Author Archives: mary jean ziska

(1) Wire communications are normally conducted through
the use of facilities which form part of an intrastate network. The same
facilities are used for interstate and intrastate communications.

(2) In order to protect effectively the privacy of wire
and oral communications, to protect the integrity of court and administrative
proceedings, and to prevent the obstruction of intrastate commerce, it is
necessary for the Legislature to define the circumstances and conditions under
which the interception of wire and oral communications may be authorized and to
prohibit any unauthorized interception of such communications and the use of the
contents thereof in evidence in courts and administrative
proceedings.

(3) Organized criminals make extensive use of wire and
oral communications in their criminal activities. The interception of such
communications to obtain evidence of the commission of crimes or to prevent
their commission is an indispensable aid to law enforcement and the
administration of justice.

(4) To safeguard the privacy of innocent persons, the
interception of wire or oral communications when none of the parties to the
communication has consented to the interception should be allowed only when
authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction and should remain under the
control and supervision of the authorizing court. Interception of wire and oral
communications should further be limited to certain major types of offenses and
specific categories of crime with assurance that the interception is justified
and that the information obtained thereby will not be
misused.

History.—s. 1, ch. 69-17.

934.02 Definitions.—As used in this chapter:

(1) “Wire communication” means any aural transfer made in
whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of
communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the
point of origin and the point of reception including the use of such connection
in a switching station furnished or operated by any person engaged in providing
or operating such facilities for the transmission of intrastate, interstate, or
foreign communications or communications affecting intrastate, interstate, or
foreign commerce.

(2) “Oral communication” means any oral communication
uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not
subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation and does
not mean any public oral communication uttered at a public meeting or any
electronic communication.

(3) “Intercept” means the aural or other acquisition of
the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication through the use of
any electronic, mechanical, or other device.

(4) “Electronic, mechanical, or other device” means any
device or apparatus which can be used to intercept a wire, electronic, or oral
communication other than:

(a) Any telephone or telegraph instrument, equipment, or
facility, or any component thereof:

1. Furnished to the subscriber or user by a provider of
wire or electronic communication service in the ordinary course of its business
and being used by the subscriber or user in the ordinary course of its business
or furnished by such subscriber or user for connection to the facilities of such
service and used in the ordinary course of its business; or

2. Being used by a provider of wire or electronic
communications service in the ordinary course of its business or by an
investigative or law enforcement officer in the ordinary course of her or his
duties.

(b) A hearing aid or similar device being used to correct
subnormal hearing to not better than normal.

(5) “Person” means any employee or agent of the State of
Florida or political subdivision thereof, of the United States, or of any other
state or political subdivision thereof, and any individual, partnership,
association, joint stock company, trust, or corporation.

(6) “Investigative or law enforcement officer” means any
officer of the State of Florida or political subdivision thereof, of the United
States, or of any other state or political subdivision thereof, who is empowered
by law to conduct on behalf of the Government investigations of, or to make
arrests for, offenses enumerated in this chapter or similar federal offenses,
any attorney authorized by law to prosecute or participate in the prosecution of
such offenses, or any other attorney representing the State of Florida or
political subdivision thereof in any civil, regulatory, disciplinary, or
forfeiture action relating to, based upon, or derived from such
offenses.

(7) “Contents,” when used with respect to any wire, oral,
or electronic communication, includes any information concerning the substance,
purport, or meaning of that communication.

(8) “Judge of competent jurisdiction” means justice of
the Supreme Court, judge of a district court of appeal, circuit judge, or judge
of any court of record having felony jurisdiction of the State of Florida,
irrespective of the geographic location or jurisdiction where the judge
presides.

(9) “Aggrieved person” means a person who was a party to
any intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communication or a person against whom
the interception was directed.

(10) “Law enforcement agency” means an agency of the State
of Florida or a political subdivision thereof or of the United States if the
primary responsibility of the agency is the prevention and detection of crime or
the enforcement of the penal, traffic, or highway laws of this state and if its
agents and officers are empowered by law to conduct criminal investigations and
to make arrests.

(11) “Communication common carrier” shall have the same
meaning which is given the term “common carrier” in 47 U.S.C. s.
153(10).

(12) “Electronic communication” means any transfer of
signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature
transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic,
photoelectronic, or photooptical system that affects intrastate, interstate, or
foreign commerce, but does not include:

(a) Any wire or oral communication;

(b) Any communication made through a tone-only paging
device;

(c) Any communication from an electronic or mechanical
device which permits the tracking of the movement of a person or an object;
or

(d) Electronic funds transfer information stored by a
financial institution in a communications system used for the electronic storage
and transfer of funds.

(13) “User” means any person or entity who:

(a) Uses an electronic communication service,
and

(b) Is duly authorized by the provider of such service to
engage in such use.

(14) “Electronic communications system” means any wire,
radio, electromagnetic, photooptical, or photoelectronic facilities for the
transmission of wire or electronic communications, and any computer facilities
or related electronic equipment for the electronic storage of such
communications.

(15) “Electronic communication service” means any service
which provides to users thereof the ability to send or receive wire or
electronic communications.

(16) “Readily accessible to the general public” means,
with respect to a radio communication, that such communication is not:

(a) Scrambled or encrypted;

(b) Transmitted using modulation techniques whose
essential parameters have been withheld from the public with the intention of
preserving the privacy of such communication;

(d) Transmitted over a communications system provided by
a common carrier, unless the communication is a tone-only paging system
communication; or

(e) Transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25;
subpart D, subpart E, or subpart F of part 74; or part 94 of the Rules of the
Federal Communications Commission, unless, in the case of a communication
transmitted on a frequency allocated under part 74 that is not exclusively
allocated to broadcast auxiliary services, the communication is a two-way voice
communication by radio.

(17) “Electronic storage” means:

(a) Any temporary intermediate storage of a wire or
electronic communication incidental to the electronic transmission
thereof.

(b) Any storage of a wire or electronic communication by
an electronic communication service for purposes of backup protection of such
communication.

(18) “Aural transfer” means a transfer containing the
human voice at any point between and including the point of origin and the point
of reception.

(19) “Remote computing service” means the provision to the
public of computer storage or processing services by means of an electronic
communications system.

(20) “Pen register” means a device or process that records
or decodes dialing, routing, addressing, or signaling information transmitted by
an instrument or facility from which a wire or electronic communication is
transmitted, but such information does not include the contents of any
communication. The term does not include any device or process used by a
provider or customer of a wire or electronic communication service for billing
or recording as an incident to billing or for communication services provided by
such provider, and does not include any device or process used by a provider or
customer of a wire communication service for cost accounting or other like
purposes in the ordinary course of its business.

(21) “Trap and trace device” means a device or process
that captures the incoming electronic or other impulses that identify the
originating number or other dialing, routing, addressing, or signaling
information reasonably likely to identify the source of a wire or electronic
communication, but such information does not include the contents of any
communication.

(22) “State” means any state of the United States, the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other possession
or territory of the United States.

(23) “Subpoena” means any administrative subpoena
authorized by federal or Florida law, federal or Florida grand jury subpoena, or
any criminal investigative subpoena as authorized by Florida statute which may
be utilized on behalf of the government by an investigative or law enforcement
officer.

(24) “Foreign intelligence information” means information,
whether or not concerning a United States person, as that term is defined in 50
U.S.C. s. 1801, which relates to:

(a) The ability of the United States to protect against
actual or potential attack or other grave hostile acts of a foreign power or an
agent of a foreign power;

(b) Sabotage or international terrorism by a foreign
power or an agent of a foreign power;

(c) Clandestine intelligence activities by an
intelligence service, a network of a foreign power, or an agent of a foreign
power; or

(d) With respect to a foreign power or foreign territory,
the national defense or security of the United States or the conduct of the
foreign affairs of the United States.

(25) “Protected computer” means:

(a) A computer for the exclusive use of a financial
institution or governmental entity;

(b) A computer that is not for the exclusive use of a
financial institution or governmental entity, but that is used by or for a
financial institution or governmental entity and with respect to which unlawful
conduct can affect the use by or for the financial institution or governmental
entity; or

(c) A computer that is used in interstate or foreign
commerce or communication, including a computer located outside the United
States.

(26) “Computer trespasser” means a person who accesses a
protected computer without authorization and thus does not have a reasonable
expectation of privacy with respect to any communication transmitted to,
through, or from the protected computer. The term does not include a person
known by the owner or operator of the protected computer to have an existing
contractual relationship with the owner or operator of the protected computer
for access to all or part of the protected computer.

History.—s. 2, ch. 69-17; s. 1, ch. 72-294;
s. 1, ch. 74-249; s. 1, ch. 80-27; s. 1, ch. 88-184; s. 1, ch. 89-269; s. 1581,
ch. 97-102; s. 8, ch. 2000-369; s. 1, ch. 2002-72; s. 125, ch.
2010-5.

934.03 Interception and disclosure of wire,
oral, or electronic communications prohibited.—

(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this
chapter, any person who:

(a) Intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or
procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, oral,
or electronic communication;

(b) Intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any
other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other
device to intercept any oral communication when:

1. Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a
signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire
communication; or

2. Such device transmits communications by radio or
interferes with the transmission of such communication;

(c) Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to
any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication,
knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the
interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this
subsection;

(d) Intentionally uses, or endeavors to use, the contents
of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know
that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or
electronic communication in violation of this subsection; or

(e) Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to
any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication
intercepted by means authorized by subparagraph (2)(a)2., paragraph (2)(b),
paragraph (2)(c), s. 934.07, or s. 934.09 when that person knows or has reason
to know that the information was obtained through the interception of such a
communication in connection with a criminal investigation, has obtained or
received the information in connection with a criminal investigation, and
intends to improperly obstruct, impede, or interfere with a duly authorized
criminal investigation;

shall be punished as provided
in subsection (4).

(2)(a)1. It is lawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for an operator
of a switchboard, or an officer, employee, or agent of a provider of wire or
electronic communication service whose facilities are used in the transmission
of a wire or electronic communication, to intercept, disclose, or use that
communication in the normal course of his or her employment while engaged in any
activity which is a necessary incident to the rendition of his or her service or
to the protection of the rights or property of the provider of that service,
except that a provider of wire communication service to the public shall not
utilize service observing or random monitoring except for mechanical or service
quality control checks.

2. Notwithstanding any other law, a provider of wire,
oral, or electronic communication service, or an officer, employee, or agent
thereof, or landlord, custodian, or other person, may provide information,
facilities, or technical assistance to a person authorized by law to intercept
wire, oral, or electronic communications if such provider, or an officer,
employee, or agent thereof, or landlord, custodian, or other person, has been
provided with:

a. A court order directing such assistance signed by the
authorizing judge; or

b. A certification in writing by a person specified in
s. 934.09(7) that no warrant or court order is required by law, that all
statutory requirements have been met, and that the specified assistance is
required, setting forth the period of time during which the provision of the
information, facilities, or technical assistance is authorized and specifying
the information, facilities, or technical assistance
required.

3. A provider of wire, oral, or electronic communication
service, or an officer, employee, or agent thereof, or landlord, custodian, or
other person may not disclose the existence of any interception or the device
used to accomplish the interception with respect to which the person has been
furnished an order under ss. 934.03-934.09, except as may otherwise be required
by legal process and then only after prior notice to the Governor, the Attorney
General, the statewide prosecutor, or a state attorney, as may be appropriate.
Any such disclosure renders such person liable for the civil damages provided
under s. 934.10, and such person may be prosecuted under s. 934.43. An action
may not be brought against any provider of wire, oral, or electronic
communication service, or an officer, employee, or agent thereof, or landlord,
custodian, or other person for providing information, facilities, or assistance
in accordance with the terms of a court order under ss.
934.03-934.09.

(b) It is lawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for an officer,
employee, or agent of the Federal Communications Commission, in the normal
course of his or her employment and in discharge of the monitoring
responsibilities exercised by the commission in the enforcement of 47 U.S.C. ch.
5, to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication transmitted by radio
or to disclose or use the information thereby obtained.

(c) It is lawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for an
investigative or law enforcement officer or a person acting under the direction
of an investigative or law enforcement officer to intercept a wire, oral, or
electronic communication when such person is a party to the communication or one
of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception
and the purpose of such interception is to obtain evidence of a criminal
act.

(d) It is lawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for a person to
intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication when all of the parties to
the communication have given prior consent to such interception.

(e) It is unlawful to intercept any wire, oral, or
electronic communication for the purpose of committing any criminal
act.

(f) It is lawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for an employee
of a telephone company to intercept a wire communication for the sole purpose of
tracing the origin of such communication when the interception is requested by
the recipient of the communication and the recipient alleges that the
communication is obscene, harassing, or threatening in nature. The individual
conducting the interception shall notify local police authorities within 48
hours after the time of the interception.

