or
as a personal representative of an active duty military consumer,
a consumer reporting agency described in section 603(p) that maintains
a file on the active duty military consumer and has received
appropriate proof of the identity of the requester shall—
‘‘(1) include an active duty alert in the file of that active
duty military consumer, and also provide that alert along with
any credit score generated in using that file, during a period
of not less than 12 months, or such longer period as the
Commission shall determine, by regulation, beginning on the
date of the request, unless the active duty military consumer
or such representative requests that such fraud alert be
removed before the end of such period, and the agency has
received appropriate proof of the identity of the requester for
such purpose;
‘‘(2) during the 2-year period beginning on the date of
such request, exclude the active duty military consumer from
any list of consumers prepared by the consumer reporting
agency and provided to any third party to offer credit or insurance
to the consumer as part of a transaction that was not
initiated by the consumer, unless the consumer requests that
such exclusion be rescinded before the end of such period;
and
‘‘(3) refer the information regarding the active duty alert
to each of the other consumer reporting agencies described
in section 603(p), in accordance with procedures developed
under section 621(f).
‘‘(d) PROCEDURES.—Each consumer reporting agency described
in section 603(p) shall establish policies and procedures to comply
with this section, including procedures that inform consumers of
the availability of initial, extended, and active duty alerts and
procedures that allow consumers and active duty military consumers
to request initial, extended, or active duty alerts (as
applicable) in a simple and easy manner, including by telephone.
‘‘(e) REFERRALS OF ALERTS.—Each consumer reporting agency
described in section 603(p) that receives a referral of a fraud alert
or active duty alert from another consumer reporting agency pursuant
to this section shall, as though the agency received the request
from the consumer directly, follow the procedures required under—
‘‘(1) paragraphs (1)(A) and (2) of subsection (a), in the
case of a referral under subsection (a)(1)(;
‘‘(2) paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(, and (2) of subsection (b),
in the case of a referral under subsection (b)(1)(C); and
‘‘(3) paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (c), in the case
of a referral under subsection (c)(3).
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00007 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1958 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘(f) DUTY OF RESELLER TO RECONVEY ALERT.—A reseller shall
include in its report any fraud alert or active duty alert placed
in the file of a consumer pursuant to this section by another
consumer reporting agency.
‘‘(g) DUTY OF OTHER CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES TO PROVIDE
CONTACT INFORMATION.—If a consumer contacts any consumer
reporting agency that is not described in section 603(p) to communicate
a suspicion that the consumer has been or is about to
become a victim of fraud or related crime, including identity theft,
the agency shall provide information to the consumer on how to
contact the Commission and the consumer reporting agencies
described in section 603(p) to obtain more detailed information
and request alerts under this section.
‘‘(h) LIMITATIONS ON USE OF INFORMATION FOR CREDIT EXTENSIONS.—
‘‘(1) REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL AND ACTIVE DUTY ALERTS.—
‘‘(A) NOTIFICATION.—Each initial fraud alert and active
duty alert under this section shall include information that
notifies all prospective users of a consumer report on the
consumer to which the alert relates that the consumer
does not authorize the establishment of any new credit
plan or extension of credit, other than under an openend
credit plan (as defined in section 103(i)), in the name
of the consumer, or issuance of an additional card on an
existing credit account reques
ted by a consumer, or any
increase in credit limit on an existing credit account
requested by a consumer, except in accordance with
subparagraph (.
‘‘( LIMITATION ON USERS.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—No prospective user of a consumer
report that includes an initial fraud alert or
an active duty alert in accordance with this section
may establish a new credit plan or extension of credit,
other than under an open-end credit plan (as defined
in section 103(i)), in the name of the consumer, or
issue an additional card on an existing credit account
requested by a consumer, or grant any increase in
credit limit on an existing credit account requested
by a consumer, unless the user utilizes reasonable
policies and procedures to form a reasonable belief
that the user knows the identity of the person making
the request.
‘‘(ii) VERIFICATION.—If a consumer requesting the
alert has specified a telephone number to be used
for identity verification purposes, before authorizing
any new credit plan or extension described in clause
(i) in the name of such consumer, a user of such consumer
report shall contact the consumer using that
telephone number or take reasonable steps to verify
the consumer’s identity and confirm that the application
for a new credit plan is not the result of identity
theft.
‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTENDED ALERTS.—
‘‘(A) NOTIFICATION.—Each extended alert under this
section shall include information that provides all prospective
users of a consumer report relating to a consumer
with—
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00008 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1959
‘‘(i) notification that the consumer does not
authorize the establishment of any new credit plan
or extension of credit described in clause (i), other
than under an open-end credit plan (as defined in
section 103(i)), in the name of the consumer, or
issuance of an additional card on an existing credit
account requested by a consumer, or any increase in
credit limit on an existing credit account requested
by a consumer, except in accordance with subparagraph
(; and
‘‘(ii) a telephone number or other reasonable contact
method designated by the consumer.
‘‘( LIMITATION ON USERS.—No prospective user of
a consumer report or of a credit score generated using
the information in the file of a consumer that includes
an extended fraud alert in accordance with this section
may establish a new credit plan or extension of credit,
other than under an open-end credit plan (as defined in
section 103(i)), in the name of the consumer, or issue an
additional card on an existing credit account requested
by a consumer, or any increase in credit limit on an existing
credit account requested by a consumer, unless the user
contacts the consumer in person or using the contact
method described in subparagraph (A)(ii) to confirm that
the application for a new credit plan or increase in credit
limit, or request for an additional card is not the result
of identity theft.’’.
(b) RULEMAKING.—The Commission shall prescribe regulations
to define what constitutes appropriate proof of identity for purposes
of sections 605A, 605B, and 609(a)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, as amended by this Act.
SEC. 113. TRUNCATION OF CREDIT CARD AND DEBIT CARD ACCOUNT
NUMBERS.
Section 605 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c)
is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(g) TRUNCATION OF CREDIT CARD AND DEBIT CARD NUMBERS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this
subsection, no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards
for the transaction of business shall print more than the last
5 digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any
receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale
or transaction.
‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—This subsection shall apply only to
receipts that are electronically printed, and shall not apply
to transactions in which the sole means of recording a credit
card or debit card account number is by handwriting or by
an imprint or copy of the card.
‘‘(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This subsection shall become
effective—
‘‘(A) 3 years after the date of enactment of this subsection,
with respect to any cash register or other machine
or device that electronically prints receipts for credit card
or debit card transactions that is in use before January
1, 2005; and
‘‘( 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection,
with respect to any cash register or other machine
Applicability.
15 USC 1681c–1
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 14:13 Dec 23, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00009 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 APPS10 PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1960 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
or device that electronically prints receipts for credit card
or debit card transactions that is first put into use on
or after January 1, 2005.’’.
SEC. 114. ESTABLISHMENT OF PROCEDURES FOR THE IDENTIFICATION
OF POSSIBLE INSTANCES OF IDENTITY THEFT.
Section 615 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681m)
is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘(e)’’ at the end; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) RED FLAG GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—
‘‘(1) GUIDELINES.—The Federal banking agencies, the
National Credit Union Administration, and the Commission
shall jointly, with respect to the entities that are subject to
their respective enforcement authority under section 621—
‘‘(A) establish and maintain guidelines for use by each
financial institution and each creditor regarding identity
theft with respect to account holders at, or customers of,
such entities, and update such guidelines as often as necessary;
‘‘( prescribe regulations requiring each financial
institution and each creditor to establish reasonable policies
and procedures for implementing the guidelines established
pursuant to subparagraph (A), to identify possible risks
to account holders or customers or to the safety and soundness
of the institution or customers; and
‘‘(C) prescribe regulations applicable to card issuers
to ensure that, if a card issuer receives notification of
a change of address for an existing account, and within
a short period of time (during at least the first 30 days
after such notification is received) receives a request for
an additional or replacement card for the same account,
the card issuer may not issue the additional or replacement
card, unless the card issuer, in accordance with reasonable
policies and procedures—
‘‘(i) notifies the cardholder of the request at the
former address of the cardholder and provides to the
cardholder a means of promptly reporting incorrect
address changes;
‘‘(ii) notifies the cardholder of the request by such
other means of communication as the cardholder and
the card issuer previously agreed to; or
‘‘(iii) uses other means of assessing the validity
of the change of address, in accordance with reasonable
policies and procedures established by the card issuer
in accordance with the regulations prescribed under
subparagraph (.
‘‘(2) CRITERIA.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—
In developing the guidelines
required by paragraph (1)(A), the agencies described in
paragraph (1) shall identify patterns, practices, and specific
forms of activity that indicate the possible existence of
identity theft.
‘‘( INACTIVE ACCOUNTS.—In developing the guidelines
required by paragraph (1)(A), the agencies described in
paragraph (1) shall consider including reasonable guidelines
providing that when a transaction occurs with respect
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00010 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1961
to a credit or deposit account that has been inactive for
more than 2 years, the creditor or financial institution
shall follow reasonable policies and procedures that provide
for notice to be given to a consumer in a manner reasonably
designed to reduce the likelihood of identity theft with
respect to such account.
‘‘(3) CONSISTENCY WITH VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—
Guidelines established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall not
be inconsistent with the policies and procedures required under
section 5318(l) of title 31, United States Code.’’.
SEC. 115. AUTHORITY TO TRUNCATE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
Section 609(a)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681g(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘except that nothing’’ and
inserting the following: ‘‘except that—
‘‘(A) if the consumer to whom the file relates requests
that the first 5 digits of the social security number (or
similar identification number) of the consumer not be
included in the disclosure and the consumer reporting
agency has received appropriate proof of the identity of
the requester, the consumer reporting agency shall so truncate
such number in such disclosure; and
‘‘( nothing’’.
Subtitle B—Protection and Restoration of
Identity Theft Victim Credit History
SEC. 151. SUMMARY OF RIGHTS OF IDENTITY THEFT VICTIMS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—
(1) SUMMARY.—Section 609 of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681g) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(d) SUMMARY OF RIGHTS OF IDENTITY THEFT VICTIMS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission, in consultation with
the Federal banking agencies and the National Credit Union
Administration, shall prepare a model summary of the rights
of consumers under this title with respect to the procedures
for remedying the effects of fraud or identity theft involving
credit, an electronic fund transfer, or an account or transaction
at or with a financial institution or other creditor.
‘‘(2) SUMMARY OF RIGHTS AND CONTACT INFORMATION.—
Beginning 60 days after the date on which the model summary
of rights is prescribed in final form by the Commission pursuant
to paragraph (1), if any consumer contacts a consumer reporting
agency and expresses a belief that the consumer is a victim
of fraud or identity theft involving credit, an electronic fund
transfer, or an account or transaction at or with a financial
institution or other creditor, the consumer reporting agency
shall, in addition to any other action that the agency may
take, provide the consumer with a summary of rights that
contains all of the information required by the Commission
under paragraph (1), and information on how to contact the
Commission to obtain more detailed information.
‘‘(e) INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO VICTIMS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of documenting fraudulent
transactions resulting from identity theft, not later than
Deadline.
Effective date.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00011 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1962 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
30 days after the date of receipt of a request from a victim
in accordance with paragraph (3), and subject to verification
of the identity of the victim and the claim of identity theft
in accordance with paragraph (2), a business entity that has
provided credit to, provided for consideration products, goods,
or services to, accepted payment from, or otherwise entered
into a commercial transaction for consideration with, a person
who has allegedly made unauthorized use of the means of
identification of the victim, shall provide a copy of application
and business transaction records in the control of the business
entity, whether maintained by the business entity or by another
person on behalf of the business entity, evidencing any transaction
alleged to be a result of identity theft to—
‘‘(A) the victim;
‘‘( any Federal, State, or local government law
enforcement agency or officer specified by the victim in
such a request; or
‘‘(C) any law enforcement agency investigating the
identity theft and authorized by the victim to take receipt
of records provided under this subsection.
‘‘(2) VERIFICATION OF IDENTITY AND CLAIM.—Before a business
entity provides any information under paragraph (1),
unless the business entity, at its discretion, otherwise has
a high degree of confidence that it knows the identity of the
victim making a request under paragraph (1), the victim shall
provide to the business entity—
‘‘(A) as proof of positive identification of the victim,
at the election of the business entity—
‘‘(i) the presentation of a government-issued identification
card;
‘‘(ii) personally identifying information of the same
type as was provided to the business entity by the
unauthorized person; or
‘‘(iii) personally identifying information that the
business entity typically requests from new applicants
or for new transactions, at the time of the victim’s
request for information, including any documentation
described in clauses (i) and (ii); and
‘‘( as proof of a claim of identity theft, at the election
of the business entity—
‘‘(i) a copy of a police report evidencing the claim
of the victim of identity theft; and
‘‘(ii) a properly completed—
‘‘(I) copy of a standardized affidavit of identity
theft developed and made available by the
Commission; or
‘‘(II) an affidavit of fact that is acceptable to
the business entity for that purpose.
‘‘(3) PROCEDURES.—The request of a victim under paragraph
(1) shall—
‘‘(A) be in writing;
‘‘( be mailed to an address specified by the business
entity, if any; and
‘‘(C) if asked by the business entity, include relevant
information about any transaction alleged to be a result
of identity theft to facilitate compliance with this section
including—
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00012 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1963
‘‘(i) if known by the victim (or if readily obtainable
by the victim), the date of the application or transaction;
and
‘‘(ii) if known by the victim (or if readily obtainable
by the victim), any other identifying information such
as an account or transaction number.
‘‘(4) NO CHARGE TO VICTIM.—Information required to be
provided under paragraph (1) shall be so provided without
charge.
‘‘(5) AUTHORITY TO DECLINE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION.—
A business entity may decline to provide information under
paragraph (1) if, in the exercise of good faith, the business
entity determines that—
‘‘(A) this subsection does not require disclosure
of the
information;
‘‘( after reviewing the information provided pursuant
to paragraph (2), the business entity does not have a high
degree of confidence in knowing the true identity of the
individual requesting the information;
‘‘(C) the request for the information is based on a
misrepresentation of fact by the individual requesting the
information relevant to the request for information; or
‘‘(D) the information requested is Internet navigational
data or similar information about a person’s visit to a
website or online service.
‘‘(6) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.—Except as provided in section
621, sections 616 and 617 do not apply to any violation
of this subsection.
‘‘(7) LIMITATION ON CIVIL LIABILITY.—No business entity
may be held civilly liable under any provision of Federal, State,
or other law for disclosure, made in good faith pursuant to
this subsection.
‘‘(8) NO NEW RECORDKEEPING OBLIGATION.—Nothing in this
subsection creates an obligation on the part of a business entity
to obtain, retain, or maintain information or records that are
not otherwise required to be obtained, retained, or maintained
in the ordinary course of its business or under other applicable
law.
‘‘(9) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—No provision of subtitle A of title
V of Public Law 106–102, prohibiting the disclosure of
financial information by a business entity to third parties
shall be used to deny disclosure of information to the
victim under this subsection.
‘‘( LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subparagraph
(A), nothing in this subsection permits a business entity
to disclose information, including information to law
enforcement under subparagraphs ( and (C) of paragraph
(1), that the business entity is otherwise prohibited from
disclosing under any other applicable provision of Federal
or State law.
‘‘(10) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.—In any civil action brought
to enforce this subsection, it is an affirmative defense (which
the defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence)
for a business entity to file an affidavit or answer
stating that—
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00013 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1964 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘(A) the business entity has made a reasonably diligent
search of its available business records; and
‘‘( the records requested under this subsection do
not exist or are not reasonably available.
