Author Archives: mary jean ziska

NOVEMBER 18 2010/ @9:26pm ( penalities for spoofing)

 CALLER  ID AC T of 2007

(i)  IN GENERAL_- Any person that is determined by the commission, in accordance with paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 503 (b) to have violated this subsection shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty.  A forfeiture penalty  determined under this paragraph shall not exceed $10,000.00 for each violation, or 3 times that amount for each day of a continuing violation, except that the amount assessed for any continuing violation shall not exceed a total of $1,000,000.00 for any single act or failure to act. 

(E) VENUE- An action brought under sub-paragraph ( A) shall be brought in a district court of the United States that meets applicable requirements relating to venue under section 1391 of title 28 United States Code.

(ii) Services of process In an action brought under sub- paragraph (A)-
(I)  process may be served without regard to the territorial limits of the district or of the state in which the action is instituted and
(II) a person who participated in an alleged violation that is being litigated in the civil action may be joined in the civil action witout regard to the residence of the  person.   

(7)  DEFINITIONS- for purpose of this subsection:

(A) CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION:   The term “caller identification information means information provided by a caller identification service regarding the telephone number of or other information regarding the origination of a call made using a telecommunication service or IP-enabled voice service.

( CALLER IDENTIFICATION SERVICE – The term “caller identification service” means any service or device designated to provide the user of the service or device with the telephone number of, or other information regarding the origination of , a call made using a telecommunications service or IP-enabled voice service. Such term includes automatic number identification services. 

(C) IP-ENABLED VOICE SERVICE-The term IP -enabled voice service has the meaning given tht term by section 9.3 of the Commission’s regulations (47 C.F.R.
9.3) as those regulations may be amended by the Commission from time to time.

(D) LIMITATION- Not withstanding any other provision of this section subsection (f) shall not apply to this subsection or to the regulations under this subsection. 

 

Thursday November 18th 2010 @7:29pm( caller id spoofing)

 the truth in caller Id Act of 2007-caller id spoofing.info      www.calleridspoofing.info/the-truth-in-caller-id-act-of-2007.php

style=”font-size: 16px;” face=”Georgia”>article from:  caller idspoofing.info
the truth in caller id act of 2007 (s.704)
Below is “the truth in caller id act of 2007” aka S. 704 as of June, 27 2007.  The bill is likely to be revised again in July after being brought in front of the Senate.  Contrary to popular belief, the Truth in Caller Id Act of 2007, if passed , would NOT at this time put an end to caller ID spoofing or shut down companies that offer caller ID spoofing services for free or for a fee.  The bill places responsibility on the user  for the first time to use Caller Id spoofing within the law.  Specifically, you would not be able to spoof “with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value.”  This means that people will no longer be able to use caller id spoofing for pretexting.  Pretexting has been a big issue in the past few years as it has come to the attention that you may be able to obtain phone records through pretexting.  This also means that you would probably not want to use called id spoofing for calls because some people may view that as “causing harm” which is specifically outlawed.  Some may argue that spoofing in general “defrauds” people but this bill is aimed at stopping calling id spoofing and being able to fine and potentially prosecute users who use caller ID spoofing to commit wire fraud or identity theft.

article from  caller id spoofing.info /the definitive  resource on caller ID spoofing 
SECTION ONE SHORT TITLE
THIS ACT MAY BE CITED AS THE “TRUTH IN CALLER ID ACT OF 2007( S. 704)

Below is “the truth in caller Id Act of 2007” a.k.a. S. 704 as of June 27th 2007. 
The bill is likely to be revised again in July after being brought in front of the Senate.  Contrary to popular belief, the truth in caller ID act  of 2007 if passed would not at his time put an end to caller id spoofing or shut down companies that offer caller id spoofing services for free or for a fee.  The bill places responsibility on the user for the first time to use caller id spoofing  within the law. 

Specifically, you would not be able to spoof “with the intent to defraud, cause harm , or wrongfully obtain anything of value   

This means that people will no longer be able to use caller id spoofing for pretexting.  Pretexting has been a big issue in the past few years as it has some to people’s attention that you may be able to obtain phone records through pretexting. 