(g) It is lawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for an employee
of:

1. An ambulance service licensed pursuant to s. 401.25,
a fire station employing firefighters as defined by s. 633.30, a public utility,
a law enforcement agency as defined by s. 934.02(10), or any other entity with
published emergency telephone numbers;

2. An agency operating an emergency telephone number
“911” system established pursuant to s. 365.171; or

3. The central abuse hotline operated pursuant to s.
39.201

to intercept and record
incoming wire communications; however, such employee may intercept and record
incoming wire communications on designated “911” telephone numbers and published
nonemergency telephone numbers staffed by trained dispatchers at public safety
answering points only. It is also lawful for such employee to intercept and
record outgoing wire communications to the numbers from which such incoming wire
communications were placed when necessary to obtain information required to
provide the emergency services being requested. For the purpose of this
paragraph, the term “public utility” has the same meaning as provided in s.
366.02 and includes a person, partnership, association, or corporation now or
hereafter owning or operating equipment or facilities in the state for conveying
or transmitting messages or communications by telephone or telegraph to the
public for compensation.

(h) It shall not be unlawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for
any person:

1. To intercept or access an electronic communication
made through an electronic communication system that is configured so that such
electronic communication is readily accessible to the general
public.

2. To intercept any radio communication which is
transmitted:

a. By any station for the use of the general public, or
that relates to ships, aircraft, vehicles, or persons in distress;

b. By any governmental, law enforcement, civil defense,
private land mobile, or public safety communications system, including any
police or fire communications system, readily accessible to the general
public;

c. By a station operating on an authorized frequency
within the bands allocated to the amateur, citizens band, or general mobile
radio services; or

d. By any marine or aeronautical communications
system.

3. To engage in any conduct which:

a. Is prohibited by s. 633 of the Communications Act of
1934; or

b. Is excepted from the application of s. 705(a) of the
Communications Act of 1934 by s. 705(b) of that act.

4. To intercept any wire or electronic communication the
transmission of which is causing harmful interference to any lawfully operating
station of consumer electronic equipment to the extent necessary to identify the
source of such interference.

5. To intercept, if such person is another user of the
same frequency, any radio communication that is not scrambled or encrypted made
through a system that utilizes frequencies monitored by individuals engaged in
the provision or the use of such system.

6. To intercept a satellite transmission that is not
scrambled or encrypted and that is transmitted:

a. To a broadcasting station for purposes of
retransmission to the general public; or

b. As an audio subcarrier intended for redistribution to
facilities open to the public, but not including data transmissions or telephone
calls, when such interception is not for the purposes of direct or indirect
commercial advantage or private financial gain.

7. To intercept and privately view a private satellite
video communication that is not scrambled or encrypted or to intercept a radio
communication that is transmitted on frequencies allocated under subpart D of
part 74 of the rules of the Federal Communications Commission that is not
scrambled or encrypted, if such interception is not for a tortious or illegal
purpose or for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private
commercial gain.

(i) It shall not be unlawful under ss.
934.03-934.09:

1. To use a pen register or a trap and trace device as
authorized under ss. 934.31-934.34 or under federal law; or

2. For a provider of electronic communication service to
record the fact that a wire or electronic communication was initiated or
completed in order to protect such provider, another provider furnishing service
toward the completion of the wire or electronic communication, or a user of that
service, from fraudulent, unlawful, or abusive use of such
service.

(j) It is not unlawful under ss. 934.03-934.09 for a
person acting under color of law to intercept the wire or electronic
communications of a computer trespasser which are transmitted to, through, or
from a protected computer if:

1. The owner or operator of the protected computer
authorizes the interception of the communications of the computer
trespasser;

2. The person acting under color of law is lawfully
engaged in an investigation;

3. The person acting under color of law has reasonable
grounds to believe that the contents of the communications of the computer
trespasser will be relevant to the investigation; and

4. The interception does not acquire communications
other than those transmitted to, through, or from the computer
trespasser.

(3)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a person or
entity providing an electronic communication service to the public shall not
intentionally divulge the contents of any communication while in transmission on
that service to any person or entity other than an addressee or intended
recipient of such communication or an agent of such addressee or intended
recipient.

(b) A person or entity providing electronic communication
service to the public may divulge the contents of any such communication:

1. As otherwise authorized in paragraph (2)(a) or s.
934.08;

2. With the lawful consent of the originator or any
addressee or intended recipient of such communication;

3. To a person employed or authorized, or whose
facilities are used, to forward such communication to its destination;
or

4. Which were inadvertently obtained by the service
provider and which appear to pertain to the commission of a crime, if such
divulgence is made to a law enforcement agency.

(4)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), whoever violates
subsection (1) is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided
in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, s. 775.084, or s. 934.41.

(b) If the offense is a first offense under paragraph (a)
and is not for any tortious or illegal purpose or for purposes of direct or
indirect commercial advantage or private commercial gain, and the wire or
electronic communication with respect to which the offense under paragraph (a)
was committed is a radio communication that is not scrambled, encrypted, or
transmitted using modulation techniques the essential parameters of which have
been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving the privacy of
such communication, then:

1. If the communication is not the radio portion of a
cellular telephone communication, a cordless telephone communication that is
transmitted between the cordless telephone handset and the base unit, a public
land mobile radio service communication, or a paging service communication, and
the conduct is not that described in subparagraph (2)(h)7., the person
committing the offense is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree,
punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

2. If the communication is the radio portion of a
cellular telephone communication, a cordless telephone communication that is
transmitted between the cordless telephone handset and the base unit, a public
land mobile radio service communication, or a paging service communication, the
person committing the offense is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree,
punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s.
775.083.

History.—s. 3, ch. 69-17; s. 1163, ch.
71-136; ss. 2, 3, ch. 74-249; s. 249, ch. 77-104; s. 1, ch. 78-376; s. 187, ch.
79-164; s. 2, ch. 80-27; s. 1, ch. 87-301; s. 2, ch. 88-184; s. 2, ch. 89-269;
s. 1582, ch. 97-102; s. 18, ch. 99-168; ss. 7, 9, ch. 2000-369; s. 2, ch.
2002-72; s. 30, ch. 2010-117.

934.04 Manufacture, distribution, or
possession of wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepting devices
prohibited.—

(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this
chapter, any person who intentionally:

(a) Sends through the mail or otherwise sends or carries
any electronic, mechanical, or other device, knowing or having reason to know
that the design of such device renders it primarily useful for the purpose of
the illegal interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as
specifically defined by this chapter; or

(b) Manufactures, assembles, possesses, or sells any
electronic, mechanical, or other device, knowing or having reason to know that
the design of such device renders it primarily useful for the purpose of the
illegal interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as specifically
defined by this chapter;

shall be guilty of a felony of
the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.

(2) It is not unlawful under this section for:

(a) A provider of wire or electronic communication
service or an officer, agent, or employee of, or a person under contract with,
such a provider, in the normal course of the business of providing that wire or
electronic communication service; or

(b) An officer, agent, or employee of, or a person under
contract with, bidding upon contracts with, or in the course of doing business
with, the United States, a state, or a political subdivision thereof, in the
normal course of the activities of the United States, a state, or a political
subdivision thereof,

to send through the mail; send
or carry in intrastate, interstate, or foreign commerce; or manufacture,
assemble, possess, or sell any electronic, mechanical, or other device, knowing
or having reason to know that the design of such device renders it primarily
useful for the purpose of the surreptitious interception of wire, oral, or
electronic communications.

History.—s. 4, ch. 69-17; s. 1164, ch.
71-136; s. 3, ch. 88-184; s. 3, ch. 89-269.

934.05 Confiscation of wire, oral, or
electronic communication intercepting devices.—Any electronic, mechanical, or other device used,
sent, carried, manufactured, assembled, possessed, or sold in violation of this
chapter may be seized and forfeited to the state.

History.—s. 5, ch. 69-17; s. 4, ch.
88-184.

934.06 Prohibition of use as evidence of
intercepted wire or oral communications; exception.—Whenever any wire or oral communication has been
intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence
derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other
proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency,
regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the state, or a
political subdivision thereof, if the disclosure of that information would be in
violation of this chapter. The prohibition of use as evidence provided in this
section does not apply in cases of prosecution for criminal interception in
violation of the provisions of this chapter.

History.—s. 6, ch. 69-17; s. 4, ch.
89-269.

934.07 Authorization for interception of
wire, oral, or electronic communications.—

(1) The Governor, the Attorney General, the statewide
prosecutor, or any state attorney may authorize an application to a judge of
competent jurisdiction for, and such judge may grant in conformity with ss.
934.03-934.09 an order authorizing or approving the interception of, wire, oral,
or electronic communications by:

(a) The Department of Law Enforcement or any law
enforcement agency as defined in s. 934.02 having responsibility for the
investigation of the offense as to which the application is made when such
interception may provide or has provided evidence of the commission of the
offense of murder, kidnapping, aircraft piracy, arson, gambling, robbery,
burglary, theft, dealing in stolen property, criminal usury, bribery, or
extortion; any felony violation of ss. 790.161-790.166, inclusive; any violation
of chapter 893; any violation of the provisions of the Florida Anti-Fencing Act;
any violation of chapter 895; any violation of chapter 896; any violation of
chapter 815; any violation of chapter 847; any violation of s. 827.071; any
violation of s. 944.40; or any conspiracy or solicitation to commit any
violation of the laws of this state relating to the crimes specifically
enumerated in this paragraph.

(b) The Department of Law Enforcement, together with
other assisting personnel as authorized and requested by the department under s.
934.09(5), for the investigation of the offense as to which the application is
made when such interception may provide or has provided evidence of the
commission of any offense that may be an act of terrorism or in furtherance of
an act of terrorism or evidence of any conspiracy or solicitation to commit any
such violation.

(2)(a) If, during the course of an interception of
communications by a law enforcement agency as authorized under paragraph (1)(a),
the law enforcement agency finds that the intercepted communications may provide
or have provided evidence of the commission of any offense that may be an act of
terrorism or in furtherance of an act of terrorism, or evidence of any
conspiracy or solicitation to commit any such violation, the law enforcement
agency shall promptly notify the Department of Law Enforcement and apprise the
department of the contents of the intercepted communications. The agency
notifying the department may continue its previously authorized interception
with appropriate minimization, as applicable, and may otherwise assist the
department as provided in this section.

(b) Upon its receipt of information of the contents of an
intercepted communications from a law enforcement agency, the Department of Law
Enforcement shall promptly review the information to determine whether the
information relates to an actual or anticipated act of terrorism as defined in
this section. If, after reviewing the contents of the intercepted
communications, there is probable cause that the contents of the intercepted
communications meet the criteria of paragraph (1)(b), the Department of Law
Enforcement may make application for the interception of wire, oral, or
electronic communications consistent with paragraph (1)(b). The department may
make an independent new application for interception based on the contents of
the intercepted communications. Alternatively, the department may request the
law enforcement agency that provided the information to join with the department
in seeking an amendment of the original interception order, or may seek
additional authority to continue intercepting communications under the direction
of the department. In carrying out its duties under this section, the department
may use the provisions for an emergency interception provided in s. 934.09(7) if
applicable under statutory criteria.

(3) As used in this section, the term “terrorism” means
an activity that:

(a)1. Involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human
life which is a violation of the criminal laws of this state or of the United
States; or

2. Involves a violation of s. 815.06;
and

(b) Is intended to:

1. Intimidate, injure, or coerce a civilian
population;

2. Influence the policy of a government by intimidation
or coercion; or

3. Affect the conduct of government through destruction
of property, assassination, murder, kidnapping, or aircraft
piracy.

History.—s. 7, ch. 69-17; ss. 11, 20, 35,
ch. 69-106; s. 42, ch. 73-334; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 15, ch. 77-342; s. 33, ch.
79-8; s. 5, ch. 88-184; s. 5, ch. 89-269; s. 14, ch. 91-33; s. 10, ch. 2000-369;
s. 1, ch. 2001-359; s. 3, ch. 2002-72.

934.08 Authorization for disclosure and use
of intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communications.—

(1) Any investigative or law enforcement officer who, by
any means authorized by this chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of
any wire, oral, or electronic communication or evidence derived therefrom may
disclose such contents to:

(a) The Department of Legal Affairs for use in
investigations or proceedings pursuant to s. 812.035, part II of chapter 501,
chapter 542, or chapter 895, to any attorney authorized by law to investigate
and institute any action on behalf of the State of Florida or political
subdivision thereof, or to another investigative or law enforcement officer to
the extent that such disclosure is appropriate to the proper performance of the
official duties of the officer or person making or receiving the
disclosure.