‘‘(11) DEFINITION OF VICTIM.—For purposes of this subsection,
the term ‘victim’ means a consumer whose means of
identification or financial information has been used or transferred
(or has been alleged to have been used or transferred)
without the authority of that consumer, with the intent to
commit, or to aid or abet, an identity theft or a similar crime.
‘‘(12) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This subsection shall become effective
180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection.
‘‘(13) EFFECTIVENESS STUDY.—Not later than 18 months
after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Comptroller
General of the United States shall submit a report to Congress
assessing the effectiveness of this provision.’’.
(2) RELATION TO STATE LAWS.—Section 625(b)(1) of the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681t(b)(1), as so redesignated)
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
‘‘(G) section 609(e), relating to information available
to victims under section 609(e);’’.
(b) PUBLIC CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT IDENTITY THEFT.—Not later
than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission
shall establish and implement a media and distribution campaign
to teach the public how to prevent identity theft. Such campaign
shall include existing Commission education materials, as well as
radio, television, and print public service announcements, video
cassettes, interactive digital video discs (DVD’s) or compact audio
discs (CD’s), and Internet resources.
SEC. 152. BLOCKING OF INFORMATION RESULTING FROM IDENTITY
THEFT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 605A, as added
by this Act, the following:
‘‘§ 605B. Block of information resulting from identity theft
‘‘(a) BLOCK.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, a
consumer reporting agency shall block the reporting of any information
in the file of a consumer that the consumer identifies as
information that resulted from an alleged identity theft, not later
than 4 business days after the date of receipt by such agency
of—
‘‘(1) appropriate proof of the identity of the consumer;
‘‘(2) a copy of an identity theft report;
‘‘(3) the identification of such information by the consumer;
and
‘‘(4) a statement by the consumer that the information
is not information relating to any transaction by the consumer.
‘‘(b) NOTIFICATION.—A consumer reporting agency shall
promptly notify the furnisher of information identified by the consumer
under subsection (a)—
‘‘(1) that the information may be a result of identity theft;
‘‘(2) that an identity theft report has been filed;
‘‘(3) that a block has been requested under this section;
and
Deadline.
15 USC 1681c–2.
Deadline.
15 USC 1681c–1
note.
Deadline.
Reports.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00014 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1965
‘‘(4) of the effective dates of the block.
‘‘(c) AUTHORITY TO DECLINE OR RESCIND.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A consumer reporting agency may
decline to block, or may rescind any block, of information
relating to a consumer under this section, if the consumer
reporting agency reasonably determines that—
‘‘(A) the information was blocked in error or a block
was requested by the consumer in error;
‘‘( the information was blocked, or a block was
requested by the consumer, on the basis of a material
misrepresentation of fact by the consumer relevant to the
request to block; or
‘‘(C) the consumer obtained possession of goods, services,
or money as a result of the blocked transaction or
transactions.
‘‘(2) NOTIFICATION TO CONSUMER.—If a block of information
is declined or rescinded under this subsection, the affected
consumer shall be notified promptly, in the same manner as
consumers are notified of the reinsertion of information under
section 611(a)(5)(.
‘‘(3) SIGNIFICANCE OF BLOCK.—For purposes of this subsection,
if a consumer reporting agency rescinds a block, the
presence of information in the file of a consumer prior to
the blocking of such information is not evidence of whether
the consumer knew or should have known that the consumer
obtained possession of any goods, services, or money as a result
of the block.
‘‘(d) EXCEPTION FOR RESELLERS.—
‘‘(1) NO RESELLER FILE.—This section shall not apply to
a consumer reporting agency, if the consumer reporting
agency—
‘‘(A) is a reseller;
‘‘( is not, at the time of the request of the consumer
under subsection (a), otherwise furnishing
or reselling a
consumer report concerning the information identified by
the consumer; and
‘‘(C) informs the consumer, by any means, that the
consumer may report the identity theft to the Commission
to obtain consumer information regarding identity theft.
‘‘(2) RESELLER WITH FILE.—The sole obligation of the consumer
reporting agency under this section, with regard to any
request of a consumer under this section, shall be to block
the consumer report maintained by the consumer reporting
agency from any subsequent use, if—
‘‘(A) the consumer, in accordance with the provisions
of subsection (a), identifies, to a consumer reporting agency,
information in the file of the consumer that resulted from
identity theft; and
‘‘( the consumer reporting agency is a reseller of
the identified information.
‘‘(3) NOTICE.—In carrying out its obligation under paragraph
(2), the reseller shall promptly provide a notice to the
consumer of the decision to block the file. Such notice shall
contain the name, address, and telephone number of each consumer
reporting agency from which the consumer information
was obtained for resale.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00015 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1966 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘(e) EXCEPTION FOR VERIFICATION COMPANIES.—The provisions
of this section do not apply to a check services company, acting
as such, which issues authorizations for the purpose of approving
or processing negotiable instruments, electronic fund transfers, or
similar methods of payments, except that, beginning 4 business
days after receipt of information described in paragraphs (1)
through (3) of subsection (a), a check services company shall not
report to a national consumer reporting agency described in section
603(p), any information identified in the subject identity theft report
as resulting from identity theft.
‘‘(f) ACCESS TO BLOCKED INFORMATION BY LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCIES.—No provision of this section shall be construed as
requiring a consumer reporting agency to prevent a Federal, State,
or local law enforcement agency from accessing blocked information
in a consumer file to which the agency could otherwise obtain
access under this title.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.) is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 605 the following new
items:
‘‘605A. Identity theft prevention; fraud alerts and active duty alerts.
‘‘605B. Block of information resulting from identity theft.’’.
SEC. 153. COORDINATION OF IDENTITY THEFT COMPLAINT INVESTIGATIONS.
Section 621 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s)
is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(f) COORDINATION OF CONSUMER COMPLAINT INVESTIGATIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Each consumer reporting agency
described in section 603(p) shall develop and maintain procedures
for the referral to each other such agency of any consumer
complaint received by the agency alleging identity theft, or
requesting a fraud alert under section 605A or a block under
section 605B.
‘‘(2) MODEL FORM AND PROCEDURE FOR REPORTING IDENTITY
THEFT.—The Commission, in consultation with the Federal
banking agencies and the National Credit Union Administration,
shall develop a model form and model procedures to be
used by consumers who are victims of identity theft for contacting
and informing creditors and consumer reporting agencies
of the fraud.
‘‘(3) ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORTS.—Each consumer reporting
agency described in section 603(p) shall submit an annual summary
report to the Commission on consumer complaints
received by the agency on identity theft or fraud alerts.’’.
SEC. 154. PREVENTION OF REPOLLUTION OF CONSUMER REPORTS.
(a) PREVENTION OF REINSERTION OF ERRONEOUS INFORMATION.—
Section 623(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681s–2(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(6) DUTIES OF FURNISHERS UPON NOTICE OF IDENTITY
THEFT-RELATED INFORMATION.—
‘‘(A) REASONABLE PROCEDURES.—A person that furnishes
information to any consumer reporting agency shall
have in place reasonable procedures to respond to any
notification that it receives from a consumer reporting
agency under section 605B relating to information resulting
Procedures.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00016 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1967
from identity theft, to prevent that person from refurnishing
such blocked information.
‘‘( INFORMATION ALLEGED TO RESULT FROM IDENTITY
THEFT.—If a consumer submits an identity theft report
to a person who furnishes information to a consumer
reporting agency at the address specified by that person
for receiving such reports stating that information maintained
by such person that purports to relate to the consumer
resulted from identity theft, the person may not
furnish such information that purports to relate to the
consumer to any consumer reporting agency, unless the
person subsequently knows or is informed by the consumer
that the information is correct.’’.
(b) PROHIBITION ON SALE OR TRANSFER OF DEBT CAUSED BY
IDENTITY THEFT.—Section 615 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
(15 U.S.C. 1681m), as amended by this Act, is amended by adding
at the end the following:
‘‘(f) PROHIBITION ON SALE OR TRANSFER OF DEBT CAUSED BY
IDENTITY THEFT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No person shall sell, transfer for consideration,
or place for collection a debt that such person has
been notified under section 605B has resulted from identity
theft.
‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY.—The prohibitions of this subsection
shall apply to all persons collecting a debt described in paragraph
(1) after the date of a notification under paragraph
(1).
‘‘(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection
shall be construed to prohibit—
‘‘(A) the repurchase of a debt in any case in which
the assignee of the debt requires such repurchase because
the debt has resulted from identity theft;
‘‘( the securitization of a debt or the pledging of
a portfolio of debt as collateral in connection with a borrowing;
or
‘‘(C) the transfer of debt as a result of a merger, acquisition,
purchase and assumption transaction, or transfer of
substantially all of the assets of an entity.’’.
SEC. 155. NOTICE BY DEBT COLLECTORS WITH RESPECT TO FRAUDULENT
INFORMATION.
Section 615 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681m),
as amended by this Act, is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(g) DEBT COLLECTOR COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING IDENTITY
THEFT.—If a person acting as a debt collector (as that term is
defined in title VIII) on behalf of a third party that is a creditor
or other user of a consumer report is notified that any information
relating to a debt that the person is attempting to collect may
be fraudulent or may be the result of identity theft, that person
shall—
‘‘(1) notify the third party that the information may be
fraudulent or may be the result of identity theft; and
‘‘(2) upon request of the consumer to whom the debt
purportedly relates, provide to the consumer all information
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00017 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1968 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
to which
the consumer would otherwise be entitled if the consumer
were not a victim of identity theft, but wished to dispute
the debt under provisions of law applicable to that person.’’.
SEC. 156. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
Section 618 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681p)
is amended to read as follows:
‘‘§ 618. Jurisdiction of courts; limitation of actions
‘‘An action to enforce any liability created under this title
may be brought in any appropriate United States district court,
without regard to the amount in controversy, or in any other court
of competent jurisdiction, not later than the earlier of—
‘‘(1) 2 years after the date of discovery by the plaintiff
of the violation that is the basis for such liability; or
‘‘(2) 5 years after the date on which the violation that
is the basis for such liability occurs.’’.
SEC. 157. STUDY ON THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO COMBAT IDENTITY
THEFT.
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall
conduct a study of the use of biometrics and other similar technologies
to reduce the incidence and costs to society of identity
theft by providing convincing evidence of who actually performed
a given financial transaction.
(b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall consult
with Federal banking agencies, the Commission, and representatives
of financial institutions, consumer reporting agencies, Federal,
State, and local government agencies that issue official forms or
means of identification, State prosecutors, law enforcement agencies,
the biometric industry, and the general public in formulating
and conducting the study required by subsection (a).
(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized
to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury for fiscal year
2004, such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions
of this section.
(d) REPORT REQUIRED.—Before the end of the 180-day period
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall submit a report to Congress containing the findings and
conclusions of the study required under subsection (a), together
with such recommendations for legislative or administrative actions
as may be appropriate.
TITLE II—IMPROVEMENTS IN USE OF
AND CONSUMER ACCESS TO CREDIT
INFORMATION
SEC. 211. FREE CONSUMER REPORTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 612 of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681j) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (a) as subsection (f), and
transferring it to the end of the section;
(2) by inserting before subsection (b) the following:
‘‘(a) FREE ANNUAL DISCLOSURE.—
‘‘(1) NATIONWIDE CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES.—
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00018 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1969
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—All consumer reporting agencies
described in subsections (p) and (w) of section 603 shall
make all disclosures pursuant to section 609 once during
any 12-month period upon request of the consumer and
without charge to the consumer.
‘‘( CENTRALIZED SOURCE.—Subparagraph (A) shall
apply with respect to a consumer reporting agency
described in section 603(p) only if the request from the
consumer is made using the centralized source established
for such purpose in accordance with section 211(c) of the
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003.
‘‘(C) NATIONWIDE SPECIALTY CONSUMER REPORTING
AGENCY.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall prescribe
regulations applicable to each consumer reporting
agency described in section 603(w) to require the
establishment of a streamlined process for consumers
to request consumer reports under subparagraph (A),
which shall include, at a minimum, the establishment
by each such agency of a toll-free telephone number
for such requests.
‘‘(ii) CONSIDERATIONS.—In prescribing regulations
under clause (i), the Commission shall consider—
‘‘(I) the significant demands that may be
placed on consumer reporting agencies in providing
such consumer reports;
‘‘(II) appropriate means to ensure that consumer
reporting agencies can satisfactorily meet
those demands, including the efficacy of a system
of staggering the availability to consumers of such
consumer reports; and
‘‘(III) the ease by which consumers should be
able to contact consumer reporting agencies with
respect to access to such consumer reports.
‘‘(iii) DATE OF ISSUANCE.—The Commission shall
issue the regulations required by this subparagraph
in final form not later than 6 months after the date
of enactment of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003.
‘‘(iv) CONSIDERATION OF ABILITY TO COMPLY.—The
regulations of the Commission under this subparagraph
shall establish an effective date by which each
nationwide specialty consumer reporting agency (as
defined in section 603(w)) shall be required to comply
with subsection (a), which effective date—
‘‘(I) shall be established after consideration of
the ability of each nationwide specialty consumer
reporting agency to comply with subsection (a);
and
‘‘(II) shall be not later than 6 months after
the date on which such regulations are issued
in final form (or such additional period not to
exceed 3 months, as the Commission determines
appropriate).
‘‘(2) TIMING.—A consumer reporting agency shall provide
a consumer report under paragraph (1) not later than 15 days
Deadline.
Deadline.
Effective date.
Deadline.
Regulations.
Applicability.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00019 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1970 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
after the date on which the request is received under paragraph
(1).
‘‘(3) REINVESTIGATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time periods
specified in section 611(a)(1), a reinvestigation under that section
by a consumer reporting agency upon a request of a consumer
that is made after receiving a consumer report under
this subsection shall be completed not later than 45 days after
the date on which the request is received.
‘‘(4) EXCEPTION FOR FIRST 12 MONTHS OF OPERATION.—This
subsection shall not apply to a consumer reporting agency
that has not been furnishing consumer reports to third parties
on a continuing basis during the 12-month period preceding
a request under paragraph (1), with respect to consumers
residing nationwide.’’;
(3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
(4) by inserting before subsection (e), as redesignated, the
following:
‘‘(d) FREE DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD ALERTS.—
Upon the request of a consumer, a consumer reporting agency
described in section 603(p) shall make all disclosures pursuant
to section 609 without charge to the consumer, as provided in
subsections (a)(2) and (b)(2) of section 605A, as applicable.’’;
(5) in subsection (e), as redesignated, by striking ‘‘subsection
(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (f)’’; and
(6) in subsection (f), as redesignated, by striking ‘‘Except
as provided in subsections (b), (c), and (d), a’’ and inserting
‘‘In the case of a request from a consumer other than a request
that is covered by any of subsections (a) through (d), a’’.
(b) CIRCUMVENTION PROHIBITED.—The Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.) is amended by adding after section
628, as added by section 216 of this Act, the following new section:
‘‘§ 629. Corporate and technological circumvention prohibited
‘‘The Commission shall prescribe regulations, to become effective
not later than 90 da
ys after the date of enactment of this
section, to prevent a consumer reporting agency from circumventing
or evading treatment as a consumer reporting agency described
in section 603(p) for purposes of this title, including—
‘‘(1) by means of a corporate reorganization or restructuring,
including a merger, acquisition, dissolution, divestiture,
or asset sale of a consumer reporting agency; or
‘‘(2) by maintaining or merging public record and credit
account information in a manner that is substantially equivalent
to that described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section
603(p), in the manner described in section 603(p).’’.