This also means caller id spoofing for prank calls may view that as “causing harm” which is specifically outlawed

Some may argue that spoofing in general “defrauds” people but this bill is aimed at stopping caller ID spoofing and being able to fine and potentially prosecute users who use Caller ID spoofing to commit wire fraud or identity theft!

SECTION 1.  SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “TRUTH IN CALLER ID ACT of 2007”

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING MANIPULATION OF CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.

Section 227 of the Communication Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 227 )
is amended

(1)  by redesignating subsections (e), (f) and (g) as subsections (f) (g) and (h) respectively and
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection:

(e) Prohibition on Provision of Inaccurate Caller Identification Information

(1)  IN GENERAL-
It shall be unlawful for any person within the United states in connection with any telecommunications service of IP-enabled voice service to cause any caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value unless such transmission is exempted pursuant to paragraph (3)(  (

(2) PROTECTION FOR BLOCKING CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION-Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prevent or restrict any person  from blocking the capacity of any caller identification service to transmit caller identification information.

(3) REGULATIONS-

(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 6 months after the enactment of this subsection , the Commission  shall prescribe regulations to implement this subsection.
(

( CONTENT OF REGULATIONS-

(i)IN GENERAL- The regulations required under sub-paragraph (A) shall include exemptions from the prohibition under paragraph (1) as the Commission determines is appropriate.

(ii) SPECIFIC EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR COURT ORDERS-The regulations required under sub paragraph (A) shall exempt from  the prohibition under paragraph (1) transmission in connection with
(I)  any authorized activity of a law enforcement agency or
(II) a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation
(III) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS-  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorized or prohibit any investigative, protective, or intelligence activities performed in connection with official duties and in accordance with all applicable laws by law enforcement agency of the United States

(4) REPORT- Not later than  6 months after the enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall report to congress whether additional legislation is necessary to prohibit the provision of inaccurate caller identificaiton information in technologies that are successor or replacement technologies to telecommunicaitons service or IP enabled voice service 

(5)  PENALTITIES
(A) CIVIL FORFEITURE-

  _910 e

November 18th 2010@6:27pm ( return email from gloria allred)


 I emailed this note to Gloria Allred, Maroko and Goldberg in their contact us Find law firm site message on Tuesday November 16th 2010 7:31pm

Name:  Mary jean ziska

Brief description of your legal issue: 
I want to prosecute a group of people who have harmed my life, my reputation, and my business.  I created website and blog because no one has been able to stop them.  Please Help!  Please contact me via my email address:  whatabtmary@yahoo.com , additional information also located in website:  www.mysearchforjustice.com and www.blog.mysearchforjustice.com
Thank you for your kind attention in this matter,
Sincerely,
Mary Jean Ziska  

So i received a reply email from Gloria Allred today.  A bit disappointing I must admidt… so here it goes…. i told you i’d say the truth .. that means all the truth…. even when it isnt great news for me…

From:  Helen Norwood ( HNorwood@amglaw.com)
To :  whatabtmary@yahoo.com
Date:  Thur, November 18,2010 1:47:32PM
Subject: Re:  Allred, Maroko & Goldberg-Contact Us Find Law Firm Site Message

Dear Ms. Ziska,
I am in receipt of your e-mail of November 16, 2010  Unfortunately, due to our office’s present case load and upcoming litigation schedule neither I nor my law firm is in a position to become involved in this matter.  If you desire to pursue further action, I strongly recommend  you seek legal counsel immediately to advise you with respect to the statute(s) of limitations and to provide representation without delay.  One source of referral  to counsel willing to review matters such as yours is your local county Bar Association.

Neither this office nor any referring lawyer are your lawyers.  We only agreed to review this case and have no obligation to file a lawsuit or claim to protect your rights.  No written attorney/client retainer has been entered into.  Our statements are a matter of opinion only and we can make no guarantees.  You are free to obtain and solicit other legal advice and we encourage you to do so.  I appreciate your inquiry and wish you success in your pursuit of justice.
Very truly yours,
Gloria Allred
Allred Maroko &Goldberg
6300 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 1500
Los Angeles Ca.  90048

Bummer right?   Maybe if i were famous/wealthier/ or mattered…. this would have been a different letter… lets hope that the right and real professional who is up for the challenge will respond  differently…. and will win… not like karen kahel jumping up and down type bully winning … but winning for justice and for all the people who have been picked on for no reason….. but for some selfish people to get  want they want…. 