(b) Any state or federal law enforcement official, state
or federal intelligence official, state or federal protective services official,
federal immigration official, state or federal defense official, or state or
federal security official to the extent that the contents or evidence includes
foreign intelligence or counterintelligence, as defined in 50 U.S.C. s. 401a, or
foreign intelligence information, as defined in this chapter, in order to assist
the official who receives that information in performing his or her official
duties. Any state or federal official who receives information under this
subsection may use that information only as necessary in conducting official
duties and is subject to any limitations on the unauthorized disclosure of such
information.

(2) Any investigative or law enforcement officer who, by
any means authorized by this chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of
any wire, oral, or electronic communication or evidence derived therefrom may
use such contents to the extent such use is appropriate to the proper
performance of her or his official duties.

(3) Any person who has received, by any means authorized
by this chapter, or by the laws of any other state or the United States, any
information concerning a wire, oral, or electronic communication or evidence
derived therefrom, intercepted in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter, may disclose the contents of that communication or such derivative
evidence while giving testimony under oath or affirmation in any criminal
proceeding in any court of the state or of the United States; in any grand jury
proceedings; in any proceeding pursuant to s. 812.035, part II of chapter 501,
chapter 542, or chapter 895; in any investigation or proceeding in connection
with the Judicial Qualifications Commission; or in any other proceeding or
investigation held under the authority of the State of Florida or any political
subdivision thereof, of the United States, or of any other state or political
subdivision thereof, if such testimony is otherwise admissible.

(4) No otherwise privileged wire, oral, or electronic
communication intercepted in accordance with, or in violation of, the provisions
of this chapter shall lose its privileged character, provided that a
communication otherwise lawfully intercepted pursuant to this chapter is not
privileged when such communication is in furtherance of the commission of a
crime.

(5) When an investigative or law enforcement officer,
while engaged in intercepting wire, oral, or electronic communications in the
manner authorized herein, intercepts wire, oral, or electronic communications
relating to offenses other than those specified in the order of authorization or
approval, the contents thereof and evidence derived therefrom may be disclosed
or used as provided in subsections (1) and (2). Such contents and any evidence
derived therefrom may be used under subsection (3) when authorized or approved
by a judge of competent jurisdiction when such judge finds on subsequent
application that the contents were otherwise intercepted in accordance with the
provisions of this chapter. Such application shall be made as soon as
practicable.

History.—s. 8, ch. 69-17; s. 2, ch. 72-294;
s. 1, ch. 73-361; s. 6, ch. 88-184; s. 6, ch. 89-269; s. 1583, ch. 97-102; s. 6,
ch. 2002-72.

934.09 Procedure for interception of wire,
oral, or electronic communications.—

(1) Each application for an order authorizing or
approving the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication under
ss. 934.03-934.09 shall be made in writing upon oath or affirmation to a judge
of competent jurisdiction and shall state the applicant’s authority to make such
application. Each application shall include the following information:

(a) The identity of the investigative or law enforcement
officer making the application and the officer authorizing the
application.

(b) A full and complete statement of the facts and
circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his or her belief that an
order should be issued, including:

1. Details as to the particular offense that has been,
is being, or is about to be committed.

2. Except as provided in subsection (11), a particular
description of the nature and location of the facilities from which, or the
place where, the communications are to be intercepted.

3. A particular description of the type of
communications sought to be intercepted.

4. The identity of the person, if known, committing the
offense and whose communications are to be intercepted.

(c) A full and complete statement as to whether or not
other investigative procedures have been tried and failed or why they reasonably
appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous.

(d) A statement of the period of time for which the
interception is required to be maintained and, if the nature of the
investigation is such that the authorization for interception should not
automatically terminate when the described type of communication has been first
obtained, a particular description of facts establishing probable cause to
believe that additional communications of the same type will occur
thereafter.

(e) A full and complete statement of the facts concerning
all previous applications known to the individual authorizing and making the
application, made to any judge for authorization to intercept, or for approval
of interceptions of, wire, oral, or electronic communications involving any of
the same persons, facilities, or places specified in the application, and the
action taken by the judge on each such application.

(f) When the application is for the extension of an
order, a statement setting forth the results thus far obtained from the
interception or a reasonable explanation of the failure to obtain such
results.

(2) The judge may require the applicant to furnish
additional testimony or documentary evidence in support of the
application.

(3) Upon such application, the judge may enter an ex
parte order, as requested or as modified, authorizing or approving interception
of wire, oral, or electronic communications within the territorial jurisdiction
of the court in which the judge is sitting, and outside such jurisdiction but
within the State of Florida in the case of a mobile interception device
authorized by the judge within such jurisdiction, if the judge determines on the
basis of the facts submitted by the applicant that:

(a) There is probable cause for belief that an individual
is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense as provided in s.
934.07.

(b) There is probable cause for belief that particular
communications concerning that offense will be obtained through such
interception.

(c) Normal investigative procedures have been tried and
have failed or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too
dangerous.

(d) Except as provided in subsection (11), there is
probable cause for belief that the facilities from which, or the place where,
the wire, oral, or electronic communications are to be intercepted are being
used, or are about to be used, in connection with the commission of such
offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by such
person.

(4) Each order authorizing or approving the interception
of any wire, oral, or electronic communication shall specify:

(a) The identity of the person, if known, whose
communications are to be intercepted.

(b) The nature and location of the communications
facilities as to which, or the place where, authority to intercept is
granted.

(c) A particular description of the type of communication
sought to be intercepted and a statement of the particular offense to which it
relates.

(d) The identity of the agency authorized to intercept
the communications and of the person authorizing the application.

(e) The period of time during which such interception is
authorized, including a statement as to whether or not the interception shall
automatically terminate when the described communication has been first
obtained.

An order authorizing the
interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication shall, upon the
request of the applicant, direct that a provider of wire or electronic
communication service, landlord, custodian, or other person shall furnish the
applicant forthwith all information, facilities, and technical assistance
necessary to accomplish the interception unobtrusively and with a minimum of
interference with the services that such service provider, landlord, custodian,
or person is according the person whose communications are to be intercepted.
The obligation of a provider of wire, oral, or electronic communication service
under such an order may include, but is not limited to, conducting an
in-progress trace during an interception, or providing other assistance to
support the investigation as may be specified in the order. Any provider of wire
or electronic communication service, landlord, custodian, or other person
furnishing such facilities or technical assistance shall be compensated therefor
by the applicant for reasonable expenses incurred in providing such facilities
or assistance.

(5) No order entered under this section may authorize or
approve the interception of any wire, oral, or electronic communication for any
period longer than is necessary to achieve the objective of the authorization or
in any event longer than 30 days. Such 30-day period begins on the day on which
the agent or officer of the law enforcement agency first begins to conduct an
interception under the order or 10 days after the order is entered, whichever
occurs earlier. Extensions of an order may be granted but only upon application
for an extension made in accordance with subsection (1) and upon the court
making the findings required by subsection (3). The period of extension shall be
no longer than the authorizing judge deems necessary to achieve the purposes for
which it was granted and in no event for longer than 30 days. Every order and
extension thereof shall contain a provision that the authorization to intercept
shall be executed as soon as practicable, shall be conducted in such a way as to
minimize the interception of communications not otherwise subject to
interception under ss. 934.03-934.09, and must terminate upon attainment of the
authorized objective or in any event in 30 days. If the intercepted
communication is in code or foreign language and an expert in that foreign
language or code is not reasonably available during the interception period,
minimization may be accomplished as soon as practicable after such interception.
An interception under ss. 934.03-934.09 may be conducted in whole or in part by
government personnel or by an individual operating under a contract with the
government, acting under the supervision of an agent or officer of the law
enforcement agency authorized to conduct the interception.

(6) Whenever an order authorizing interception is entered
pursuant to ss. 934.03-934.09, the order may require reports to be made to the
judge who issued the order showing what progress has been made toward
achievement of the authorized objective and the need for continued interception.
Such reports shall be made at such intervals as the judge may
require.

(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,
any investigative or law enforcement officer specially designated by the
Governor, the Attorney General, the statewide prosecutor, or a state attorney
acting under this chapter, who reasonably determines that:

(a) An emergency exists that:

1. Involves immediate danger of death or serious
physical injury to any person, the danger of escape of a prisoner, or
conspiratorial activities threatening the security interest of the nation or
state; and

2. Requires that a wire, oral, or electronic
communication be intercepted before an order authorizing such interception can,
with due diligence, be obtained; and

(b) There are grounds upon which an order could be
entered under this chapter to authorize such interception

may intercept such wire, oral,
or electronic communication if an application for an order approving the
interception is made in accordance with this section within 48 hours after the
interception has occurred or begins to occur. In the absence of an order, such
interception shall immediately terminate when the communication sought is
obtained or when the application for the order is denied, whichever is earlier.
If such application for approval is denied, or in any other case in which the
interception is terminated without an order having been issued, the contents of
any wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepted shall be treated as
having been obtained in violation of s. 934.03(4), and an inventory shall be
served as provided for in paragraph (8)(e) on the person named in the
application.

(8)(a) The contents of any wire, oral, or electronic
communication intercepted by any means authorized by ss. 934.03-934.09 shall, if
possible, be recorded on tape or wire or other comparable device. The recording
of the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication under this
subsection shall be kept in such a way as will protect the recording from
editing or other alterations. Immediately upon the expiration of the period of
the order, or extensions thereof, such recordings shall be made available to the
judge issuing such order and sealed under his or her directions. Custody of the
recordings shall be wherever the judge orders. They shall not be destroyed
except upon an order of the issuing or denying judge, or that judge’s successor
in office, and in any event shall be kept for 10 years. Duplicate recordings may
be made for use or disclosure pursuant to the provisions of s. 934.08(1) and (2)
for investigations.

(b) The presence of the seal provided for by this
subsection, or a satisfactory explanation for the absence thereof, shall be a
prerequisite for the use or disclosure of the contents of any wire, oral, or
electronic communication or evidence derived therefrom under s. 934.08(3), as
required by federal law.

(c) Applications made and orders granted under ss.
934.03-934.09 shall be sealed by the judge. Custody of the applications and
orders shall be wherever the judge directs. As required by federal law, such
applications and orders shall be disclosed only upon a showing of good cause
before a judge of competent jurisdiction and shall not be destroyed except on
order of the issuing or denying judge, or that judge’s successor in office, and
in any event shall be kept for 10 years.

(d) Any violation of the provisions of this subsection
may be punished as contempt of the issuing or denying judge.

(e) Within a reasonable time but not later than 90 days
after the termination of the period of an order or extensions thereof, the
issuing or denying judge shall cause to be served on the persons named in the
order or the application, and such other parties to intercepted communications
as the judge may determine in his or her discretion to be in the interest of
justice, an inventory which shall include notice of:

1. The fact of the entry of the order or the
application.

2. The date of the entry and the period of authorized,
approved, or disapproved interception, or the denial of the
application.

3. The fact that during the period wire, oral, or
electronic communications were or were not intercepted.

The judge, upon the filing of
a motion, may make available to such person or the person’s counsel for
inspection such portions of the intercepted communications, applications, and
orders as the judge determines to be in the interest of justice. On an ex parte
showing of good cause to a judge of competent jurisdiction, the serving of the
inventory required by this paragraph may be postponed.

(9) As required by federal law, the contents of any
intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communication or evidence derived
therefrom shall not be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any trial,
hearing, or other proceeding unless each party, not less than 10 days before the
trial, hearing, or proceeding, has been furnished with a copy of the court order
and accompanying application under which the interception was authorized or
approved. This 10-day period may be waived by the judge if he or she finds that
it was not possible to furnish the party with the above information 10 days
before the trial, hearing, or proceeding and that the party will not be
prejudiced by the delay in receiving such information.

(10)(a) Any aggrieved person in any trial, hearing, or
proceeding in or before any court, department, officer, agency, regulatory body,
or other authority may move to suppress the contents of any intercepted wire,
oral, or electronic communication, or evidence derived therefrom, on the grounds
that:

1. The communication was unlawfully
intercepted;

2. The order of authorization or approval under which it
was intercepted is insufficient on its face; or

3. The interception was not made in conformity with the
order of authorization or approval.

Such motion shall be made
before the trial, hearing, or proceeding unless there was no opportunity to make
such motion or the person was not aware of the grounds of the motion. If the
motion is granted, the contents of the intercepted wire or oral communication,
or evidence derived therefrom, shall be treated as having been obtained in
violation of ss. 934.03-934.09. The judge, upon the filing of such motion by the
aggrieved person, may make available to the aggrieved person or his or her
counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted communication or
evidence derived therefrom as the judge determines to be in the interest of
justice.