(c) SUMMARY OF RIGHTS TO OBTAIN AND DISPUTE INFORMATION
IN CONSUMER REPORTS AND TO OBTAIN CREDIT SCORES.—Section
609(c) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681g) is amended
to read as follows:
‘‘(c) SUMMARY OF RIGHTS TO OBTAIN AND DISPUTE INFORMATION
IN CONSUMER REPORTS AND TO OBTAIN CREDIT SCORES.—
‘‘(1) COMMISSION SUMMARY OF RIGHTS REQUIRED.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall prepare a
model summary of the rights of consumers under this
title.
Regulations.
Effective date.
15 USC 1681x.
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00020 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1971
‘‘( CONTENT OF SUMMARY.—The summary of rights
prepared under subparagraph (A) shall include a description
of—
‘‘(i) the right of a consumer to obtain a copy of
a consumer report under subsection (a) from each consumer
reporting agency;
‘‘(ii) the frequency and circumstances under which
a consumer is entitled to receive a consumer report
without charge under section 612;
‘‘(iii) the right of a consumer to dispute information
in the file of the consumer under section 611;
‘‘(iv) the right of a consumer to obtain a credit
score from a consumer reporting agency, and a description
of how to obtain a credit score;
‘‘(v) the method by which a consumer can contact,
and obtain a consumer report from, a consumer
reporting agency without charge, as provided in the
regulations of the Commission prescribed under section
211(c) of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003; and
‘‘(vi) the method by which a consumer can contact,
and obtain a consumer report from, a consumer
reporting agency described in section 603(w), as provided
in the regulations of the Commission prescribed
under section 612(a)(1)(C).
‘‘(C) AVAILABILITY OF SUMMARY OF RIGHTS.—The
Commission shall—
‘‘(i) actively publicize the availability of the summary
of rights prepared under this paragraph;
‘‘(ii) conspicuously post on its Internet website the
availability of such summary of rights; and
‘‘(iii) promptly make such summary of rights available
to consumers, on request.
‘‘(2) SUMMARY OF RIGHTS REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED WITH
AGENCY DISCLOSURES.—A consumer reporting agency shall provide
to a consumer, with each written disclosure by the agency
to the consumer under this section—
‘‘(A) the summary of rights prepared by the Commission
under paragraph (1);
‘‘( in the case of a consumer reporting agency
described in section 603(p), a toll-free telephone number
established by the agency, at which personnel are accessible
to consumers during normal business hours;
‘‘(C) a list of all Federal agencies responsible for
enforcing any provision of this title, and the address and
any appropriate phone number of each such agency, in
a form that will assist the consumer in selecting the appropriate
agency;
‘‘(D) a statement that the consumer may have additional
rights under State law, and that the consumer may
wish to contact a State or local consumer protection agency
or a State attorney general (or the equivalent thereof)
to learn of those rights; and
‘‘(E) a statement that a consumer reporting agency
is not required to remove accurate derogatory information
from the file of a consumer, unless the information is
outdated under section 605 or cannot be verified.’’.
Public
information.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00021 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1972 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
(d) RULEMAKING REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall prescribe regulations
applicable to consumer reporting agencies described in
section 603(p) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, to require
the establishment of—
(A) a centralized source through which consumers may
obtain a consumer report from each such consumer
reporting agency, using a single request, and without
charge to the consumer, as provided in section 612(a) of
the Fair Credit Reporting Act (as amended by this section);
and
( a standardized form for a consumer to make such
a request for a consumer report by mail or through an
Internet website.
(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In prescribing regulations under
paragraph (1), the Commission shall consider—
(A) the significant demands that may be placed on
consumer reporting agencies in providing such consumer
reports;
( appropriate means to ensure that consumer
reporting agencies can satisfactorily meet those demands,
including the efficacy of a system of staggering the availability
to consumers of such consumer reports; and
(C) the ease by which consumers should be able to
contact consumer reporting agencies with respect to access
to such consumer reports.
(3) CENTRALIZED SOURCE.—The centralized source for a
request for a consumer report from a consumer required by
this subsection shall provide for—
(A) a toll-free telephone number for such purpose;
( use of an Internet website for such purpose; and
(C) a process for requests by mail for such purpose.
(4) TRANSITION.—The regulations of the Commission under
paragraph (1) shall provide for an orderly transition by consumer
reporting agencies described in section 603(p) of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act to the centralized source for consumer
report distribution required by section 612(a)(1)(, as amended
by this section, in a manner that—
(A) does not temporarily overwhelm such consumer
reporting agencies with requests for disclosures of consumer
reports beyond their capacity to deliver; and
( does not deny creditors, other users, and consumers
access to consumer reports on a time-sensitive basis for
specific purposes, such as home purchases or suspicions
of identity theft, during the transition period.
(5) TIMING.—Regulations required by this subsection
shall—
(A) be issued in final form not later than 6 months
after the date of enactment of this Act; and
( become effective not later than 6 months after
the date on which they are issued in final form.
(6) SCOPE OF REGULATIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall, by rule, determine
whether to require a consumer reporting agency that
compiles and maintains files on consumers on substantially
a nationwide basis, other than one described in section
Effective date.
Deadline.
15 USC 1681j
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO
00159 Frm 00022 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1973
603(p) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, to make free consumer
reports available upon consumer request, and if
so, whether such consumer reporting agencies should make
such free reports available through the centralized source
described in paragraph (1)(A).
( CONSIDERATIONS.—Before making any determination
under subparagraph (A), the Commission shall
consider—
(i) the number of requests for consumer reports
to, and the number of consumer reports generated
by, the consumer reporting agency, in comparison with
consumer reporting agencies described in subsections
(p) and (w) of section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act;
(ii) the overall scope of the operations of the consumer
reporting agency;
(iii) the needs of consumers for access to consumer
reports provided by consumer reporting agencies free
of charge;
(iv) the costs of providing access to consumer
reports by consumer reporting agencies free of charge;
and
(v) the effects on the ongoing competitive viability
of such consumer reporting agencies if such free access
is required.
SEC. 212. DISCLOSURE OF CREDIT SCORES.
(a) STATEMENT ON AVAILABILITY OF CREDIT SCORES.—Section
609(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681g(a)) is
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(6) If the consumer requests the credit file and not the
credit score, a statement that the consumer may request and
obtain a credit score.’’.
(b) DISCLOSURE OF CREDIT SCORES.—Section 609 of the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681g), as amended by this Act,
is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(f) DISCLOSURE OF CREDIT SCORES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon the request of a consumer for
a credit score, a consumer reporting agency shall supply to
the consumer a statement indicating that the information and
credit scoring model may be different than the credit score
that may be used by the lender, and a notice which shall
include—
‘‘(A) the current credit score of the consumer or the
most recent credit score of the consumer that was previously
calculated by the credit reporting agency for a
purpose related to the extension of credit;
‘‘( the range of possible credit scores under the model
used;
‘‘(C) all of the key factors that adversely affected the
credit score of the consumer in the model used, the total
number of which shall not exceed 4, subject to paragraph
(9);
‘‘(D) the date on which the credit score was created;
and
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00023 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1974 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘(E) the name of the person or entity that provided
the credit score or credit file upon which the credit score
was created.
‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this subsection, the following
definitions shall apply:
‘‘(A) CREDIT SCORE.—The term ‘credit score’—
‘‘(i) means a numerical value or a categorization
derived from a statistical tool or modeling system used
by a person who makes or arranges a loan to predict
the likelihood of certain credit behaviors, including
default (and the numerical value or the categorization
derived from such analysis may also be referred to
as a ‘risk predictor’ or ‘risk score’); and
‘‘(ii) does not include—
‘‘(I) any mortgage score or rating of an automated
underwriting system that considers one or
more factors in addition to credit information,
including the loan to value ratio, the amount of
down payment, or the financial assets of a consumer;
or
‘‘(II) any other elements of the underwriting
process or underwriting decision.
‘‘( KEY FACTORS.—The term ‘key factors’ means all
relevant elements or reasons adversely affecting the credit
score for the particular individual, listed in the order of
their importance based on their effect on the credit score.
‘‘(3) TIMEFRAME AND MANNER OF DISCLOSURE.—The
information required by this subsection shall be provided in
the same timeframe and manner as the information described
in subsection (a).
‘‘(4) APPLICABILITY TO CERTAIN USES.—This subsection shall
not be construed so as to compel a consumer reporting agency
to develop or disclose a score if the agency does not—
‘‘(A) distribute scores that are used in connection with
residential real property loans; or
‘‘( develop scores that assist credit providers in
understanding the general credit behavior of a consumer
and predicting the future credit behavior of the consumer.
‘‘(5) APPLICABILITY TO CREDIT SCORES DEVELOPED BY
ANOTHER PERSON.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—This subsection shall not be construed
to require a consumer reporting agency that distributes
credit scores developed by another person or entity
to provide a further explanation of them, or to process
a dispute arising pursuant to section 611, except that the
consumer reporting agency shall provide the consumer with
the name and address and website for contacting the person
or entity who developed the score or developed the methodology
of the score.
‘‘( EXCEPTION.—This paragraph shall not apply to
a consumer reporting agency that develops or modifies
scores that are developed by another person or entity.
‘‘(6) MAINTENANCE OF CREDIT SCORES NOT REQUIRED.—This
subsection shall not be construed to require a consumer
reporting agency to maintain credit scores in its files.
‘‘(7) COMPLIANCE IN CERTAIN CASES.—In complying with
this subsection, a consumer reporting agency shall—
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00024 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1975
‘‘(A) supply the consumer with a credit score that is
derived from a credit scoring model that is widely distributed
to users by that consumer reporting agency in connection
with residential real property loans or with a credit
score that assists the consumer in understanding the credit
scoring assessment of the credit behavior of the consumer
and predictions about the future credit behavior of the
consumer; and
‘‘( a statement indicating that the information and
credit scoring model may be different than that used by
the lender.
‘‘(8) FAIR AND REASONABLE FEE.—A consumer reporting
agency may charge a fair and reasonable fee, as determined
by the Commission, for providing the information required
under this subsection.
‘‘(9) USE OF ENQUIRIES AS A KEY FACTOR.—If a key factor
that adversely affects the credit score of a consumer consists
of the number of enquiries made with respect to a consumer
report, that factor shall be included in the disclosure pursuant
to paragraph (1)(C) without regard to the numerical limitation
in such paragraph.’’.
(c) DISCLOSURE OF CREDIT SCORES BY CERTAIN MORTGAGE
LENDERS.—Section 609 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681g), as amended by this Act, is amended by adding at the
end the following:
‘‘(g) DISCLOSURE OF CREDIT SCORES BY CERTAIN MORTGAGE
LENDERS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any person who makes or arranges loans
and who uses a cons
umer credit score, as defined in subsection
(f), in connection with an application initiated or sought by
a consumer for a closed end loan or the establishment of an
open end loan for a consumer purpose that is secured by 1
to 4 units of residential real property (hereafter in this subsection
referred to as the ‘lender’) shall provide the following
to the consumer as soon as reasonably practicable:
‘‘(A) INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDER SUBSECTION (f ).—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A copy of the information identified
in subsection (f) that was obtained from a consumer
reporting agency or was developed and used
by the user of the information.
‘‘(ii) NOTICE UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (D).—In addition
to the information provided to it by a third party
that provided the credit score or scores, a lender is
only required to provide the notice contained in
subparagraph (D).
‘‘( DISCLOSURES IN CASE OF AUTOMATED UNDERWRITING
SYSTEM.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—If a person that is subject to
this subsection uses an automated underwriting
system to underwrite a loan, that person may satisfy
the obligation to provide a credit score by disclosing
a credit score and associated key factors supplied by
a consumer reporting agency.
‘‘(ii) NUMERICAL CREDIT SCORE.—However, if a
numerical credit score is generated by an automated
underwriting system used by an enterprise, and that
score is disclosed to the person, the score shall be
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00025 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1976 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
disclosed to the consumer consistent with subparagraph
(C).
‘‘(iii) ENTERPRISE DEFINED.—For purposes of this
subparagraph, the term ‘enterprise’ has the same
meaning as in paragraph (6) of section 1303 of the
Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and
Soundness Act of 1992.
‘‘(C) DISCLOSURES OF CREDIT SCORES NOT OBTAINED
FROM A CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY.—A person that is
subject to the provisions of this subsection and that uses
a credit score, other than a credit score provided by a
consumer reporting agency, may satisfy the obligation to
provide a credit score by disclosing a credit score and
associated key factors supplied by a consumer reporting
agency.
‘‘(D) NOTICE TO HOME LOAN APPLICANTS.—A copy of
the following notice, which shall include the name, address,
and telephone number of each consumer reporting agency
providing a credit score that was used:
‘NOTICE TO THE HOME LOAN APPLICANT
‘In connection with your application for a home loan, the lender
must disclose to you the score that a consumer reporting agency
distributed to users and the lender used in connection with your
home loan, and the key factors affecting your credit scores.
‘The credit score is a computer generated summary calculated
at the time of the request and based on information that a consumer
reporting agency or lender has on file. The scores are based on
data about your credit history and payment patterns. Credit scores
are important because they are used to assist the lender in determining
whether you will obtain a loan. They may also be used
to determine what interest rate you may be offered on the mortgage.
Credit scores can change over time, depending on your conduct,
how your credit history and payment patterns change, and how
credit scoring technologies change.
‘Because the score is based on information in your credit history,
it is very important that you review the credit-related information
that is being furnished to make sure it is accurate. Credit
records may vary from one company to another.
‘If you have questions about your credit score or the credit
information that is furnished to you, contact the consumer reporting
agency at the address and telephone number provided with this
notice, or contact the lender, if the lender developed or generated
the credit score. The consumer reporting agency plays no part
in the decision to take any action on the loan application and
is unable to provide you with specific reasons for the decision
on a loan application.
‘If you have questions concerning the terms of the loan, contact
the lender.’.
‘‘(E) ACTIONS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION.—
This subsection shall not require any person to—
‘‘(i) explain the information provided pursuant to
subsection (f);
‘‘(ii) disclose any information other than a credit
score or key factors, as defined in subsection (f);
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00026 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1977
‘‘(iii) disclose any credit score or related information
obtained by the user after a loan has closed;
‘‘(iv) provide more than 1 disclosure per loan transaction;
or
‘‘(v) provide the disclosure required by this subsection
when another person has made the disclosure
to the consumer for that loan transaction.
‘‘(F) NO OBLIGATION FOR CONTENT.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The obligation of any person
pursuant to this subsection shall be limited solely to
providing a copy of the information that was received
from the consumer reporting agency.
‘‘(ii) LIMIT ON LIABILITY.—No person has liability
under this subsection for the content of that information
or for the omission of any information within
the report provided by the consumer reporting agency.
‘‘(G) PERSON DEFINED AS EXCLUDING ENTERPRISE.—As
used in this subsection, the term ‘person’ does not include
an enterprise (as defined in paragraph (6) of section 1303
of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and
Soundness Act of 1992).
‘‘(2) PROHIBITION ON DISCLOSURE CLAUSES NULL AND VOID.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any provision in a contract that
prohibits the disclosure of a credit score by a person who
makes or arranges loans or a consumer reporting agency
is void.
‘‘( NO LIABILITY FOR DISCLOSURE UNDER THIS SUBSECTION.—
A lender shall not have liability under any
contractual provision for disclosure of a credit score pursuant
to this subsection.’’.
