Monthly Archives: November 2010

Tuesday November 23rd 2010 @2:03pm ( email to police dated thursday september 4th 2008)

this blog entry is a recreation of the email sent to the police department  (ccsoweb@colliersheriff.net) on Thursday September 4th 2008 @ 2:23pm I am typing this blog on Tuesday November 23rd at 2:04pm

To Whom it may concern,                                                    9/04/2008

I am writing today Thursday September 04, 2008 to reconfirm conversations i have had these past weeks with various police officers.  I am writing to receive a copy of the report that should have been written and to find the progress of the case.

I was and still am missing personal items from my home and called the police @1am 08/28/08, after working on my computer for A Tender Loving Care Service and
 A TLC Kindergarten Preparatory and Etiquette School.  I  discovered items missing while i was putting my computer away.  The items missing were from a locked briefcase when I place my computer every evening .  The reason i now lock up my compute when not in use is due to an incident that occurred December 2007 see case #07-400-79.  On 8/28/08 Officer Hurley badge #2308 came4 to my home after i reported the missing items.  He spoke with me concerning the incident however he didn’t take any notes nor did he file a report for the occurrence.  He did call detective Chris Allen and told him of the incident .  Chris Allen was the detective that had been assigned the case in December 2007.

Within the next following days I went to the substation off Vanderbilt drive and met with detective Linquist ( badge#        )who took notes and told me he would email me a copy of the report so i could keep in my files.  I have not received a report to date.  I called and spoke with  Detective Sannicaro badge#:  2649) on the phone from the front guard gate of my community a few nights ago and told him of more items missing.  Thee are personal photos and letters of mine,  and files on/from  clients and their homes and children.  He told me to not bother Chris  Allen ( badge # 2511) since he was off work but to try him the following day.  Therefore  to make sure I’m not bothering anyone, I am emailing to find out the progress and to obtain a copy of the report. 

Occurrences such as these have been occurring since 2003 when incidences of peeping tom/threatening messages for me and my family began.  For a while Chris Allen had police coming to my home and checking on everything when i gave him my schedule of when i would leave my home.  This seemed to alleviate the occurrences for the time  he had the officers checking on everything.  I am afraid that the same people may be resuming their offenses since as far as i know no one was charged for trespassing or  for stealing.

I was scheduled to do a babysitting for a family in Autumn woods and told detective Linquist.  Once i had told the detectives the sitting was canceled.  As i told Chris Allen, these occurrences would happen when i would leave my home and work or whenever i left my home for scheduled dates or times.  Should I give the detectives a list of clients?  I would hate for someone to compromise their lives, or homes and definitely compromise their children’s safety. 

items missing:
personal photos from a backpacking summer in Europe
Personal photos from  going to school in  France
personal photos from  Saudi Arabia
personal letters
white combination lock from locked suitcase
files from business concerning web hosting accounts and web design
also reported email or hacking problem to internet provide concerning tampering with email addresses, email messages and business emails that composed two years worth of correspondence.
files missing containing personal information on clients in Pelican marsh, Port Royal, and various areas in Naples.  Information contained in files:  phone numbers, email addresses personal information on clients children and on their homes.  Ie: directions, and sometimes security instruction.

Thank you for your kind attention in theis matter. I would appreciate a response as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Mary Jean Ziska
email:  whatabtmary@yahoo.com 

November 18th 2010 @9:50pm ( article: Caller ID spoofing aboutto be outlawed)

Caller ID Spoofing about to be outlawed
two bills making their way through the House and Senate will outlaw caller ID spoofing.
By Ken Fisher/ last updated June 27th 2007 *8:49PM 

“Today the  US Senate Committee on Commerce Science and Transportation has passed S. 704 a bill that would make it a crime to spoof caller Id Dubbed the “truth in Caller ID Act of 2007” the bill would outlaw causing “any caller identification service to transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information “via” any telecommunications service or IP-enabled voice service.”  Law enforcement is exempted from the rule.

While  we all probably wish this would outlaw caller ID blocking( think “private”) it won’t The proposed legislation only targets misleading caller ID spoofing such as pranking your buddy by sending along “Bush GHW” with your next VoIP call.

“Caller ID provides critical informatin to whose who rely it ” said Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) in a statement.  “HOwever, when this technology is used to deceive people it can endanger personal privacy and safety.  This bill will help strengthen the ability  of the FCC and states to combat these nefarious practices”  We know Stevens is just sick of getting calls from “Tubes, Internet” and Mr. Giant Truck”

The bill was introduced in February by Senmator Bill Nelson (D-Fl) and Senator Olympia Snowe(R-ME) A similar act has been introduced in the House and passed, making it very likely that this little bill will indeed someday become a law. 

On a serious note, caller ID spoofing can be used to bypass dial-in systems that use your calling location to determine who you are. 