November 16th 2010/email to gloria allred

 This evening  11/16/2010 @ 10:33pm I  emailed Gloria Allred
I have her book Fight back and win / when 
i saw the title  of the book on my shelf i knew immediately that i wanted to make sure to contact her…

Have you ever felt like David fighting Goliath?  I’ ve felt like that since 2003…. like no matter what i do or how i try to finish against injustice and all the harm these people have continually done to my life… that i am just this little person who is not allowed to “win” to “have justice”  that no one really cares or wants to help… or maybe they cant fight against these people… i mean the police have tried but haven’t  been able to stop  anything….  but you still have to have hope right… that truth will prevail.. that people who bully and trespass or harm others are stopped…

I would love….. swift justice with Nancy Grace and  Gloria Allred author of  to fight and win …. wow to be able to stop these horrible criminals and be able to have them be held accountable for the damage they have caused in my life…. wow… now that would be absolutely great!

I received an additional bully email sent  few days ago… on Monday November 15th from someone who was supposed to be a long time family friend.  Of course no true friend would have sent such a horrible email…. I sent a reply back including  the website to www.mysearchforjustice.com  and perhaps that will stop any more emails form that email address…..anyway… since IP addresses can be traced… and eventually  criminals will be caught  or at least i hope they will be caught and put in jail where thy belong! ….. we shall see.

I had to call go daddy twice this evening… once spoke with Mike  the next time i spoke with another guy once concerning the fact that when i put my website into an email or the contact form of a lawyer or police department the website for www.mysearchforjustice.com is not hyper linking.  Please if anyone is out there and it is or is not hyper linking as well… please let me know!   Then i also had to mention the fact that my pass code wasn’t working when i started to  use go daddy today….
 I had him check to see if anyone had changed my pass code between last night and today!  One way or another, i will find out if anyone is hacking into my accounts or preventing me from freedom of speech on my blog or my website and i will make sure the scummy liars, cheats and thieves are in jail where they should have been since 2003! 
 

Thursday November 18th 2010/ @5:17pm (virgin mobil continued)

  Well i put in a request for help last evening when speaking with the Philippines and Nicaragua(SP?)  and today i got an email on 11/17/10 telling me that i will receive an email to clarify the problem the incident report number was : ( 101117-001494) but when opened the email that  was intended to clear up the problem .. (weird enough) it was blank… not one word from  our team @virgin Mobil.com to explain what i was dealing with when dealing with all the phone problems and not one  word even saying they were still working on the situation.. not one word saying that  they would credit the problem… just a blank email with nothing…

now doesn’t that seem very odd and very unprofessional from virgin Mobil USA.com?  i think it would appear to me to be either a mistake sent  to my email  address when an email with the information correcting the situation was either not sent or was sent elsewhere.. human error right?…

 or could it be some form of tampering with email… like say email theft… or what would you call it when someone infiltrates your accounts or your emails…. cyber theft.. or  hacking?    

here is what the first email  said:  

From: our team at virgin mobi usa ( ourtem@virginmobileusa.com)
To:   whatabtmary@yahoo.com

Subject incident :  101117-001494
Response:  thanks for sending us an email.  We received your message dated 11/17/2010 06:26PM

Our team is looking at your email right now and we’ll be sending you a response within the next 24 hours.  Please do not reply to this email since this is an auto -forward email.

In the event you need to contact us regarding your original message please refer to the  incident#101117-001494.   This will help us locate and review your correspondence with us. 

Thanks once again for writing.  We’ll be in touch very soon.
Virgin Mobile usa customer support.   
___________________________________________

Remember you can contact us using *VM frp, your virgin mobile or 888 322-1122

the next email i received was 11/18/2010 @  4:06pm  that was BLANK

Wednesday November 17th 2010/ another problem and issue to fix with virgin mobil

 So this evening i called Virgin Mobil at  5:19pm.  I was able to connect to an office in the Philippines and spoke with Eilleen (id #5223851) who was in the customer service representative department.   She told me that for some unknown reason when i topped up and tried renewing my account (which should have been due on November 2nd ) anyway when i tried renewing it didn’t “take” and she said i now needed to call in each time i need to pay for my monthly charges instead on just putting in the top up pin and having it start through the phone.   So by 5:50pm I thought i had everything fixed.