(d) INCLUSION OF KEY FACTOR IN CREDIT SCORE INFORMATION
IN CONSUMER REPORT.—Section 605(d) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c(d)) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘DISCLOSED.—Any consumer reporting
agency’’ and inserting ‘‘DISCLOSED.—
‘‘(1) TITLE 11 INFORMATION.—Any consumer reporting
agency’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(2) KEY FACTOR IN CREDIT SCORE INFORMATION.—Any consumer
reporting agency that furnishes a consumer report that
contains any credit score or any other risk score or predictor
on any consumer shall include in the report a clear and conspicuous
statement that a key factor (as defined in section
609(f)(2)() that adversely affected such score or predictor
was the number of enquiries, if such a predictor was in fact
a key factor that adversely affected such score. This paragraph
shall not apply to a check services company, acting as such,
which issues authorizations for the purpose of approving or
processing negotiable instruments, electronic fund transfers,
or similar methods of payments, but only to the extent that
such company is engaged in such activities.’’.
(e) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 625(b)
of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681t(b)), as so designated
by section 214 of this Act, is amended—
(1) by strikin
g ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (2); and
(2) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00027 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1978 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘(3) with respect to the disclosures required to be made
under subsection (c), (d), (e), or (g) of section 609, or subsection
(f) of section 609 relating to the disclosure of credit scores
for credit granting purposes, except that this paragraph—
‘‘(A) shall not apply with respect to sections 1785.10,
1785.16, and 1785.20.2 of the California Civil Code (as
in effect on the date of enactment of the Fair and Accurate
Credit Transactions Act of 2003) and section 1785.15
through section 1785.15.2 of such Code (as in effect on
such date);
‘‘( shall not apply with respect to sections 5–3–106(2)
and 212–14.3–104.3 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (as
in effect on the date of enactment of the Fair and Accurate
Credit Transactions Act of 2003); and
‘‘(C) shall not be construed as limiting, annulling,
affecting, or superseding any provision of the laws of any
State regulating the use in an insurance activity, or regulating
disclosures concerning such use, of a credit-based
insurance score of a consumer by any person engaged in
the business of insurance;
‘‘(4) with respect to the frequency of any disclosure under
section 612(a), except that this paragraph shall not apply—
‘‘(A) with respect to section 12–14.3–105(1)(d) of the
Colorado Revised Statutes (as in effect on the date of
enactment of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003);
‘‘( with respect to section 10–1–393(29)(C) of the
Georgia Code (as in effect on the date of enactment of
the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003);
‘‘(C) with respect to section 1316.2 of title 10 of the
Maine Revised Statutes (as in effect on the date of enactment
of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
of 2003);
‘‘(D) with respect to sections 14–1209(a)(1) and 14–
1209(b)(1)(i) of the Commercial Law Article of the Code
of Maryland (as in effect on the date of enactment of
the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003);
‘‘(E) with respect to section 59(d) and section 59(e)
of chapter 93 of the General Laws of Massachusetts (as
in effect on the date of enactment of the Fair and Accurate
Credit Transactions Act of 2003);
‘‘(F) with respect to section 56:11–37.10(a)(1) of the
New Jersey Revised Statutes (as in effect on the date
of enactment of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003); or
‘‘(G) with respect to section 2480c(a)(1) of title 9 of
the Vermont Statutes Annotated (as in effect on the date
of enactment of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003); or’’.
SEC. 213. ENHANCED DISCLOSURE OF THE MEANS AVAILABLE TO OPT
OUT OF PRESCREENED LISTS.
(a) NOTICE AND RESPONSE FORMAT FOR USERS OF REPORTS.—
Section 615(d)(2) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681m(d)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) DISCLOSURE OF ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER; FORMAT.—
A statement under paragraph (1) shall—
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00028 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1979
‘‘(A) include the address and toll-free telephone number
of the appropriate notification system established under
section 604(e); and
‘‘( be presented in such format and in such type
size and manner as to be simple and easy to understand,
as established by the Commission, by rule, in consultation
with the Federal banking agencies and the National Credit
Union Administration.’’.
(b) RULEMAKING SCHEDULE.—Regulations required by section
615(d)(2) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by this
section, shall be issued in final form not later than 1 year after
the date of enactment of this Act.
(c) DURATION OF ELECTIONS.—Section 604(e) of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681b(e)) is amended in each of paragraphs
(3)(A) and (4)((i)), by striking ‘‘2-year period’’ each place that
term appears and inserting ‘‘5-year period’’.
(d) PUBLIC AWARENESS CAMPAIGN.—The Commission shall
actively publicize and conspicuously post on its website any address
and the toll-free telephone number established as part of a notification
system for opting out of prescreening under section 604(e)
of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681b(e)), and otherwise
take measures to increase public awareness regarding the availability
of the right to opt out of prescreening.
(e) ANALYSIS OF FURTHER RESTRICTIONS ON OFFERS OF CREDIT
OR INSURANCE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Board shall conduct a study of—
(A) the ability of consumers to avoid receiving written
offers of credit or insurance in connection with transactions
not initiated by the consumer; and
( the potential impact that any further restrictions
on providing consumers with such written offers of credit
or insurance would have on consumers.
(2) REPORT.—The Board shall submit a report summarizing
the results of the study required under paragraph (1) to the
Congress not later than 12 months after the date of enactment
of this Act, together with such recommendations for legislative
or administrative action as the Board may determine to be
appropriate.
(3) CONTENT OF REPORT.—The report described in paragraph
(2) shall address the following issues:
(A) The current statutory or voluntary mechanisms
that are available to a consumer to notify lenders and
insurance providers that the consumer does not wish to
receive written offers of credit or insurance.
( The extent to which consumers are currently utilizing
existing statutory and voluntary mechanisms to avoid
receiving offers of credit or insurance.
(C) The benefits provided to consumers as a result
of receiving written offers of credit or insurance.
(D) Whether consumers incur significant costs or are
otherwise adversely affected by the receipt of written offers
of credit or insurance.
(E) Whether further restricting the ability of lenders
and insurers to provide written offers of credit or insurance
to consumers would affect—
(i) the cost consumers pay to obtain credit or insurance;
Deadline.
15 USC 1601
note.
Internet.
15 USC 1681b
note.
Deadline.
15 USC 1681m
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00029 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1980 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
(ii) the availability of credit or insurance;
(iii) consumers’ knowledge about new or alternative
products and services;
(iv) the ability of lenders or insurers to compete
with one another; and
(v) the ability to offer credit or insurance products
to consumers who have been traditionally underserved.
SEC. 214. AFFILIATE SHARING.
(a) LIMITATION.—The Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1601
et seq.) is amended—
(1) by redesignating sections 624 (15 U.S.C. 1681t), 625
(15 U.S.C. 1681u), and 626 (15 U.S.C. 6181v) as sections 625,
626, and 627, respectively; and
(2) by inserting after section 623 the following:
‘‘§ 624. Affiliate sharing
‘‘(a) SPE
CIAL RULE FOR SOLICITATION FOR PURPOSES OF MARKETING.—
‘‘(1) NOTICE.—Any person that receives from another person
related to it by common ownership or affiliated by corporate
control a communication of information that would be a consumer
report, but for clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of section
603(d)(2)(A), may not use the information to make a solicitation
for marketing purposes to a consumer about its products or
services, unless—
‘‘(A) it is clearly and conspicuously disclosed to the
consumer that the information may be communicated
among such persons for purposes of making such solicitations
to the consumer; and
‘‘( the consumer is provided an opportunity and a
simple method to prohibit the making of such solicitations
to the consumer by such person.
‘‘(2) CONSUMER CHOICE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The notice required under paragraph
(1) shall allow the consumer the opportunity to prohibit
all solicitations referred to in such paragraph, and
may allow the consumer to choose from different options
when electing to prohibit the sending of such solicitations,
including options regarding the types of entities and
information covered, and which methods of delivering solicitations
the consumer elects to prohibit.
‘‘( FORMAT.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the
notice required under paragraph (1) shall be clear, conspicuous,
and concise, and any method provided under
paragraph (1)( shall be simple. The regulations prescribed
to implement this section shall provide specific
guidance regarding how to comply with such standards.
‘‘(3) DURATION.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The election of a consumer pursuant
to paragraph (1)( to prohibit the making of solicitations
shall be effective for at least 5 years, beginning on the
date on which the person receives the election of the consumer,
unless the consumer requests that such election
be revoked.
‘‘( NOTICE UPON EXPIRATION OF EFFECTIVE PERIOD.—
At such time as the election of a consumer pursuant to
15 USC 1681s–3.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00030 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1981
paragraph (1)( is no longer effective, a person may not
use information that the person receives in the manner
described in paragraph (1) to make any solicitation for
marketing purposes to the consumer, unless the consumer
receives a notice and an opportunity, using a simple
method, to extend the opt-out for another period of at
least 5 years, pursuant to the procedures described in
paragraph (1).
‘‘(4) SCOPE.—This section shall not apply to a person—
‘‘(A) using information to make a solicitation for marketing
purposes to a consumer with whom the person has
a pre-existing business relationship;
‘‘( using information to facilitate communications to
an individual for whose benefit the person provides
employee benefit or other services pursuant to a contract
with an employer related to and arising out of the current
employment relationship or status of the individual as
a participant or beneficiary of an employee benefit plan;
‘‘(C) using information to perform services on behalf
of another person related by common ownership or affiliated
by corporate control, except that this subparagraph
shall not be construed as permitting a person to send
solicitations on behalf of another person, if such other
person would not be permitted to send the solicitation
on its own behalf as a result of the election of the consumer
to prohibit solicitations under paragraph (1)(;
‘‘(D) using information in response to a communication
initiated by the consumer;
‘‘(E) using information in response to solicitations
authorized or requested by the consumer; or
‘‘(F) if compliance with this section by that person
would prevent compliance by that person with any provision
of State insurance laws pertaining to unfair discrimination
in any State in which the person is lawfully doing
business.
‘‘(5) NO RETROACTIVITY.—This subsection shall not prohibit
the use of information to send a solicitation to a consumer
if such information was received prior to the date on which
persons are required to comply with regulations implementing
this subsection.
‘‘(b) NOTICE FOR OTHER PURPOSES PERMISSIBLE.—A notice or
other disclosure under this section may be coordinated and consolidated
with any other notice required to be issued under any other
provision of law by a person that is subject to this section, and
a notice or other disclosure that is equivalent to the notice required
by subsection (a), and that is provided by a person described in
subsection (a) to a consumer together with disclosures required
by any other provision of law, shall satisfy the requirements of
subsection (a).
‘‘(c) USER REQUIREMENTS.—Requirements with respect to the
use by a person of information received from another person related
to it by common ownership or affiliated by corporate control, such
as the requirements of this section, constitute requirements with
respect to the exchange of information among persons affiliated
by common ownership or common corporate control, within the
meaning of section 625(b)(2).
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00031 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1982 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the following
definitions shall apply:
‘‘(1) PRE-EXISTING BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP.—The term ‘preexisting
business relationship’ means a relationship between
a person, or a person’s licensed agent, and a consumer, based
on—
‘‘(A) a financial contract between a person and a consumer
which is in force;
‘‘( the purchase, rental, or lease by the consumer
of that person’s goods or services, or a financial transaction
(including holding an active account or a policy in force
or having another continuing relationship) between the
consumer and that person during the 18-month period
immediately preceding the date on which the consumer
is sent a solicitation covered by this section;
‘‘(C) an inquiry or application by the consumer
regarding a product or service offered by that person,
during the 3-month period immediately preceding the date
on which the consumer is sent a solicitation covered by
this section; or
‘‘(D) any other pre-existing customer relationship
defined in the regulations implementing this section.
‘‘(2) SOLICITATION.—The term ‘solicitation’ means the marketing
of a product or service initiated by a person to a particular
consumer that is based on an exchange of information
described in subsection (a), and is intended to encourage the
consumer to purchase such product or service, but does not
include communications that are directed at the general public
or determined not to be a solicitation by the regulations prescribed
under this section.’’.
(b) RULEMAKING REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal banking agencies, the
National Credit Union Administration, and the Commission,
with respect to the entities that are subject to their respective
enforcement authority under section 621 of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act and the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and in coordination as described in paragraph (2), shall prescribe
regulations to implement section 624 of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act, as added by this section.
(2) COORDINATION.—Each agency required to prescribe
regulations under paragraph (1) shall consult and coordinate
with each other such agency so that, to the extent possible,
the regulations prescribed by each such entity are consistent
and comparable with the regulations prescribed by each other
such agency.
(3) CONSIDERATIONS.—In promulgating regulations under
this subsection, each agency referred to in paragraph (1) shall—
(A) ensure that affiliate sharing notification methods
provide a simple means for consumers to make determinations
and choices under section 624 of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act, as added by this section;
( consider the affiliate sharing notification practices
employed on the date of enactment of this Act by persons
that will be subject to that section 624; and
(C) ensure that notices and disclosures may be coordinated
and consolidated, as provided in subsection (b) of
that section 624.
15 USC 1681s–3
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00032 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1983
(4) TIMING.—Regulations required by this subsection
shall—
(A) be issued in final form not later than 9 months
after the date of enactment of this Act; and
( become effective not later than 6 months after
the date on which they are issued in final form.
(c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—Section 603(d)(2)(A) of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681(d)(2)(A)) is amended by inserting
‘‘subject to section 624,’’ after ‘‘(A)’’.
(2) RELATION TO STATE LAWS.—Section 625(b)(1) of the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681t(b)(1)), as so designated
by subsection (a) of this section, is amended—
(A) by striking ‘‘or’’ after the semicolon at the end
of subparagraph (E); and
( by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
‘‘(H) section 624, relating to the exchange and use
of information to make a solicitation for marketing purposes;
or’’.
(3) CROSS REFERENCE CORRECTION.—Section 627(d) of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681v(d)), as so designated
by subsection (a) of this section, is amended by striking ‘‘section
625’’ and inserting ‘‘section 626’’.
(4) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections for title
VI of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1601
et seq.) is amended by striking the items relating to sections
624 through 626 and inserting the following:
‘‘624. Affiliate sharing.
‘‘625. Relation to State laws.
‘‘626. Disclosures to FBI for counterintelligence purposes.
‘‘627. Disclosures to governmental agencies for counterintelligence purposes.’’.
(e) STUDIES OF INFORMATION SHARING PRACTICES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal banking agencies, the
National Credit Union Administration, and the Commission
shall jointly conduct regular studies of the consumer information
sharing practices by financial institutions and other persons
that are creditors or users of consumer reports with their
affiliates.
(2) MATTERS FOR STUDY.—In conducting the studies
required by paragraph (1), the agencies described in paragraph
(1) shall—
(A) identify—
(i) the purposes for which financial institutions
and other creditors and users of consumer reports
share consumer information;
(ii) the types of information shared by such entities
with their affiliates;
(iii) the number of choices provided to consumers
with respect to the control of such sharing, and the
degree to and manner in which consumers exercise
such choices, if at all; and
(iv) whether such entities share or may share
personally identifiable transaction or experience
information with affiliates for purposes—
(I) that are related to employment or hiring,
including whether the person that is the subject
15 USC 1681s–3
note.
15 USC 1681a.
Effective date.
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00033 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1984 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
of such information is given notice of such sharing,
and the specific uses of such shared information;
or
(II) of general publication of such information;
and
( specifically examine the information sharing practices
that financial institutions and other creditors and
users of consumer reports and their affiliates employ for
the purpose of making underwriting decisions or credit
evaluations of consumers.