November 18th 2010 @10:13pm/articel from AARP: “Ask Sid: Who Is That Really on MY Caller ID?” by sid Kirchheimer

 Article concerning spoofing: 

copyright 1995-2009 AARP.  All rights reserved.  A Member of AARP Global Network

From AARP Bulletin  today/  Ask Sid:  Who is that really on my caller id?

By Sid Kirchheimer/ AARP Bullitan Today July 3, 2009
Q.  How does telephone spoofing work an is it legal? 

A.  Caller ID spoofing lets callers hide their real phone number and instead display another number on the recipient’s called ID service, along with the name of the company or individual registered for that number.  Such services, widely available  on the internet and costing as little as $10.00 per house of calling time, are legal and have traditionally been used by collection agencies police private investigators and others who want to hide their identities. 

But increasingly, scammers are using spoofing services to commit identity theft.  They pretend to be calling from a bank, credit card company or a government agency and the recipients may feel safe revealing personal information such as bank account and social security numbers because the name and phone number of the legitimate company or agency appears on their caller ID.

Once a scammer has subscribed to spoofing service getting the victim’s caller ID to display a fake number is easy.  The spoofer simply enters the recipients number and the fake caller ID number on a Web form or telephone touch pad, and the service completes the call.

The practice has become even more widespread with the growth of the technology known as voice over Internet protocol.  VoIP phone services such as Skype and Vonage use computer addresses instead of actual phone numbers to connect calls over the Internet.  That means their subscribers can choose any area code and phone number that’s available in the entire county and scammers can take advantage of that flexibility to choose a deceptive number. 

FLORIDA IS THE ONLY STATE THAT HAS BANNED CALLER ID SPOOFING MAKING IT A FIRST DEGREE MISDEMEANOR AND SOME OTHER STATES ARE CONSIDERING  SIMILAR LAWS.

No matter where you live, people who have signed up for the National Do Not Call Registry ( file complaints)
about unsolicited spoofing calls with the Federal Trade Commission or their STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’s OFFICE

The bottom line:  Because spoofing is easily done and enforcement has been las, you should never provide sensitive information to any caller.  Instead, look up the number of the company that claims to be calling and dial it yourself.
 

 

NOVEMBER 18 2010/ @9:26pm ( penalities for spoofing)

 CALLER  ID AC T of 2007

(i)  IN GENERAL_- Any person that is determined by the commission, in accordance with paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 503 (b) to have violated this subsection shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty.  A forfeiture penalty  determined under this paragraph shall not exceed $10,000.00 for each violation, or 3 times that amount for each day of a continuing violation, except that the amount assessed for any continuing violation shall not exceed a total of $1,000,000.00 for any single act or failure to act. 

(E) VENUE- An action brought under sub-paragraph ( A) shall be brought in a district court of the United States that meets applicable requirements relating to venue under section 1391 of title 28 United States Code.

(ii) Services of process In an action brought under sub- paragraph (A)-
(I)  process may be served without regard to the territorial limits of the district or of the state in which the action is instituted and
(II) a person who participated in an alleged violation that is being litigated in the civil action may be joined in the civil action witout regard to the residence of the  person.   

(7)  DEFINITIONS- for purpose of this subsection:

(A) CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION:   The term “caller identification information means information provided by a caller identification service regarding the telephone number of or other information regarding the origination of a call made using a telecommunication service or IP-enabled voice service.

( CALLER IDENTIFICATION SERVICE – The term “caller identification service” means any service or device designated to provide the user of the service or device with the telephone number of, or other information regarding the origination of , a call made using a telecommunications service or IP-enabled voice service. Such term includes automatic number identification services. 

(C) IP-ENABLED VOICE SERVICE-The term IP -enabled voice service has the meaning given tht term by section 9.3 of the Commission’s regulations (47 C.F.R.
9.3) as those regulations may be amended by the Commission from time to time.

(D) LIMITATION- Not withstanding any other provision of this section subsection (f) shall not apply to this subsection or to the regulations under this subsection. 

 

Thursday November 18th 2010 @7:29pm( caller id spoofing)

 the truth in caller Id Act of 2007-caller id spoofing.info      www.calleridspoofing.info/the-truth-in-caller-id-act-of-2007.php

style=”font-size: 16px;” face=”Georgia”>article from:  caller idspoofing.info
the truth in caller id act of 2007 (s.704)
Below is “the truth in caller id act of 2007” aka S. 704 as of June, 27 2007.  The bill is likely to be revised again in July after being brought in front of the Senate.  Contrary to popular belief, the Truth in Caller Id Act of 2007, if passed , would NOT at this time put an end to caller ID spoofing or shut down companies that offer caller ID spoofing services for free or for a fee.  The bill places responsibility on the user  for the first time to use Caller Id spoofing within the law.  Specifically, you would not be able to spoof “with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value.”  This means that people will no longer be able to use caller id spoofing for pretexting.  Pretexting has been a big issue in the past few years as it has come to the attention that you may be able to obtain phone records through pretexting.  This also means that you would probably not want to use called id spoofing for calls because some people may view that as “causing harm” which is specifically outlawed.  Some may argue that spoofing in general “defrauds” people but this bill is aimed at stopping calling id spoofing and being able to fine and potentially prosecute users who use caller ID spoofing to commit wire fraud or identity theft.