Silly me….

 I went to check my minutes and my phone and then remembered I wanted to talk to a virgin Mobil representative  about the 112392872294 number that kept showing up… and even though there was supposed to be a block on the number since September it did not stop… in fact…

10/22/10:  112392872294 was called  1 time
10/23/10:  112392872294 was called  2 times
10/25/10:  112392872294 was called  5 time
10/26/10:  112392872294 was called  2 times
10/27/10:  112392872294 was called  1 time
10/30/10:  112392872294 was called  1 time
11/01/10:  112392872294 was called  1 time
11/02/10:  112392872294 was called  1 time
11/03/10:  112392872294 was called  3 times
11/04/10:  112392872294 was called  3 times
11/05/10:  112392872294 was called  3 times
11/06/10:  112392872294 was called  6 time
11/07/10:  112392872294 was called  2 time
11/08/10:  112392872294 was called  4 time
11/09/10:  112392872294 was called  5 time
11/10/10:  112392872294 was called   1 time
11/11/10:  112392872294 was called  2 time
11/12/10:  112392872294 was called  3 time
11/17/10:  112392872294 was called  5 time

When i called back ( starting at 7:35pm )  i found out that 11 minutes were used on my plan and i had only called to make a test call  ( at 7:17pm) and leave a message on my voice mail.  It was a total of 47 seconds but instead of being charged one minute i was charged 11 minutes.  I spoke with George ( id# 701859 ) from the central America office of Nicaragua.  He told me he would credit me the 10 minutes ( gave me a confirmation number of ( 3-h1I9n91).  He said he thought I wouldn’t have any more calls from the 112392872294  number.  He also told me how i was supposed to put in a new code for my pass code and also told me  how to leave a new voice message on my phone.  He told me in 5 minutes i should be able to check my account and see the credit and the phone will be set without any spoofing…. or so i thought….

So i changed my pass code and information and message for my phone at 8:00pm(11/17/10)  no messages @8:04pm
8:06pm a test call time of 47 seconds on my phone
8:07pm 11/17/2010 to check voice mail used 1 minute 6 seconds
8:13pm still showing 11 minutes used on website and in my account
8:43pm called back virgin Mobil again  got Nicaragua
this time i spoke with a man named Jeff  id# (209296)
I explained that the 11 minutes used had not been credited yet  and he said the confirmation number in the computer (after I gave Jeff and George my pin numbers these men or anyone on the phone were able to get into my virgin Mobil account)

Jeff said the confirmation number for the 10 minute credit was 3-h1hrut and then he proceeded to say that there were 8 of the credit minutes already used. He also tried telling me that when ever i check my voice mail I will be charged minutes from now on even though i hadn’t been charged before.   I asked to speak with his manager… he put me on hold and from 858pm until 9:06pm  then he hung up on me…. So who is telling the truth? and who is lying? and what is ever going to happen to the minutes and the phone number?    Help…. Do you have any idea how much having your phone number messed up or having anyone stealing your messages or your phone number? 
When i started trying  to fix all this when  I opened the account… remember when i told you i had to speak with customer service for hours… i mean many hours… about these bogus minutes that we used… 

I think it is still messed up….. i told all three customer reps that i would be putting this information in the website and emailing it to the police and lawyers….

I have been trying to get more information on identity theft….  some great guys in the west law  reference area….. so this is what i want to prove….

that the girls who  have stolen phones are culpable of identity theft for impersonating the owner of the phone… right?

that girls who have stolen clothing or worn clothing with the intent to impersonate another person and did so without  the permission of the owner of the clothing… that has committed a form of identity theft… and each and every time these girls have knowingly and willfully and in a premeditated fashion went ahead and trespassed onto private property… broke into a private residence and then proceeded to impersonate the owner of the home..  or claimed  to be someone they were not….  then these  girls should be charged for each and every  time they committed this form of identity theft right? 