(3) REPORTS.—
(A) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Federal banking agencies,
the National Credit Union Administration, and the
Commission shall jointly submit a report to the Congress
on the results of the initial study conducted in accordance
with this subsection, together with any recommendations
for legislative or regulatory action.
( FOLLOWUP REPORTS.—The Federal banking agencies,
the National Credit Union Administration, and the
Commission shall, not less frequently than once every 3
years following the date of submission of the initial report
under subparagraph (A), jointly submit a report to the
Congress that, together with any recommendations for
legislative or regulatory action—
(i) documents any changes in the areas of study
referred to in paragraph (2)(A) occurring since the
date of submission of the previous report;
(ii) identifies any changes in the practices of financial
institutions and other creditors and users of consumer
reports in sharing consumer information with
their affiliates for the purpose of making underwriting
decisions or credit evaluations of consumers occurring
since the date of submission of the previous report;
and
(iii) examines the effects that changes described
in clause (ii) have had, if any, on the degree to which
such affiliate sharing practices reduce the need for
financial institutions, creditors, and other users of consumer
reports to rely on consumer reports for such
decisions.
SEC. 215. STUDY OF EFFECTS OF CREDIT SCORES AND CREDIT-BASED
INSURANCE SCORES ON AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY
OF FINANCIAL PRODUCTS.
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Commission and the Board, in consultation
with the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, shall conduct
a study of—
(1) the effects of the use of credit scores and credit-based
insurance scores on the availability and affordability of financial
products and services, including credit cards, mortgages, auto
loans, and property and casualty insurance;
(2) the statistical relationship, utilizing a multivariate analysis
that controls for prohibited factors under the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act and other known risk factors, between credit
15 USC 1681
note.
Deadlines.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00034 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW
108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1985
scores and credit-based insurance scores and the quantifiable
risks and actual losses experienced by businesses;
(3) the extent to which, if any, the use of credit scoring
models, credit scores, and credit-based insurance scores impact
on the availability and affordability of credit and insurance
to the extent information is currently available or is available
through proxies, by geography, income, ethnicity, race, color,
religion, national origin, age, sex, marital status, and creed,
including the extent to which the consideration or lack of consideration
of certain factors by credit scoring systems could result
in negative or differential treatment of protected classes under
the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the extent to which,
if any, the use of underwriting systems relying on these models
could achieve comparable results through the use of factors
with less negative impact; and
(4) the extent to which credit scoring systems are used
by businesses, the factors considered by such systems, and
the effects of variables which are not considered by such systems.
(b) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.—The Commission shall seek public
input about the prescribed methodology and research design of
the study described in subsection (a), including from relevant Federal
regulators, State insurance regulators, community, civil rights,
consumer, and housing groups.
(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Before the end of the 24-month period
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission
shall submit a detailed report on the study conducted pursuant
to subsection (a) to the Committee on Financial Services of
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking,
Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.
(2) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report submitted under
paragraph (1) shall include the findings and conclusions of
the Commission, recommendations to address specific areas
of concerns addressed in the study, and recommendations for
legislative or administrative action that the Commission may
determine to be necessary to ensure that credit and creditbased
insurance scores are used appropriately and fairly to
avoid negative effects.
SEC. 216. DISPOSAL OF CONSUMER REPORT INFORMATION AND
RECORDS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681 et seq.), as amended by this Act, is amended by adding
at the end the following:
‘‘§ 628. Disposal of records
‘‘(a) REGULATIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date
of enactment of this section, the Federal banking agencies,
the National Credit Union Administration, and the Commission
with respect to the entities that are subject to their respective
enforcement authority under section 621, and the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and in coordination as described
in paragraph (2), shall issue final regulations requiring any
person that maintains or otherwise possesses consumer
information, or any compilation of consumer information,
Deadline.
15 USC 1681w.
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 09:34 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00035 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 APPS10 PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1986 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
derived from consumer reports for a business purpose to properly
dispose of any such information or compilation.
‘‘(2) COORDINATION.—Each agency required to prescribe
regulations under paragraph (1) shall—
‘‘(A) consult and coordinate with each other such
agency so that, to the extent possible, the regulations prescribed
by each such agency are consistent and comparable
with the regulations by each such other agency; and
‘‘( ensure that such regulations are consistent with
the requirements and regulations issued pursuant to Public
Law 106–102 and other provisions of Federal law.
‘‘(3) EXEMPTION AUTHORITY.—In issuing regulations under
this section, the Federal banking agencies, the National Credit
Union Administration, the Commission, and the Securities and
Exchange Commission may exempt any person or class of persons
from application of those regulations, as such agency
deems appropriate to carry out the purpose of this section.
‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall
be construed—
‘‘(1) to require a person to maintain or destroy any record
pertaining to a consumer that is not imposed under other
law; or
‘‘(2) to alter or affect any requirement imposed under any
other provision of law to maintain or destroy such a record.’’.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for title VI
of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)
is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 627,
as added by section 214 of this Act, the following:
‘‘628. Disposal of records.
‘‘629. Corporate and technological circumvention prohibited.’’.
SEC. 217. REQUIREMENT TO DISCLOSE COMMUNICATIONS TO A CONSUMER
REPORTING AGENCY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 623(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s–2(a)) as amended by this Act, is amended
by inserting after paragraph (6), the following new paragraph:
‘‘(7) NEGATIVE INFORMATION.—
‘‘(A) NOTICE TO CONSUMER REQUIRED.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—If any financial institution that
extends credit and regularly and in the ordinary course
of business furnishes information to a consumer
reporting agency described in section 603(p) furnishes
negative information to such an agency regarding
credit extended to a customer, the financial institution
shall provide a notice of such furnishing of negative
information, in writing, to the customer.
‘‘(ii) NOTICE EFFECTIVE FOR SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSIONS.—
After providing such notice, the financial
institution may submit additional negative information
to a consumer reporting agency described in section
603(p) with respect to the same transaction, extension
of credit, account, or customer without providing additional
notice to the customer.
‘‘( TIME OF NOTICE.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The notice required under
subparagraph (A) shall be provided to the customer
prior to, or no later than 30 days after, furnishing
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00036 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1987
the negative information to a consumer reporting
agency described in section 603(p).
‘‘(ii) COORDINATION WITH NEW ACCOUNT DISCLOSURES.—
If the notice is provided to the customer prior
to furnishing the negative information to a consumer
reporting agency, the notice may not be included in
the initial disclosures provided under section 127(a)
of the Truth in Lending Act.
‘‘(C) COORDINATION WITH OTHER DISCLOSURES.—The
notice required under subparagraph (A)—
‘‘(i) may be included on or with any notice of
default, any billing statement, or any other materials
provided to the customer; and
‘‘(ii) must be clear and conspicuous.
‘‘(D) MODEL DISCLOSURE.—
‘‘(i) DUTY OF BOARD TO PREPARE.—The Board shall
prescribe a brief model disclosure a financial institution
may use to comply with subparagraph (A), which shall
not exceed 30 words.
‘‘(ii) USE OF MODEL NOT REQUIRED.—No provision
of this paragraph shall be construed as requiring a
financial institution to use any such model form prescribed
by the Board.
‘‘(iii) COMPLIANCE USING MODEL.—A financial
institution shall be deemed to be in compliance with
subparagraph (A) if the financial institution uses any
such model form prescri
bed by the Board, or the financial
institution uses any such model form and
rearranges its format.
‘‘(E) USE OF NOTICE WITHOUT SUBMITTING NEGATIVE
INFORMATION.—No provision of this paragraph shall be construed
as requiring a financial institution that has provided
a customer with a notice described in subparagraph (A)
to furnish negative information about the customer to a
consumer reporting agency.
‘‘(F) SAFE HARBOR.—A financial institution shall not
be liable for failure to perform the duties required by
this paragraph if, at the time of the failure, the financial
institution maintained reasonable policies and procedures
to comply with this paragraph or the financial institution
reasonably believed that the institution is prohibited, by
law, from contacting the consumer.
‘‘(G) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this paragraph, the
following definitions shall apply:
‘‘(i) NEGATIVE INFORMATION.—The term ‘negative
information’ means information concerning a customer’s
delinquencies, late payments, insolvency, or
any form of default.
‘‘(ii) CUSTOMER; FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The
terms ‘customer’ and ‘financial institution’ have the
same meanings as in section 509 Public Law 106–
102.’’.
(b) MODEL DISCLOSURE FORM.—Before the end of the 6-month
period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Board
shall adopt the model disclosure required under the amendment
Deadline.
Federal Register,
publication.
15 USC 1681s–2
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00037 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1988 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
made by subsection (a) after notice duly given in the Federal Register
and an opportunity for public comment in accordance with
section 553 of title 5, United States Code.
TITLE III—ENHANCING THE ACCURACY
OF CONSUMER REPORT INFORMATION
SEC. 311. RISK-BASED PRICING NOTICE.
(a) DUTIES OF USERS.—Section 615 of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681m), as amended by this Act, is amended by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘(h) DUTIES OF USERS IN CERTAIN CREDIT TRANSACTIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to rules prescribed as provided
in paragraph (6), if any person uses a consumer report in
connection with an application for, or a grant, extension, or
other provision of, credit on material terms that are materially
less favorable than the most favorable terms available to a
substantial proportion of consumers from or through that person,
based in whole or in part on a consumer report, the
person shall provide an oral, written, or electronic notice to
the consumer in the form and manner required by regulations
prescribed in accordance with this subsection.
‘‘(2) TIMING.—The notice required under paragraph (1) may
be provided at the time of an application for, or a grant,
extension, or other provision of, credit or the time of communication
of an approval of an application for, or grant, extension,
or other provision of, credit, except as provided in the regulations
prescribed under paragraph (6).
‘‘(3) EXCEPTIONS.—No notice shall be required from a person
under this subsection if—
‘‘(A) the consumer applied for specific material terms
and was granted those terms, unless those terms were
initially specified by the person after the transaction was
initiated by the consumer and after the person obtained
a consumer report; or
‘‘( the person has provided or will provide a notice
to the consumer under subsection (a) in connection with
the transaction.
‘‘(4) OTHER NOTICE NOT SUFFICIENT.—A person that is
required to provide a notice under subsection (a) cannot meet
that requirement by providing a notice under this subsection.
‘‘(5) CONTENT AND DELIVERY OF NOTICE.—A notice under
this subsection shall, at a minimum—
‘‘(A) include a statement informing the consumer that
the terms offered to the consumer are set based on information
from a consumer report;
‘‘( identify the consumer reporting agency furnishing
the report;
‘‘(C) include a statement informing the consumer that
the consumer may obtain a copy of a consumer report
from that consumer reporting agency without charge; and
‘‘(D) include the contact information specified by that
consumer reporting agency for obtaining such consumer
reports (including a toll-free telephone number established
by the agency in the case of a consumer reporting agency
described in section 603(p)).
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00038 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1989
‘‘(6) RULEMAKING.—
‘‘(A) RULES REQUIRED.—The Commission and the Board
shall jointly prescribe rules.
‘‘( CONTENT.—Rules required by subparagraph (A)
shall address, but are not limited to—
‘‘(i) the form, content, time, and manner of delivery
of any notice under this subsection;
‘‘(ii) clarification of the meaning of terms used
in this subsection, including what credit terms are
material, and when credit terms are materially less
favorable;
‘‘(iii) exceptions to the notice requirement under
this subsection for classes of persons or transactions
regarding which the agencies determine that notice
would not significantly benefit consumers;
‘‘(iv) a model notice that may be used to comply
with this subsection; and
‘‘(v) the timing of the notice required under paragraph
(1), including the circumstances under which
the notice must be provided after the terms offered
to the consumer were set based on information from
a consumer report.
‘‘(7) COMPLIANCE.—A person shall not be liable for failure
to perform the duties required by this section if, at the time
of the failure, the person maintained reasonable policies and
procedures to comply with this section.
‘‘(8) ENFORCEMENT.—
‘‘(A) NO CIVIL ACTIONS.—Sections 616 and 617 shall
not apply to any failure by any person to comply with
this section.
‘‘( ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT.—This section
shall be enforced exclusively under section 621 by the Federal
agencies and officials identified in that section.’’.
(b) RELATION TO STATE LAWS.—Section 625(b)(1) of the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681t(b)(1)), as so designated by
section 214 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(I) section 615(h), relating to the duties of users of
consumer reports to provide notice with respect to terms
in certain credit transactions;’’.
SEC. 312. PROCEDURES TO ENHANCE THE ACCURACY AND INTEGRITY
OF INFORMATION FURNISHED TO CONSUMER
REPORTING AGENCIES.
(a) ACCURACY GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS.—Section 623 of
the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s–2) is amended
by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) ACCURACY GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—
‘‘(1) GUIDELINES.—The Federal banking agencies, the
National Credit Union Administration, and the Commission
shall, with respect to the entities that are subject to their
respective enforcement authority under section 621, and in
coordination as described in paragraph (2)—
‘‘(A) establish and maintain guidelines for use by each
person that furnishes information to a consumer reporting
agency regarding the accuracy and integrity of the information
relating to consumers that such entities furnish to
Ver
Date 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00039 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1990 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
consumer reporting agencies, and update such guidelines
as often as necessary; and
‘‘( prescribe regulations requiring each person that
furnishes information to a consumer reporting agency to
establish reasonable policies and procedures for implementing
the guidelines established pursuant to subparagraph
(A).
‘‘(2) COORDINATION.—Each agency required to prescribe
regulations under paragraph (1) shall consult and coordinate
with each other such agency so that, to the extent possible,
the regulations prescribed by each such entity are consistent
and comparable with the regulations prescribed by each other
such agency.
‘‘(3) CRITERIA.—In developing the guidelines required by
paragraph (1)(A), the agencies described in paragraph (1)
shall—
‘‘(A) identify patterns, practices, and specific forms of
activity that can compromise the accuracy and integrity
of information furnished to consumer reporting agencies;
‘‘( review the methods (including technological
means) used to furnish information relating to consumers
to consumer reporting agencies;
‘‘(C) determine whether persons that furnish information
to consumer reporting agencies maintain and enforce
policies to assure the accuracy and integrity of information
furnished to consumer reporting agencies; and
‘‘(D) examine the policies and processes that persons
that furnish information to consumer reporting agencies
employ to conduct reinvestigations and correct inaccurate
information relating to consumers that has been furnished
to consumer reporting agencies.’’.
(b) DUTY OF FURNISHERS TO PROVIDE ACCURATE INFORMATION.—
Section 623(a)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681s–2(a)(1)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘knows or consciously
avoids knowing that the information is inaccurate’’ and
inserting ‘‘knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the
information is inaccurate’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(D) DEFINITION.—For purposes of subparagraph (A),
the term ‘reasonable cause to believe that the information
is inaccurate’ means having specific knowledge, other than
solely allegations by the consumer, that would cause a
reasonable person to have substantial doubts about the
accuracy of the information.’’.
(c) ABILITY OF CONSUMER TO DISPUTE INFORMATION DIRECTLY
WITH FURNISHER.—Section 623(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
(15 U.S.C. 1681s–2(a)), as amended by this Act, is amended by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘(8) ABILITY OF CONSUMER TO DISPUTE INFORMATION
DIRECTLY WITH FURNISHER.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal banking agencies, the
National Credit Union Administration, and the Commission
shall jointly prescribe regulations that shall identify the
circumstances under which a furnisher shall be required
to reinvestigate a dispute concerning the accuracy of
Regulations.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00040 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1991
information contained in a consumer report on the consumer,
based on a direct request of a consumer.