article from  caller id spoofing.info /the definitive  resource on caller ID spoofing 
SECTION ONE SHORT TITLE
THIS ACT MAY BE CITED AS THE “TRUTH IN CALLER ID ACT OF 2007( S. 704)

Below is “the truth in caller Id Act of 2007” a.k.a. S. 704 as of June 27th 2007. 
The bill is likely to be revised again in July after being brought in front of the Senate.  Contrary to popular belief, the truth in caller ID act  of 2007 if passed would not at his time put an end to caller id spoofing or shut down companies that offer caller id spoofing services for free or for a fee.  The bill places responsibility on the user for the first time to use caller id spoofing  within the law. 

Specifically, you would not be able to spoof “with the intent to defraud, cause harm , or wrongfully obtain anything of value   

This means that people will no longer be able to use caller id spoofing for pretexting.  Pretexting has been a big issue in the past few years as it has some to people’s attention that you may be able to obtain phone records through pretexting. 

This also means caller id spoofing for prank calls may view that as “causing harm” which is specifically outlawed

Some may argue that spoofing in general “defrauds” people but this bill is aimed at stopping caller ID spoofing and being able to fine and potentially prosecute users who use Caller ID spoofing to commit wire fraud or identity theft!

SECTION 1.  SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “TRUTH IN CALLER ID ACT of 2007”

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING MANIPULATION OF CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.

Section 227 of the Communication Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 227 )
is amended

(1)  by redesignating subsections (e), (f) and (g) as subsections (f) (g) and (h) respectively and
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection:

(e) Prohibition on Provision of Inaccurate Caller Identification Information

(1)  IN GENERAL-
It shall be unlawful for any person within the United states in connection with any telecommunications service of IP-enabled voice service to cause any caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value unless such transmission is exempted pursuant to paragraph (3)(  (

(2) PROTECTION FOR BLOCKING CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION-Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prevent or restrict any person  from blocking the capacity of any caller identification service to transmit caller identification information.

(3) REGULATIONS-

(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 6 months after the enactment of this subsection , the Commission  shall prescribe regulations to implement this subsection.
(

( CONTENT OF REGULATIONS-

(i)IN GENERAL- The regulations required under sub-paragraph (A) shall include exemptions from the prohibition under paragraph (1) as the Commission determines is appropriate.

(ii) SPECIFIC EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR COURT ORDERS-The regulations required under sub paragraph (A) shall exempt from  the prohibition under paragraph (1) transmission in connection with
(I)  any authorized activity of a law enforcement agency or
(II) a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation
(III) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS-  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorized or prohibit any investigative, protective, or intelligence activities performed in connection with official duties and in accordance with all applicable laws by law enforcement agency of the United States

(4) REPORT- Not later than  6 months after the enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall report to congress whether additional legislation is necessary to prohibit the provision of inaccurate caller identificaiton information in technologies that are successor or replacement technologies to telecommunicaitons service or IP enabled voice service 

(5)  PENALTITIES
(A) CIVIL FORFEITURE-

  _910 e

November 18th 2010@6:27pm ( return email from gloria allred)


 I emailed this note to Gloria Allred, Maroko and Goldberg in their contact us Find law firm site message on Tuesday November 16th 2010 7:31pm

Name:  Mary jean ziska

Brief description of your legal issue: 
I want to prosecute a group of people who have harmed my life, my reputation, and my business.  I created website and blog because no one has been able to stop them.  Please Help!  Please contact me via my email address:  whatabtmary@yahoo.com , additional information also located in website:  www.mysearchforjustice.com and www.blog.mysearchforjustice.com
Thank you for your kind attention in this matter,
Sincerely,
Mary Jean Ziska  

So i received a reply email from Gloria Allred today.  A bit disappointing I must admidt… so here it goes…. i told you i’d say the truth .. that means all the truth…. even when it isnt great news for me…

From:  Helen Norwood ( HNorwood@amglaw.com)
To :  whatabtmary@yahoo.com
Date:  Thur, November 18,2010 1:47:32PM
Subject: Re:  Allred, Maroko & Goldberg-Contact Us Find Law Firm Site Message

Dear Ms. Ziska,
I am in receipt of your e-mail of November 16, 2010  Unfortunately, due to our office’s present case load and upcoming litigation schedule neither I nor my law firm is in a position to become involved in this matter.  If you desire to pursue further action, I strongly recommend  you seek legal counsel immediately to advise you with respect to the statute(s) of limitations and to provide representation without delay.  One source of referral  to counsel willing to review matters such as yours is your local county Bar Association.