(b) In addition to any other right to appeal, the state
shall have the right to appeal from an order granting a motion to suppress made
under paragraph (a) or the denial of an application for an order of approval if
the attorney shall certify to the judge or other official granting such motion
or denying such application that the appeal is not taken for purposes of delay.
Such appeal shall be taken within 30 days after the date the order was entered
and shall be diligently prosecuted.

(c) The remedies and sanctions described in ss.
934.03-934.10 with respect to the interception of electronic communications are
the only judicial remedies and sanctions for violations of those sections
involving such communications.

(11) The requirements of subparagraph (1)(b)2. and
paragraph (3)(d) relating to the specification of the facilities from which, or
the place where, the communication is to be intercepted do not apply if:

(a) In the case of an application with respect to the
interception of an oral communication:

1. The application is by an agent or officer of a law
enforcement agency and is approved by the Governor, the Attorney General, the
statewide prosecutor, or a state attorney.

2. The application contains a full and complete
statement as to why such specification is not practical and identifies the
person committing the offense and whose communications are to be
intercepted.

3. The judge finds that such specification is not
practical.

(b) In the case of an application with respect to a wire
or electronic communication:

1. The application is by an agent or officer of a law
enforcement agency and is approved by the Governor, the Attorney General, the
statewide prosecutor, or a state attorney.

2. The application identifies the person believed to be
committing the offense and whose communications are to be intercepted and the
applicant makes a showing that there is probable cause to believe that the
person’s actions could have the effect of thwarting interception from a
specified facility or that the person whose communications are to be intercepted
has removed, or is likely to remove, himself or herself to another judicial
circuit within the state.

3. The judge finds that such showing has been adequately
made.

4. The order authorizing or approving the interception
is limited to interception only for such time as it is reasonable to presume
that the person identified in the application is or was reasonably proximate to
the instrument through which such communication will be or was
transmitted.

Consistent with this
paragraph, a judge of competent jurisdiction may authorize interception within
this state, whether the interception is within or outside the court’s
jurisdiction, if the application for the interception makes a showing that some
activity or conspiracy believed to be related to, or in furtherance of, the
criminal predicate for the requested interception has occurred or will likely
occur, or the communication to be intercepted or expected to be intercepted is
occurring or will likely occur, in whole or in part, within the jurisdiction of
the court where the order is being sought.

(12) If an interception of a communication is to be
carried out pursuant to subsection (11), such interception may not begin until
the facilities from which, or the place where, the communication is to be
intercepted is ascertained by the person implementing the interception order. A
provider of wire or electronic communications service that has received an order
as provided under paragraph (11)(b) may petition the court to modify or quash
the order on the ground that the interception cannot be performed in a timely or
reasonable fashion. The court, upon notice to the state, shall decide such a
petition expeditiously.

History.—s. 9, ch. 69-17; s. 2, ch. 78-376;
s. 7, ch. 88-184; s. 7, ch. 89-269; s. 1, ch. 94-101; s. 92, ch. 95-211; s.
1584, ch. 97-102; s. 11, ch. 2000-369; ss. 2, 3, ch. 2001-359; ss. 4, 5, ch.
2002-72.

934.10 Civil remedies.—

(1) Any person whose wire, oral, or electronic
communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of ss.
934.03-934.09 shall have a civil cause of action against any person or entity
who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person or entity to
intercept, disclose, or use, such communications and shall be entitled to
recover from any such person or entity which engaged in that violation such
relief as may be appropriate, including:

(a) Preliminary or equitable or declaratory relief as may
be appropriate;

(b) Actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages
computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000,
whichever is higher;

(d) A reasonable attorney’s fee and other litigation
costs reasonably incurred.

(2) A good faith reliance on:

(a) A court order, subpoena, or legislative authorization
as provided in ss. 934.03-934.09,

(b) A request of an investigative or law enforcement
officer under s. 934.09(7), or

(c) A good faith determination that Florida or federal
law, other than 18 U.S.C. s. 2511(2)(d), permitted the conduct complained
of

shall constitute a complete
defense to any civil or criminal, or administrative action arising out of such
conduct under the laws of this state.

(3) A civil action under this section may not be
commenced later than 2 years after the date upon which the claimant first has a
reasonable opportunity to discover the violation.

History.—s. 10, ch. 69-17; s. 3, ch. 78-376;
s. 8, ch. 88-184; s. 8, ch. 89-269; s. 12, ch. 2000-369.

934.15 Situations in which law enforcement
officer may order telephone line cut, rerouted, or diverted.—

(1) The supervising law enforcement officer at the scene
of an incident where there is reasonable cause to believe:

(a) That a person is holding one or more
hostages,

(b) That a person has barricaded herself or himself and
taken a position of confinement to avoid apprehension,

(d) That a person has barricaded herself or himself and
is armed and is threatening suicide,

may order law enforcement or
telephone company personnel to cut, reroute, or divert telephone lines for the
purpose of preventing telephone communications between the suspect and any
person other than a law enforcement officer or the law enforcement officer’s
designee, if such cutting, rerouting, or diverting of telephone lines is
technically feasible and can be performed without endangering the lives of
telephone company or other utility personnel.

(2) The good faith reliance by a telephone company on an
oral or written order to cut, reroute, or divert telephone lines given by a
supervising law enforcement officer under subsection (1) constitutes a complete
defense to any civil, criminal, or administrative action arising out of such an
order.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 87-357; s. 1585, ch.
97-102.

934.21 Unlawful access to stored
communications; penalties.—

(1) Except as provided in subsection (3), whoever:

(a) Intentionally accesses without authorization a
facility through which an electronic communication service is provided,
or

(b) Intentionally exceeds an authorization to access such
facility,

and thereby obtains, alters,
or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is
in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection
(2).

(2) The punishment for an offense under subsection (1) is
as follows:

(a) If the offense is committed for purposes of
commercial advantage, malicious destruction or damage, or private commercial
gain, the person is:

1. In the case of a first offense under this subsection,
guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s.
775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 934.41.

2. In the case of any subsequent offense under this
subsection, guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s.
775.082, s. 775.083, s. 775.084, or s. 934.41.

(b) In any other case, the person is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s.
775.083.

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply with respect to conduct
authorized:

(a) By the person or entity providing a wire or
electronic communications service;

(b) By a user of a wire or electronic communications
service with respect to a communication of or intended for that user;
or

History.—s. 9, ch. 88-184; s. 9, ch.
89-269.

934.215 Unlawful use of a two-way
communications device.—Any person who uses a two-way
communications device, including, but not limited to, a portable two-way
wireless communications device, to facilitate or further the commission of any
felony offense commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in
s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.—s. 1, ch.
2001-114.

934.22 Voluntary disclosure of customer
communications or records.—

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) or subsection
(3):

(a) A provider of electronic communication service to the
public may not knowingly divulge to:

1. Any person or entity the contents of a communication
while in electronic storage by that service; or

2. Any governmental entity a record or other information
pertaining to a subscriber to or customer of such service.

(b) A provider of remote computing service to the public
may not knowingly divulge to:

1. Any person or entity the contents of any
communication that is carried or maintained on that service:

a. On behalf of a subscriber or customer of such service
and received by means of electronic transmission from, or created by means of
computer processing of communications received by means of electronic
transmission from, a subscriber or customer of such remote computing service;
and

b. Solely for the purpose of providing storage or
computer processing services to its subscriber or customer, if the provider is
not authorized to access the contents of any such communication for purposes of
providing any service other than storage or computer processing;
or

2. Any governmental entity a record or other information
pertaining to a subscriber to or customer of such
service.

(2) A provider described in subsection (1) may divulge
the contents of a communication:

(a) To an addressee or intended recipient of such
communication or an agent of such addressee or intended recipient.

(b) As otherwise authorized in s. 934.03(2)(a), s.
934.07, or s. 934.23.

(c) With the lawful consent of the originator or an
addressee or intended recipient of such communication, or the subscriber in the
case of a remote computing service.

(d) To a person employed or authorized, or whose
facilities are used, to forward such communication to its
destination.

(e) As may be necessarily incident to the rendition of
the service or to the protection of the rights or property of the provider of
that service.

(f) To a law enforcement agency, if:

1. The contents were inadvertently obtained by the
service provider;

2. The contents appear to pertain to the commission of a
crime; or

3. The provider reasonably believes an emergency
involving immediate danger of death or serious physical injury to another person
requires disclosure of the contents without delay.

(3)(a) A provider described in subsection (1) may disclose a
record or other information pertaining to a subscriber to or customer of such
service:

1. As is otherwise authorized in s. 934.23.

2. With the lawful consent of the customer or
subscriber.

3. As is necessary incident to rendering service or
protecting the rights or property of the provider of that service.

4. To a governmental entity if the provider reasonably
believes that an emergency involving immediate danger of death or serious
physical injury to any person justifies disclosure of the
information.

5. To any person other than a governmental
entity.

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a provider may not
disclose the contents of communications specified in paragraph (1)(a) or
paragraph (1)(b).

History.—s. 9, ch. 88-184; s. 7, ch.
2002-72.

934.23 Required disclosure of customer
communications or records.—

(1) An investigative or law enforcement officer may
require the disclosure by a provider of electronic communication service of the
contents of a wire or electronic communication that has been in electronic
storage in an electronic communications system for 180 days or less only
pursuant to a warrant issued by the judge of a court of competent jurisdiction.
As used in this section, the term “a court of competent jurisdiction” means a
court that has jurisdiction over the investigation or that is otherwise
authorized by law. An investigative or law enforcement officer may require the
disclosure by a provider of electronic communication services of the contents of
a wire or electronic communication that has been in electronic storage in an
electronic communications system for more than 180 days by the means available
under subsection (2).

(2) An investigative or law enforcement officer may
require a provider of remote computing service to disclose the contents of any
wire or electronic communication to which this subsection is made applicable by
subsection (3):

(a) Without required notice to the subscriber or customer
if the investigative or law enforcement officer obtains a warrant issued by the
judge of a court of competent jurisdiction; or

(b) With prior notice, or with delayed notice pursuant to
s. 934.25, from the investigative or law enforcement officer to the subscriber
or customer if the investigative or law enforcement officer:

1. Uses a subpoena; or

2. Obtains a court order for such disclosure under
subsection (5).

(3) Subsection (2) is applicable with respect to any
electronic communication that is held or maintained on a remote computing
service:

(a) On behalf of a subscriber or customer of such service
and received by means of electronic transmission from, or created by means of
computer processing of communications received by means of electronic
transmission from, a subscriber or customer of such service.

(b) Solely for the purposes of providing storage or
computer processing services to a subscriber or customer, if the provider is not
authorized to access the contents of any such communication for purposes of
providing any service other than storage or computer
processing.

(4)(a) An investigative or law enforcement officer may
require a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing
service to disclose a record or other information pertaining to a subscriber or
customer of such service, not including the contents of a communication, only
when the investigative or law enforcement officer:

1. Obtains a warrant issued by the judge of a court of
competent jurisdiction;

2. Obtains a court order for such disclosure under
subsection (5);

3. Has the consent of the subscriber or customer to such
disclosure; or

4. Seeks information under paragraph
(b).

(b) A provider of electronic communication service or
remote computing service shall disclose to an investigative or law enforcement
officer the name; address; local and long-distance telephone connection records,
or records of session times or durations; length of service, including the
starting date of service; types of services used; telephone or instrument number
or other subscriber number or identity, including any temporarily assigned
network address; and means and source of payment, including any credit card or
bank account number of a subscriber to or customer of such service when the
governmental entity uses a subpoena or obtains such information in the manner
specified in paragraph (a) for obtaining information under that
paragraph.

(c) An investigative or law enforcement officer who
receives records or information under this subsection is not required to provide
notice to a subscriber or customer.

(5) A court order for disclosure under subsection (2),
subsection (3), or subsection (4) shall issue only if the investigative or law
enforcement officer offers specific and articulable facts showing that there are
reasonable grounds to believe the contents of a wire or electronic communication
or the records of other information sought are relevant and material to an
ongoing criminal investigation. A court issuing an order pursuant to this
section, on a motion made promptly by the service provider, may quash or modify
such order if the information or records requested are unusually voluminous in
nature or compliance with such order otherwise would cause an undue burden on
such provider.

(6) No cause of action shall lie in any court against any
provider of wire or electronic communication service, its officers, employees,
agents, or other specified persons for providing information, facilities, or
assistance in accordance with the terms of a court order, warrant, subpoena, or
certification under ss. 934.21-934.28.

(7)(a) A provider of wire or electronic communication
services or a remote computing service, upon the request of an investigative or
law enforcement officer, shall take all necessary steps to preserve records and
other evidence in its possession pending the issuance of a court order or other
process.

(b) Records referred to in paragraph (a) shall be
retained for a period of 90 days, which shall be extended for an additional 90
days upon a renewed request by an investigative or law enforcement
officer.