‘‘( CONSIDERATIONS.—In prescribing regulations
under subparagraph (A), the agencies shall weigh—
‘‘(i) the benefits to consumers with the costs on
furnishers and the credit reporting system;
‘‘(ii) the impact on the overall accuracy and integrity
of consumer reports of any such requirements;
‘‘(iii) whether direct contact by the consumer with
the furnisher would likely result in the most expeditious
resolution of any such dispute; and
‘‘(iv) the potential impact on the credit reporting
process if credit repair organizations, as defined in
section 403(3), including entities that would be a credit
repair organization, but for section 403(3)((i), are
able to circumvent the prohibition in subparagraph
(G).
‘‘(C) APPLICABILITY.—Subparagraphs (D) through (G)
shall apply in any circumstance identified under the regulations
promulgated under subparagraph (A).
‘‘(D) SUBMITTING A NOTICE OF DISPUTE.—A consumer
who seeks to dispute the accuracy of information shall
provide a dispute notice directly to such person at the
address specified by the person for such notices that—
‘‘(i) identifies the specific information that is being
disputed;
‘‘(ii) explains the basis for the dispute; and
‘‘(iii) includes all supporting documentation
required by the furnisher to substantiate the basis
of the dispute.
‘‘(E) DUTY OF PERSON AFTER RECEIVING NOTICE OF DISPUTE.—
After receiving a notice of dispute from a consumer
pursuant to subparagraph (D), the person that provided
the information in dispute to a consumer reporting agency
shall—
‘‘(i) conduct an investigation with respect to the
disputed information;
‘‘(ii) review all relevant information provided by
the consumer with the notice;
‘‘(iii) complete such person’s investigation of the
dispute and report the results of the investigation to
the consumer before the expiration of the period under
section 611(a)(1) within which a consumer reporting
agency would be required to complete its action if
the consumer had elected to dispute the information
under that section; and
‘‘(iv) if the investigation finds that the information
reported was inaccurate, promptly notify each consumer
reporting agency to which the person furnished
the inaccurate information of that determination and
provide to the agency any correction to that information
that is necessary to make the information provided
by the person accurate.
‘‘(F) FRIVOLOUS OR IRRELEVANT DISPUTE.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—This paragraph shall not apply
if the person receiving a notice of a dispute from a
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00041 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1992 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
consumer reasonably determines that the dispute is
frivolous or irrelevant, including—
‘‘(I) by reason of the failure of a consumer
to provide sufficient information to investigate the
disputed information; or
‘‘(II) the submission by a consumer of a dispute
that is substantially the same as a dispute previously
submitted by or for the consumer, either
directly to the person or through a consumer
reporting agency under subsection (b), with respect
to which the person has already performed the
person’s duties under this paragraph or subsection
(b), as applicable.
‘‘(ii) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION.—Upon making
any determination under clause (i) that a dispute is
frivolous or irrelevant, the person shall notify the consumer
of such determination not later than 5 business
days after making such determination, by mail or,
if authorized by the consumer for that purpose, by
any other means available to the person.
‘‘(iii) CONTENTS OF NOTICE.—A notice under clause
(ii) shall include—
‘‘(I) the reasons for the determination under
clause (i); and
‘‘(II) identification of any information required
to investigate the disputed information, which may
consist of a standardized form describing the general
nature of such information.
‘‘(G) EXCLUSION
OF CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS.—
This paragraph shall not apply if the notice of the dispute
is submitted by, is prepared on behalf of the consumer
by, or is submitted on a form supplied to the consumer
by, a credit repair organization, as defined in section 403(3),
or an entity that would be a credit repair organization,
but for section 403(3)((i).’’.
(d) FURNISHER LIABILITY EXCEPTION.—Section 623(a)(5) of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s–2(a)(5)) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘A person’’ and inserting the following:
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A person’’;
(2) by inserting ‘‘date of delinquency on the account, which
shall be the’’ before ‘‘month’’;
(3) by inserting ‘‘on the account’’ before ‘‘that immediately
preceded’’; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘( RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—For purposes of this
paragraph only, and provided that the consumer does not
dispute the information, a person that furnishes information
on a delinquent account that is placed for collection,
charged for profit or loss, or subjected to any similar action,
complies with this paragraph, if—
‘‘(i) the person reports the same date of delinquency
as that provided by the creditor to which the
account was owed at the time at which the commencement
of the delinquency occurred, if the creditor previously
reported that date of delinquency to a consumer
reporting agency;
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00042 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1993
‘‘(ii) the creditor did not previously report the date
of delinquency to a consumer reporting agency, and
the person establishes and follows reasonable procedures
to obtain the date of delinquency from the creditor
or another reliable source and reports that date
to a consumer reporting agency as the date of delinquency;
or
‘‘(iii) the creditor did not previously report the
date of delinquency to a consumer reporting agency
and the date of delinquency cannot be reasonably
obtained as provided in clause (ii), the person establishes
and follows reasonable procedures to ensure the
date reported as the date of delinquency precedes the
date on which the account is placed for collection,
charged to profit or loss, or subjected to any similar
action, and reports such date to the credit reporting
agency.’’.
(e) LIABILITY AND ENFORCEMENT.—
(1) CIVIL LIABILITY.—Section 623 of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s–2) is amended by striking subsections
(c) and (d) and inserting the following:
‘‘(c) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.—Except as provided in section
621(c)(1)(, sections 616 and 617 do not apply to any violation
of—
‘‘(1) subsection (a) of this section, including any regulations
issued thereunder;
‘‘(2) subsection (e) of this section, except that nothing in
this paragraph shall limit, expand, or otherwise affect liability
under section 616 or 617, as applicable, for violations of subsection
(b) of this section; or
‘‘(3) subsection (e) of section 615.
‘‘(d) LIMITATION ON ENFORCEMENT.—The provisions of law
described in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (c) (other
than with respect to the exception described in paragraph (2) of
subsection (c)) shall be enforced exclusively as provided under section
621 by the Federal agencies and officials and the State officials
identified in section 621.’’.
(2) STATE ACTIONS.—Section 621(c) of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s(c)) is amended—
(A) in paragraph (1)((ii), by striking ‘‘of section
623(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘described in any of paragraphs (1)
through (3) of section 623(c)’’; and
( in paragraph (5)—
(i) in each of subparagraphs (A) and (, by
striking ‘‘of section 623(a)(1)’’ each place that term
appears and inserting ‘‘described in any of paragraphs
(1) through (3) of section 623(c)’’; and
(ii) by amending the paragraph heading to read
as follows:
‘‘(5) LIMITATIONS ON STATE ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS.—’’.
(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section, the
amendments made by this section, or any other provision of this
Act shall be construed to affect any liability under section 616
or 617 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681n, 1681o)
that existed on the day before the date of enactment of this Act.
15 USC 1681n
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00043 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1994 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
SEC. 313. FTC AND CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY ACTION CONCERNING
COMPLAINTS.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 611 of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681i) is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) TREATMENT OF COMPLAINTS AND REPORT TO CONGRESS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall—
‘‘(A) compile all complaints that it receives that a file
of a consumer that is maintained by a consumer reporting
agency described in section 603(p) contains incomplete or
inaccurate information, with respect to which, the consumer
appears to have disputed the completeness or
accuracy with the consumer reporting agency or otherwise
utilized the procedures provided by subsection (a); and
‘‘( transmit each such complaint to each consumer
reporting agency involved.
‘‘(2) EXCLUSION.—Complaints received or obtained by the
Commission pursuant to its investigative authority under the
Federal Trade Commission Act shall not be subject to paragraph
(1).
‘‘(3) AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES.—Each consumer reporting
agency described in section 603(p) that receives a complaint
transmitted by the Commission pursuant to paragraph (1)
shall—
‘‘(A) review each such complaint to determine whether
all legal obligations imposed on the consumer reporting
agency under this title (including any obligation imposed
by an applicable court or administrative order) have been
met with respect to the subject matter of the complaint;
‘‘( provide reports on a regular basis to the Commission
regarding the determinations of and actions taken
by the consumer reporting agency, if any, in connection
with its review of such complaints; and
‘‘(C) maintain, for a reasonable time period, records
regarding the disposition of each such complaint that is
sufficient to demonstrate compliance with this subsection.
‘‘(4) RULEMAKING AUTHORITY.—The Commission may prescribe
regulations, as appropriate to implement this subsection.
‘‘(5) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Commission shall submit to
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of
the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the
House of Representatives an annual report regarding information
gathered by the Commission under this subsection.’’.
(b) PROMPT INVESTIGATION OF DISPUTED CONSUMER INFORMATION.—
(1) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Board and the Commission shall
jointly study the extent to which, and the manner in which,
consumer reporting agencies and furnishers of consumer
information to co
nsumer reporting agencies are complying with
the procedures, time lines, and requirements under the Fair
Credit Reporting Act for the prompt investigation of the disputed
accuracy of any consumer information, the completeness
of the information provided to consumer reporting agencies,
and the prompt correction or deletion, in accordance with such
Act, of any inaccurate or incomplete information or information
that cannot be verified.
(2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Before the end of the 12-month
period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the
Deadline.
15 USC 1681i
note.
Records.
Records.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00044 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1995
Board and the Commission shall jointly submit a progress
report to the Congress on the results of the study required
under paragraph (1).
(3) CONSIDERATIONS.—In preparing the report required
under paragraph (2), the Board and the Commission shall
consider information relating to complaints compiled by the
Commission under section 611(e) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, as added by this section.
(4) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The report required under paragraph
(2) shall include such recommendations as the Board
and the Commission jointly determine to be appropriate for
legislative or administrative action, to ensure that—
(A) consumer disputes with consumer reporting agencies
over the accuracy or completeness of information in
a consumer’s file are promptly and fully investigated and
any incorrect, incomplete, or unverifiable information is
corrected or deleted immediately thereafter;
( furnishers of information to consumer reporting
agencies maintain full and prompt compliance with the
duties and responsibilities established under section 623
of the Fair Credit Reporting Act; and
(C) consumer reporting agencies establish and maintain
appropriate internal controls and management review
procedures for maintaining full and continuous compliance
with the procedures, time lines, and requirements under
the Fair Credit Reporting Act for the prompt investigation
of the disputed accuracy of any consumer information and
the prompt correction or deletion, in accordance with such
Act, of any inaccurate or incomplete information or information
that cannot be verified.
SEC. 314. IMPROVED DISCLOSURE OF THE RESULTS OF REINVESTIGATION.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 611(a)(5)(A) of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681i(a)(5)(A)) is amended by striking
‘‘shall’’ and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph,
and inserting the following: ‘‘shall—
‘‘(i) promptly delete that item of information from
the file of the consumer, or modify that item of information,
as appropriate, based on the results of the reinvestigation;
and
‘‘(ii) promptly notify the furnisher of that information
that the information has been modified or deleted
from the file of the consumer.’’.
(b) FURNISHER REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO INACCURATE,
INCOMPLETE, OR UNVERIFIABLE INFORMATION.—Section 623(b)(1) of
the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s–2(b)(1)) is
amended—
(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end;
and
(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the
end and inserting the following: ‘‘; and
‘‘(E) if an item of information disputed by a consumer
is found to be inaccurate or incomplete or cannot be verified
after any reinvestigation under paragraph (1), for purposes
Notification.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00045 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1996 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
of reporting to a consumer reporting agency only, as appropriate,
based on the results of the reinvestigation
promptly—
‘‘(i) modify that item of information;
‘‘(ii) delete that item of information; or
‘‘(iii) permanently block the reporting of that item
of information.’’.
SEC. 315. RECONCILING ADDRESSES.
Section 605 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c),
as amended by this Act, is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(h) NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY IN ADDRESS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a person has requested a consumer
report relating to a consumer from a consumer reporting agency
described in section 603(p), the request includes an address
for the consumer that substantially differs from the addresses
in the file of the consumer, and the agency provides a consumer
report in response to the request, the consumer reporting
agency shall notify the requester of the existence of the discrepancy.
‘‘(2) REGULATIONS.—
‘‘(A) REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—The Federal banking
agencies, the National Credit Union Administration, and
the Commission shall jointly, with respect to the entities
that are subject to their respective enforcement authority
under section 621, prescribe regulations providing guidance
regarding reasonable policies and procedures that a user
of a consumer report should employ when such user has
received a notice of discrepancy under paragraph (1).
‘‘( POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO BE INCLUDED.—The
regulations prescribed under subparagraph (A) shall
describe reasonable policies and procedures for use by a
user of a consumer report—
‘‘(i) to form a reasonable belief that the user knows
the identity of the person to whom the consumer report
pertains; and
‘‘(ii) if the user establishes a continuing relationship
with the consumer, and the user regularly and
in the ordinary course of business furnishes information
to the consumer reporting agency from which the
notice of discrepancy pertaining to the consumer was
obtained, to reconcile the address of the consumer with
the consumer reporting agency by furnishing such
address to such consumer reporting agency as part
of information regularly furnished by the user for the
period in which the relationship is established.’’.
SEC. 316. NOTICE OF DISPUTE THROUGH RESELLER.
(a) REQUIREMENT FOR REINVESTIGATION OF DISPUTED INFORMATION
UPON NOTICE FROM A RESELLER.—Section 611(a) of the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681i(a)(1)(A)) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)(A)—
(A) by striking ‘‘If the completeness’’ and inserting
‘‘Subject to subsection (f), if the completeness’’;
( by inserting ‘‘, or indirectly through a reseller,’’
after ‘‘notifies the agency directly’’; and
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00046 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1997
(C) by inserting ‘‘or reseller’’ before the period at the
end;
(2) in paragraph (2)(A)—
(A) by inserting ‘‘or a reseller’’ after ‘‘dispute from
any consumer’’; and
( by inserting ‘‘or reseller’’ before the period at the
end; and
(3) in paragraph (2)(, by inserting ‘‘or the reseller’’ after
‘‘from the consumer’’.
(b) REINVESTIGATION REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO RESELLERS.—
Section 611 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681i), as amended by this Act, is amended by adding at the
end the following:
‘‘(f) REINVESTIGATION REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO RESELLERS.—
‘‘(1) EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL REINVESTIGATION REQUIREMENT.—
Ex
cept as provided in paragraph (2), a reseller shall
be exempt from the requirements of this section.
‘‘(2) ACTION REQUIRED UPON RECEIVING NOTICE OF A DISPUTE.—
If a reseller receives a notice from a consumer of a
dispute concerning the completeness or accuracy of any item
of information contained in a consumer report on such consumer
produced by the reseller, the reseller shall, within 5 business
days of receiving the notice, and free of charge—
‘‘(A) determine whether the item of information is
incomplete or inaccurate as a result of an act or omission
of the reseller; and
‘‘( if—
‘‘(i) the reseller determines that the item of
information is incomplete or inaccurate as a result
of an act or omission of the reseller, not later than
20 days after receiving the notice, correct the information
in the consumer report or delete it; or
‘‘(ii) if the reseller determines that the item of
information is not incomplete or inaccurate as a result
of an act or omission of the reseller, convey the notice
of the dispute, together with all relevant information
provided by the consumer, to each consumer reporting
agency that provided the reseller with the information
that is the subject of the dispute, using an address
or a notification mechanism specified by the consumer
reporting agency for such notices.