When going through the penalties and the fines.. each count of identity theft  would be up $10,000.00   and time in prison… so just say….since 2003… one time a month when someone broke the law by breaking into a home and stealing clothing or even wearing your clothes … ( uck.. how invasive  and disgusting right? ) / but just one month time 12 months…  8 years….. = 96 times then charge those girls with the fines of up to 10,000.00 that would be a cost of $960,000.00….. right?  maybe if they were fined and put in jail to be a deterrent for the crimes they commit … maybe they will stop committing crimes right?  i mean in Saudi when someone steals once and has their hand cut off… they most probably don’t do it again…. it works!.. capital punishment works!

       &nbs
p;                                                       so if…..
identity theft includes a “voice print” and even fingerprints and physical appearance…. as a part of the definition and criteria for a person’s identity…… it would make sense that anyone who mimics or impersonates you( without your permission and with the intent to defraud )  on the phone or in person…. these criminals… (or  actors… or con artists… what should be the correct terminology for this group of( slime?)… people) …. they would be committing identity theft as well…..and ea VERY TIME THEY COMMIT THIS CRIME THEY SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH IDENTITY THEFT AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED FOR THEIR CRIMES ESPECIALLY WHEN IT HARMS ANOTHER PERSON.. AND CREATES A VICTIM FROM THEIR CRIMES…. 

   
 

November 17th 2010@2:47pmEmail sent to sheriff/lawyers/authorities

To whom it may concern,                               November 17th 2010 @2:26pm

My name is Mary Jean Ziska I reside at:  ____________________Naples Florida.  My email address is:  whatabtmary@yahoo.com
My contact phone numbers are supposed to  be:239-287-2294 ( virgin mobil )and 561-594-5921 through (magic jack) I have been dealing with a group of con artists and criminals since meeting Gerard Ahler in 2003 and Karen Kahel in 2005.  they haven not only infiltrated and ruined every aspect of the life i had before meeting them including businesses and relationships but there have been numerous criminal and civil wrongdoings.  I am still attempting to rectify all the damage and situations they created. 

I want criminals to be caught and be stopped.  I don’t want anyone else to go through the horrible years that i have had to endure or the intentional infliction of pain and suffering.  Not only emotional distress and bulling but all the items stolen harmed or ruined.  All the business that have been tampered with the relationships that in this entire process by not stopping them have been ruined. 

These people are a detriment to society and to the Naples community.  Without stopping them they will continue to be criminals and continue to harm other people… I did not ask to be involved… did not want my life or family to be involved… but I find myself and my business my friends and realtionships  and MYSELF to  still be continually  harmed by these people. 
I have started to catalog the laws broken, the people involved, and will continuely make updates and i will continue to fill in all the incidents.  Putting all this information on line seems to be the only way to let the public and the world know the truth and to do something about it!  It’s my first  amendment right
my freedom of speech to be notified of all this injustice!  As i mentioned my blog and my website  will tell all the details.  I hope by notifying you about all of this you will do something about it once and for all! 
my website is:  www.mysearchforjustice.com
myblog is:  blog.mysearchforjustice.com 

Thank you for your kind attention in this matter, 
Sincerely,
Mary Jean Ziska
   

November 17th 2010/email sent to virgin mobil: “ourteam email address”






To Whom It May Concern:                                                                    September 11Th 2010

 

My name is Mary Jean Ziska and I just switched over my phone number 239-287-2294 from Metro PCS on September 02Nd 2010.  I went to check my minutes on September 10th 2010 and found  248 minutes were said to have been used.  I went on line and at first couldn’t access my account.  Following that incident (when my pin wouldn’t access my account), I found that  in the  9 days I had the phone service there were many calls to
 ( 11239-287-2294) on my account.  