(8) A provider of electronic communication service, a
remote computing service, or any other person who furnished assistance pursuant
to this section shall be held harmless from any claim and civil liability
resulting from the disclosure of information pursuant to this section and shall
be reasonably compensated for reasonable expenses incurred in providing such
assistance.

History.—s. 9, ch. 88-184; s. 10, ch.
89-269; s. 13, ch. 2000-369; s. 8, ch. 2002-72; s. 2, ch.
2003-71.

934.24 Backup preservation; customer
notification; challenges by customer.—

(1) An investigative or law enforcement officer acting
under s. 934.23(2)(b) may include in the subpoena or court order upon which such
action is based a requirement that the service provider to whom the request is
directed create a backup copy of the contents of the electronic communications
sought in order to preserve those communications. Without notifying the
subscriber or customer of such subpoena or court order, such service provider
must create such backup copy as soon as practicable consistent with its regular
business practices and shall confirm to the investigative or law enforcement
officer that such backup copy has been made. Such backup copy must be created
within 2 business days after receipt by the service provider of the subpoena or
court order.

(2) Notice to the subscriber or customer must be made by
the investigative or law enforcement officer within 3 days after the receipt of
such confirmation, unless such notice is delayed pursuant to s.
934.25(1).

(3) The service provider may not destroy the backup copy
until the later of:

(a) The actual receipt by the requesting investigative or
law enforcement officer of the information; or

(b) The resolution of any proceeding, including appeals
thereof, concerning the government’s subpoena or court order.

(4) The service provider shall release the backup copy to
the requesting investigative or law enforcement officer no sooner than 14 days
after the investigative or law enforcement officer’s notice to the subscriber or
customer if such service provider:

(a) Has not received notice from the subscriber or
customer that the subscriber or customer has challenged the investigative or law
enforcement officer’s request, and

(b) Has not initiated proceedings to challenge the
request of the investigative or law enforcement officer.

(5) An investigative or law enforcement officer may seek
to require the creation of a backup copy under subsection (1) if in the sole
discretion of such officer there is reason to believe that notification under s.
934.23 of the existence of the subpoena or court order may result in destruction
of or tampering with evidence. This determination is not subject to challenge by
the subscriber or customer or the service provider.

(6) Within 14 days after notice by the investigative or
law enforcement officer to the subscriber or customer under subsection (2), the
subscriber or customer may file a motion to quash the subpoena or vacate the
court order seeking contents of electronic communications, with copies served
upon the investigative or law enforcement officer and with written notice of
such challenge to the service provider. A motion to vacate a court order must be
filed in the court which issued the order. A motion to quash a subpoena must be
filed in the circuit court in the circuit from which the subpoena issued. Such
motion or application must contain an affidavit or sworn statement:

(a) Stating that the applicant is a subscriber or
customer of the service from which the contents of electronic communications
maintained for her or him have been sought, and

(b) Stating the applicant’s reasons for believing that
the records sought are not relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry or
that there has not been substantial compliance with the provisions of ss.
934.21-934.28 in some other respect.

(7) Except as otherwise obtained under paragraph (3)(a),
service must be made under this section upon an investigative or law enforcement
officer by delivering or mailing by registered or certified mail a copy of the
papers to the person, office, or department specified in the notice which the
subscriber or customer has received pursuant to ss. 934.21-934.28. For the
purposes of this subsection, the term “delivering” shall be construed in
accordance with the definition of “delivery” as provided in Rule 1.080, Florida
Rules of Civil Procedure.

(8) If the court finds that the customer has complied
with subsections (6) and (7), the court shall order the investigative or law
enforcement officer’s agency or employing entity to file a sworn response, which
may be filed in camera if the investigative or law enforcement officer’s agency
or employing entity includes in its response the reasons which make in camera
review appropriate. If the court is unable to determine the motion or
application on the basis of the parties’ initial allegations and response, the
court may conduct such additional proceedings as it deems appropriate. All such
proceedings must be completed and the motion or application decided as soon as
practicable after the filing of the investigative or law enforcement officer’s
agency’s or employing entity’s response.

(9)(a) If the court finds that the applicant is not the
subscriber or customer for whom the communications sought by the governmental
entity are maintained, or that there is reason to believe that the law
enforcement inquiry is legitimate and that the communications sought are
relevant to that inquiry, it shall deny the motion or application and order such
process enforced.

(b) If the court finds that the applicant is the
subscriber or customer for whom the communications sought by the governmental
entity are maintained, and that there is not reason to believe that the
communications sought are relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry or
that there has not been substantial compliance with the provisions of this
chapter, it shall order the process quashed.

(10) A court order denying a motion or application under
this section shall not be deemed a final order and no interlocutory appeal or
petition or request for discretionary review may be taken therefrom by the
customer.

History.—s. 9, ch. 88-184; s. 1586, ch.
97-102.

934.25 Delayed notice.—

(1) An investigative or law enforcement officer acting
under s. 934.23(2) may:

(a) Where a court order is sought, include in the
application a request for an order delaying the notification required under s.
934.23(2) for a period not to exceed 90 days, which request the court shall
grant if it determines that there is reason to believe that notification of the
existence of the court order may have an adverse result described in subsection
(2).

(b) Where a subpoena is obtained, delay the notification
required under s. 934.23(2) for a period not to exceed 90 days upon the
execution of a written certification of a supervisory official that there is
reason to believe that notification of the existence of the subpoena may have an
adverse result described in subsection (2).

(2) Any of the following acts constitute an adverse
result for purposes of subsection (1):

(a) Endangering the life or physical safety of an
individual.

(b) Fleeing from prosecution.

(d) Intimidating potential witnesses.

(e) Seriously jeopardizing an investigation or unduly
delaying a trial.

(3) The investigative or law enforcement officer shall
maintain a true copy of a certification obtained under paragraph
(1)(b).

(4) Extensions of the delay of notification provided in
s. 934.23(2) of up to 90 days each may be granted by the court upon application,
or by certification by an investigative or law enforcement officer, but only in
accordance with subsection (6).

(5) Upon the expiration of the period of delay of
notification under subsection (1) or subsection (4), the investigative or law
enforcement officer must serve upon or deliver by registered or first-class mail
to the subscriber or customer a copy of the process or request together with
notice which:

(a) States with reasonable specificity the nature of the
law enforcement inquiry, and

(b) Informs the subscriber or customer:

1. That information maintained for such subscriber or
customer by the service provider named in the process or request was supplied to
or requested by the investigative or law enforcement officer and the date on
which such information was so supplied or requested.

2. That notification of such subscriber or customer was
delayed.

3. What investigative or law enforcement officer or what
court made the certification or determination pursuant to which that delay was
made.

4. Which provision of ss. 934.21-934.28 allowed such
delay.

(6) An investigative or law enforcement officer acting
under s. 934.23, when not required to notify the subscriber or customer under s.
934.23(2)(a), or to the extent that such notice may be delayed pursuant to
subsection (1), may apply to a court for an order commanding a provider of
electronic communication service or remote computing service to whom a warrant,
subpoena, or court order is directed, for such period as the court deems
appropriate, not to notify any other person of the existence of such warrant,
subpoena, or court order. The court shall enter such order if it determines that
there is reason to believe that notification of the existence of the warrant,
subpoena, or court order will result in any of the following:

(a) Endangering the life or physical safety of an
individual.

(b) Fleeing from prosecution.

(d) Intimidating potential witnesses.

(e) Seriously jeopardizing an investigation or unduly
delaying a trial.

(7) As used in paragraph (1)(b), the term “supervisory
official” means the person in charge of an investigating or law enforcement
agency’s or entity’s headquarters or regional office; the state attorney of the
circuit from which the subject subpoena has been issued; the statewide
prosecutor; or an assistant state attorney or assistant statewide prosecutor
specifically designated by the state attorney or statewide prosecutor to make
such written certification.

(8) As used in subsection (5), the term “deliver” shall
be construed in accordance with the definition of “delivery” as provided in Rule
1.080, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

History.—s. 9, ch.
88-184.

934.26 Cost reimbursement.—

(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3), a
governmental entity which obtains the contents of communications, records, or
other information under s. 934.22, s. 934.23, or s. 934.24 shall pay to the
person or entity assembling or providing such information a fee for
reimbursement for such costs as are reasonably necessary and which have been
directly incurred in searching for, assembling, reproducing, or otherwise
providing such information. Such reimbursable costs include any costs incurred
due to necessary disruption of normal operations of any electronic communication
service or remote computing service in which such information may be
stored.

(2) The amount of the fee provided by subsection (1)
shall be as mutually agreed upon by the governmental entity and the person or
entity providing the information or, in the absence of agreement, shall be as
determined by the court which issued the order for production of such
information or the court before which a criminal prosecution relating to such
information would be brought if no court order was issued for production of the
information.

(3) The requirement of subsection (1) does not apply with
respect to records or other information maintained by a communications carrier
that relate to telephone toll records and telephone listings obtained under s.
934.23. The court may, however, order a payment as described in subsection (1)
if the court determines the information required is unusually voluminous in
nature or otherwise causes an undue burden on the provider.

History.—s. 9, ch.
88-184.

934.27 Civil action: relief; damages;
defenses.—

(1) Except as provided in s. 934.23(5), any provider of
electronic communication service, or subscriber or customer thereof, aggrieved
by any violation of ss. 934.21-934.28 in which the conduct constituting the
violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind may, in a
civil action, recover from the person or entity which engaged in that violation
such relief as is appropriate.

(2) In a civil action under this section, appropriate
relief includes:

(a) Such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory
relief as is appropriate.

(b) Damages under subsection (3).

(3) The court may assess as damages in a civil action
under this section the sum of the actual damages suffered by the plaintiff and
any profits made by the violator as a result of the violation, but in no case
shall a plaintiff entitled to recover be awarded less than $1,000.

(4) A good faith reliance on any of the following is a
complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under ss.
934.21-934.28:

(a) A court warrant or order, a subpoena, or a statutory
authorization, including, but not limited to, a request of an investigative or
law enforcement officer to preserve records or other evidence, as provided in s.
934.23(7).

(b) A request of an investigative or law enforcement
officer under s. 934.09(7).

(5) A civil action under this section may not be
commenced later than 2 years after the date upon which the claimant first
discovered or had a reasonable opportunity to discover the
violation.

History.—s. 9, ch. 88-184; s. 11, ch.
89-269; s. 14, ch. 2000-369; s. 9, ch. 2002-72.

934.28 Exclusivity of remedies and
sanctions.—The remedies and sanctions described in ss.
934.21-934.27 are the only judicial remedies and sanctions for violation of
those sections.

History.—s. 9, ch.
88-184.

934.31 General prohibition on pen register
and trap and trace device use; exception.—

(1) Except as provided in this section, no person may
install or use a pen register or a trap and trace device without first obtaining
a court order under s. 934.33.

(2) The prohibition of subsection (1) does not apply with
respect to the use of a pen register or a trap and trace device by a provider of
electronic or wire communication service:

(a) Which relates to the operation, maintenance, and
testing of a wire or electronic communication service or to the protection of
the rights or property of the provider or to the protection of users of that
service from abuse of service or unlawful use of service;

(b) To record the fact that a wire or electronic
communication was initiated or completed in order to protect the provider
thereof, another provider furnishing service toward the completion of the wire
communication, or a user of the service, from fraudulent, unlawful, or abusive
use of service; or

(3) An investigative or law enforcement officer
authorized to install and use a pen register or trap and trace device under ss.
934.31-934.34 shall use technology reasonably available to him or her which
restricts the recording or decoding of electronic or other impulses to the
dialing, routing, addressing, and signaling information used in processing and
transmitting wire or electronic communications so that the contents of any wire
or electronic communications are not recorded or decoded.

(4)(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,
any investigative or law enforcement officer specially designated by the
Governor, the Attorney General, the statewide prosecutor, or a state attorney
acting pursuant to this chapter, who reasonably determines that:

1. An emergency exists which:

a. Involves immediate danger of death or serious
physical injury to any person or the danger of escape of a prisoner;
and

b. Requires the installation and use of a pen register
or a trap and trace device before an order authorizing such installation and use
can, with due diligence, be obtained; and

2. There are grounds upon which an order could be
entered under this chapter to authorize such installation and use,

may have installed and use a
pen register or trap and trace device if, within 48 hours after the installation
has occurred or begins to occur, an order approving the installation or use is
issued in accordance with s. 934.33.

(b) In the absence of an authorizing order, such use
shall immediately terminate when the information sought is obtained, when the
application for the order is denied, or when 48 hours have lapsed since the
installation of the pen register or trap and trace device, whichever is
earlier.