‘‘(3) RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY TO
NOTIFY CONSUMER THROUGH RESELLER.—Upon the completion
of a reinvestigation under this section of a dispute concerning
the completeness or accuracy of any information in the file
of a consumer by a consumer reporting agency that received
notice of the dispute from a reseller under paragraph (2)—
‘‘(A) the notice by the consumer reporting agency under
paragraph (6), (7), or (8) of subsection (a) shall be provided
to the reseller in lieu of the consumer; and
‘‘( the reseller shall immediately reconvey such notice
to the consumer, including any notice of a deletion by
telephone in the manner required under paragraph (8)(A).
‘‘(4) RESELLER REINVESTIGATIONS.—No provision of this subsection
shall be construed as prohibiting a reseller from conducting
a reinvestigation of a consumer dispute directly.’’.
Deadline.
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00047 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 1998 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
(c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section
611(a)(2)( of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681i(a)(2)() is amended in the subparagraph heading, by striking
‘‘FROM CONSUMER’’.
SEC. 317. REASONABLE REINVESTIGATION REQUIRED.
Section 611(a)(1)(A) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681i(a)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘shall reinvestigate free of
charge’’ and inserting ‘‘shall, free of charge, conduct a reasonable
reinvestigation to determine whether the disputed information is
inaccurate’’.
SEC. 318. FTC STUDY OF ISSUES RELATING TO THE FAIR CREDIT
REPORTING ACT.
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall conduct a study
on ways to improve the operation of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act.
(2) AREAS FOR STUDY.—In conducting the study under paragraph
(1), the Commission shall review—
(A) the efficacy of increasing the number of points
of identifying information that a credit reporting agency
is required to match to ensure that a consumer is the
correct individual to whom a consumer report relates before
releasing a consumer report to a user, including—
(i) the extent to which requiring additional points
of such identifying information to match would—
(I) enhance the accuracy of credit reports; and
(II) combat the provision of incorrect consumer
reports to users;
(ii) the extent to which requiring an exact match
of the first and last name, social security number,
and address and ZIP Code of the consumer would
enhance the likelihood of increasing credit report
accuracy; and
(iii) the effects of allowing consumer reporting
agencies to use partial matches of social security numbers
and name recognition software on the accuracy
of credit reports;
( requiring notification to consumers when negative
information has been added to their credit reports,
including—
(i) the potential impact of such notification on the
ability of consumers to identify errors on their credit
reports; and
(ii) the potential impact of such notification on
the ability of consumers to remove fraudulent information
from their credit reports;
(C) the effects of requiring that a consumer who has
experienced an adverse action based on a credit report
receives a copy of the same credit report that the creditor
relied on in taking the adverse action, including—
(i) the extent to which providing such reports to
consumers would increase the ability of consumers to
identify errors in their credit reports; and
(ii) the extent to which providing such reports
to consumers would increase the ability of consumers
15 USC 1681
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00048 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 1999
to remove fraudulent information from their credit
reports;
(D) any common financial transactions that are not
generally reported to the consumer reporting agencies, but
would provide useful information in determining the credit
worthiness of consumers; and
(E) any actions that might be taken within a voluntary
reporting system to encourage the reporting of the types
of transactions described in subparagraph (D).
(3) COSTS AND BENEFITS.—With respect to each area of
study described in paragraph (2), the Commission shall consider
the extent to which such requirements would benefit consumers,
balanced against the cost of implementing such provisions.
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 1 year after the date
of enactment of this Act, the chairman of the Commission shall
submit a report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban
Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services
of the House of Representatives containing a detailed summary
of the findings and conclusions of the study under this section,
together with such recommendations for legislative or administrative
actions as may be appropriate.
SEC. 319. FTC STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF CONSUMER REPORTS.
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—Until the final report is submitted under
subsection (b)(2), the Commission shall conduct an ongoing study
of the accuracy and completeness of information contained in consumer
reports prepared or maintained by consumer reporting agencies
and methods for improving the accuracy and completeness
of such information.
(b) BIENNIAL REPORTS REQUIRED.—
(1) INTERIM REPORTS.—The Commission shall submit an
interim report to the Congress on the study conducted under
subsection (a) at the end of the 1-year period beginning on
the date of enactment of this Act and biennially thereafter
for 8 years.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—The Commission shall submit a final
report to the Congress on the study conducted under subsection
(a) at the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date
on which the final interim report is submitted to the Congress
under paragraph (1).
(3) CONTENTS.—Each report submitted under this subsection
shall contain a detailed summary o
f the findings and
conclusions of the Commission with respect to the study
required under subsection (a) and such recommendations for
legislative and administrative action as the Commission may
determine to be appropriate.
TITLE IV—LIMITING THE USE AND
SHARING OF MEDICAL INFORMATION
IN THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM
SEC. 411. PROTECTION OF MEDICAL INFORMATION IN THE FINANCIAL
SYSTEM.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 604(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681b(g)) is amended to read as follows:
15 USC 1681
note.
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00049 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 2000 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘(g) PROTECTION OF MEDICAL INFORMATION.—
‘‘(1) LIMITATION ON CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES.—A
consumer reporting agency shall not furnish for employment
purposes, or in connection with a credit or insurance transaction,
a consumer report that contains medical information
about a consumer, unless—
‘‘(A) if furnished in connection with an insurance transaction,
the consumer affirmatively consents to the furnishing
of the report;
‘‘( if furnished for employment purposes or in connection
with a credit transaction—
‘‘(i) the information to be furnished is relevant
to process or effect the employment or credit transaction;
and
‘‘(ii) the consumer provides specific written consent
for the furnishing of the report that describes in clear
and conspicuous language the use for which the
information will be furnished; or
‘‘(C) the information to be furnished pertains solely
to transactions, accounts, or balances relating to debts
arising from the receipt of medical services, products, or
devises, where such information, other than account status
or amounts, is restricted or reported using codes that do
not identify, or do not provide information sufficient to
infer, the specific provider or the nature of such services,
products, or devices, as provided in section 605(a)(6).
‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON CREDITORS.—Except as permitted
pursuant to paragraph (3)(C) or regulations prescribed under
paragraph (5)(A), a creditor shall not obtain or use medical
information pertaining to a consumer in connection with any
determination of the consumer’s eligibility, or continued eligibility,
for credit.
‘‘(3) ACTIONS AUTHORIZED BY FEDERAL LAW, INSURANCE
ACTIVITIES AND REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS.—Section
603(d)(3) shall not be construed so as to treat information
or any communication of information as a consumer report
if the information or communication is disclosed—
‘‘(A) in connection with the business of insurance or
annuities, including the activities described in section 18B
of the model Privacy of Consumer Financial and Health
Information Regulation issued by the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners (as in effect on January 1,
2003);
‘‘( for any purpose permitted without authorization
under the Standards for Individually Identifiable Health
Information promulgated by the Department of Health and
Human Services pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act of 1996, or referred to under
section 1179 of such Act, or described in section 502(e)
of Public Law 106–102; or
‘‘(C) as otherwise determined to be necessary and
appropriate, by regulation or order and subject to paragraph
(6), by the Commission, any Federal banking agency
or the National Credit Union Administration (with respect
to any financial institution subject to the jurisdiction of
such agency or Administration under paragraph (1), (2),
or (3) of section 621(b), or the applicable State insurance
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00050 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 2001
authority (with respect to any person engaged in providing
insurance or annuities).
‘‘(4) LIMITATION ON REDISCLOSURE OF MEDICAL INFORMATION.—
Any person that receives medical information pursuant
to paragraph (1) or (3) shall not disclose such information
to any other person, except as necessary to carry out the purpose
for which the information was initially disclosed, or as
otherwise permitted by statute, regulation, or order.
‘‘(5) REGULATIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE FOR PARAGRAPH
(2).—
‘‘(A) REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—Each Federal banking
agency and the National Credit Union Administration
shall, subject to paragraph (6) and after notice and opportunity
for comment, prescribe regulations that permit
transactions under paragraph (2) that are determined to
be necessary and appropriate to protect legitimate operational,
transactional, risk, consumer, and other needs (and
which shall include permitting actions necessary for
administrative verification purposes), consistent with the
intent of paragraph (2) to restrict the use of medical
information for inappropriate purposes.
‘‘( FINAL REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—The Federal
banking agencies and the National Credit Union Administration
shall issue the regulations required under subparagraph
(A) in final form before the end of the 6-month
period beginning on the date of enactment of the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003.
‘‘(6) COORDINATION WITH OTHER LAWS.—No provision of
this subsection shall be construed as altering, affecting, or
superseding the applicability of any other provision of Federal
law relating to medical confidentiality.’’.
(b) RESTRICTION ON SHARING OF MEDICAL INFORMATION.—Section
603(d) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a(d))
is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting
‘‘Except as provided in paragraph (3), the term’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
‘‘(3) RESTRICTION ON SHARING OF MEDICAL INFORMATION.—
Except for information or any communication of information
disclosed as provided in section 604(g)(3), the exclusions in
paragraph (2) shall not apply with respect to information disclosed
to any person related by common ownership or affiliated
by corporate control, if the information is—
‘‘(A) medical information;
‘‘( an individualized list or description based on the
payment transactions of the consumer for medical products
or services; or
‘‘(C) an aggregate list of identified consumers based
on payment transactions for medical products or services.’’.
(c) DEFINITION.—Section 603(i) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a(i)) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(i) MEDICAL INFORMATION.—The term ‘medical information’—
‘‘(1) means information or data, whether oral or recorded,
in any form or medium, created by or derived from a health
care provider or the consumer, that relates to—
‘‘(A) the past, present, or future physical, mental, or
behavioral health or condition of an individual;
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00051 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 2002 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
‘‘( the provision of health care to an individual; or
‘‘(C) the payment for the provision of health care to
an individual.
‘‘(2) does not include the age or gender of a consumer,
demographic information about the consumer, including a co
nsumer’s
residence address or e-mail address, or any other
information about a consumer that does not relate to the physical,
mental, or behavioral health or condition of a consumer,
including the existence or value of any insurance policy.’’.
(d) EFFECTIVE DATES.—This section shall take effect at the
end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of enactment
of this Act, except that paragraph (2) of section 604(g) of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act (as amended by subsection (a) of this
section) shall take effect on the later of—
(1) the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date
on which the regulations required under paragraph (5)( of
such section 604(g) are issued in final form; or
(2) the date specified in the regulations referred to in
paragraph (1).
SEC. 412. CONFIDENTIALITY OF MEDICAL CONTACT INFORMATION IN
CONSUMER REPORTS.
(a) DUTIES OF MEDICAL INFORMATION FURNISHERS.—Section
623(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s–2(a)),
as amended by this Act, is amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(9) DUTY TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF STATUS AS MEDICAL
INFORMATION FURNISHER.—A person whose primary business
is providing medical services, products, or devices, or the person’s
agent or assignee, who furnishes information to a consumer
reporting agency on a consumer shall be considered
a medical information furnisher for purposes of this title, and
shall notify the agency of such status.’’.
(b) RESTRICTION OF DISSEMINATION OF MEDICAL CONTACT
INFORMATION.—Section 605(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
(15 U.S.C. 1681c(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(6) The name, address, and telephone number of any medical
information furnisher that has notified the agency of its
status, unless—
‘‘(A) such name, address, and telephone number are
restricted or reported using codes that do not identify,
or provide information sufficient to infer, the specific provider
or the nature of such services, products, or devices
to a person other than the consumer; or
‘‘( the report is being provided to an insurance company
for a purpose relating to engaging in the business
of insurance other than property and casualty insurance.’’.
(c) NO EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED FOR DOLLAR AMOUNTS.—Section
605(b) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c(b)) is
amended by striking ‘‘The provisions of subsection (a)’’ and inserting
‘‘The provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) of subsection (a)’’.
(d) COORDINATION WITH OTHER LAWS.—No provision of any
amendment made by this section shall be construed as altering,
affecting, or superseding the applicability of any other provision
of Federal law relating to medical confidentiality.
15 USC 1681b
note.
15 USC 1681a
note.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00052 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 2003
(e) FTC REGULATION OF CODING OF TRADE NAMES.—Section
621 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681s), as amended
by this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(g) FTC REGULATION OF CODING OF TRADE NAMES.—If the
Commission determines that a person described in paragraph (9)
of section 623(a) has not met the requirements of such paragraph,
the Commission shall take action to ensure the person’s compliance
with such paragraph, which may include issuing model guidance
or prescribing reasonable policies and procedures, as necessary
to ensure that such person complies with such paragraph.’’.
(f) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 604(g)
of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681b(g)), as amended
by section 411 of this Act, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘(other than medical
contact information treated in the manner required under section
605(a)(6))’’ after ‘‘a consumer report that contains medical
information’’; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘(other than medical
information treated in the manner required under section
605(a)(6))’’ after ‘‘a creditor shall not obtain or use medical
information’’.
(g) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section
shall take effect at the end of the 15-month period beginning on
the date of enactment of this Act.
TITLE V—FINANCIAL LITERACY AND
EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT
SEC. 511. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Literacy and Education
Improvement Act’’.
SEC. 512. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this title—
(1) the term ‘‘Chairperson’’ means the Chairperson of the
Financial Literacy and Education Commission; and
(2) the term ‘‘Commission’’ means the Financial Literacy
and Education Commission established under section 513.
SEC. 513. ESTABLISHMENT OF FINANCIAL LITERACY AND EDUCATION
COMMISSION.
(a) IN GENERAL.—There is established a commission to be
known as the ‘‘Financial Literacy and Education Commission’’.
(b) PURPOSE.—The Commission shall serve to improve the
financial literacy and education of persons in the United States
through development of a national strategy to promote financial
literacy and education.
(c) MEMBERSHIP.—
(1) COMPOSITION.—The Commission shall be composed of—
(A) the Secretary of the Treasury;
( the respective head of each of the Federal banking
agencies (as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act), the National Credit Union Administration,
the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the
Departments of Education, Agriculture, Defense, Health
and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development,
20 USC 9702.
20 USC 9701.
20 USC 9701
note.
Financial
Literacy and
Education
Improvement
Act.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00053 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 2004 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
Labor, and Veterans Affairs, the Federal Trade Commission,
the General Services Administration, the Small Business
Administration, the Social Security Administration,
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the
Office of Personnel Management; and
(C) at the discretion of the President, not more than
5 individuals appointed by the President from among the
administrative heads of any other Federal agencies, departments,
or other Federal Government entities, whom the
President determines to be engaged in a serious effort
to improve financial literacy and education.
(2) ALTERNATES.—Each member of the Commission may
designate an alternate if the member is unable to attend a
meeting of the Commission. Such alternate shall be an individual
who exercises significant decisionmaking authority.
(d) CHAIRPERSON.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall serve
as the Chairperson.
(e) MEETINGS.—The Commission shall hold, at the call of the
Chairperson, at least 1 meeting every 4 months. All such meetings
shall be open to the public. The Commission may hold, at the
call of the Chairperson, such other meetings as the Chairperson
sees fit to carry out this title.
(f) QUORUM.—A majority of the members of the Commission
shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may
hold hearings.
(g) INITIAL MEETING.—The Commission shall hold its first
meeting not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of
this Act.
SEC. 514. DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION.
(a) DUTIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission, through the authority
of the members referred to in section 513(c), sha
ll take such
actions as it deems necessary to streamline, improve, or augment
the financial literacy and education programs, grants,
and materials of the Federal Government, including curricula
for all Americans.