On september 2nd 2010: 2 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 3nd 2010: 3 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 4nd 2010: 11 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 5nd 2010: 1 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 6nd 2010: 2 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 7th 2010:  12 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 8th 2010:  10 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 9th 2010:   0 calls show the number 11239-2872294

On september 10th 2010: 4 calls show the number 11239-2872294

 

Since my phone number is  (239-287-2294)  I questioned whether or not those calls were from my number or to my number.  Upon investigating further, I realized that on ( 02/10/2010) I did not even turn on my phone until after 7 pm and the print out of the phone calls claimed that I had made phone calls:    

 

          09/10/2010     To:  11239-287-2294      @  09:48 pm         

          09/10/2010     To:  611                           @   8:16 pm 

          09/10/2010     To:  11239-287-2294      @  7:30  pm

          09//10/2010    To:  11239-287-2294      @  5:00 pm

          09/10/2010     To:  11239-287-2294      @  3:45 pm

          09/10/2010     To:  11239-287-2294      @  2:28 pm

          09/10/2010     To:  11239-287-2294      @  2:14 pm

          

I did not use the phone  until 7pm and definatly did not make those 11239-2872294 telephone calls to my self!  On numerous days calls to (11239-287-2294)this telephone number ranged from 1-12 calls in a day!  On September 10th 2010  alone, a total of 7 fraudulent calls were said to be made from/to  my telephone.  

 

This fraudulent misuse of my account has cost me  thousands of dollars in revenue  as I used this phone number as my work phone over the course of 2009-2010!  I am Assistant Director of A Tender Loving Care Service.  It is a babysitting service run and scheduled primiarily through the phone. I called the police ( from my my other phone 561- 594-5921. and  a police sargent called me back.   After speaking with  the police I called your help line which directed me to three different people:

 

1st spoke with:

Arnal ( id number 1301434) then

2nd spoke with:  

Shinne (  id number:  82410) then

3rd spoke with:

Lenn ( id number:  56552) 

She said she was the manager/supervisor of the department and would be able the help. Lenn said she would block the number 112392872294 and would erase all the phone calls made so far since most of them were incorrect. 

 

I called ( September 11th 2010) checking everything and did not see where the phone number was blocked.  I tried to block the number myself and it would not block.  The reason stated by the automated email service was for that 112392872294 was not a legitimate or valid number.  I also see that calls were not erased but  bonus minutes were added to make up for all the fraudulent calls made and that a credit of 248 minutes were added as bonus minutes.  Is that the same thing as promised by Lenn?  In a way it is good that she didn’t erase those phone calls from the official record as I plan on pressing charges and having the people responsible for this criminal activity and illegal and fraudulent misuse of my cell phone arrested or charged with all criminal charges that apply.  I had the woman Lynn check and verify that the serial number on the phone is the same as the serial number of the phone in my possession but am still under the assumption that something is wrong.  She was supposed to call me after 10-15 minutes on the cell phone in question last evening after talking on the phone with her until 1 or 2 am trying to resolve this situation.  I NEVER received a call and upon checking the calls there was also a call to #611 which I never made! 

 

I do believe  the same criminal  element is involved in many of the unfortunant events in my life since 2003 as I met one con artist  Gerard Ahler  and one vicious bully Karen Kahel.  What they and their   criminal  associates have done to my life, my business and my personal connections to my friends and family is not only unforgivable but   luckily criminally prosecutable! 

 

I had this phone number with:

Sprint (account # 514-620-247 ) from May 18th 2009 until August 6th 2009. 

Metro PCS from August 6th 2009- September 2nd 2010. 

I changed to Virgin Mobil on September 2nd 2010.

 

The reason we changed from Sprint was due to bills that were unreasonable high.  I tried to tell people then that something was amiss with the phone and the amount and duration of the calls made but now I can prove that calls to the phone number and with extreme dollar amounts were fraudulent.  I believe it may be the same group of criminals/criminal element  involved and would like to take them to court have them arrested or their crimes and put in jail/ punished for all their crimes. 

 

I am trying to rectify this situation and not allow any more of the criminal behavior to go unpunished.  I need your assantance in this matter and advice in how to rectify this situation.  I was told by a really helpful represantive of sprint that an MSID code can be traced  or needs to be changed  for any cloned phones.  Is there a way to track down the telephone number 11239-287-2294?  Or to  make sure that the phone number is correct on my actual phone?  Is there a way to see if any clone phones have been created from any of the phone providers?  Is there any additional information needed to verify that this criminal behavior has been going on with my same phone number?  As I mentioned before, I have used this phone number for my business and use it for many of the business contacts, and jobs  for my company.  Direct phone calls concerning jobs are our major source of income and by diverting the  phone calls  the perpretrator has cost me and my company 2 years worth of business!  Because we have exlusive contract with the Waldorf Astoria and work with many other 4-5 star hotels in the area this criminal activity has cost my business thousands and thousands of dollars! 