(c) The knowing installation or use by any investigative
or law enforcement officer of a pen register or trap and trace device pursuant
to paragraph (a) without application for the authorizing order within 48 hours
after the installation constitutes a violation of s. 934.31.

(d) A provider of wire or electronic service, landlord,
custodian, or other person who has furnished facilities or technical assistance
pursuant to this subsection shall be held harmless from any claims and civil
liability resulting from the disclosure of information pursuant to this
subsection and shall be reasonably compensated for reasonable expenses incurred
in providing such facilities and assistance.

(5) Whoever knowingly violates subsection (1) is guilty
of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.
775.083, or s. 934.41.

History.—s. 10, ch. 88-184; s. 12, ch.
89-269; s. 15, ch. 2000-369; s. 10, ch. 2002-72.

934.32 Application for an order for a pen
register or a trap and trace device.—

(1)(a) The Governor, the Attorney General, a state attorney,
the statewide prosecutor, or a designated assistant state attorney or assistant
statewide prosecutor may make application for an order or an extension of an
order under s. 934.33 authorizing or approving the installation and use of a pen
register or a trap and trace device under this chapter, in writing under oath or
equivalent affirmation, to the judge of a court of competent
jurisdiction.

(b) An investigative or law enforcement officer may make
application for an order or an extension of an order under s. 934.33 authorizing
or approving the installation and use of a pen register or a trap and trace
device under this chapter, in writing under oath or equivalent affirmation, to
the judge of a court of competent jurisdiction.

(2) An application under subsection (1) must
include:

(a) The identity of the applicant specified in the
section and the identity of the law enforcement agency conducting the
investigation, and

(b) A certification by the applicant that the information
likely to be obtained is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation being
conducted by the investigating agency.

History.—s. 10, ch.
88-184.

934.33 Issuance of an order for a pen
register or a trap and trace device.—

(1) Upon application made under s. 934.32, the court
shall enter an ex parte order authorizing the installation and use of a pen
register or a trap and trace device within the jurisdiction of the court if the
court finds that the applicant specified in s. 934.32(1) has certified to the
court that the information likely to be obtained by such installation and use is
relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation. Whenever such order is served on
any person or entity not specifically named in the order, upon request of such
person or entity, the person specified in s. 934.32 who has requested and is
serving such order shall provide written or electronic certification that such
order applies to the person or entity being served.

(2) An order issued under this section:

(a) Must specify the following:

1. The identity, if known, of the person to whom is
leased or in whose name is listed the telephone line or other facility to which
the pen register or trap and trace device is to be attached or
applied.

2. The identity, if known, of the person who is the
subject of the criminal investigation.

3. The attributes of the communications to which the
order applies, including the number or other identifier and, if known, the
location of the telephone line or other facility to which the pen register or
trap and trace device is to be attached or applied and, in the case of an order
authorizing installation and use of a trap and trace device, the geographic
limits of the order.

4. A statement of the offense to which the information
likely to be obtained by the pen register or trap and trace device
relates.

(b) Must direct, upon the request of the applicant, the
furnishing of information, facilities, and technical assistance necessary to
accomplish the installation of the pen register or trap and trace device under
s. 934.34.

(3)(a) An order issued under this section may not authorize
the installation and use of a pen register or a trap and trace device for more
than 60 days.

(b) Extensions of such an order may be granted but only
upon an application for an order under s. 934.32 and upon the judicial finding
required by subsection (1). The period of extension may not exceed 60
days.

(4) An order authorizing or approving the installation
and use of a pen register or a trap and trace device must direct that:

(a) The order be sealed until otherwise ordered by the
court, and

(b) The person owning or leasing the line or other
facility to which the pen register or a trap and trace device is attached or
applied, or who is obligated by the order to provide assistance to the
applicant, not disclose the existence of the pen register or trap and trace
device or the existence of the investigation to the listed subscriber or to any
other person except as otherwise ordered by the court.

(5) A court may not require greater specificity or
additional information beyond that which is required under s. 934.32 and this
section as a requisite for issuing an order as provided in this
section.

(6)(a) If an investigative or law enforcement agency
implementing an ex parte order under this section seeks to do so by installing
and using its own pen register or trap and trace device on a packet-switched
data network of a provider of electronic communication service to the public,
the agency must ensure that a record is maintained which identifies:

1. Each officer who installed the device and each
officer who accessed the device to obtain information from the
network;

2. The date and time the device was installed; the date
and time the device was uninstalled; and the date, time, and duration of each
occasion the device was accessed to obtain information;

3. The configuration of the device at the time of its
installation and any subsequent modification of that configuration;
and

4. Any information that was collected by the
device.

(b) To the extent that the pen register or trap and trace
device can be set automatically to record electronically the information
required in paragraph (a), the record shall be maintained electronically
throughout the installation and use of the device.

(7) The record maintained under subsection (6) shall be
provided ex parte and under seal to the court that entered the ex parte order
authorizing the installation and use of the device within 30 days after
termination of the order, including any extension of the
order.

History.—s. 10, ch. 88-184; s. 13, ch.
89-269; s. 11, ch. 2002-72.

934.34 Assistance in installation and use of
a pen register or a trap and trace device.—

(1) Upon the request of the applicant specified in s.
934.32(1), a provider of wire or electronic communication service, landlord,
custodian, or other person shall furnish such investigative or law enforcement
officer or other applicant forthwith all information, facilities, and technical
assistance necessary to accomplish the installation of a pen register
unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services that the
person so ordered by the court accords the party with respect to whom the
installation and use is to take place, or such other assistance to support the
investigation, if such assistance is directed by a court order as provided in s.
934.33(2)(b).

(2) Upon the request of the applicant specified in s.
934.32(1), a provider of a wire or electronic communication service, landlord,
custodian, or other person shall install a trap and trace device forthwith on
the appropriate line or other facility and shall furnish such investigative or
law enforcement officer or other applicant all additional information,
facilities, and technical assistance, including installation and operation of
the device unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services
that the person so ordered by the court accords the party with respect to whom
the installation and use is to take place if such installation and assistance is
directed by a court order as provided in s. 934.33(2)(b). Unless otherwise
ordered by the court, the results of the trap and trace device shall be
furnished, pursuant to s. 934.31(4) or s. 934.33(2)(b), to an officer of the law
enforcement agency designated in the court order at reasonable intervals during
regular business hours for the duration of the order. The obligation of a
provider of electronic communication service under such an order or under such
emergency pen register or trap and trace device installation may include, but is
not limited to, conducting an in-progress trace, or providing other assistance
to support the investigation as may be specified in the order.

(3) A provider of a wire or electronic communication
service, landlord, custodian, or other person who furnished facilities or
technical assistance pursuant to this section shall be reasonably compensated
for such reasonable expenses incurred in providing such facilities and
assistance.

(4) No cause of action shall lie in any court against any
provider of a wire or electronic communication service, its officers, employees,
agents, or other specified persons for providing information, facilities, or
assistance in accordance with the terms of a court order under ss.
934.31-934.34.

(5) A good faith reliance on a court order or a statutory
authorization is a complete defense against any civil or criminal action brought
under ss. 934.31-934.34.

History.—s. 10, ch. 88-184; s. 14, ch.
89-269; s. 16, ch. 2000-369; s. 12, ch. 2002-72.

934.41 Alternative penalty.—

(1) In lieu of a fine otherwise authorized by law, any
person convicted of engaging in conduct in violation of this chapter, through
which she or he derived pecuniary value, or by which she or he caused property
damage or other loss, may be sentenced to pay a fine that does not exceed three
times the gross value gained or three times the gross loss caused, whichever is
the greater, plus court costs and the costs of investigation and prosecution,
reasonably incurred.

(2) The court shall hold a hearing to determine the
amount of the fine authorized by subsection (1).

(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), “pecuniary value”
means:

(a) Anything of value in the form of money, a negotiable
instrument, or a commercial interest or anything else the primary significance
of which is economic advantage; or

(b) Any other property or service that has a value in
excess of $100.

History.—s. 15, ch. 89-269; s. 1587, ch.
97-102.

934.42 Mobile tracking device
authorization.—

(1) An investigative or law enforcement officer may make
application to a judge of competent jurisdiction for an order authorizing or
approving the installation and use of a mobile tracking device.

(2) An application under subsection (1) of this section
must include:

(a) A statement of the identity of the applicant and the
identity of the law enforcement agency conducting the
investigation.

(b) A certification by the applicant that the information
likely to be obtained is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation being
conducted by the investigating agency.

(d) A statement whether it may be necessary to use and
monitor the mobile tracking device outside the jurisdiction of the court from
which authorization is being sought.

(3) Upon application made as provided under subsection
(2), the court, if it finds that the certification and statements required by
subsection (2) have been made in the application, shall enter an ex parte order
authorizing the installation and use of a mobile tracking device. Such order may
authorize the use of the device within the jurisdiction of the court and outside
that jurisdiction but within the State of Florida if the device is installed
within the jurisdiction of the court.

(4) A court may not require greater specificity or
additional information beyond that which is required by this section as a
requisite for issuing an order.

(5) The standards established by the United States
Supreme Court for the installation and monitoring of mobile tracking devices
shall apply to the installation and use of any device as authorized by this
section.

(6) As used in this section, a “tracking device” means an
electronic or mechanical device which permits the tracking of the movement of a
person or object.

History.—s. 16, ch.
89-269.

934.43 Criminal disclosure of subpoena,
order, or authorization.—

(1) Any person having knowledge of a warrant, subpoena,
application, order, or other authorization which has been issued or obtained
pursuant to the action of an investigative or law enforcement officer as
authorized by this chapter, who:

(a) With intent to obstruct, impede, or prevent an
investigation, criminal prosecution, or civil, regulatory, or forfeiture action
on behalf of the State of Florida or a political subdivision thereof;
or

(b) With intent to obstruct, impede, or prevent the
obtaining by an investigative or law enforcement officer of the information or
materials sought pursuant to such warrant, subpoena, application, order, or
authorization

gives notice or attempts to
give notice of the investigation, criminal prosecution, or civil, regulatory, or
forfeiture action, warrant, subpoena, application, order, or other authorization
to any person commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s.
775.082, s. 775.083, s. 775.084, or s. 934.41.

(2) This section does not prevent disclosure of the
existence of the warrant, subpoena, application, order, or other authorization
as otherwise provided under this chapter.

History.—s. 17, ch.
89-269.

May 11th 2011@ 5:46pm ( florida statutes: 874 relating to criminal gangs)

personal question : what constitutes a gang? a family? a group of individuals who commit crimes for a common goal and that common goal is to benefit the group? or gang

Title
XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter
874
CRIMINAL GANG ENFORCEMENT AND PREVENTION

View
Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 874

CRIMINAL GANG ENFORCEMENT AND PREVENTION

874.01 Short title.

874.02 Legislative findings and intent.

874.03 Definitions.

874.04 Gang-related offenses; enhanced penalties.

874.045 Arrest and prosecution under other provisions.

874.05 Causing, encouraging, soliciting, or recruiting criminal gang
membership.

874.06 Civil cause of action.

874.08 Criminal gang activity and recruitment; forfeiture.

874.09 Crime data information.

874.10 Directing the activities of a criminal gang.

874.11 Electronic communication.

874.12 Identification documents; unlawful possession or
creation.

874.01 Short title.—This chapter may be cited as the “Criminal Gang
Prevention Act.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 90-207; s. 34, ch.
96-388; s. 5, ch. 2008-238.

874.02 Legislative findings and
intent.—

(1) The Legislature finds that it is the right of every
person, regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age,
sexual orientation, or handicap, to be secure and protected from fear,
intimidation, and physical harm caused by the activities of criminal gangs and
their members. It is not the intent of this chapter to interfere with the
exercise of the constitutionally protected rights of freedom of expression and
association. The Legislature recognizes the constitutional right of every
citizen to harbor and express beliefs on any lawful subject whatsoever, to
lawfully associate with others who share similar beliefs, to petition lawfully
constituted authority for a redress of perceived grievances, and to participate
in the electoral process.

(2) The Legislature finds, however, that the state is
facing a mounting crisis caused by criminal gangs whose members threaten and
terrorize peaceful citizens and commit a multitude of crimes. These criminal
gang activities, both individually and collectively, present a clear and present
danger. Street gangs, terrorist organizations, and hate groups have evolved into
increasingly sophisticated and complex organized crime groups in their criminal
tactics, schemes, and brutality. The state has a compelling interest in
preventing criminal gang activity and halting the real and present danger posed
by the proliferation of criminal gangs and the graduation from more primitive
forms of criminal gangs to highly sophisticated criminal gangs. For these
reasons, the Legislature finds that the provisions of this chapter are essential
to maintain public order and safety.

