the truth in caller Id Act of 2007-caller id spoofing.info www.calleridspoofing.info/the-truth-in-caller-id-act-of-2007.php
style=”font-size: 16px;” face=”Georgia”>article from: caller idspoofing.info
the truth in caller id act of 2007 (s.704)
Below is “the truth in caller id act of 2007” aka S. 704 as of June, 27 2007. The bill is likely to be revised again in July after being brought in front of the Senate. Contrary to popular belief, the Truth in Caller Id Act of 2007, if passed , would NOT at this time put an end to caller ID spoofing or shut down companies that offer caller ID spoofing services for free or for a fee. The bill places responsibility on the user for the first time to use Caller Id spoofing within the law. Specifically, you would not be able to spoof “with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value.” This means that people will no longer be able to use caller id spoofing for pretexting. Pretexting has been a big issue in the past few years as it has come to the attention that you may be able to obtain phone records through pretexting. This also means that you would probably not want to use called id spoofing for calls because some people may view that as “causing harm” which is specifically outlawed. Some may argue that spoofing in general “defrauds” people but this bill is aimed at stopping calling id spoofing and being able to fine and potentially prosecute users who use caller ID spoofing to commit wire fraud or identity theft.
article from caller id spoofing.info /the definitive resource on caller ID spoofing
SECTION ONE SHORT TITLE
THIS ACT MAY BE CITED AS THE “TRUTH IN CALLER ID ACT OF 2007( S. 704)
Below is “the truth in caller Id Act of 2007” a.k.a. S. 704 as of June 27th 2007.
The bill is likely to be revised again in July after being brought in front of the Senate. Contrary to popular belief, the truth in caller ID act of 2007 if passed would not at his time put an end to caller id spoofing or shut down companies that offer caller id spoofing services for free or for a fee. The bill places responsibility on the user for the first time to use caller id spoofing within the law.
Specifically, you would not be able to spoof “with the intent to defraud, cause harm , or wrongfully obtain anything of value
This means that people will no longer be able to use caller id spoofing for pretexting. Pretexting has been a big issue in the past few years as it has some to people’s attention that you may be able to obtain phone records through pretexting.
This also means caller id spoofing for prank calls may view that as “causing harm” which is specifically outlawed
Some may argue that spoofing in general “defrauds” people but this bill is aimed at stopping caller ID spoofing and being able to fine and potentially prosecute users who use Caller ID spoofing to commit wire fraud or identity theft!
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “TRUTH IN CALLER ID ACT of 2007”
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING MANIPULATION OF CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.
Section 227 of the Communication Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 227 )
is amended
(1) by redesignating subsections (e), (f) and (g) as subsections (f) (g) and (h) respectively and
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection:
(e) Prohibition on Provision of Inaccurate Caller Identification Information
(1) IN GENERAL-
It shall be unlawful for any person within the United states in connection with any telecommunications service of IP-enabled voice service to cause any caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value unless such transmission is exempted pursuant to paragraph (3)(
(
(2) PROTECTION FOR BLOCKING CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION-Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prevent or restrict any person from blocking the capacity of any caller identification service to transmit caller identification information.
(3) REGULATIONS-
(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 6 months after the enactment of this subsection , the Commission shall prescribe regulations to implement this subsection.
(
( CONTENT OF REGULATIONS-
(i)IN GENERAL- The regulations required under sub-paragraph (A) shall include exemptions from the prohibition under paragraph (1) as the Commission determines is appropriate.
(ii) SPECIFIC EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR COURT ORDERS-The regulations required under sub paragraph (A) shall exempt from the prohibition under paragraph (1) transmission in connection with
(I) any authorized activity of a law enforcement agency or
(II) a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation
(III) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS- Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorized or prohibit any investigative, protective, or intelligence activities performed in connection with official duties and in accordance with all applicable laws by law enforcement agency of the United States
(4) REPORT- Not later than 6 months after the enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall report to congress whether additional legislation is necessary to prohibit the provision of inaccurate caller identificaiton information in technologies that are successor or replacement technologies to telecommunicaitons service or IP enabled voice service
(5) PENALTITIES
(A) CIVIL FORFEITURE-
_910 e