(2) AREAS OF EMPHASIS.—To improve financial literacy and
education, the Commission shall emphasize, among other elements,
basic personal income and household money management
and planning skills, including how to—
(A) create household budgets, initiate savings plans,
and make strategic investment decisions for education,
retirement, home ownership, wealth building, or other
savings goals;
( manage spending, credit, and debt, including credit
card debt, effectively;
(C) increase awareness of the availability and significance
of credit reports and credit scores in obtaining credit,
the importance of their accuracy (and how to correct inaccuracies),
their effect on credit terms, and the effect
common financial decisions may have on credit scores;
(D) ascertain fair and favorable credit terms;
(E) avoid abusive, predatory, or deceptive credit offers
and financial products;
(F) understand, evaluate, and compare financial products,
services, and opportunities;
20 USC 9703.
Deadline.
President.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00054 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 2005
(G) understand resources that ought to be easily accessible
and affordable, and that inform and educate investors
as to their rights and avenues of recourse when an investor
believes his or her rights have been violated by unprofessional
conduct of market intermediaries;
(H) increase awareness of the particular financial
needs and financial transactions (such as the sending of
remittances) of consumers who are targeted in multilingual
financial literacy and education programs and improve the
development and distribution of multilingual financial literacy
and education materials;
(I) promote bringing individuals who lack basic
banking services into the financial mainstream by opening
and maintaining an account with a financial institution;
and
(J) improve financial literacy and education through
all other related skills, including personal finance and
related economic education, with the primary goal of programs
not simply to improve knowledge, but rather to
improve consumers’ financial choices and outcomes.
(b) WEBSITE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall establish and
maintain a website, such as the domain name
‘‘FinancialLiteracy.gov’’, or a similar domain name.
(2) PURPOSES.—The website established under paragraph
(1) shall—
(A) serve as a clearinghouse of information about Federal
financial literacy and education programs;
( provide a coordinated entry point for accessing
information about all Federal publications, grants, and
materials promoting enhanced financial literacy and education;
(C) offer information on all Federal grants to promote
financial literacy and education, and on how to target,
apply for, and receive a grant that is most appropriate
under the circumstances;
(D) as the Commission considers appropriate, feature
website links to efforts that have no commercial content
and that feature information about financial literacy and
education programs, materials, or campaigns; and
(E) offer such other information as the Commission
finds appropriate to share with the public in the fulfillment
of its purpose.
(c) TOLL-FREE HOTLINE.—The Commission shall establish a
toll-free telephone number that shall be made available to members
of the public seeking information about issues pertaining to financial
literacy and education.
(d) DEVELOPMENT AND DISSEMINATION OF MATERIALS.—The
Commission shall—
(1) develop materials to promote financial literacy and education;
and
(2) disseminate such materials to the general public.
(e) COORDINATION OF EFFORTS.—The Commission shall take
such steps as are necessary to coordinate and promote financial
literacy and education efforts at the State and local level, including
promoting partnerships among Federal, State, and local governments,
nonprofit organizations, and private enterprises.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00055 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 2006 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
(f) NATIONAL STRATEGY.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall—
(A) not later than 18 months after the date of enactment
of this Act, develop a national strategy to promote
basic financial literacy and education among all American
consumers; and
( coordinate Federal efforts to implement the
strategy developed under subparagraph (A).
(2) STRATEGY.—The strategy to promote basic financial literacy
and education required to be developed under paragraph
(1) shall provide for—
(A) participation by State and local governments and
private, nonprofit, and public institutions in the creation
and implementation of such strategy;
( the development of methods—
(i) to increase the general financial education level
of current and future consumers of financial services
and products; and
(ii) to enhance the general understanding of financial
services and products;
(C) review of Federal activities designed to promote
financial literacy and education, and development of a plan
to improve coordination of such activities; and
(D) the identification of areas of overlap and duplication
among Federal financial literacy and education activities
and proposed means of eliminating any such overlap
and duplication.
(3) NATIONAL STRATEGY REVIEW.—The Commission shall,
not less than annually, review the national strategy developed
under this subsection and make such changes and recommendations
as it deems necessary.
(g) CONSULTATION.—The Commission shall actively consult with
a variety of representatives from private and nonprofit organizations
and State and local agencies, as determined appropriate by
the Commission.
(h) REPORTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after the date
of the first meeting of the Commission, and annually thereafter,
the Commission shall issue a report, the Strategy for Assuring
Financial Empowerment (‘‘SAFE Strategy’’), to the Committee
on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and
the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives
on the progress of the Commission in carrying out this
title.
(2) CONTENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1)
shall include—
(A) the national strategy for financial literacy and education,
as described under subsection (f);
( information concerning the implementation of the
duties of the Commission under subsections (a) through
(g);
(C) an assessment of the success of the Commission
in implementing the national strategy developed under
subsection (f);
(D) an assessment of the availability, utilization, and
impact of Federal financial literacy and education materials;
Deadline.
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00056 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 2007
(E) information concerning the content and public use
of—
(i) the website established under subsection (b);
and
(ii) the toll-free telephone number est
ablished
under subsection (c);
(F) a brief survey of the financial literacy and education
materials developed under subsection (d), and data
regarding the dissemination and impact of such materials,
as measured by improved financial decisionmaking;
(G) a brief summary of any hearings conducted by
the Commission, including a list of witnesses who testified
at such hearings;
(H) information about the activities of the Commission
planned for the next fiscal year;
(I) a summary of all Federal financial literacy and
education activities targeted to communities that have
historically lacked access to financial literacy materials
and education, and have been underserved by the mainstream
financial systems; and
(J) such other materials relating to the duties of the
Commission as the Commission deems appropriate.
(3) INITIAL REPORT.—The initial report under paragraph
(1) shall include information regarding all Federal programs,
materials, and grants which seek to improve financial literacy,
and assess the effectiveness of such programs.
(i) TESTIMONY.—The Commission shall annually provide testimony
by the Chairperson to the Committee on Banking, Housing,
and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial
Services of the House of Representatives.
SEC. 515. POWERS OF THE COMMISSION.
(a) HEARINGS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall hold such hearings,
sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony,
and receive such evidence as the Commission deems appropriate
to carry out this title.
(2) PARTICIPATION.—In hearings held under this subsection,
the Commission shall consider inviting witnesses from, among
other groups—
(A) other Federal Government officials;
( State and local government officials;
(C) consumer and community groups;
(D) nonprofit financial literacy and education groups
(such as those involved in personal finance and economic
education); and
(E) the financial services industry.
(b) INFORMATION FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.—The Commission
may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such
information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out
this title. Upon request of the Chairperson, the head of such department
or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.
(c) PERIODIC STUDIES.—The Commission may conduct periodic
studies regarding the state of financial literacy and education in
the United States, as the Commission determines appropriate.
(d) MULTILINGUAL.—The Commission may take any action to
develop and promote financial literacy and education materials
20 USC 9704.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00057 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 2008 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
in languages other than English, as the Commission deems appropriate,
including for the website established under section 514(b),
at the toll-free number established under section 514(c), and in
the materials developed and disseminated under section 514(d).
SEC. 516. COMMISSION PERSONNEL MATTERS.
(a) COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS.—Each member of the Commission
shall serve without compensation in addition to that received
for their service as an officer or employee of the United States.
(b) TRAVEL EXPENSES.—The members of the Commission shall
be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence,
at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter
I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from
their homes or regular places of business in the performance of
services for the Commission.
(c) ASSISTANCE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of Financial
Education of the Department of the Treasury shall provide
assistance to the Commission, upon request of the Commission,
without reimbursement.
(2) DETAIL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.—Any Federal
Government employee may be detailed to the Commission without
reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption
or loss of civil service status or privilege.
SEC. 517. STUDIES BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL.
(a) EFFECTIVENESS STUDY.—Not later than 3 years after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the
United States shall submit a report to Congress assessing the
effectiveness of the Commission in promoting financial literacy and
education.
(b) STUDY AND REPORT ON THE NEED AND MEANS FOR
IMPROVING FINANCIAL LITERACY AMONG CONSUMERS.—
(1) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the
United States shall conduct a study to assess the extent of
consumers’ knowledge and awareness of credit reports, credit
scores, and the dispute resolution process, and on methods
for improving financial literacy among consumers.
(2) FACTORS TO BE INCLUDED.—The study required under
paragraph (1) shall include the following issues:
(A) The number of consumers who view their credit
reports.
( Under what conditions and for what purposes do
consumers primarily obtain a copy of their consumer report
(such as for the purpose of ensuring the completeness and
accuracy of the contents, to protect against fraud, in
response to an adverse action based on the report, or in
response to suspected identity theft) and approximately
what percentage of the total number of consumers who
obtain a copy of their consumer report do so for each
such primary purpose.
(C) The extent of consumers’ knowledge of the data
collection process.
(D) The extent to which consumers know how to get
a copy of a consumer report.
(E) The extent to which consumers know and understand
the factors that positively or negatively impact credit
scores.
Deadline.
Reports.
20 USC 9706.
20 USC 9705.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00058 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 2009
(3) REPORT REQUIRED.—Before the end of the 12-month
period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the
Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress on the
findings and conclusions of the Comptroller General pursuant
to the study conducted under this subsection, together with
such recommendations for legislative or administrative action
as the Comptroller General may determine to be appropriate,
including recommendations on methods for improving financial
literacy among consumers.
SEC. 518. THE NATIONAL PUBLIC SERVICE MULTIMEDIA CAMPAIGN
TO ENHANCE THE STATE OF FINANCIAL LITERACY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (in this section
referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’), after review of the recommendations
of the Commission, as part of the national strategy, shall develop,
implement, and conduct a pilot national public service multimedia
campaign to enhance the state of financial literacy and education
in the United States.
(b) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—
(1) PUBLIC SERVICE CAMPAIGN.—The Secretary, after review
of the recommendations of the Commission, shall select and
work with a nonprofit organization or organizations that are
especially well-qualified in the distribution of public service
campaigns, and have secured private sector funds to produce
the pilot national public service multimedia campaign.
(2) DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIMEDIA CAMPAIGN.—The Secretary,
after review of the recommendations of the Commission,
shall develop, in consultation with nonprofit, public, or private
organizations, especially those that are well qualified by virtue
of their experience in the field of financial literacy and education,
to develop the financial literacy national public service
multimedia
campaign.
(3) FOCUS OF CAMPAIGN.—The pilot national public service
multimedia campaign shall be consistent with the national
strategy, and shall promote the toll-free telephone number and
the website developed under this title.
(c) MULTILINGUAL.—The Secretary may develop the multimedia
campaign in languages other than English, as the Secretary deems
appropriate.
(d) PERFORMANCE MEASURES.—The Secretary shall develop
measures to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot national public
service multimedia campaign, as measured by improved financial
decision making among individuals.
(e) REPORT.—For each fiscal year for which there are appropriations
pursuant to the authorization in subsection (e), the Secretary
shall submit a report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and
Urban Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate
and the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on
Appropriations of the House of Representatives, describing the
status and implementation of the provisions of this section and
the state of financial literacy and education in the United States.
(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized
to be appropriated to the Secretary, not to exceed $3,000,000 for
fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006, for the development, production,
and distribution of a pilot national public service multimedia campaign
under this section.
20 USC 9707.
Deadline.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00059 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 2010 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
SEC. 519. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Commission
such sums as may be necessary to carry out this title, including
administrative expenses of the Commission.
TITLE VI—PROTECTING EMPLOYEE
MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS
SEC. 611. CERTAIN EMPLOYEE INVESTIGATION COMMUNICATIONS
EXCLUDED FROM DEFINITION OF CONSUMER REPORT.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a), as amended by this Act is amended by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘(x) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMMUNICATIONS FOR EMPLOYEE
INVESTIGATIONS.—
‘‘(1) COMMUNICATIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS SUBSECTION.—
A communication is described in this subsection if—
‘‘(A) but for subsection (d)(2)(D), the communication
would be a consumer report;
‘‘( the communication is made to an employer in
connection with an investigation of—
‘‘(i) suspected misconduct relating to employment;
or
‘‘(ii) compliance with Federal, State, or local laws
and regulations, the rules of a self-regulatory organization,
or any preexisting written policies of the
employer;
‘‘(C) the communication is not made for the purpose
of investigating a consumer’s credit worthiness, credit
standing, or credit capacity; and
‘‘(D) the communication is not provided to any person
except—
‘‘(i) to the employer or an agent of the employer;
‘‘(ii) to any Federal or State officer, agency, or
department, or any officer, agency, or department of
a unit of general local government;
‘‘(iii) to any self-regulatory organization with regulatory
authority over the activities of the employer
or employee;
‘‘(iv) as otherwise required by law; or
‘‘(v) pursuant to section 608.
‘‘(2) SUBSEQUENT DISCLOSURE.—After taking any adverse
action based in whole or in part on a communication described
in paragraph (1), the employer shall disclose to the consumer
a summary containing the nature and substance of the communication
upon which the adverse action is based, except that
the sources of information acquired solely for use in preparing
what would be but for subsection (d)(2)(D) an investigative
consumer report need not be disclosed.
‘‘(3) SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATION DEFINED.—For purposes
of this subsection, the term ‘self-regulatory organization’
includes any self-regulatory organization (as defined in section
3(a)(26) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), any entity
established under title I of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
any board of trade designated by the Commodity Futures
20 USC 9708.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00060 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003 117 STAT. 2011
Trading Commission, and any futures association registered
with such Commission.’’.
(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section
603(d)(2)(D) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681a(d)(2)(D)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or (x)’’ after ‘‘subsection
(o)’’.
TITLE VII—RELATION TO STATE LAWS
SEC. 711. RELATION TO STATE LAWS.
Section 625 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681t),
as so designated by section 214 of this Act, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘or for the prevention
or mitigation of identity theft,’’ after ‘‘information on consumers,’’;
(2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(5) with respect to the conduct required by the specific
provisions of—
‘‘(A) section 605(g);
‘‘( section 605A;
‘‘(C) section 605B;
‘‘(D) section 609(a)(1)(A);
‘‘(E) section 612(a);
‘‘(F) subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section 615;
‘‘(G) section 621(f);
‘‘(H) section 623(a)(6); or
‘‘(I) section 628.’’; and
(3) in subsection (d)—
(A) by striking paragraph (2);
( by striking ‘‘(c)—’’ and all that follows through
‘‘do not affect’’ and inserting ‘‘(c) do not affect’’; and
(C) by striking ‘‘1996; and’’ and inserting ‘‘1996.’’.
TITLE VIII—MISCELLANEOUS
SEC. 811. CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—Section 601 of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 note) is amended by striking ‘‘the Fair Credit
Reporting Act.’’ and inserting ‘‘the ‘Fair Credit Reporting Act’.’’.
(b) SECTION 604.—Section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)) is amended in paragraphs (1) through
(5), other than subparagraphs (E) and (F) of paragraph (3), by
moving each margin 2 ems to the right.
(c) SECTION 605.—
(1) Section 605(a)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15
U.S.C. 1681c(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘(1) cases’’ and
inserting ‘‘(1) Cases’’.
(2)(A) Section 5(1) of Public Law 105–347 (112 Stat. 3211)
is amended by striking ‘‘Judgments which’’ and inserting ‘‘judgments
which’’.
( The amendment made by subparagraph (A) shall be
deemed to have the same effective date as section 5(1) of
Public Law 105–347 (112 Stat. 3211).
(d) SECTION 609.—Section 609(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681g(a)) is amended—
15 USC 1681c
note.
15 USC 1681c.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 04:48 Dec 12, 2003 Jkt 029139 PO 00159 Frm 00061 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL159.108 BILLW PsN: PUBL159
117 STAT. 2012 PUBLIC LAW 108–159—DEC. 4, 2003
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2622 (S. 1753):
HOUSE REPORTS: Nos. 108–263