(3) It is the intent of the Legislature to outlaw certain
conduct associated with the existence and proliferation of criminal gangs,
provide enhanced criminal penalties, and eliminate the patterns, profits,
proceeds, instrumentalities, and property facilitating criminal gang activity,
including criminal gang recruitment.

(4) The Legislature finds that the timely reporting and
exchange of criminal gang information facilitates the ability of law enforcement
agencies to monitor and anticipate criminal activities of gangs and their
members. Additionally, the timely and standardized reporting of such criminal
gang information supports the identification of gang members via the criminal
justice information system and directly contributes to law enforcement officers’
safety. For these reasons, it is the intent of the Legislature to encourage
state and local law enforcement agencies to facilitate the exchange of crime
data information through the statewide criminal gang database as provided in s.
874.09.

History.—s. 1, ch. 90-207; s. 74, ch.
94-209; s. 56, ch. 95-267; s. 35, ch. 96-388; s. 6, ch.
2008-238.

874.03 Definitions.—As used in this chapter:

(1) “Criminal gang” means a formal or informal ongoing
organization, association, or group that has as one of its primary activities
the commission of criminal or delinquent acts, and that consists of three or
more persons who have a common name or common identifying signs, colors, or
symbols, including, but not limited to, terrorist organizations and hate
groups.

(a) As used in this subsection, “ongoing” means that the
organization was in existence during the time period charged in a petition,
information, indictment, or action for civil injunctive relief.

(b) As used in this subsection, “primary activities”
means that a criminal gang spends a substantial amount of time engaged in such
activity, although such activity need not be the only, or even the most
important, activity in which the criminal gang engages.

(2) “Criminal gang associate” means a person who:

(a) Admits to criminal gang association; or

(b) Meets any single defining criterion for criminal gang
membership described in subsection (3).

(3) “Criminal gang member” is a person who meets two or
more of the following criteria:

(a) Admits to criminal gang membership.

(b) Is identified as a criminal gang member by a parent
or guardian.

(d) Adopts the style of dress of a criminal
gang.

(e) Adopts the use of a hand sign identified as used by a
criminal gang.

(f) Has a tattoo identified as used by a criminal
gang.

(g) Associates with one or more known criminal gang
members.

(h) Is identified as a criminal gang member by an
informant of previously untested reliability and such identification is
corroborated by independent information.

(i) Is identified as a criminal gang member by physical
evidence.

(j) Has been observed in the company of one or more known
criminal gang members four or more times. Observation in a custodial setting
requires a willful association. It is the intent of the Legislature to allow
this criterion to be used to identify gang members who recruit and organize in
jails, prisons, and other detention settings.

(k) Has authored any communication indicating
responsibility for the commission of any crime by the criminal
gang.

Where a single act or factual
transaction satisfies the requirements of more than one of the criteria in this
subsection, each of those criteria has thereby been satisfied for the purposes
of the statute.

(4) “Criminal gang-related activity” means:

(a) An activity committed with the intent to benefit,
promote, or further the interests of a criminal gang, or for the purposes of
increasing a person’s own standing or position within a criminal
gang;

(b) An activity in which the participants are identified
as criminal gang members or criminal gang associates acting individually or
collectively to further any criminal purpose of a criminal gang;

(d) An activity that is identified as criminal gang
activity by an informant of previously untested reliability and such
identification is corroborated by independent information.

(5) “Electronic communication” has the meaning provided
in s. 934.02 and includes, but is not limited to, photographs, video, telephone
communications, text messages, facsimile, electronic mail messages as defined in
s. 668.602, and instant message real-time communications with other individuals
through the Internet or other means.

(6) “Hate group” means an organization whose primary
purpose is to promote animosity, hostility, and malice against a person or
persons or against the property of a person or persons because of race,
religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or national
origin.

(7) “Terrorist organization” means any organized group
engaged in or organized for the purpose of engaging in terrorism as defined in
s. 775.30. This definition shall not be construed to prevent prosecution under
this chapter of individuals acting alone.

History.—s. 1, ch. 90-207; s. 75, ch.
94-209; s. 36, ch. 96-388; s. 7, ch. 2008-238.

874.04 Gang-related offenses; enhanced
penalties.—Upon a finding by the factfinder that the defendant
committed the charged offense for the purpose of benefiting, promoting, or
furthering the interests of a criminal gang, the penalty for any felony or
misdemeanor, or any delinquent act or violation of law which would be a felony
or misdemeanor if committed by an adult, may be enhanced. Penalty enhancement
affects the applicable statutory maximum penalty only. Each of the findings
required as a basis for such sentence shall be found beyond a reasonable doubt.
The enhancement will be as follows:

(1)(a) A misdemeanor of the second degree may be punished as
if it were a misdemeanor of the first degree.

(b) A misdemeanor of the first degree may be punished as
if it were a felony of the third degree. For purposes of sentencing under
chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944,
such offense is ranked in level 1 of the offense severity ranking chart. The
criminal gang multiplier in s. 921.0024 does not apply to misdemeanors enhanced
under this paragraph.

(2)(a) A felony of the third degree may be punished as if it
were a felony of the second degree.

(b) A felony of the second degree may be punished as if
it were a felony of the first degree.

For purposes of sentencing
under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter
944, such felony offense is ranked as provided in s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023,
and without regard to the penalty enhancement in this
subsection.

History.—s. 1, ch. 90-207; s. 76, ch.
94-209; s. 23, ch. 95-184; s. 37, ch. 96-388; s. 21, ch. 97-194; s. 1, ch.
2001-126; s. 8, ch. 2008-238.

874.045 Arrest and prosecution under other
provisions.—Nothing in this chapter shall
prohibit the arrest and prosecution of a criminal gang member under chapter 876,
chapter 895, chapter 896, s. 893.20, or any other applicable provision of law
except to the extent otherwise prohibited pursuant to a statutory or
constitutional provision.

History.—s. 9, ch.
2008-238.

874.05 Causing, encouraging, soliciting, or
recruiting criminal gang membership.—

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person who
intentionally causes, encourages, solicits, or recruits another person to become
a criminal gang member where a condition of membership or continued membership
is the commission of any crime commits a felony of the third degree, punishable
as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(2) A person who commits a second or subsequent violation
commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.
775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.—s. 38, ch. 96-388; s. 10, ch.
2008-238.

874.06 Civil cause of action.—

(1) A person or organization establishing, by clear and
convincing evidence, coercion, intimidation, threats, or other harm to that
person or organization in violation of this chapter has a civil cause of action
for treble damages, an injunction, or any other appropriate relief in law or
equity. Upon prevailing, the plaintiff may recover attorney’s fees in the trial
and appellate courts and the costs of investigation and litigation that are
reasonably incurred.

(2)(a) For purposes of this subsection, the term “state”
includes any of the state’s agencies, instrumentalities, subdivisions, or
municipalities, and includes, but is not limited to, state attorneys and the
Office of Statewide Prosecution of the Department of Legal Affairs.

(b) In addition to any remedies provided for by ss. 60.05
and 823.05, the state has a civil cause of action against any person or
organization if it proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has been
injured by reason of a violation of this chapter by the person or organization.
The state has a civil cause of action for treble damages, injunctive relief, or
any other relief in law or equity which the court deems appropriate. If the
state prevails, it may also recover attorney’s fees in the trial and appellate
courts and the costs of investigation and litigation that are reasonably
incurred. The state may not recover punitive damages. The defendant is entitled
to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs if the court finds that
the state raised a claim that was without factual or legal support and was
vexatious, frivolous, or brought in bad faith.

(3) A prevailing plaintiff under subsection (1) has a
right or claim that is superior to any right or claim that the state has in the
same property or proceeds.

(4) A person who knowingly violates a temporary or
permanent order issued under this section or s. 60.05 commits a misdemeanor of
the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s.
775.083.

History.—s. 1, ch. 90-207; s. 39, ch.
96-388; s. 11, ch. 2008-238.

874.08 Criminal gang activity and
recruitment; forfeiture.—All profits, proceeds, and
instrumentalities of criminal gang activity and all property used or intended or
attempted to be used to facilitate the criminal activity of any criminal gang or
of any criminal gang member; and all profits, proceeds, and instrumentalities of
criminal gang recruitment and all property used or intended or attempted to be
used to facilitate criminal gang recruitment are subject to seizure and
forfeiture under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, s.
932.704.

History.—s. 1, ch. 90-207; s. 77, ch.
94-209; s. 55, ch. 95-267; s. 40, ch. 96-388; s. 12, ch.
2008-238.

874.09 Crime data information.—

(1) The Department of Law Enforcement may:

(a) Develop and manage a statewide criminal gang database
to facilitate the exchange of information pursuant to the intent and purpose of
this chapter.

(b) Notify all law enforcement agencies that reports of
criminal gang members or associates shall be entered into the database as soon
as the minimum level of data specified by the department is available to the
reporting agency and no waiting period for the entry of that data
exists.

(c) Compile and retain information regarding criminal
gangs and their members and associates in a manner that allows the information
to be used by law enforcement and other agencies deemed appropriate for
investigative purposes.

(d) Compile and maintain a data repository relating to
criminal gangs and their members and associates in order to develop and improve
techniques used by law enforcement agencies and prosecutors in the
investigation, apprehension, and prosecution of members and affiliates of
criminal gangs.

(2) Local law enforcement agencies may:

(a) After carrying out any arrest of any individual whom
they believe is a member or associate of a criminal gang, create or update that
individual’s electronic file within the database.

(b) Notify the prosecutor of the accused individual’s
suspected criminal gang membership or associate
status.

History.—s. 1, ch. 90-207; s. 41, ch.
96-388; s. 13, ch. 2008-238.

874.10 Directing the activities of a criminal
gang.—Any person who knowingly initiates, organizes, plans,
finances, directs, manages, or supervises criminal gang-related activity commits
a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not
exceeding life or as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.

History.—s. 14, ch.
2008-238.

874.11 Electronic communication.—Any person who, for the purpose of benefiting,
promoting, or furthering the interests of a criminal gang, uses electronic
communication to intimidate or harass other persons, or to advertise his or her
presence in the community, including, but not limited to, such activities as
distributing, selling, transmitting, or posting on the Internet any audio,
video, or still image of criminal activity, commits a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.

History.—s. 15, ch.
2008-238.

874.12 Identification documents; unlawful
possession or creation.—

(1) For purposes of this section, the term
“identification document” includes, but is not limited to, a social security
card or number, a birth certificate, a driver’s license, an identification card
issued pursuant to s. 322.051, a naturalization certificate, an alien
registration number, a passport, and any access credentials for a publicly
operated facility or an infrastructure facility covered under 18 U.S.C. s.
2332f.

(2) Any person possessing or manufacturing any blank,
forged, stolen, fictitious, fraudulent, counterfeit, or otherwise unlawfully
issued identification document for the purpose of benefiting, promoting, or
furthering the interests of a criminal gang commits a felony of the second
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.

History.—s. 16, ch.
2008-238.

May 11th 2011 @5:43pm ( chapter 934 security fo communication section 934.07)

Criminal PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter
934
SECURITY OF COMMUNICATIONS

View
Entire Chapter

934.07 Authorization for interception of
wire, oral, or electronic communications.—

(1) The Governor, the Attorney General, the statewide
prosecutor, or any state attorney may authorize an application to a judge of
competent jurisdiction for, and such judge may grant in conformity with ss. 934.03–934.09
an order authorizing or approving the interception of, wire, oral, or electronic
communications by:

(a) The Department of Law Enforcement or any law
enforcement agency as defined in s. 934.02
having responsibility for the investigation of the offense as to which the
application is made when such interception may provide or has provided evidence
of the commission of the offense of murder, kidnapping, aircraft piracy, arson,
gambling, robbery, burglary, theft, dealing in stolen property, criminal usury,
bribery, or extortion; any felony violation of ss. 790.161–790.166,
inclusive; any violation of chapter 893; any violation of the provisions of the
Florida Anti-Fencing Act; any violation of chapter 895; any violation of chapter
896; any violation of chapter 815; any violation of
chapter 847; any violation of s. 827.071;
any violation of s. 944.40;
or any conspiracy or solicitation to commit any violation of the laws of this
state relating to the crimes specifically enumerated in this
paragraph.

(b) The Department of Law Enforcement, together with
other assisting personnel as authorized and requested by the department under s.
934.09(5),
for the investigation of the offense as to which the application is made when
such interception may provide or has provided evidence of the commission of any
offense that may be an act of terrorism or in furtherance of an act of terrorism
or evidence of any conspiracy or solicitation to commit any such
violation.