Neither this office nor any referring lawyer are your lawyers.  We only agreed to review this case and have no obligation to file a lawsuit or claim to protect your rights.  No written attorney/client retainer has been entered into.  Our statements are a matter of opinion only and we can make no guarantees.  You are free to obtain and solicit other legal advice and we encourage you to do so.  I appreciate your inquiry and wish you success in your pursuit of justice.
Very truly yours,
Gloria Allred
Allred Maroko &Goldberg
6300 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 1500
Los Angeles Ca.  90048

Bummer right?   Maybe if i were famous/wealthier/ or mattered…. this would have been a different letter… lets hope that the right and real professional who is up for the challenge will respond  differently…. and will win… not like karen kahel jumping up and down type bully winning … but winning for justice and for all the people who have been picked on for no reason….. but for some selfish people to get  want they want…. 

November 16th 2010/email to gloria allred

 This evening  11/16/2010 @ 10:33pm I  emailed Gloria Allred
I have her book Fight back and win / when  i saw the title  of the book on my shelf i knew immediately that i wanted to make sure to contact her…

Have you ever felt like David fighting Goliath?  I’ ve felt like that since 2003…. like no matter what i do or how i try to finish against injustice and all the harm these people have continually done to my life… that i am just this little person who is not allowed to “win” to “have justice”  that no one really cares or wants to help… or maybe they cant fight against these people… i mean the police have tried but haven’t  been able to stop  anything….  but you still have to have hope right… that truth will prevail.. that people who bully and trespass or harm others are stopped…

I would love….. swift justice with Nancy Grace and  Gloria Allred author of  to fight and win …. wow to be able to stop these horrible criminals and be able to have them be held accountable for the damage they have caused in my life…. wow… now that would be absolutely great!

I received an additional bully email sent  few days ago… on Monday November 15th from someone who was supposed to be a long time family friend.  Of course no true friend would have sent such a horrible email…. I sent a reply back including  the website to www.mysearchforjustice.com  and perhaps that will stop any more emails form that email address…..anyway… since IP addresses can be traced… and eventually  criminals will be caught  or at least i hope they will be caught and put in jail where thy belong! ….. we shall see.

I had to call go daddy twice this evening… once spoke with Mike  the next time i spoke with another guy once concerning the fact that when i put my website into an email or the contact form of a lawyer or police department the website for www.mysearchforjustice.com is not hyper linking.  Please if anyone is out there and it is or is not hyper linking as well… please let me know!   Then i also had to mention the fact that my pass code wasn’t working when i started to  use go daddy today….
 I had him check to see if anyone had changed my pass code between last night and today!  One way or another, i will find out if anyone is hacking into my accounts or preventing me from freedom of speech on my blog or my website and i will make sure the scummy liars, cheats and thieves are in jail where they should have been since 2003! 
 

Thursday November 18th 2010/ @5:17pm (virgin mobil continued)

  Well i put in a request for help last evening when speaking with the Philippines and Nicaragua(SP?)  and today i got an email on 11/17/10 telling me that i will receive an email to clarify the problem the incident report number was : ( 101117-001494) but when opened the email that  was intended to clear up the problem .. (weird enough) it was blank… not one word from  our team @virgin Mobil.com to explain what i was dealing with when dealing with all the phone problems and not one  word even saying they were still working on the situation.. not one word saying that  they would credit the problem… just a blank email with nothing…

now doesn’t that seem very odd and very unprofessional from virgin Mobil USA.com?  i think it would appear to me to be either a mistake sent  to my email  address when an email with the information correcting the situation was either not sent or was sent elsewhere.. human error right?…

 or could it be some form of tampering with email… like say email theft… or what would you call it when someone infiltrates your accounts or your emails…. cyber theft.. or  hacking?    

here is what the first email  said:  

From: our team at virgin mobi usa ( ourtem@virginmobileusa.com)
To:   whatabtmary@yahoo.com

Subject incident :  101117-001494
Response:  thanks for sending us an email.  We received your message dated 11/17/2010 06:26PM

Our team is looking at your email right now and we’ll be sending you a response within the next 24 hours.  Please do not reply to this email since this is an auto -forward email.

In the event you need to contact us regarding your original message please refer to the  incident#101117-001494.   This will help us locate and review your correspondence with us. 

Thanks once again for writing.  We’ll be in touch very soon.
Virgin Mobile usa customer support.   
___________________________________________

Remember you can contact us using *VM frp, your virgin mobile or 888 322-1122

the next email i received was 11/18/2010 @  4:06pm  that was BLANK