 

Please contact me via email (whatabtmary@yahoo.com ) or registered letter as I need to know what procedure to take so as not to  only make sure I have the correct phone with the correct phone number but also to begin to gather evidence to put these people in jail. 

 

Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter,

Sincerely, Mary jean Ziska

 

I will be sending a copy of this email to my attorney, to the police I spoke with and to the other emails connected to Virgin Mobil.  I want to have everyone informed of this horrid  and criminal situation and bring  conclusion to the criminal situation and justice for myself as i have been very harmed by these criminals.    

 

 

A Tender Loving Care Service

Marion Gregory   Director 239-598-1515


Mary Jean Ziska   Assistant Director 239-287-2294



 

November 16th 2010/ 2008 florida statutes ( idenity theft)

including any:
1.  Name, postal or electronic mail address telephone number social security number, date of birth, mother’s maiden name , official state issued or United states issued driver’s license or identification number alien registration number government passport number, employee or taxpayer identification number medicaid or food stamp account number, bank account number, credit or debit card number or personal identification number or code assigned to the holder of a debit card by the issuer to permit authorized electronic use of such card.
2.  Unique isometric data such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation
3.  unique electronic identification number address or routing code
4.  medical records
5.  telecommunication identifying information or access device or
6,  other number or information that can be used to access a person’s financial resources
(g)  “Counterfeit or fictitious personal identification information means any counterfeit fictitious or fabricated information in the similitude of the data outlined in paragraph ( f) that although not truthful or accurate would in context lead a reasonable prudent person to credit its truthfulness and accuracy. 

Any person who willfully and without authorization fraudulent uses personal identification information concerning an individual without first obtaining that individual’s consent commits a felony of the second degree punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.775.083, or 775.084.  If the pecuniary benefit the value of the services received, the payment sought to be avoided or the amount of the injury or fraud perpetrated is $5000.00 or more or if the person fraudulently uses the personal identification information of 10 or more individuals but fewer than 20 individuals without their consent.  Not withstanding any other provision of law the court shall sentence any person convicted of committing the offense describe in this paragraph to a mandatory minimum sentence of 3 years imprisonment.  e

November 16th 2010@ 5:05pm/ misrepresentation of identityity

November 16th 2010 @5:05pm/ Misrepresentation of identity 

Person using personal identification information misrepresents himself or herself to be a Law enforcement officer, an employee or representative of a bank, credit card company,  credit  counseling company, or credit reporting agency; or any person who wrongfully represents that he or she is seeking to assist the victim with a  problem with the victims credit history shall have the offense reclassified as follows:

(a) In the case of a misdemeanor, the offense is reclassified as a felony of the third degree.

(b) In the case of a felony of the third degree, the offense is reclassified as a felony of the second degree.

(c)  In the case of a felony of the second degree, the offense is reclassified as a felony of the first degree.

(d) In the case of a felony of the first degree of a felony of the first degree punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding, the offense is reclassified as a life felony. 
For purpose of sentencing under Chapter 921

___________________________________
(13) (a)  In sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense under this section, the court may order that the defendant make RESTITUTION under s.______  to any victim of the offense.  In addition to the victim’s out of pocket costs restitution may include payment of any other costs including attorneys fees incurred by the victim in clearing the  victim’s credit history or credit rating or any costs incurred in connection with any civil or administrative proceeding to satisfy any debt, lien, or other obligation of the victim arising as the result of the actions of the defendant.

(b)  The sentencing court may issue such orders as are necessary to correct any public record that contains false information given in violation of this section. 

(14) Prosecutions for violations of this section may be brought on behalf of the state by any state attorney or by the statewide prosecutor. 

 thoughts by mary jean ziska: 
i just added posts today concerning fraud in my phone accounts/ If someone was misrepresenting themselves as me/ whether on the phone/ by stealing my actual phone  number… or by then stealing babysitting jobs in my name/ each and every time they used my name, my likeness and misrepresented themselves as me/ even as far as impersonating my voice….  it would be a criminal offense /  therefore such criminals should be in jail !    they should  definately be in jail!