(3) As used in this section, the term “terrorism” means
an activity that:

(a)1. Involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human
life which is a violation of the criminal laws of this state or of the United
States; or

2. Involves a violation of s. 815.06;
and

(b) Is intended to:

1. Intimidate, injure, or coerce a civilian
population;

2. Influence the policy of a government by intimidation
or coercion; or

3. Affect the conduct of government through destruction
of property, assassination, murder, kidnapping, or aircraft
piracy.

wednesday may 11th 2011@5:37pm ( florida statutes: chapter 843 relating to obstructionof justice)

May 6th 2011@5:20pm ( slaughtered horses… abc documentary continued page 2)

Page 2 of 3

Sept. 9, 2009

Illegal Horse Slaughters ‘Alive and Well’ in Miami

With no suspect yet arrested, the motive for the killings has not been confirmed, but Karen Gustinger, a local horse lover and member of the Homestead Rodeo Association, is convinced the horses are being sold on the black market for meat.

“It’s solely profit-driven. There’s a black market down here for horse meat. My understanding is it’s selling for $20 per pound and it ranges from people eating horse meat in other cultures to the rumor of horse meat being a miraculous medical discovery that cures all ailments.”

Couto says the meat is definitely being harvested on the black market and for even higher than $20 per pound.

“The reason we know it’s becoming an issue is that there are people living in rural areas who are having people drive up to them at their homes or on the street and asking if they want to buy horse meat… There are reports from a few of the law enforcement agencies out of Broward County saying the meat’s going for up to $40 per pound,” Couto said.

“Many people in the U.S. think horse slaughtering is only being done in Mexico and Canada…..slaughter and the black market trade is alive and well in Miami,” he added.

According to Couto, some local ethnic groups believe that eating the horse meat is a cure-all.

“Miami-Dade is a melting pot and there are a lot of cultures here where it’s OK to eat horse meat… Some nationalities think it helps with some ailments. They think that AIDS patients will be cured and will recover quicker if they eat horse meat. This is not true,” Couto said.

Not only is the horse meat not a wonder drug like some falsely believe, but the meat being harvested is contaminated.

“These horses are being seen by vets on a monthly basis. Tranquilizers and even just a basic fly spray all are labeled not to be used on animals to be used in the food chain. People are spending a lot of money on contaminated meat that’s going to make them sick,” said Couto.

Miami-Dade Not Just a Beach Community

Though most think of palm trees and night clubs when they think of Miami, Couto paints a different picture.

“Miami-Dade isn’t only about the beach and the sand,” said Couto. “The majority of Miami is more in rural areas and our horse population is extremely high. It’s the second most populated horse state in the country. It’s horse country,” he added.

Gustinger said local horse owners have taken up arms to protect their beloved pets.

“The horse community is getting edgy and very upset,” Gustinger told ABC News. “We’ve started community watches, people are patrolling their yards with guns to the point where some of the horse owners are looking forward to it. They’re starting to hunt these people… they want it stopped,” she added.

“The fear that is in place right now for anyone that owns a horse in South Florida… people are having a hard time sleeping, worried that when they wake up in the morning they’ll find a massacre in their barn,” Couto said.

The Humane Society Society of the United States is offering a reward of $2,500 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible for these horrific acts.

“If the meat is being sold for consumption, that would be in violation of federal law,” the Human Society’s Dane told ABC News.

Comment & Contribute

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.

View All Comments (34)

perrichiss

10:50 PM EDT
Sep 10, 2009

All the above comments say what I feel having read them. I feel so helpless. When this happens , sometimes we just wallow in it all. But, deep down in my heart, I know that there are many folks who are crying and hurtingover this brutal slaughter. I for one hope some one will lead the way to bring those guilty to jail. As a horse owner,I want to do what ever is helpful. Perhaps the worst thing for us , who care, is to do absolutely nothing toward helping this cause.

oonogil2

10:46 PM EDT
Sep 10, 2009

lastdropofcommonsence. — Most of us detest inhumane slaughter of any animal. It can and should be done as quickly and painlessly as possible. I lived most of my life in Texas where it’s legal to use deadly force to protect your property. No problem with that so if you want to shoot a thief, I loan you a gun. …. I love and respect all life but I also understand that in order for anything to live, something else must die. Laws that treat certain animals differently are ususlly based on emotion, not on logic. A beloved pet lamb is not suitable for consumption. A sheep raised commercially is. A horse, cow, pig or any other animal is the same. A cat at your house may be a pet. A cat damaging my property is a pest. It all depends on the context. These people are stealing animals and slaughtering them inhumanely. The fact that it’s a horse is of little consequence. A calf raised by a child can be just as loved by that child but laws see it differently than they would a horse. Why?

lastdropofcommonsence

8:25 PM EDT
Sep 10, 2009

When I read the comments here I am frequently baffled by the logic people apply. People who would scream their heads off it their car was stolen see no big issue in the killing (therefore theft) of these horses because, in other parts of the world, people eat horse meat. Huh? Even if you don’t care about the inhumane actions, think about the theft angle and the simple fact that they are breaking the law. Still not bothered? Then think about the fact that there are people who are able to cut the legs off a horse before they kill it walking around in our society and that what YOU own might be what they want next.

View All Comments (34)

May 6th 2011@ 5:03pm ( abc documentary on slaughtereing and selling of horse meat in florida)

By MONICA NISTA and SARAH NETTER

Sept. 9, 2009

The discovery of another slaughtered horse — this time a prized racehorse — has deepend the mystery of a spate of grotesque mutilations in south Florida this year.

Police and animal rights advocates believe the slaughters may be sparked by the exhorbitant asking price for horse meat in that part of the country, but have not been able to track down who has killed as many as 20 animals.

The latest horse to be mutiliated was a 4 1/2-year-old racehorse named Kristi, found in it’s Miami Gardens, Fla., stall, her throat slit and back legs removed, according to the Miami Herald.

Owner Yosmel Luis found his horse dead earlier today when he visited the stable to feed her.

“He has no idea how bad I want to find him,” Luis told the Herald, referring to the killer. “It’s so cruel. It’s murder like if they killed a person. The only thing worse than killing my horse would be killing my daughter and my mother and father.”

The Herald also reported that the Miami Gardens police were in contact with authorities in Miami-Dade County, where more than a dozen horses have been killed since January.

In what has seemed like scenes right out of a Wes Craven horror movie — the equine version — horses have been killed in that time, some even hacked alive while the butcher did his work, their carcasses strewn along roads and farms.

Photos of the aftermath sent to ABC News were too graphic for use. Horse remains have been discovered mutilated, body parts hacked at the limbs and meat cut away from their stomachs, some apparently killed in remote locations and others on the horse owners’ property, slaughtered in their own stalls.

Public information officer Nick Pimentel of the Miami-Dade Police Department said investigators are working hard to find the perpetrator and the officers directly involved in the investigation were unavailable for comment.

“All entities are trying to locate who these people are and what they are doing with the horses and what they are doing with the meat,” Pimentel told ABC News.

Richard Couto, an investigator with the South Florida Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, was on the scene of the latest ghastly discovery.

“It is one of the more disturbing stories. There was a foal, a baby involved. I got to the scene, the horse was killed by a knife that went under her chin, and she died a slow, grueling death. The reason I know this is because the blood trail was just everywhere,” Couto told ABC News.

“And the foal never leaves the mother’s side, so the baby was certainly by her side while they were carving her up. The owner found the baby trying to nurse off the mother’s carcass,” he added.

It appears that no neighborhood is safer than the other. According to Keith Dane, director of equine protection at the Humane Society of the United States, the killings have been all over the map.

“It’s been really varied in terms of who the owners and victims are,” he said. “There have been some farms that raise horses, private families that own horses on their property. Most of the instances have been in remote locations where there isn’t a lot of traffic. The more remote the location the less likely the violator is going to be caught.”

May 5th 2011 @ 10:14pm ( fbi update interesting article on imposters )

Somerville Man Charged with Impersonating a Federal Air Marshal

U.S. Attorney’s Office
May 04, 2011 District of Massachusetts
(617) 748-3100

— filed under: Press Release

BOSTON—A Somerville man was charged today in federal court with impersonating a federal air marshal.

EDWARD VELOZA, a/k/a EDGAR VELOZA, 37, of Somerville, was charged in an indictment with falsely impersonating a federal officer. The indictment alleges that on March 16, 2011, VELOZA falsely pretended to be, and impersonated, a federal air marshal.

If convicted on these charges, VELOZA faces up to three years’ imprisonment, to be followed by one year of supervised release and a $250,000 fine.

United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz; Richard DesLauriers, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation – Boston Field Division; and Colonel Marian McGovern, Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, made the announcement today. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric P. Christofferson of Ortiz’s Major Crimes Unit.

The details contained in the indictment are allegations. The defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Boston Division Links

Boston Home

Territory/Jurisdiction

May 02nd 2011 ( additional time( date: ) had to call the police concerning possible trespassor at home- called the police )

So i went out and when i came back the bike lock that i had put on the refrideg and left at 0000… was at the nuber 0913…. ther was a large indent on my feather bed inthe center of the bed…. and since a few days before i had cleaned up these metal shavings on teh inside of my main door… i freaked.. and since officer scala told me to jsut calland have them come out…. and not move anything so that they could see the entire scene….. i called…..

oficer scala was the same officer i had called when i found the blueberry and oats on my; kitchen dining area… when i didnt have any of those items in my home… in that instance.. i cleaned up the blueberry and just put a note on the floor with the actual area where the blueberrry was on my floor…..

note to anyone…. when you think that someone has trespassed… when things are out of sorts… Don’t listen to the people who sont want you to cause waves…. because if you are nice… which i was… and if you keep quiet… which i did for years… and if you listen to people who really could care less about you or your safety…. but instead are concerned with their own lives…

here is the clue… the criminals are counting on you to be a nice person and to not cause waves… to not report anything… so they can continue to commit crimes against you and trust me yoru life will never be the same again…. so do what officer scala told me… actually it was really refreshing to haved an officer whoactually almost gave me permission to question… to report… and to make sure to do anything in my power to stop any criminals…

reember they are scumm they are worth less human being s whorealy have no concern for you… or yoru possessions.. or yoru money they dotn care how hard you worked for what you have.. or who sentimental your possessions are to you… so dotn worry about ther feeling… or if you wlll get them up set… make sure to tell the police.. your neighbors.. anyone who wiill listen to you….be sure that you have as many people ..aware of your home… o fthe possibility that there may be an intruder or conartist.. or criminal… and stope them.!!!!!!!!.

may 02nd 2011@7:49pm ( april 27th 2011- change locks )

On april 27th @ 10:30am according to my notes i went into the store of B&B locksmith and spoke with some really nice people who work there. I scheduled an appointment for that day for the locks to be changed to prevent any additional people from entering my home… They gave me additional information on guard dogs and on video surveillance systems and installers. they told mether lock smiths that woudl be comign out to my home would either be travis or scott and tehy quoted me a price of 165.00.

so on April 27th 2011 between 1pm-3pm….. i took yet another step to make sure my home is defiantely secure… and had the same lock smith that put the origional lock on the door in  to change the entire lock/key to once again stop anyone from illegally entering my home!

The company that changed the locks/ keys: B&B lock smith naples florida
the person who came out to change the locks: travis wright
the time the locks were changed:  between 1pm and 3pm exact time: 2:38pm
the cost of the locks being changed: $ 184.50
break down of receipt:
the receipt numbered:

I have the notes i wrote down from the when i was in the shop.. and from when travis was sin my home but cannot find the receipt for the actual transaction. I will hae to go back and get an additional copy to keep with my hard copy files for the cost/day and breakdown of the transaction.

Blog . My Search For Justice.Com

The blog for "my search for justice.com" website

Author Archives: mary jean ziska

Wed. May 11th 2011 @6:04pm ( florida statutes: chapter 817 relating to fraudulent practces/false pretenses /fraud gererally credit card crimes)

Quick Search

Legislation

Statutes

Senators

Make this an Advanced Search »

The Florida Senate

2010 Florida Statutes (including Special Session A)

wed. May 11th 2011@6:01pm ( chapter 934 security of communcations)

May 11th 2011@ 5:46pm ( florida statutes: 874 relating to criminal gangs)

May 11th 2011 @5:43pm ( chapter 934 security fo communication section 934.07)

wednesday may 11th 2011@5:37pm ( florida statutes: chapter 843 relating to obstructionof justice)

May 6th 2011@5:20pm ( slaughtered horses… abc documentary continued page 2)

Illegal Horse Slaughters ‘Alive and Well’ in Miami

Miami-Dade Not Just a Beach Community

May 6th 2011@ 5:03pm ( abc documentary on slaughtereing and selling of horse meat in florida)

May 5th 2011 @ 10:14pm ( fbi update interesting article on imposters )

May 02nd 2011 ( additional time( date: ) had to call the police concerning possible trespassor at home- called the police )

may 02nd 2011@7:49pm ( april 27th 2011- change locks )